matherto
ask me about our 50% off sale!
Is there a link to watch it?Rosenstein dropping some massive truth bombs about the GRU. Insinuating Wikileaks was used as a go between.
Is there a link to watch it?Rosenstein dropping some massive truth bombs about the GRU. Insinuating Wikileaks was used as a go between.
Should be in twitter in moments. On live tv here.Is there a link to watch it?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I hope they charge Assange with something related to this and bring Farage and Banks in too.Rosenstein dropping some massive truth bombs about the GRU. Insinuating Wikileaks was used as a go between.
Savage. You just know he will too.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Did the deputy AG really say that? Not what I heard. Unauthorized access to computers, definitely, but I did not hear anything about knowing the motivation.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They did hack Hillary's servers to aid Trump and provided documents to Wikileaks.Did the deputy AG really say that? Not what I heard. Unauthorized access to computers, definitely, but I did not hear anything about knowing the motivation.
Was there anything in the emails that was damaging? I think the damage was use of a personal server, not the content of any email and the lack of recognition by HRC.
Social info a different thing entirely, but so much BS on the web who would know the impact.
They can also freeze their US assets, like for example if they bought a student apartment for one of their kids at an American college like most top Russian officials do, it can be siezed by the Justice department.I really hope that some of them are on Russian soil. Otherwise it’ll be characterised as more faceless Russian citizens who will never be tried in court and never have any evidence publically laid out against them.
Edit - This is seemingly somewhat related to the Trump Tower meeting. Hopefully that indicates some level of culpability for those who conspired with them.
Did the deputy AG really say that? Not what I heard. Unauthorized access to computers, definitely, but I did not hear anything about knowing the motivation.
Was there anything in the emails that was damaging? I think the damage was use of a personal server, not the content of any email and the lack of recognition by HRC.
Social info a different thing entirely, but so much BS on the web who would know the impact.
- October 10, 2016 in Wilkes-Barre, PA: "This just came out," Trump said. "WikiLeaks, I love WikiLeaks."
- October 12, 2016 in Ocala, FL: "This WikiLeaks stuff is unbelievable," Trump said. "It tells you the inner heart, you gotta read it."
- October 13, 2016 in Cincinnati, OH: "It's been amazing what's coming out on WikiLeaks."
- October 31, 2016 in Warren, MI: "Another one came in today," Trump said. "This WikiLeaks is like a treasure trove."
- November 4, 2016 in Wilmington, OH: "Getting off the plane, they were just announcing new WikiLeaks, and I wanted to stay there, but I didn't want to keep you waiting," said Trump. "Boy, I love reading those WikiLeaks."
“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said during a news conference here in an apparent reference to Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Drifter said:
- October 10, 2016 in Wilkes-Barre, PA: "This just came out," Trump said. "WikiLeaks, I love WikiLeaks."
- October 12, 2016 in Ocala, FL: "This WikiLeaks stuff is unbelievable," Trump said. "It tells you the inner heart, you gotta read it."
- October 13, 2016 in Cincinnati, OH: "It's been amazing what's coming out on WikiLeaks."
- October 31, 2016 in Warren, MI: "Another one came in today," Trump said. "This WikiLeaks is like a treasure trove."
- November 4, 2016 in Wilmington, OH: "Getting off the plane, they were just announcing new WikiLeaks, and I wanted to stay there, but I didn't want to keep you waiting," said Trump. "Boy, I love reading those WikiLeaks."
In a later tweet he says it hasn't been filed yet but probably will happen Monday.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The conspiracy is totally in plain sight.https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html
27th July 2016:
Indictment document: https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download
The eternal cycle of joy and the doubt if it’ll mean anything. It’s terribly exhausting.Doubt this will go anywhere.
We’ve got thunder in Bristol today. At least that’s what I thought it was, pretty sure it’s actually the twitchy arses of GOP representatives echoing across the Atlantic.In a later tweet he says it hasn't been filed yet but probably will happen Monday.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This is just the latest drop. It’s far from over.I hope this isn't it, if they are saying no Americans knew then feck it all, Trump gets away again.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
But if they had anything on Trump they would be roasting him over a spit right now.This is just the latest drop. It’s far from over.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Komrade, report back in.
The last security briefing and IG report said a non-russian entity also hacked the server. So it will be interesting when they prove who gave wiki leaks the emails. Still not seen or heard evidence to say it was definitely Russia.They did hack Hillary's servers to aid Trump and provided documents to Wikileaks.
That's who the unnamed organization mentioned today is. Assange and Stone's time in the barrel are therefore likely in the next round of indictments. If Mueller creates a clear nexus between the GRU and Assange, then Assange with Stone, then he is literally one step away from Trump himself.The last security briefing and IG report said a non-russian entity also hacked the server. So it will be interesting when they prove who gave wiki leaks the emails. Still not seen or heard evidence to say it was definitely Russia.
I'd say the document is suggesting otherwise. A candidate for Congress contacting Guccifer, Stone's interactions (if it is him) and the timing of what Trump said in relation to when there was an attack on the Clinton Campaign. There is still a long way to go and I agree completely with what Pexbo says here:I hope this isn't it, if they are saying no Americans knew then feck it all, Trump gets away again.
It’s interesting that they name two entities and decline from naming the third.
I’d say it’s obvious that it’s Wikileaks and that’s a problem for Assange, Stone, Farage and Trump Jr.
The language used once more is “no Americans indicted” and “no evidence it affected the election” ect. I genuinely think they are humouring Trump and his supporters at this stage and allowing them to continue pushing the narrative that nothing has been found and it’s all a ruse as it allows them to continue the investigation with no interference.
When they drop the indictments on American citizens, they will all come at once and it will be unprecedented.