Tinkerman Ole

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,162
It's not tinkering. Scheduling issues means he has to rotate. I'd be one of those moaning if he continually played the same players and ran them to the ground.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,628
And as such, he won the game and they had 45 minutes rest:lol:

How cant you see this as a positive? I’d understand if we had dropped points....
It wasn't his intention to give them 45 minutes. To suggest his tinkering works when he had to call upon players he never wanted to call upon isn't really a strong point, is all I'm saying.

I never said 45 minute rest is a bad thing though.
 

Jonno

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
8,375
Location
Preston, Lancashire
It wasn't his intention to give them 45 minutes. To suggest his tinkering works when he had to call upon players he never wanted to call upon isn't really a strong point, is all I'm saying.

I never said 45 minute rest is a bad thing though.
It doesnt matter, he’s entitled to use them from the bench. Every tinkering manager in world football will at times need to bring his best players on to turn games. I was the great man Fergie do it countless times, you see Klopp do it often.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,628
It doesnt matter, he’s entitled to use them from the bench. Every tinkering manager in world football will at times need to bring his best players on to turn games. I was the great man Fergie do it countless times, you see Klopp do it often.
Whilst tinkering relates to starting a different looking side more than just occasionally, it only works if your starting line-up is justified. Not if you have to go to the bench to rectify a mistaken team selection. That's a failed tinker, which was rectified at half time.

Of course he was well within his right to use the bench. That's not really part of the debate.

An example where he "tinkered" successfully would be say, Leipzig.
 

UpWithRivers

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
3,653
And as such, he won the game and they had 45 minutes rest:lol:

How cant you see this as a positive? I’d understand if we had dropped points....
Because we have gone 5 games with conceding first and then having to react. Surely you can see its a problem. Its not the game. Everyone's buzzing about the result. Everyone's buzzing about our league position. We can still analyze areas of improvement and its glaring and baffling how we can be the worst team one minute and world class the next. And its happening over and over again. If its not because we keep tinkering then what is it? Because if we are to achieve anything it has to be sorted.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Bizarre thread.

Ole is the first manager we’ve had in a decade (and this includes an ageing Ferguson) who doesn’t rotate for the hell of it. I mean, it was only a few months ago that he was getting pelters for overplaying the same XI, in spite of having to field the likes of Ighalo and Lingard if he fancied making a change.

Seems most (all?) others responders to this thread happen to agree.

I’d argue that our current back four is the most settled it’s been in a decade, too. Say what you want about their quality, but it’s the same lads every week.
 

Dve

New Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
2,913
We have loads of games coming up this December including are most important match of the season on Tuesday we also didn’t get much pre season and break for the players. We have to rotate so I don’t see a problem with this. The only problem is the level drops so much when we leave out Bruno
He is basically playing all the time, so that does not have to be true. Last time he sat out the first half, we were still the dominate side. Fernandes is obviously very important for this team, but it´s a game of 90 minutes, and United tend to play better second half. It seems like every team that plays United these days, comes with the plan of pressing us high and intensive, as they do not respect our abilities to play out from the back. They have seen other teams beating us that way. Then they run out of steam, and we hammer them in the second. If Fernandes and Rashford had played the first half, and Donny and Canavi the second, I think the pictures would have been different. So I think the fans are a bit unfair to those playing first half when we are forgetting there are two teams on the pitch.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,692
The problem is that we don't have a clearly defined system so players can't slot in and out easily. Instead we rely on individual moments of quality and organic understanding between players. This makes us hopeless unable to rotate or leave out Bruno.

If we had a decent coach would not be a problem.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,491
He didn't tinker post lockdown and it resulted in a burnout end of season

Problem is some of our players don't seemingly give it their all or just aren't good enough.

Sure we added players but really given he's playing with a lot of youth were gonna have inconsistency too
The short end of season didn't help and the packed schedule means we need to tinker but we will get weird performances
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,369
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
The problem is -
We change systems all the time.5 at the back. Diamond. 4-3-3. Two holding midfielders. One holding midfielder. etc
We change players on mass. Not just one or two. On mass. 3,4,5
We change the players positions.
We play to many players that are finding form or adjusting.

