SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,326
Supports
Aston Villa
Yes, I can see the sense as otherwise we would never get out of a lock down situation. It just makes you realise how difficult this thing is to contain, there is no right or wrong it is just a matter of having as little contact as possible with other people and doing our best to shield the vulnerable.
Going to be very hard in winter months though which we're now on verge of.

That's one thing you can't prevent with more harsh restrictrions, minus temperatures in November, December and January which will keep people indoors for prolonged periods. Of course though you still need to go to shops to stock up in this period.

The light in the tunnel will hopefully be from Feb onwards but it's going to be a long and painful slog to get there.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,252
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Yes, I can see the sense as otherwise we would never get out of a lock down situation. It just makes you realise how difficult this thing is to contain, there is no right or wrong it is just a matter of having as little contact as possible with other people and doing our best to shield the vulnerable.
Yeah, basically. Plus asymptomatic spread means even the most stringent possible measures will still let cases slip through the net.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,423
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Local lockdowns would have been the preferred measure from the start, but they dropped a b*llock early doors and had to input the national lockdown. However you're saying that there is a conspiracy as to why there is a local lockdown, and my point is the data clearly suggests that the North is f*cked and the South isn't based on case rates. No point on having the same measures for both the North & South if the data is completely different.
Though again, Manchester went into special measures in July - and had lower numbers at that time (and through August in most areas) than London does now.

The goalposts have moved. Which is fair enough, but a difficult sales pitch if the rate/policy debate is supposed to be science based. Of course, in reality, it's not science based it's a juggling act - but the juggling act has not worked in Manchester.
 

djembatheking

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
4,080
Going to be very hard in winter months though which we're now on verge of.

That's one thing you can't prevent with more harsh restrictrions, minus temperatures in November, December and January which will keep people indoors for prolonged periods. Of course though you still need to go to shops to stock up in this period.

The light in the tunnel will hopefully be from Feb onwards but it's going to be a long and painful slog to get there.
Yeah, basically. Plus asymptomatic spread means even the most stringent possible measures will still let cases slip through the net.
Yep, as I have said before , I look after my in laws who are in their 80s and he has Alzheimers and sleep apnoea . Up until this last week or so we have been sitting outside but it is just too cold for them now so I go in masked up . Their living room is 7 metres x 7 metres so we sit as far away as possible . I can`t stop visiting as the social isolation would destroy them , my mother in law especially. They already have to face up to not seeing their great grandsons . It is going to be a tough old winter. Also doesn`t help that there is a holiday home next door to me with a family of scousers in it this week and just across the field the neighbour there has all sorts in and out of his house everyday, there are still a lot of people that aren`t affected by this.
 

Dave_MUFC

Full Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
813
Location
Somewhere
I would like to understand the governements end goal in all of this... Is it to get rid of Covid completely - which is not going to happen. So what is the point in restricting people to lockdowns and such? How many months of my life am i going to be wasting and why?
I know the risks, i am aware of the advise. As an adult, this should be enough for me to life my life how i want to. If i catch it, its my fault. If i die, its my fault, and the same for everybody else. If someone does not want to catch it and chooses to isolate themselves completely then that is fine, but it should also be fine for me to have a meal, play football, let me kids play out with other people, enjoy some wine at a friends if i choose to.
Such a selfish outlook.

So any relatives you may have who are 50+, you don't mind potentially giving them a death sentence/getting extremely ill because of your actions? Same goes for older/vulnerable people in general, but I know a lot of selfish people at the moment don't give a care if they die as apparently "they're old and would die anyway"...

You enjoy playing football, as I do aswell (I am currently playing Saturday league, as I feel outdoors the chances are almost zero of catching it), but this virus has affected many healthy individuals who had the flu symptoms, yet now 5-6 months on still have breathing troubles and fatigued etc. and can't do any sport. That absolutely terrifies me.
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
At no point in your rant do you take into account being a possible spreader. It’s all about you
Such a selfish outlook.

So any relatives you may have who are 50+, you don't mind potentially giving them a death sentence/getting extremely ill because of your actions? Same goes for older/vulnerable people in general, but I know a lot of selfish people at the moment don't give a care if they die as apparently "they're old and would die anyway"...

