Port Vale Devil
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 3,382
- Supports
- Port Vale
Ok cool, just haven’t seen anything mentioned about them. Probably missed it as try to avoid COVID news generally.They're still open.
Ok cool, just haven’t seen anything mentioned about them. Probably missed it as try to avoid COVID news generally.They're still open.
To be clear, I don't think people generally should be left to make their own judgement, because it's a road to disaster and the eventual outcome will be a lockdown anyway. I don't really disagree with you on any of that.I agree with you that communication has been rubbish. I don't agree with you that rules are inconsistent and there are reasons that explain why similar situations are handled differently, based on different sets of societal priorities. But let's accept your position on that too.
We now know this is a dangerous time. We also know the vaccine is a legitimate exit strategy. Let's say we stop paying attention to government rules and instead make judgments bases purely on what is the best way to handle this pandemic as a society. If you choose to see your friends, your family, etc. you are taking a risk that you will spread the virus. Every one of those interactions counts, not just the parties. The motivations can provide individual justification but that doesn't change the epidemiological outcome. The self isolation is only plausible in very specific circumstances for a few people. People gotta eat.
If people weigh up their own individual risk of catching and passing on the virus, don't you think they'll end up making decisions that are an acceptable level of risk for them as individuals, but an unacceptable risk for society? Is there any reason to believe that if people were left to rely on their own judgment, they would be able to manage things in a way that prevent hospital capacity going over 90%?
If not, then choosing not to judge those decisions therefore encourages individuals to take actions that cause more societal harm. I don't see any way around that.
Are they giving out estimates of a 0.4 to 0.9 increase?The number 0.9 to me didn't sound right because I'm sure the PM said 0.4 yesterday. I can see where the breakdown in communication is. This comes from Nervtag's meeting minutes that were framed for a particular audience, and the media are reporting on it very, very badly if the takeaway people are getting is it will increase things by 0.9.
Their esimates range from 0.4 to 0.9 and it's based on correlation studies which "suggest" those numbers. The media are bad at science reporting in general but I think this is particularly bad. These correlation studies and models are very limited, and it's at a very early stage. We conclusively do not know what impact it will have on the r, they just had to provide their best estimate so the PM could make a call pre-Christmas.
Their key conclusion is that they have "moderate" confidence it demonstrates a substantial increase. They by definition have significantly lower confidence in the precise estimates, and presumably high confidence that it demonstrates some kind of increase, but it may not be significant.
For some reason we're focusing exclusively on the grave news. There are plenty of other details that paint a more complex picture. For example, they know someone from the UK with that virus strain brought it to Australia. Presumably they used a form of transport that exposed them to other people on the journey, and after the journey. No-one else got infected by it. It isn't some kind of super-strain.
If it increased the r rate by 0.4 then some of the measures imposed during the lockdown were estimated to have reduced the r rate by that amount too. No catastrophes. Maybe if you close schools temporarily you achieve a kind of equilibrium.
What the feck are you on about? Where have I said anything is not my responsibility?With opinions such as this being so prevalent we hav’nt got a chance and the U.K. is well and truly fecked. Talk about ‘it’s not my responsibility’. Its at times like this that it crosses my mind that a ‘police state’ might not be a bad idea.
Yeah this is their translation of the R number. It is more easily interpretable the 71% more transmissible estimate.Are they giving out estimates of a 0.4 to 0.9 increase?
I assumed you just, you know, increase the R number by 75%? It's (allegedly) 75% more contagious? The R Number is effectively a measure of the viruses contagiousness over it's lifespan? You can't just add a standard number to it, that's ridiculous.
Regardless I feel really really shit right now sitting in the middle of Tier 4 Lockdown. Christmas is cancelled. Everyone I know is devastated and feeling like they've been punched in the gut. Friends jobs are fecked again, but also schools closing is going to be a killer. If the 70% or 75% more infectiousness is correct then I don't see how that even the most extreme measures we took at the height of lockdown would have been enough to get R below 1.0
Like you say, maybe the media are exaggerating. If the one thing the media are known to do, it's to take a figure and run with it without context.