None of the above is bad. Its good. But not all together. Or you get FA cup syndrome. Fact.
Take out the names and this describes Potter's Brighton perfectly, but he gets loads of praise for it and it is seen as a positive.
 

cyril C

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
2,653
The same 11 cannot play 60 games each season, Cov19 or not. Rotation is necessary, unless you are Sheffield with only 12 players squad. Key point is whether bench players step up or prefer watching from the stand and earn their 300K like Ozil
 

Jonno

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
8,375
Location
Preston, Lancashire
Because we have gone 5 games with conceding first and then having to react. Surely you can see its a problem. Its not the game. Everyone's buzzing about the result. Everyone's buzzing about our league position. We can still analyze areas of improvement and its glaring and baffling how we can be the worst team one minute and world class the next. And its happening over and over again. If its not because we keep tinkering then what is it? Because if we are to achieve anything it has to be sorted.
Ok, thanks for your input. My point is that we managed to rest our best 2 players for 45 minutes and still win the game, which is a plus ahead of Leipzig.

What you're discussing is how we concede the first goal.

Completely separate issue, but happy to talk about it.

We're building a long-term squad capable of challenging. We've got the youngest squad in the league and it will take time. It took City years to build to top 2 level, it took Liverpool years.

Whether Ole is the man to win trophies remains to be seen, but the squad building is generally good. We've improved in every area of the pitch this past 2 years.

Also, not "everyone is buzzing about our league position". I'm pleased we've recovered from a poor start to the season, pleased we're a win away from the top, content after 10-11 games and optimistic for the season... but "buzzing"? No.
 

sparky

Full Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
2,419
Location
in la la land
I find this old post I made back in 2008 ish!! Should have out a bet on it then.


sparky
Full Member

Joined Jul 5, 2006Messages 2,413Location in la la land
Just watching, Theres only one....Ole Gunnar Solskjaer on MUTV
Cracking goals, such a shame he had injury problems.
Found myself wondering if Ole is being groomed to take over as Manager when SAF leaves.
2OLEGEND!!!
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,545
Location
Oslo, Norway
Lots of tinkerman articles doing the rounds in the last few days. Find it quite baffling especially after the "Unchanged FC" and "running players into the ground" arguments in the summer. Damned if you do rest and rotate, damned if you don't.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
Do people not realise this season is massively different compared to the past?
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,120
Location
Where the grass is greener.
He'd be mad not to tinker and rotate due to the circumstances, the issue is we don't have the squad depth to make it not massively noticeable when he does so.
 

UpWithRivers

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
3,653
Lots of tinkerman articles doing the rounds in the last few days. Find it quite baffling especially after the "Unchanged FC" and "running players into the ground" arguments in the summer. Damned if you do rest and rotate, damned if you don't.
Do people not realise this season is massively different compared to the past?
He'd be mad not to tinker and rotate due to the circumstances, the issue is we don't have the squad depth to make it not massively noticeable when he does so.
No one is saying dont rotate. Playing the same 11 week in week out is as nuts as changing it constantly. However there is an art to making changes. You have to do it in a way that is not detrimental to the team. The problem is that Ole not only changes players, he changes formation, he changes positioning. Every game. Its too much change. Im 99 percent sure other teams know this as well and get their teams to press us early on so when we are out of sorts and finding out feet.

I am glad there are reports that Senior players are pushing back against this. So far its been only me! :-)
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,103
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
The issue for me isn't changing players up, it's fine, SAF used to do it all the time. Nowadays with the COVID context, it's even more vital.
What annoys me is the use of so many formations. That must not be easy for the players to adapt to
 

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,796
Location
London
This issue isn't tinkering. The issue is not having a defined style. Look at the way we played our last three games? Its what makes the likes of Pep and Klopp stand out in comparison to lesser managers. Players in those teams know their roles weeks before a match. I doubt our players know what they're doing during the match.
 

Flanders Devil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
450
This issue isn't tinkering. The issue is not having a defined style. Look at the way we played our last three games? Its what makes the likes of Pep and Klopp stand out in comparison to lesser managers. Players in those teams know their roles weeks before a match. I doubt our players know what they're doing during the match.
This is it for me too. It’s not the player rotation. It’s a bit more the formation, but even then not 100 percent that...it’s the style. The mindset, how to play etc. changes too much.
 