You enjoy playing football, as I do aswell (I am currently playing Saturday league, as I feel outdoors the chances are almost zero of catching it), but this virus has affected many healthy individuals who had the flu symptoms, yet now 5-6 months on still have breathing troubles and fatigued etc. and can't do any sport. That absolutely terrifies me.
I wouldn't say its all about me or i am selfish - i follow the guide lines, unlike many folk. I wear a mask, i dont mix my bubbles and so on - i am just concerned for my welfare as i am finding it hard being dictated too and i am not 100% why. As i can see the death % seems relatively low considering the amount of positive cases. I understand about not wanting to overwhelm the NHS but didnt they build a currently unused nightingale as an overflow?

Just as a separate question which hopefully someone could shed some light on for me.... My Son has had to isolate for 2 weeks as a supply teacher he has tested positive which is fine.
There is a bloke i work with in an office that has tested positive last week, management have told us we do not need to isolate and must continue coming to work. There is now another lad who has developed symptoms and is awaiting results of a test.
Are work in the wrong by making us come to work still? bear in mind - we are able to work from home, but apparently we are more productive in the office.!
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,252
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I wouldn't say its all about me or i am selfish - i follow the guide lines, unlike many folk. I wear a mask, i dont mix my bubbles and so on - i am just concerned for my welfare as i am finding it hard being dictated too and i am not 100% why. As i can see the death % seems relatively low considering the amount of positive cases. I understand about not wanting to overwhelm the NHS but didnt they build a currently unused nightingale as an overflow?

Just as a separate question which hopefully someone could shed some light on for me.... My Son has had to isolate for 2 weeks as a supply teacher he has tested positive which is fine.
There is a bloke i work with in an office that has tested positive last week, management have told us we do not need to isolate and must continue coming to work. There is now another lad who has developed symptoms and is awaiting results of a test.
Are work in the wrong by making us come to work still? bear in mind - we are able to work from home, but apparently we are more productive in the office.!
Basically, yes.

It’s possible you don’t fit the definition of a close contact but if you were, you shouldn’t really be leaving your house. Never mind going to work.

Anyway, if you’re able to work from home you should be working from home. That was true before your colleague tested positive and even more so now.
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
Basically, yes.

It’s possible you don’t fit the definition of a close contact but if you were, you shouldn’t really be leaving your house. Never mind going to work.

Anyway, if you’re able to work from home you should be working from home. That was true before your colleague tested positive and even more so now.
We wlked past each other in the brew room but were both masked up at the time.

Management have said that the office has been deemed 'Covid safe' which i think means we have a temp checked daily, we have a new sanitizer and if somebody tests positive, we get the feather duster out and clean up a tad.

I feel like we are having the wool pulled over our eyes - we were all working from home the first few months then we was urged to return to the office, and when Boris recently said if you can work from home you should - we were just told this doesn't apply to us. They believe we do more work in the office than at home.
 

DavidDeSchmikes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
17,336
Anyone else feel like this is being treated like some crap transfer deadline day.
"Government sources are telling"
"MP is telling me"
"Update coming soon"
"We understand that"
"Big announcement"

Government sources accidentally on purpose leaking to the media
 

onemanarmy

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
4,717
Location
Belgium
Anyone else feel like this is being treated like some crap transfer deadline day.
"Government sources are telling"
"MP is telling me"
"Update coming soon"
"We understand that"
"Big announcement"

Government sources accidentally on purpose leaking to the media
Anything on Sancho?
 

groovyalbert

it's a mute point
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
9,749
Location
London
Anyone else feel like this is being treated like some crap transfer deadline day.
"Government sources are telling"
"MP is telling me"
"Update coming soon"
"We understand that"
"Big announcement"