But god.
We have achieved much bigger drops in the R number so you shouldn't panic. E.g. here is the reference point from NI:NERVTAG said:Studies of correlation between R-values and detection of the variant: which suggest an absolute increase in the R-value of between 0.39 to 0.93.
...
In summary, NERVTAG has moderate confidence that VUI-202012/01 demonstrates a substantial increase in transmissibility compared to other variants.
It's from this article. People are getting arried away because of the way this being communicated and contextualised, IMO.Dr McBride urged people to behave as they did in March, when the restrictions and behaviour saw the R number fall from almost 3, down to 0.7 by July.
Shouldn't be much really, most retailers have stockpiled for Brexit. Exports will be worst affected.What a shit few days. I expect panic buying tomorrow due to the news around ports.
I work for a local council who have access to the data and they have been telling the government for weeks that the tiers needed to change. I see the data every week and the problem has been obvious for a long time now. Go by case rates or hospital capacity or both. It doesn't matter. The basic numbers alone are the equivalent of not only the fire alarm going off but being able to literaly see the fire burning on your desk in front of you, and still thinking "yeah I'll just sit here a bit longer". They did nothing at all until Wednesday and also blocked the Council's attempts to close or stagger schools. Now I'm supposed to believe there was no prior warning of any major issue until THIS Friday My work place alone has literally been saying directly to the government "look there's a bit of a problem here" for fecking ages now. Local Councils have been asking them to let the schools close due to how out of hand the case rises have been getting. Essex County Council have been saying it for even longer.Case rate, potentially not, but you shouldn't be solely looking at cases in isolation. The motivation for the restrictions is all related to ICU and hospital capacity, the stricter the measure should give an indication as to the severity of the capacity issues. Wales had last week one day where they had 10 free ICU beds across the whole country. So they can balance an increase of case rate, as long as the hospital's capacity is in a healthy status.
The transmission pattern for the tier 4 areas, has grown at an extremely sharp rate over the past week. You can't see the data in one or two days due to the fact that the current turn around time on tests is about 3.1 days and increasing daily. So in reality the decisions being made on Friday/Saturday is based off tests that were taken on Tuesday at the latest.
The thought had crossed my mindShouldn't be much really, most retailers have stockpiled for Brexit. Exports will be worst affected.
At least we get an early insight into what Brexit looks like on January 1st.
Yes but it's not a simple as saying "we dropped the R-Value from 3.7 to 0.7 previously and we can do it again" well no, we went from a completely open economy to a completely shut economy. We do not have a completely open economy now. If the R-value in March-April was 0.6 then and it's 70% more infectious, and we can just do 0.6*1.7 which, you know, maybe I am wrong about, then that is 1.0 back in March-April.Yeah this is their translation of the R number. It is more easily interpretable the 71% more transmissible estimate.
We have achieved much bigger drops in the R number so you shouldn't panic. E.g. here is the reference point from NI:
It's from this article. People are getting arried away because of the way this being communicated and contextualised, IMO.
Yeah very much likely but they maybe have to tinker with it like the do with the flu jab every year.Hi guys,
Reading reports here in NA about the bew coronavirus strain in UK.
Will the Covid vaccine be affective against this new strain?
Alright I'll leave you to your despair but I'll just say that isn't the right way to use the 71% transmissibility estimate, even if it were accurateYes but it's not a simple as saying "we dropped the R-Value from 3.7 to 0.7 previously and we can do it again" well no, we went from a completely open economy to a completely shut economy. We do not have a completely open economy now. If the R-value in March-April was 0.6 then and it's 70% more infectious, and we can just do 0.6*1.7 which, you know, maybe I am wrong about, then that is 1.0 back in March-April.
feck. What else can you close?
Also, It's winter. March-April was an (actually very nice) Spring-Summer.