UpWithRivers

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
3,653
The issue for me isn't changing players up, it's fine, SAF used to do it all the time. Nowadays with the COVID context, it's even more vital.
What annoys me is the use of so many formations. That must not be easy for the players to adapt to
This issue isn't tinkering. The issue is not having a defined style. Look at the way we played our last three games? Its what makes the likes of Pep and Klopp stand out in comparison to lesser managers. Players in those teams know their roles weeks before a match. I doubt our players know what they're doing during the match.
Agreed but that all goes under the umbrella of tinkering.

In 16 Premier League and Champions League matches this season, Solskjaer has used 11 different midfield combinations - with nine having only been seen once. The Red Devils have fallen behind in a staggering ten of these matches.

Man United formations 2020-21

4-2-3-1
: P11 W6 D1 L4

4-4-2 diamond: P3 W2 D0 L1

3-4-1-2: P2 W1 D0 L1
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,093
This issue isn't tinkering. The issue is not having a defined style. Look at the way we played our last three games? Its what makes the likes of Pep and Klopp stand out in comparison to lesser managers. Players in those teams know their roles weeks before a match. I doubt our players know what they're doing during the match.
It's both tinkering and a lack of defined style of play imo. A common denominator during the two times we were consistent under Ole(second half of last season and his early interim period) was having an unchanged FC. Both of these teams started becoming inconsistent when the players started getting tired and there was no strong depth to back them up.

This season we have good depth now to rotate with the unchanged FC we used in the second half of last season that made us consistent . Except now some of these players are off form so the unchanged team needs to change. The problem here is Ole simply hasn't found the squad that works and that is why he is always tinkering formations and players and because of this we are not consistent.

We will find consistency whenever Ole discovers his unchanged Fc again and when that team gets tired or some players are off form we will become inconsistent again because Ole does not know how to get the best out of the depth he has and he doesn't know how because he is more reliant on individual quality than a defined style of play
 

Plymouth Red

New Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
475
It's both tinkering and a lack of defined style of play imo. A common denominator during the two times we were consistent under Ole(second half of last season and his early interim period) was having an unchanged FC. Both of these teams started becoming inconsistent when the players started getting tired and there was no strong depth to back them up.

This season we have good depth now to rotate with the unchanged FC we used in the second half of last season that made us consistent . Except now some of these players are off form so the unchanged team needs to change. The problem here is Ole simply hasn't found the squad that works and that is why he is always tinkering formations and players and because of this we are not consistent.

We will find consistency whenever Ole discovers his unchanged Fc again and when that team gets tired or some players are off form we will become inconsistent again because Ole does not know how to get the best out of the depth he has and he doesn't know how because he is more reliant on individual quality than a defined style of play
But surely if Ole keeps changing our shape as well as the players on the team sheet, we won't reach a situation where individuals know what is expected when they are asked to play in a certain position?

The chopping and changing of formation and faces is stopping the team from developing its own version of muscle memory, so when someone comes in to replace an injured team mate, for example, they don't know for sure what their role is going to be and positionally, what is expected of them. I understand you have to be able to flex things but there should be a core shape that is favoured at home or away.

I would have thought that this was a key requirement to train players to behave as a unit and build up a clear understanding of who does what. When you do this very well, you get to the situation that observers call telepathy between players. Currently, our team's setting is firmly on brain freeze most of the time.
 

led_scholes

Full Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
2,461
The problem is not rotation for me. The problem is that tactics always change. The last few months we have played 4-5-1, 4-4-2 and 5-3-2. He has been 2 years here and he is still uncertain which formation he prefers. You cant change system every week and expect consistency..
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,533
I mean players needing to build an understanding is an undisputed concept isn't it? So is consistency in position and formation?

My issue and i balther on about it all the time is that our players who come in and out the team all play differently. If i could ask for one thing it would be for all our forwards to work with Bruno on making movements he can predict.
 