Government sources accidentally on purpose leaking to the media
They're just monitoring the situation
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
Going to be very hard in winter months though which we're now on verge of.
That's one thing you can't prevent with more harsh restrictrions, minus temperatures in November, December and January which will keep people indoors for prolonged periods. Of course though you still need to go to shops to stock up in this period.
The light in the tunnel will hopefully be from Feb onwards but it's going to be a long and painful slog to get there.
The hope is our population is now far better educated about virus pandemic protocol (like some Asia countries), and all the key institutions of British life are also prepared and adjusted.
Think back to March when crowds were still allowed in football stadiums, nightclubs schools and offices with zero knowledge or precautions: that naivety seems insane now.
I think once the death numbers get into high 3 digits, people will also start to get scared and become more compliant, with Government interventions as well.
Hopefully everyone aged 50+ is vaccinated early next year and we'll be able to see the end of this nightmare.
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
The hope is our population is now far better educated about virus pandemic protocol (like some Asia countries), and all the key institutions of British life are also prepared and adjusted.
Think back to March when crowds were still allowed in football stadiums, nightclubs schools and offices with zero knowledge or precautions: that naivety seems insane now.
I think once the death numbers get into high 3 digits, people will also start to get scared and become more compliant, with Government interventions as well.
Hopefully everyone aged 50+ is vaccinated early next year and we'll be able to see the end of this nightmare.
How likely would you say a vaccines early next year would be?
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,378
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I wouldn't say its all about me or i am selfish - i follow the guide lines, unlike many folk. I wear a mask, i dont mix my bubbles and so on - i am just concerned for my welfare as i am finding it hard being dictated too and i am not 100% why. As i can see the death % seems relatively low considering the amount of positive cases. I understand about not wanting to overwhelm the NHS but didnt they build a currently unused nightingale as an overflow?

Just as a separate question which hopefully someone could shed some light on for me.... My Son has had to isolate for 2 weeks as a supply teacher he has tested positive which is fine.
There is a bloke i work with in an office that has tested positive last week, management have told us we do not need to isolate and must continue coming to work. There is now another lad who has developed symptoms and is awaiting results of a test.
Are work in the wrong by making us come to work still? bear in mind - we are able to work from home, but apparently we are more productive in the office.!
Your work are being stupid cnuts. I’d say you’re within your rights to work from home if it’s possible - in fact it’s encouraged
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,378
Location
Dublin, Ireland
We wlked past each other in the brew room but were both masked up at the time.

Management have said that the office has been deemed 'Covid safe' which i think means we have a temp checked daily, we have a new sanitizer and if somebody tests positive, we get the feather duster out and clean up a tad.

I feel like we are having the wool pulled over our eyes - we were all working from home the first few months then we was urged to return to the office, and when Boris recently said if you can work from home you should - we were just told this doesn't apply to us. They believe we do more work in the office than at home.
That might be true but the health and safety of the workers should be paramount. Ask them if they are gonna change their minds if someone ends up in ICU. I’m irritated on your behalf, very very lax from your workplace
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,263
Location
Manchester
I wouldn't say its all about me or i am selfish - i follow the guide lines, unlike many folk. I wear a mask, i dont mix my bubbles and so on - i am just concerned for my welfare as i am finding it hard being dictated too and i am not 100% why. As i can see the death % seems relatively low considering the amount of positive cases. I understand about not wanting to overwhelm the NHS but didnt they build a currently unused nightingale as an overflow?

Just as a separate question which hopefully someone could shed some light on for me.... My Son has had to isolate for 2 weeks as a supply teacher he has tested positive which is fine.
There is a bloke i work with in an office that has tested positive last week, management have told us we do not need to isolate and must continue coming to work. There is now another lad who has developed symptoms and is awaiting results of a test.
Are work in the wrong by making us come to work still? bear in mind - we are able to work from home, but apparently we are more productive in the office.!
I went for a job interview in a ‘COVID safe’ office and got the impression they just didn’t trust people to work from home. The role id be doing could definitely be done from home, at least once I’ve got up to speed at the new place.
 

Habs

Full Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
702
I’m not sure if people realise but these Nightingale hospitals provide extra beds, but they will be staffed by removing doctors, nurses and HCA’s from other hospitals in that area. This is exactly what was proposed back in April.

Most hospitals I’ve worked in tend to be understaffed already with plenty of rota gaps, and winters are tough to work in. So I’m not sure how they’re going to make this work. It’s not like they’re offering to bring in more doctors to help.