Also, March-April wasn't good. My kids weren't at school. Their school was shocking at providing home learning. The government spent large percentage points of GDP to keep going and the economy subtracted by large percentage points of GDP.
Ergh
It looks like this virus isn't very transmissible fortunately.
According to the European CDC the chance of the virus spreading to Europe is very small.
We consider it a small chance that the virus will appear here since there is no direct traffic to Wuhan from here.
33.5 k on Wednesday rather than the reported 25.1k then.There is a backlog in today's reporting, 8.4k cases dropped in that weren't included in Wednesday's number.
What are they comparing this new variant to? Are they sure it is a different Ro? Or just a different R? If they are comparing it to other variants in areas that were locked down harder then the difference could just be R due to different conditions.Alright I'll leave you to your despair but I'll just say that isn't the right way to use the 71% transmissibility estimate, even if it were accurate
That's just ridiculous. Wear masks, dont mix, keep distance. It's not that fkin hard.The infection rate here is soaring but has been very low compared to other areas for the whole pandemic until now. It's a bit daft not to attribute some of the speed of the infection rate to the fact a lot more people here simply wont have had it at all yet.
Regardless, surely the overall transmission patterns would give a fairly accurate idea that there was a problem before this fecking Friday. For example, I knew there was a problem before then, because I looked at the publicly available data and saw that there very obviously was. We've crept up from 40 cases per 100,000 to nearly 500 per 100,000 in under 2 months. It hasn't just suddenly happened this week, no matter what it's attributed to.
We need rules for something like this because it's a crisis, and most people lack common sense at the best of times, never mind when they are in survival or reactionary mode. Give people guidance that helps them get through a crisis and they will generally stick to it rather than take risks.Give them guidance that keeps changing, often contradicts itselfm and at times obviously makes no sense, and people will end up all over the place or making their own decisions.
It's like being in a burning building and having to choose whether you let someone guide you out. If they're dressed as a firefighter and appear to be leading you to where they think the exit is, then you're probably going to follow them. If they're dressed as a circus clown and keep changing their mind about which way to go, and occasionally try to make you walk through things that are on fire, you're probably going to start thinking about finding your own way out, or at the very least start getting very angry at them when you notice your arm is burning.
At some point we have to look past Boris and address the elephant in the room, that being a significant number of the populace put their full trust into him not once (Brexit) but twice (the last election).What the feck are you on about? Where have I said anything is not my responsibility?
I simply think it is quite important during a world pandemic that the people in charge aren't complete idiots who have no regard for anyone else's wellbeing, and I don't think that's what we have unfortunately .
In fact at this point if you think Boris is in any way competent and not a dangerous person to have in charge of managing a pandemic, then I think you have to be somewhat mad. They guy came on national television in March and TOLD you to go visit a covid ward and shake hands with everyone there.
Also, anyone know exactly why this variant is more virulent and what adaptations covid19 has made to itself to become much more contagious?Can someone tell me how the rest of the world is reacting to this new virus strain in the South East?
Obviously, I can see that countries are closing their borders - but - what's the general consensus.
Is that strain just here (SE UK) at the moment? Or has it already spread? Did it start here? Is the 75% more infectious considered correct?
This is getting boring now. It obviously is hard for some people as otherwise everyone would do it, and again, nearly everyone who can do it has been. I literally don't know anyone who hasn't been doing everything they can, apart from a few who went to the BLM march because they decided it was an important issue, and a few who want to see their families at Christmas because they are genuinely worried for their wellbeing.That's just ridiculous. Wear masks, dont mix, keep distance. It's not that fkin hard.
Yes well that's very true but again it does nothing to help people through a pandemic.At some point we have to look past Boris and address the elephant in the room, that being a significant number of the populace put their full trust into him not once (Brexit) but twice (the last election).
Boris never at any point tried (or was unable) to hide what a nasty piece of work he is yet people voted for him anyway.
