Champagne Football
New Member
Surely it's in the new contract that China must have a national holiday on Yaya's birthday so that nobody forgets?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Surely it's in the new contract that China must have a national holiday on Yaya's birthday so that nobody forgets?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I don't post non-league news. I stick to league 2 and above.Chutney has a rival
Geez, talk about elitism.I don't post non-league news. I stick to league 2 and above.
Not sure about "ideal" - if his contract is up next summer then we'd be selling him at a significantly reduced fee.This. It's clear he wants to leave. This is the ideal time to sell him.
Makes it easier to set the value of the clause when it was negotiated back when.The feck is the point of having a percentage sell on clause if its capped?
Who would want him though. Madrid have their keeper and psg seem to be buying DonnarummaThis. It's clear he wants to leave. This is the ideal time to sell him.
So he is the FA-Cup and you are the Carabao Cup ?I don't post non-league news. I stick to league 2 and above.
Not buying a centre half last year was madness. Paying over the odds for players is expected the way we've done business the last few years. We deserve to get pissed about.£70-80M for Maguire is madness
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
United insist on Ronaldo, Dybala and 200m for Pogba.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Hopefully we don't sell Pogba. He's worth more to United then ~200 mil. and because of the long contract we can keep him for at least 2 more years. Madrid and Juventus can both piss off.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Not a bad offer but we don't need Dybala.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Pjanic, Dybala and Moise Kean + 100mTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Unsure how Tielemans is one of the best midfielders in the world after 13 pretty good games for Leicester following a couple of years of average performances. He's a good prospect, certainly not one of the best in the world.More briefings today by Woodward. Meanwhile Leicester sign one of the best midfielders in the world for 40m. You just know they've got a Maguire replacement lined up for 20-30m as well.
That's actually not a bad offer in my opinionTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Can we get him, whoever he might be?More briefings today by Woodward. Meanwhile Leicester sign one of the best midfielders in the world for 40m. You just know they've got a Maguire replacement lined up for 20-30m as well.
Exactly. If there is a chance of having him sign a new extension, I find it mental so many posters are advocating for him to leave right now.Yep. World class goalkeeper and it would be great to have continued stability in one fecking position on the pitch!
Not our style. We'll wait until he moves to Leicester or Spurs and then becomes a 100m player before we bid. Not sure who the replacement will be (If i were in charge of these things, Bristol City's Adam Webster would be the top target, maybe Nathan Jones of Stoke). But they'll sign him for 30 or less, and he'll be worth 60m in a year or two.Can we get him, whoever he might be?
I think the issue is the wages. He's already rejected 350,000. What kind of player rejects 350,000 a week when they want to stay? We might get him at 400,000(!) a week, but then any new player coming in is going to see two declining players on 400,000 a week and see they can take United for a ride.Exactly. If there is a chance of having him sign a new extension, I find it mental so many posters are advocating for him to leave right now.
Fixed.I think the issue is the wages. He's already rejected 350,000. What kind of player rejects 350,000 a week when they want to stay? We might get him at 400,000(!) a week, but then any new player coming in is going to see two declining players on 400,000 a week and see they can take United for a BIGGER ride.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I always thought that he wanted to leave not because of the money but to be closer to his GF and to win trophies.It would be so good! Incredible how fast out fans turned away from him and declared him "past it", with the assumption that we can easily replace or even improve on him.
edit: that was before I've read that he rejected the 350k per week. That's a bit insane, although we'll still not going to be able to replace him properly if he goes.
Should be the highest paid player at the club, as he is our best player. Dont know why people cant see that. It is not his fault how much Sanchez earns.Exactly. If there is a chance of having him sign a new extension, I find it mental so many posters are advocating for him to leave right now.
A lot of our targets are those kinds of players though? Signing before they break out fully. Hell, look at Daniel James.Not our style. We'll wait until he moves to Leicester or Spurs and then becomes a 100m player before we bid. Not sure who the replacement will be (If i were in charge of these things, Bristol City's Adam Webster would be the top target, maybe Nathan Jones of Stoke). But they'll sign him for 30 or less, and he'll be worth 60m in a year or two.
I think he is rejecting offers up to this point because he believes, justifiably so over the last 5 years or so, that he should be the highest earner at the club as he is consistently one of the best players, if not the best. The wage itself isn't the issue in my opinion. In addition, I think he may well be worried about the current state we are in, and whether or not we are going to be challenging for the major honours in the forseeable future. I just don't see it being as simple as him being very greedy.I think the issue is the wages. He's already rejected 350,000. What kind of player rejects 350,000 a week when they want to stay? We might get him at 400,000(!) a week, but then any new player coming in is going to see two declining players on 400,000 a week and see they can take United for a ride.
Agreed 100%.Should be the highest paid player at the club, as he is our best player. Dont know why people cant see that. It is not his fault how much Sanchez earns.
And I do have some sympathy with that position. The De Gea of the 2017/18 season was the best goalkeeper in the world. If he had negotiated then he would have got more more money. Now, he seems to have declined. He's still a fantastic goalkeeper. But it's no longer impossible to see him replaced by someone just as good or better in the future. If I were him, I'd accept what United offer knowing that every other scout has seen his decline.Should be the highest paid player at the club, as he is our best player. Dont know why people cant see that. It is not his fault how much Sanchez earns.
Why would we keep him if he's going to hold us to ransom and demand huge money. He has turned down 350k per week, that's insane. That would cover wages for two top quality new players.With all the holes in the squad people want to create another one, by selling our best player over the last 5 years. I'd rather we spend some of the money we earn on keeping our best players. If he still wants to go in a year or 2 then fair enough, we'll get a lot more for him when he's not free in 12 months.
Over the last few years sure, by far our best player.Should be the highest paid player at the club, as he is our best player. Dont know why people cant see that. It is not his fault how much Sanchez earns.
He had been around the same time as Tancredi but there was an amnesty for some reason and a bunch of crap accounts like Schira and Tancredi were allowed to be posted again.Suprised this lad hasnt been banned. Spouts nonsense 24×7. Tier: IndyKalia
By that logic Luke Shaw should be the best paid player, or one of the top paid players. And Sanchez the lowest.Should be the highest paid player at the club, as he is our best player. Dont know why people cant see that. It is not his fault how much Sanchez earns.