If there’s no lockdown like summer, it’s going to a awful time for the NHS. It seems people are expecting to carry on as normal, and are not realising that eventually the amount of people who will need to be hospitalised will be unmanageable for the people working in hospitals.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,252
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I’m not sure if people realise but these Nightingale hospitals provide extra beds, but they will be staffed by removing doctors, nurses and HCA’s from other hospitals in that area. This is exactly what was proposed back in April.

Most hospitals I’ve worked in tend to be understaffed already with plenty of rota gaps, and winters are tough to work in. So I’m not sure how they’re going to make this work. It’s not like they’re offering to bring in more doctors to help.

If there’s no lockdown like summer, it’s going to a awful time for the NHS. It seems people are expecting to carry on as normal, and are not realising that eventually the amount of people who will need to be hospitalised will be unmanageable for the people working in hospitals.
That’s the elephant in the room. Lots of talk about pubs and schools but not much about what happened in hospitals during the first wave: cancellation of elective surgery, massively reduced services across the board.

Creating a load of extra beds/wards won’t help with maintaining the existing services. In fact they’ll do the opposite. And that’s how some of the most damaging consequences will occur.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,584
Probably because none of them can be trusted not to go leaking everything to the press if they get any kind of time to do so.
Christ yeah imagine policy being discussed openly rather than Supreme Leader Boris ruling by decree.

To be fair it's not like Boris and his cronies didn't warn us what would happen.
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
That might be true but the health and safety of the workers should be paramount. Ask them if they are gonna change their minds if someone ends up in ICU. I’m irritated on your behalf, very very lax from your workplace
im glad i aint the only one thats irritated. just spoke to management - the people that were sat on that same bank of desks as the positive case are working from home for now. Suppose they have to look like there taking some measures ha.
 

Dave_MUFC

Full Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
813
Location
Somewhere
Is anywhere actually Tier 3 then?

Bit of a joke that there's been all this talk about lockdown coming, and it's basically just the same as we were...

As usual, BoJo doing something meaningless in the big picture, so when people later try to blame him for all the deaths, he can turn around and say that he implemented measures.

Bets on ~50,000 cases a day come November?
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
Is anywhere actually Tier 3 then?

Bit of a joke that there's been all this talk about lockdown coming, and it's basically just the same as we were...

As usual, BoJo doing something meaningless in the big picture, so when people later try to blame him for all the deaths, he can turn around and say that he implemented measures.

Bets on ~50,000 cases a day come November?
Liverpool.

So pubs have to close apart from ones that do food of course, like Spoons etc.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,350
Christ yeah imagine policy being discussed openly rather than Supreme Leader Boris ruling by decree.

To be fair it's not like Boris and his cronies didn't warn us what would happen.
That's what happened last time the restrictions started and everybody went running out for one last hurrah.
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
Such a selfish outlook.

So any relatives you may have who are 50+, you don't mind potentially giving them a death sentence/getting extremely ill because of your actions? Same goes for older/vulnerable people in general, but I know a lot of selfish people at the moment don't give a care if they die as apparently "they're old and would die anyway"...

You enjoy playing football, as I do aswell (I am currently playing Saturday league, as I feel outdoors the chances are almost zero of catching it), but this virus has affected many healthy individuals who had the flu symptoms, yet now 5-6 months on still have breathing troubles and fatigued etc. and can't do any sport. That absolutely terrifies me.
I'm presuming the 50+ relatives in that scenario have either made the decision to shield or made the adult decision to put themselves at risk?

The grey area in this scenario are hospital and care home workers etc whereby the decisions of others are thrust upon the residents/patients on a day to day basis. I wonder whether from March there could have been some form of recompense whereby themselves and those within their households essentially shield outside of their work.

It would obviously be a real logistical challenge allowing adults to flagrantly put themselves at risk if they so choose; whilst protecting the aforementioned category. However given the cost to the economy (well into the 11 figures) and also the additional spending on job support etc (also 11 figures); plus the huge cost to the mental and physical health of the country; I'm surprised that a solution couldn't be found.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,252
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I'm presuming the 50+ relatives in that scenario have either made the decision to shield or made the adult decision to put themselves at risk?

