gza the genius
Full Member
Watch the games when it is convenient. I can't be bothered at the moment to change around my plans or work schedule to see all the games and it will only keep getting worse the longer LVG stays.
I definitely agree it would be poetic justice - I would say it would even be the owners reaping what they have sown.There would be some sort of poetic justice (a grim sort) to that: Treat them like customers, and have them abandon you en masse as the “product” becomes inferior.
I'm not sure to what extent this will actually happen, though. Most United fans I know personally won't ever abandon the club in the sense that they'll start endorsing another “product”. They may feel less enthusiastic about United, but that's as far as it goes.
In other words, as far as genuine fans (people who have an emotional tie to the club – let's put it like that) are concerned, I can't believe they will walk out on the club, customer style, simply because they're fed up with LVG and/or the current brand of football.
I think it would be very naïve (at best) to deny this completely. In fact, it would be downright bizarre if it weren't true to some degree.If you said to an impartial observer, before SAF left, what is going to happen when the success dries up, they would have said, a load of "glory hunters" are going to lose interest and walk away. Nobody wants to say they are losing interest because we are shit - its always about something else - but that fairly predictable (and hypothetical) prophecy is coming true.
Agree with a great deal of your post - my question is how to get rid of "Internet supporters" / "Glory Hunters" quicker because I find it harder and harder to digest the drivel coming out of forums like this one..I couldnt give a shit who people on the internet support, or why, but what I see here is a load of people who are frustrated that we arent as good as we used to be, who cant be bothered to watch us anymore. If you said to an impartial observer, before SAF left, what is going to happen when the success dries up, they would have said, a load of "glory hunters" are going to lose interest and walk away. Nobody wants to say they are losing interest because we are shit - its always about something else - but that fairly predictable (and hypothetical) prophecy is coming true.
Youre right but even here things are so complicated. Like you said, its hard to nail down.I think it would be very naïve (at best) to deny this completely. In fact, it would be downright bizarre if it weren't true to some degree.
However, United are currently in a situation which is very hard to nail down – as far as these things (what we're talking about here) are concerned.
We haven't simply become a bit shit, in a fashion which is completely in line with a – let's say – general post-Fergie blues period (a period most realistic fans were prepared for). There are several factors here, but one could mention the two most obvious ones:
The football hasn't simply been shit, as perceived by many fans: It's been safe, bland, devoid of charm, cowardly even. And this is the antithesis to the “United Way”, as many see it (whether they're overly romantic, nostalgic, blinkered or not). Now, some of this is exaggerated, no doubt, but there's reality to it as well – and it would be unreasonable to chalk such perceptions up to rationalization alone (i.e. people moan about the nature of the football simply because it doesn't produce the results they crave).
Our fans don't trust Woodward and the owners. This is a huge factor. Having a manager many dislike is one thing: Managers come and go. Having a chairman and owners one simply doesn't trust (people one suspects don't give a shit about the football side of the operation at all) is a different thing – and a much worse thing.
Oh wow.Leicester is doing an amazing job. If united is stupid enough to hold on to LVG or give the crown to Giggs, I could swap my interest for a season to Leicester or Tottenham and see if it sticks.
Just try and ignore it for as much as you can. That's two fans who've basically said in the last day they're going to swap who they support, to another team doing better.Agree with a great deal of your post - my question is how to get rid of "Internet supporters" / "Glory Hunters" quicker because I find it harder and harder to digest the drivel coming out of forums like this one..
Personally I'm (well) over 50 and a lifetime supporter who joined this forum when Ferguson left just to see how other fans were reacting - i wasn't really ready for the vitriol that has been pretty much constantly spouted since.
The stage was set for Fergusons good work to be undone the minute Moyes was hired to be manager of Manchester United, thats the truth. Deep down no matter how much we tried to delude ourselves i think most of us knew the good times were over. Ferguson himself picked him for reasons that still to this day make no sense to me.I don't think people are moaning about the recent lack of trophies, they're moaning because all the good work done by Fergie is being undone by incompetent management, and people are assisting this incompetence by lowering their own standards.
Thats fair enough mate, interest in football can wane thats only natural. I am not as fanatical now as i was 10-15 year ago. But lets be honest here in the grand scheme of things and compared to 99% of other teams we aren't even that bad.I'd also suggest that, while you don't pick your side based on entertaining football, you're within your rights to reduce the amount of time and money you spend following your team if the football is terrible. If the team keeps churning out godawful games like the Norwich one, I'll find it hard to justify building my weekend around watching the games.
Support the team, being a football supporter. A real one is about supporting a team through times are good and bad. Things are not always going to be to your ideal liking. The team won't always play good football and/or win things. You won't always like the man in charge etc etc.If the club is content with such a clown as a manager, if they dont mind the standard is being consistently lowered, if they dont mind the United DNA and SAF legacy gets well and truely burried. Than I ask you wtf is there left to support for me ?
