Foxbatt
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 14,297
Fred was good too but I thought McTominay was slightly better than him today.Oh. Wasn't sure whether you meant outfield player, because I thought Fred was very good, too.
Fred was good too but I thought McTominay was slightly better than him today.Oh. Wasn't sure whether you meant outfield player, because I thought Fred was very good, too.
It was good enough.One of his better performances but still not good enough and went missing a bit in the second half. For a change he passed ball forward pretty well but all the attackers were so poor it didn’t really matter.
we did not have a comfortable win because 4 of our forwards were crap today. Sancho a little less son than the other three. As soon as they got the ball they lost possession and back they came at us. Without our midfield playing like that we would have lost this game. Well DeGea and our defence. We were playing 7 players actually.Don't see the "good" performance from Scott (includes many others aswell) because Norwich had the better of the game. If our midfielders had "good" performances I would have expected a comfortable win which didn't play out.
Was he better than normal? Yes, but that is only because he has been so poor.
Sounds like you expect the midfielders to shield the back, provide for the attackers, and finish for them too. We weren't comfortable because 3 of the front 4 had mares. We created plenty but could barely finish our supper.Don't see the "good" performance from Scott (includes many others aswell) because Norwich had the better of the game. If our midfielders had "good" performances I would have expected a comfortable win which didn't play out.
Was he better than normal? Yes, but that is only because he has been so poor.
Yes, because that was McTominay’s fault…Glad you find it funny, personally I prefer to see Manchester United hold their own against bottom of the league teams who are riddled with injuries.
64 touches, 7 "progressive" passes (including 2 that led to shooting opportunities), 4 "progressive" carries w/ the ball, 90+ % pass accuracy.What were his stats like? Felt like he was much more involved than usual. His biggest weakness has always been not getting on the ball enough. Seemed like that didn’t happen today.
I thought it was a poor cross, was way over Ronny's headHe was good yesterday, a shame all of our forwards decided to have another off day.
Good cross for the penalty too.
It wasn't good cross for Ronaldo but very good cross for Bruno, shocking miss by Bruno.I thought it was a poor cross, was way over Ronny's head
But yeah he played well
You calling me the one with an agenda is literally funny. I regularly post that I like Scott, I have no agenda, he’s just not good enough like a few others at this club.Yes, because that was McTominay’s fault…
Jesus christ, imagine seething with so much hatred for one of our own academy products that you’ll do anything to downplay what was a good performance. I can’t imagine what you’d have been coming out with if he struggled. He won possession back, he pushed the ball forward and it was his cross that led to the penalty. Still gets shit.
The agenda is stronger than reality for a lot of people.
Not sure how they measure that but it was more than that. In the performance video you can see him winning tackle 3 times within first 15 seconds, one more tackle at 1:22.He had what 2 successful tackles?
Hopefully this is just going to become how we play now. McT us had some terrible games but I don’t think he was getting a huge amount of direction, it will be interesting if he steps up a level now.One of his better performances but still not good enough and went missing a bit in the second half. For a change he passed ball forward pretty well but all the attackers were so poor it didn’t really matter.
Reiterates the same point. Look at the number of promising positions the midfielders got us into only to be fecked up completely by the front 3 (Sancho was decent ). They just didn't knew what to do in the final third.
Very good game, played some nice passes to wings and between the lines.
yea, but shouldn't it be the bare minimum seeing there's so many option ahead and he didn't get pressed at allVery good game, played some nice passes to wings and between the lines.
Yeah attacking 4 had very poor game, like you said Sancho was decent.Reiterates the same point. Look at the number of promising positions the midfielders got us into only to be fecked up completely by the front 3 (Sancho was decent ). They just didn't knew what to do in the final third.