Phurry
Furry Fecker
Are you for real? FML.Cantona was as bad on the field across his career, probably worse.
Are you for real? FML.Cantona was as bad on the field across his career, probably worse.
BOLLOCKS , did you actually watch any of his games,because it does not sound like you did.Having an affair with your brothers wife is worse than all those things. It really doesn't come any lower than that.
Cantona was as bad on the field across his career, probably worse.
Rodgers has probably seen it once, you've probably seen it 100 times from different anglesI misunderstood Rodgers's comments earlier. A few minutes ago I heard his post-match interview arguing that the handball was not deliberate and thus the referee made the right call in letting the goal stand.
And then a Fox Soccer "analyst", Lloyd Barker, agreed with Rodgers that it was ball-to-hand and thus it was not a handball.
Incredible.
However, I've also read reports online that Rodgers's conceded that the goal should not have been allowed to stand.
See the following:
"I've just seen it again and there's no doubt it was handball but the referee and the officials ruled it wasn't deliberate."
But then, curiously, this:
"It's not been deliberate as it's pushed up and hit his hand. It's up to the officials to decide that."
"Obviously what the referee and officials were looking at was that it wasn't deliberate, which it clearly wasn't," he added. (Eh?)
Yes, it was, Brendan.
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/s...ndball-?campaign=rss&source=soccernet&cc=5901
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/brendan-rodgers-on-luis-suarez-handball-1522018
http://fourfourtwo.com/news/england/117098/default.aspx
You cannot watch the video and conclude that the Suarez was "not deliberate". The motion of the hand to control the ball is plain to the naked eye and beyond any conceivable disagreement.
Then Rodgers should wait until he has seen the replays before opening his mouth.Rodgers has probably seen it once, you've probably seen it 100 times from different angles
according to lunchforthesky, yes. CantonaEvery single game this guy does something pathetic, malicious or just simply cheats. Has there ever been a bigger khunt in the PL?
Nice work Alan,Whatever moral high ground you take over Luis Suárez’s goal, no footballer would ever ask for a goal to be disallowed.
It has never happened in the history of the game. It will never happen in my lifetime.
What exactly was Suárez supposed to do? Run to the referee and tell him it hit his hand? His team-mates would go berserk, and his manager would not be too impressed either.
Complete bullshit. Keane saw red mist at times which obviously got him in trouble, but he was never a cheating, diving bellend who used racism to wind a player up.Keane was Uniteds Suarez, Without the casual racist language. The career ending business was scummy. But as in most cases you have to stick with your own.
I love that the comparison and subsequent discussion went completely over your head but you've piped up with a bag of wank anyway. Well played.I love the argument that since Keane was obviously a complete thug that makes him better than Suarez who's a relatively subtle cheat.
Having an affair with your brothers wife is worse than all those things. It really doesn't come any lower than that.
Cantona was as bad on the field across his career, probably worse.
There's so much bollocks in this thread. Suarez isn't the nicest chap in the world but the arrogance of some to come in and say 'clearly deliberate - how could anyone disagree?' when he has about half a second to react is just astonishing. What does it matter what he's done in the past? In that particular incident, it is more than arguable that it just hits his hand.I love that the comparison and subsequent discussion went completely over your head but you've piped up with a bag of wank anyway. Well played.
The Scouse apologists are out in full force, which is probably even more infuriating than the cheating itself. It has happened on numerous occasions, Alan, you fecking twat.From Alan Hansen in the Telegraph
Nice work Alan,
What he did in the past is very relevant. Oh wait, that only implies to Evra right?There's so much bollocks in this thread. Suarez isn't the nicest chap in the world but the arrogance of some to come in and say 'clearly deliberate - how could anyone disagree?' when he has about half a second to react is just astonishing. What does it matter what he's done in the past? In that particular incident, it is more than arguable that it just hits his hand.
Better the devil you know than the devil you don't.I love the argument that since Keane was obviously a complete thug that makes him better than Suarez who's a relatively subtle cheat.
Even funnier because Evra didn't actually do the things he was supposed to have doneWhat he did in the past is very relevant. Oh wait, that only implies to Evra right?
That's bullshit, Rio Ferdinand was found guilty of racially abusing Ashley Cole and he's still here. As for "I wouldn't want a racist representing my club", everyone involved in the Suarez case concluded that he wasn't a racist, he was abusing Evra to try and gain a competitive advantage.Simply, if one of our players had been found guilty of a 'racial incident' he would have been sent packing.