What are you on about? See post below....I find it hard to respond to vague all encompassing posts that have no balance or thought behind them. It's a strange way to post on a discussion site and probably symptomatic of the type of fan I originally mentioned.If only we all had such high horses to sit on. You must feel like the bestest fan ever
Of course people "can" do whatever they want. It doesn't make it right. I don't think the club is in a. Good position and I don't necessarily think van Gaal should be our manager. Our football is atrocious. But some of the stuff on this site has descended into comedy, a lot of the posts actually conjure up an image of some lonely people hammering their keyboards and crying, there seems to be an extremist faction of anti lvg side. Some are rational and balanced, some are appallingSo who made you the judge exactly?
People can do whatever the hell they want. It's not just the fact we aren't winning trophies and anyone with a pair of eyes can see the bigger picture.
It's not even just about what you should do, for me. I don't think you'll actually get as much out of the good times if you don't stick around for the bad. How much joy can you actually take from a turnaround if you didn't actually stick around and endure the rough patch? I think that fair-weather attitude excludes you from even experiencing the real highs.But in my opinion if you enjoy the good times (and United fans have had more than most) then you should endure the bad. It's as simple as that for me.
Hehe, yes – I've said it before: If this is actually the case, there's something positively grotesque about it. Some would say that Fergie's just lobbying for Giggs because he thinks the latter can be controlled like a puppet – but I don't buy that personally. I don't think Fergie craves control of the club to that extent anymore. I do believe he's still very conscious about protecting his reputation and his legacy – but I don't believe he's scheming to regain lost control in that cartoonish fashion. But – yes: That schism there is bizarre no matter how you look at it, even at a hypothetical level: In general United fans do favour what is supposedly Woody's choice over what you'd think would be the more popular one (but Giggs clearly isn't a popular choice – nor is the idea itself, that of an ex-player taking over to carry on the “way”, popular – and that goes for all sorts of United fans, from local match goers to people who've never been to Old Trafford).How paradoxical is it to find youself in a situation, as we have this season, where - if you want to frame the situation of the club in the crudest possible terms, as two factions - you have the Glazers and their stooge on one side, and SAF and SBC (allegedly) on the other, and the fans are calling for the Glazer camp, personified by Woodward, to overrule "the football people" and bring in Mourinho?
I think it means both. Sort of. The negativity of Mourinho's football has been blown somewhat out of proportion, as people tend to ignore how his teams play against weaker opposition, focusing solely on his generally cagey approach in big games. Plus, many will – simply – see his brand of football as an upgrade on LVG's, even if it isn't champagne football as such. LVG hasn't been cagey in a Mourinho sense: He's been safe and dull and frequently simply ineffective, not noticeably cynical and clever (which is what Mourinho arguably is). And yes – Mourinho wins. That's obviously the main factor: I don't think many would claim that they love his brand of football so much that we should hire him on account of that alone.And then, what does it say about this craving for football to be played "The United Way" when apparently 80% of our fans want Mourinho brought in? Does that mean this view that he is ultra defensive is an oversimplification to the point of being completely untrue? Or does it mean that, actually, when push comes to shove, people want to see us winning? Or does it mean both?
Very much so.Or does it mean we have to be careful about treating United fans as a homogeneous entity, with a single, coherent view...
Isn't this thread about what you would do if LVG stays for another season ? (look at the title please) ?Could you elaborate on the difference between the two things I have highlighted?
You wouldnt stop supporting United because they are not playing well. But you would if it doesnt have sufficient ambition?
So this all hinges on doubts you have about whether the club actually wants to be at the top? If so, what evidence do you have that we lack that ambition? We have spent plenty of money in recent years. This cant all be because the club havent sacked Van Gaal fast enough? If this is what it hinges on, we could be weeks away from a resolution on that score. Doesnt this all feel a bit premature? I find it odd that people can be questioning our standards and ambitions at this stage. We are going through a bad spell at the moment but these things happen, it doesnt mean the club has given up.
I might have completely misinterpreted what you are saying but if I understood you it feels like you are being unbelievably impatient. A couple of bad years, despite spending a load of money, and 6 months of delay and not sacking an underperforming manager, and fans conclude that the team no longer has ambition. I mean, Im not immune to questions about the club's ambition myself - it has certainly occurred to me that our owners might find The Arsenal Model quite attractive, and if that proves to be the case I will be critical of that. But at this stage isnt the official explanation also the simpler and more obvious one? That we are going through a bit of a transitional phase (this is literally true if you look at our squad turnover which has been unprecedentedly high) and are rebuilding and we have to trust that things will improve?