Nice!Not sure if this was posted before but that’s a great read on the current state of knowledge about new variants of covid and offers some good insights https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...om-sets-alarms-its-importance-remains-unclear
We have our blue passports though Penna.The UK seems so isolated now. Numerous countries banning flights from the UK and from Jan 1st, Brits won't be able to travel to Europe for non-essential trips because of Brexit.
It's all so weird.
This is getting boring now. It obviously is hard for some people as otherwise everyone would do it, and again, nearly everyone who can do it has been. I literally don't know anyone who hasn't been doing everything they can, apart from a few who went to the BLM march because they decided it was an important issue, and a few who want to see their families at Christmas because they are genuinely worried for their wellbeing.
Making ignorant and stupid statements and judging people without being able to show any empathy whatsoever, does nothing to help anyone. Give it a fecking rest.
If I catch COVID it will not be Boris or one of his cohorts that give it to me it will be a tosser with a similar attitude to yours. All of us are suffering in this pandemic but what the feck.....how many more times does wash your hands, keep your distance, wear a mask and stay in your bubble have to be parroted before folk take notice and accept responsibility.Yes well that's very true but again it does nothing to help people through a pandemic.
I think anyone who voted for him should be ashamed of themselves really, but it's gone now, and its pretty important to hold him to account when thousands of people's lives are dependent on it. Instead of wasting energy moaning about a few desperate people trying to catch a train or buy a coffee, as if it somehow makes them the devil.
I think most of January will be a lockdown. We need to vaccinate as many vulnerable as possibleSurely we’re headed for another prolonged full lockdown whilst we vaccinate as many people as we possibly can?
It feels inevitable really, seems like it’s spiralling out of control at present. I’d really like to see the government making more provision for kids to be home schooled now while we try and get it back under some level of control. No point in restrictions on families if kids are allowed to mix with 30 other kids.Surely we’re headed for another prolonged full lockdown whilst we vaccinate as many people as we possibly can?
Ok, what's your solution to it all?This is getting boring now. It obviously is hard for some people as otherwise everyone would do it, and again, nearly everyone who can do it has been. I literally don't know anyone who hasn't been doing everything they can, apart from a few who went to the BLM march because they decided it was an important issue, and a few who want to see their families at Christmas because they are genuinely worried for their wellbeing.
Making ignorant and stupid statements and judging people without being able to show any empathy whatsoever, does nothing to help anyone. Give it a fecking rest.
When did this come in?
I agree with the general principle that criticising people for things that we know will happen is stupid and often pointless. I just think that's a very generous and dangerous position to take, and even if it seems unfair, individual criticism helps moderate that behaviour so it is not unreasonable. That is one of the social roles of criticism, reminding communities of what we believe is acceptable or not. I do accept that people were right to hear that news and rush out of London. I wouldn't be completely shocked if one of my friends was on that train because there's definitely something of a split among my London friends on the last couple of weeks. I would have to tell them I think that's absolutely reckless.To be clear, I don't think people generally should be left to make their own judgement, because it's a road to disaster and the eventual outcome will be a lockdown anyway. I don't really disagree with you on any of that.
The point is more that when you have a government who does stuff like pretends Christmas can go ahead until literally just before Christmas, and then suddenly changes their mind and imposes a quarantine on half the country and gives people only hours to escape it, then what that is doing is forcing a lot of people into a position where they have to make their own judgements, or do so out of panic. Going down any route where you end up blaming and criticising people for behaving exactly as you can expect large groups of people to behave, is as pointless as it is useless.
The rules are quite inconsistent as I have found out through trying to do my job, and some of the logic behind them is beyond any sense. People at our work were literally getting emails threatening them to not keep their kids out of school the week before the end of term, but at the same time being told they were at high risk of infection if they sent their kids into school due to that being the main area of infection. As a result several used their own judgement to not send their kids in. If you give people tripe to eat and tell them its pancakes, some of them wont eat it. You are pushing people to make their own minds up.