The fundamental difference between the clubs.
No he wasnt.That's bullshit, Rio Ferdinand was found guilty of racially abusing Ashley Cole and he's still here.
Er...it's true dick head. He was found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute with a racial remark.No he wasnt.
But hey, why go to the trouble of a cognitive argument when you can just make shit up.
None of which claims he was found guilty of racially abusing Ashley Cole, which was your claim.Er...it's true dick head. He was found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute with a racial remark.
"The commission found that the breach included a reference to ethnic origin, colour or race", exactly as with Suarez.
it's further stated that it's considered abuse
"The Football Association clearly states that this is not an allegation that Mr Ferdinand is a racist, concedes that he is not a racist but contends that his conduct in endorsing @carltonEbanks tweet in a public forum is a term of abuse and brought the game into disrepute."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18847477
Are you actually reading what you're quoting here? It was found that his endorsement of @carltonEbanks' tweet was a term of abuse, and that it included a reference to ethnic origin, colour or race. If that's not racial abuse I don't know what is. You sound extremely similar to Suarez's apologists in continuing to argue this point.None of which claims he was found guilty of racially abusing Ashley Cole, which was your claim.
He was found to have endorsed a tweet , he said nothing himself.
You don't think the type of man he is plays a role in whether or not this was seen as deliberate?There's so much bollocks in this thread. Suarez isn't the nicest chap in the world but the arrogance of some to come in and say 'clearly deliberate - how could anyone disagree?' when he has about half a second to react is just astonishing. What does it matter what he's done in the past? In that particular incident, it is more than arguable that it just hits his hand.
Very well put, Mr LambsYou don't think the type of man he is plays a role in whether or not this was seen as deliberate?
Regardless of your answer, or who you support, I think it's quite clear that he did deliberately handball. But, a ridiculous amount is being made out of this, though I guess he does only have himself to blame for that.
Oh and I've said it in the past, and good old Shades is showing it now, but sooner or later EVERY scouser on here slips the pretence and goes into Rawk mode.
Funnily enough, I said the same thing about the linesman in the derby match when he disallowed Suarez's late winner.Most astonishing thing about the whole incident is how did the linesman not see it! He wants sacking.
I'd be quiet if I were you, regarding how many decisions seem to go in Liverpool's favour when they play EvertonFunnily enough, I said the same thing about the linesman in the derby match when he disallowed Suarez's late winner.
Some you win, some you lose eh ?
Having an affair with your brothers wife is worse than all those things. It really doesn't come any lower than that.
Cantona was as bad on the field across his career, probably worse.
I was thinking about this earlier and not one of our players could ever be compared to that hideous twerp . Not even if you added them all together - as Suarez's many sins do seem to encompass the entire spectrum
What the actual feck? Closet dipper?
Suarez racially abused a black player in order to wind them up.
Cantona kicked someone in the face who had racially abused him as he walked off the pitch.
The only way he could compare to Suarez is if he rolled around pretending to be injured after kicking the twat in the face.
No, I think what people were advocating was that it was a great opportunity for him to do that and gain some respect/appreciation for it.I can't believe people are seriously advocating he tell the ref afterwards it hit his hand. I'd like to see a defender admit he fouled a player in the box, or his goal line clearance actually crossed the line. Weirdo's
I still remember that infamous Clattenburg performance in the Merseyside derby several years back.I'd be quiet if I were you, regarding how many decisions seem to go in Liverpool's favour when they play Everton
Ok I have replied 3 times already to clarify what I said yet its not getting through. Here are my earlier posts.Complete bullshit. Keane saw red mist at times which obviously got him in trouble, but he was never a cheating, diving bellend who used racism to wind a player up.
One thing with Keane was what you saw is what you got, there were no back doors with him. Whatever you thought about his tackle on Haaland, one thing you can say is he knew what he was doing and he immediately took his punishment.
Suarez is a sneaky, conniving coward who acts like he does nothing wrong. I've seen footage of him deliberately trying to injure a player on the ground, then rolling around himself as if he's the one that's been hurt. Shameful.
He stamped on the chest of a Swindon defender too.
What the actual feck? Closet dipper?
Suarez racially abused a black player in order to wind them up.
Cantona kicked someone in the face who had racially abused him as he walked off the pitch.
The only way he could compare to Suarez is if he rolled around pretending to be injured after kicking the twat in the face.