I guess my question is, what is the evidence for this lack of ambition? What tells you the club is not setting high enough standards? There must be more than keeping Van Gaal in place. I mean, if it was next season and he was still there Id say you had the beginnings of a point - though even then Id say you were being impatient. But here, in May, with speculation rife that Mourinho is coming in, Van Gaal will leave, where is this concern coming from?
Exactly mate. My two favourite title wins are 1993 followed by 2007.It's not even just about what you should do, for me. I don't think you'll actually get as much out of the good times if you don't stick around for the bad. How much joy can you actually take from a turnaround if you didn't actually stick around and endure the rough patch? I think that fair-weather attitude excludes you from even experiencing the real highs.
Missing out on Champions league for the 17/18 season will result in a loss of hundreds of millions with the adidas deal. Not worth the risk with Van Gaal. Five mil now or two hundred and five mill next summer.As depressing as it is it if he stayed it won't be the end of the world. He is here for 12 more months at the very maximum. A lot can change in football in a year. By then things could have fallen into place and other exciting managerial candidates might have emerged and we will no longer be looking at Jose or nothing.
And surely the football can't get any worse. I mean results definitely but in terms of attacking style, we can only get better.
Anyway not worse case scenario but close.
Chelsea where bloody champions. There were many factors in their implosion, Mourinho was one but not the whole reason. We can say the same about Klopp in his last few years at Dortmund. That hasn't affected him so why do we suddenly think Mourinho is finished, foolish thinking.I would invite people to check out the 2011-2012 season to find the roots of all the trouble... there were effectively only two teams in the title race us and city - compare and contrast with this season where the 19 point gap between us and 3rd place Arsenal would cover the top seven. Ferguson instead of leaving as rumoured decided to stay for another season to go out on a high, yet the only player he invested in was RvP.
In 2011/12 we were knocked out of FA cup in 4th round against... Liverpool, knocked out of League cup by Palace in quarters, Knocked out of Champions league by Basel and Benfica at the group stage and finally out of the Europa league by Athletico Bilbao who beat us 3-2 at Old Trafford.
The signs were there for a good clear out/rebuild despite the decent league performance yet it never happened and was left first to a bumbling Moyes and then to LvG to pick up the shit can.
Imo sacking LvG would simply put us back to square one where a new manager comes in and thrashes about for a season or two before (possibly) getting us back on the "right track". For this reason I won't be jumping for joy when we see LvGs smiling face next season but on the other hand i feel it's the better of several evils...
Those who believe Mou will come in and turn things around in a few games are living in a fantasy world because the goalposts have been moved in the prem and just look at how that worked for Chelsea this year who have arguably a better squad than ours.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011–12_Manchester_United_F.C._season
He may not be finished but do you seriously think he'd change things around here in a matter of months ?Chelsea where bloody champions. There were many factors in their implosion, Mourinho was one but not the whole reason. We can say the same about Klopp in his last few years at Dortmund. That hasn't affected him so why do we suddenly think Mourinho is finished, foolish thinking.
Another thing that excludes you from experiencing real highs is if your club falls from grace and wins nothing for 30 years: see Liverpool. Wearing a hair shirt for years in order to better appreciate the feel of silk on your skin when the good day dawns has its downside. The good day may never come. There's no point in becoming a martyr to football. It's meant to be a source of pleasure.It's not even just about what you should do, for me. I don't think you'll actually get as much out of the good times if you don't stick around for the bad. How much joy can you actually take from a turnaround if you didn't actually stick around and endure the rough patch? I think that fair-weather attitude excludes you from even experiencing the real highs.
Football style will still be the same with whomever we bring in, it's become increasingly obvious that this safety first, risk adverse style is what LvG wants, aka posession for safetys sake, an emphasis on ultra patience and try to capitalise on any opposition mistake.Forget about this car crash of a season and start afresh with few new signings.
Never said months. He will instill a different mentality in the group and I would gladly place my money on Mourinho winning us the league or Champions league within three season then I would Van Gaal, Giggs or Pochettino. The club need this guy right now. He will step in and give Woodward the lesson he needs. He will be the alpha of the club and I would be shocked if we didn't get at least five seasons from him which in my opinion is two more then we would get from Giggs or City will get from Pep.He may not be finished but do you seriously think he'd change things around here in a matter of months ?
If he does stay it will probably mean the Giggs succession plan will be implementedAs depressing as it is it if he stayed it won't be the end of the world. He is here for 12 more months at the very maximum. A lot can change in football in a year. By then things could have fallen into place and other exciting managerial candidates might have emerged and we will no longer be looking at Jose or nothing.
And surely the football can't get any worse. I mean results definitely but in terms of attacking style, we can only get better.