The grey area in this scenario are hospital and care home workers etc whereby the decisions of others are thrust upon the residents/patients on a day to day basis. I wonder whether from March there could have been some form of recompense whereby themselves and those within their households essentially shield outside of their work.

It would obviously be a real logistical challenge allowing adults to flagrantly put themselves at risk if they so choose; whilst protecting the aforementioned category. However given the cost to the economy (well into the 11 figures) and also the additional spending on job support etc (also 11 figures); plus the huge cost to the mental and physical health of the country; I'm surprised that a solution couldn't be found.
That’s far from the only grey area.

For someone who is vulnerable (which could apparently be argued to be 25% of the Uk population) how do they shield themselves when they get a haircut? Visit the dentist? Go and see their GP? Or a physiotherapist? What if they would like to spend some time with their family?

And what about vulnerable people still at work? How do they earn a living doing one of the dozens of types of job that can’t be done from home, if their co-workers are likely to be riddled with the virus?

The whole “shielding only the vulnerable” strategy puts an intolerable burden on a not insignificant proportion of the population. It’s an incredibly harsh and unfair solution. Which will likely result in enormous death/hardship regardless.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,378
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I’m considered medically vulnerable and apart from medical appointments and today’s dental appointment I don’t really see anyone other than my wife and children since March. I’m ok but I worry about the stress on my wife as she has basically bought fully into cocooning too for my sake. She hasn’t seen her family since like January (they live in England), and she works from home so not getting even to see work colleagues. It’s starting to give her anxiety. We desperately need a small break somewhere. Fcuk 2020
 

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,423
Location
Tameside
We wlked past each other in the brew room but were both masked up at the time.

Management have said that the office has been deemed 'Covid safe' which i think means we have a temp checked daily, we have a new sanitizer and if somebody tests positive, we get the feather duster out and clean up a tad.

I feel like we are having the wool pulled over our eyes - we were all working from home the first few months then we was urged to return to the office, and when Boris recently said if you can work from home you should - we were just told this doesn't apply to us. They believe we do more work in the office than at home.
I've found an awful lot of employers have wilfully ignored the latest government advice as though it's somehow not as binding as the previous advice. Are you a member of a trade union? It might be worth setting one up if there is not already one at your work, because they may be able to hold your employer to account over health and safety stuff like this.
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
I've found an awful lot of employers have wilfully ignored the latest government advice as though it's somehow not as binding as the previous advice. Are you a member of a trade union? It might be worth setting one up if there is not already one at your work, because they may be able to hold your employer to account over health and safety stuff like this.
Unfortunately not, I often feel we need to be part of a Union the way we are treated sometimes. The latest advise on working from home has certainly been ignored here. Its this type of attitude that means harsher lockdowns and increased cases are inevitable. Prolonging the misery.
 

No Love

Full Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
2,384
So the “very high” tier entails the closing of bookies and wet bars? Do we anticipate that making much difference?
 

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,423
Location
Tameside
Unfortunately not, I often feel we need to be part of a Union the way we are treated sometimes. The latest advise on working from home has certainly been ignored here. Its this type of attitude that means harsher lockdowns and increased cases are inevitable. Prolonging the misery.
A union rep would also be able to ask your employers how they are monitoring productivity. I expect it's like my place, where they aren't at all, and it's just based on the assumption/personal opinion of the managers that people want to be back in the office and work better there. When I asked about monitoring, they went quiet, and while they are still 'encouraging' staff back into offices that aren't big enough to accommodate every member of staff if they all went in on the same day, they aren't enforcing it yet either.
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
A union rep would also be able to ask your employers how they are monitoring productivity. I expect it's like my place, where they aren't at all, and it's just based on the assumption/personal opinion of the managers that people want to be back in the office and work better there. When I asked about monitoring, they went quiet, and while they are still 'encouraging' staff back into offices that aren't big enough to accommodate every member of staff if they all went in on the same day, they aren't enforcing it yet either.
Its kind of funny - i would question the monitoring of productivity BUT a productivity tool / macro was created about 2 months before lockdown - and it was me who created it. Talk about shooting yourself in your own foot. I could easily sabotage the excel formula's a nobody would be none the wiser but if i got caught id be in hot water.