Lemon Moon

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
713
Location
Manchester
I got push back in the match thread and it seems like Im the only one saying this but it has to be said......We make too many changes. There I said it. Its the reason for our inconsistency. Different systems, different players, different positions of players. All the time! Maybe Im wrong but I dont remember any Prem/Seria A/Champs League etc winning team that made so many changes.
Now dont get me wrong we need to use our squad. But its about making smart changes not sweeping changes. Its like the FA cup. You see a Prem side put out a team worth 300 mill against a team thats worth 100 grand. Yeah they could be brilliant and hammer them 5-0 or there can be a shock defeat. Happens all the time. Why? Because you cant just throw on 11 players and guarantee they will click. Even is they are man for man miles better the team that is better coached, drilled and used to playing together might win. It evens the odds. Why do teams like Greece win the Euros.
Everyone says Ole did well against West Ham to make changes and it was all about Bruno being the catalyst etc. It was. But the reason the first half team played sht was not because they are sht but because there were too many changes. Pogba/Greenwood just coming back. Martial out of form and back to left where he hasnt been playing much. Keepers first game. New midfield trio. Too many players finding their feet, getting to know one another, find form and work out the system. The first half team should work. But give them a pre-season or at least some time to gel.
Tell me Im crazy or give me a reason for our inconsistencies. Its no fluke we are world class one minute and the worst team in the league the next.

I agree with what you're saying here.

Last season, post lockdown Ole picked more or less the same formation & team for a number of games on the bounce.
And this was our most consistent period under his management.

It doesn't help that we dont have adequate cover for the RW position & that we have many central midfielders who all need games.

I'm not saying Ole should just pick the same team week in week out but our core or spine needs to be consistent. Our formation needs to be consistent. And from this constant base we will hopefully be able to put together some consistent performances.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,754
Definitely the biggest tinkerman in the premier league since Ranieri at Chelsea
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,093
But surely if Ole keeps changing our shape as well as the players on the team sheet, we won't reach a situation where individuals know what is expected when they are asked to play in a certain position?

The chopping and changing of formation and faces is stopping the team from developing its own version of muscle memory, so when someone comes in to replace an injured team mate, for example, they don't know for sure what their role is going to be and positionally, what is expected of them. I understand you have to be able to flex things but there should be a core shape that is favoured at home or away.

I would have thought that this was a key requirement to train players to behave as a unit and build up a clear understanding of who does what. When you do this very well, you get to the situation that observers call telepathy between players. Currently, our team's setting is firmly on brain freeze most of the time.
Ole is a cautious manager. And his position seems to be under review as of late I don't think he would take the risk of letting the players develop muscle memory by them playing together consistently unless they start performing from the get go.
 

Ollie Derbyshire

Full Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2016
Messages
2,279
New formations, combinations and setups every game :nervous:
Is definitely the biggest issue in getting our chemistry flowing this season, I have no issue rotating players due to the hectic schedule, but I’d prefer a settled formation. Let the opposition worry about us.
 

Globule

signature/tagline creator extraordinaire
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
4,760
Serious amount of games coming up and I’m more than happy for lads to be getting a break.
Player rotation is fine. We have to give players a break to minimise the risk of them getting burnt out later in the season.
System rotation is a lot riskier though, and that's what worries me.
 

LJJT

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
1,536
Location
North West
AWB missing has caused the mass tinkering today. Don’t think he’d have picked such a vastly different side to the usual If AWB was fit
 

ManRed

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
2,081
Location
London
Its genius if it works out and disaster if it doesn't. Leicester will have to rework thier formation now to play against 3-5-2.

Ole has to live and die by his tactics just like any other manager.
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
AWB missing has caused the mass tinkering today. Don’t think he’d have picked such a vastly different side to the usual If AWB was fit
a shame that it seems Tuanzebe is not able to play 2 games in a row. He did fine against Everton.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,373
AWB missing has caused the mass tinkering today. Don’t think he’d have picked such a vastly different side to the usual If AWB was fit
Its potentially not a massive change. This may well be our usual shape just with Lindelof at RB.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
We play the same formation (4231) practically every week and every so often reverts to an obviously rehearsed 352. It might not always work (does anything?) but the suggestion that Ole tinkers on a whim is not based on the evidence.

I’d argue that he’s the first manager in a long time who regularly turns out the obvious team that the masses would like to see.