I don't buy that anything happened on Friday to "suddenly" make this new strain more of a problem, because I've been monitering the cases in my area every week, and it's been VERY obvious there is a problem that needed to be addressed for well over a month now, and there have been plenty of people saying it too. Hosptials at nearly 90% capacity, and cases that have gone up more than 10 fold in two months...I mean anyone that can count could have decided before yesterday that something needed to be done.
Now they haven't said for sure it is a different R0 but they have moderate confidence than it is. They're just comparing it to other major strains. Given they're comparing in the same place over the same time and they have some idea of the biological differences, they think the really explosive growth of this particular strain has to have something to do with transmissibility. But we need better tests to evaluate that fully.What are they comparing this new variant to? Are they sure it is a different Ro? Or just a different R? If they are comparing it to other variants in areas that were locked down harder then the difference could just be R due to different conditions.
It is not about how it transmits between humans but how it works within the body. It binds more easily and appears to replicate more quickly which creates a higher viral load because of some structural changes to the receptor binding domain (RBD). Higher viral load means more transmission in general.Also, anyone know exactly why this variant is more virulent and what adaptations covid19 has made to itself to become much more contagious?
Eg: Has it grown wings for itself? Does it fly further through the air?
So although it might be more infectious we don't know yet. What we do know is that Boris is bigging this up to cover for the fact he allowed London and the SE to be less restricted than was sensible and we are now paying the price.Not sure if this was posted before but that’s a great read on the current state of knowledge about new variants of covid and offers some good insights https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...om-sets-alarms-its-importance-remains-unclear
It came directly from NERVTAG in fairness. You can see the meeting they had and the statements they made are alarming. They should come with heavy caveats but it's appropriate to take a cautious response to that. You can see in the doc PHE and NERVTAG agreed on the policy response to it too. PHE confirmed that on Andrew Marr yesterday too. You can't just put this down to Boris.So although it might be more infectious we don't know yet. What we do know is that Boris is bigging this up to cover for the fact he allowed London and the SE to be less restricted than was sensible and we are now paying the price.
Mhm. Is there not some things about higher viral load also means higher chance to get sicker?It is not about how it transmits between humans but how it works within the body. It binds more easily and appears to replicate more quickly which creates a higher viral load because of some structural changes to the receptor binding domain (RBD).Higher viral load means more transmission in general.
Thanks for the link.Not sure if this was posted before but that’s a great read on the current state of knowledge about new variants of covid and offers some good insights https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...om-sets-alarms-its-importance-remains-unclear
I totally agree with you that the people in charge are complete idiots and and largely to blame for the situation we find ourselves in. The decision not to restrict travel into the UK from countries earlier in the year, a lockdown brought in too late, the Dominic Cummings eyesight test, attempting to force children back to school before the September break, the eat out to help the virus, Johnson telling people to get back into the office and then being forced to backtrack as infection rates started to increase.What the feck are you on about? Where have I said anything is not my responsibility?
I simply think it is quite important during a world pandemic that the people in charge aren't complete idiots who have no regard for anyone else's wellbeing, and I don't think that's what we have unfortunately .
In fact at this point if you think Boris is in any way competent and not a dangerous person to have in charge of managing a pandemic, then I think you have to be somewhat mad. They guy came on national television in March and TOLD you to go visit a covid ward and shake hands with everyone there.
Blaming every single other person in the country for not thinking or doing exactly what you want them to do is quite a strange way to approach what is going on. A lot of people actually need help or support and would probably behave a lot more safely if they got it, and a vast majority are doing absolutely everything they can within the realms of what they need to in order to survive.
The only thing i can think with some of the weird posts in this thread is that some of you still aren't even living in the real world and seeing what is really going on out there. Just judging from the odd photo being thrown around London for example has been an absolute ghost town for months. There aren't people just roaming the streets in massive packs. The only thing that's been busy is the trains, which is because its a massively populated city with many people in it who still have no choice but to travel around. It's actually quite spooky and anxiety enducing to walk around there due to how dead it is. The chaos last night was caused by making a ridiculous announcement at a ridiciulous time, 3 days after telling everyone that it was something that defintiely wouldn't happen.