Anyway not worse case scenario but close.
Fergie built a beautiful palace, but unfortunately he let it go old by not maintening it propely. It grew so bad, that only a few of the halls could be retained and the rest had to be rebuild.I will watch Old united dvds from the nineties to remind me what a real united team were. Passion, attacking, blitzing teams down the wings, fearless youth filled with desire and them last minute goals to remind me to never give up on them. The true values that Sir Matt created the foundation's for and Fergie built on. This fraud manager isn't united and never will be. He refused to embrace the real values of what we are,except stumbling on youth through luck and bad squad management.
You say not sacking him implies lack of ambition. The assumptions you make areIsn't this thread about what you would do if LVG stays for another season ? (look at the title please) ?
My feelings about the club and that it would be very difficult to keep on supporting it are indeed hyphotetical as in what would my reaction be if the club doesn't sack LVG and let him see out his contract as manager. Currently I'am still 100% supporting this club even tough LVG is still the manager and we play bad football and all that but if the club has serious ambition than it simply has to sack LVG, there is no two ways about that imo. If they sack him and hire a new manager that isn't Giggs, I will remain fully on board and look ahead to the new season with reinvigorated enthousiasm and hope for better times but that LVG gets the sack at the end of the season is a vital key element in that.
If the club lets him stay on after this kind of season, than I seriously question the ambition of the club. It would seem like they are ok with playing bad football, getting 4th to fill their pockets with CL money and repeat. That is not the kind of club I want to support. If people think you are a bad supporter because of that, then that is fine but for me if LVG stays on for another season the club shows they arent serious anymore and really lowered the standards so anyone could get under them, that for me is a dealbreaker as it cuts right into the core reason on why I started to support this club.
You can play bad, I'am ok with that. But club shouldn't be happy with it and should do anything possible to change the brand of football asap. Just buying new players for the sake of it and throwing around some money in the market doesn't cover that for me. They must have higher expectations of the manager than what LVG has brought to the table. Last season we also didnt play well, but it was his first season, so he needed some time and I've always said, my expecations are that he moves forward, improves the team, begins to start solving our scoring problem. He has failed at that completley this season, so now he needs to go. If the club doesn't fire him than that is a real problem in terms of ambition as far as I'am concerned. If the next manager they hire spends another fortune in the market and gets it all wrong, than that is ok for me, but the expecation should remain the same, if the manager can't realise that or atleast give the feeling that he has the club on a path forward to realising them than that manager needs to fired. I will not sind around season after season watching boring football and the club being ok with that and not taking action, then I rather go watch some games from Leicester to be honest.
Do you think all Stoke fans just lack ambition? That if they were more ambitious they'd just support Manchesrer United?" You want Mourinho, you spoilt supporter, he's shit. What's that you say, numerous trophies, no, he had a bad four months so he is finished, done. I'm going to stick with Van Gaal, even though everything is crap he is the more stable option, what, he's retiring in twelve months, well then we should give it to Giggs, he's the more stable option, only four games you say, but he knows the club. You want the club to have every chance to win, you're a spoilt glory hunter, not a proper fan".
Sick of this bullshit, these people must of been disgusted at our success since the early nineties. How did they show their faces outside, their team winning all those trophies playing organized and breathtaking football. If you're happy to plod along watching a man about to pack it in make us a laughing stock while playing football the Faroe Islands would be embarrassed with then I feel sorry for you. We support Manchester United and have been the best team in the world. I refuse to stand aside and keep quiet while people that can't be bothered to use facts to form an opinion ridicule us for glory hunting, support the team even though it's usually the worst two hours of the week. News flash, we do support the team, we do support the club, we don't support the shenanigans of Mr. Van Gaal and we certainly don't support the methods that has lead to the abysmal failure we have witnessed over three seasons.
Instead of telling people to go support some other team for the crime of caring and wanting their team to play attractive football while competing then take you're own advice and go support a team more in tune with you're ambition as a supporter. Stoke City sounds like a good option, if you are such an good fan let me see you do it at the Brittania on a cold wet Tuesday night. Good day to you sir.
Fair point, I guess. If you feel you can just turn the tap off and it looks like your team are going nowhere you might as well pack it in, follow a more successful club for a while and Im sure eventually you'll start to genuinely care about them a bit.Another thing that excludes you from experiencing real highs is if your club falls from grace and wins nothing for 30 years: see Liverpool. Wearing a hair shirt for years in order to better appreciate the feel of silk on your skin when the good day dawns has its downside. The good day may never come. There's no point in becoming a martyr to football. It's meant to be a source of pleasure.
I figure lifelong supporters haven't got a choice. But if you're not, there may come a time when it's sensible to move on. Carrying a bag of stones on your back when you could drop it..