Pogue Mahone
The caf's Camus.
But they look really guilty. Shifty eyes an' all. That's good enough for me, thanks very much.A few thousand other sad, lazy, gossip hungry, ignoramuses on the internet at last count.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
But they look really guilty. Shifty eyes an' all. That's good enough for me, thanks very much.A few thousand other sad, lazy, gossip hungry, ignoramuses on the internet at last count.
.... and they're middle class. Sure them bastards are always killing people and getting away with it.But they look really guilty. Shifty eyes an' all. That's good enough for me, thanks very much.
So who else thinks that they were reckless and accident happened and they tried to cover it up. They look really guilty everytime I see them on tv.
Don't be so precious. Ridiculing silly opinions that is part and parcel of the caf, on all topics. In this context deciding the McCanns are master-minding a cover-up because "they look really guilty" on TV is definitely worthy of a bit of piss-taking.For goodness sake, stop ridiculing opinions which don't tally with your own. This happens all over the Caf these days, on a number of subjects. On this particular subject, I'm not claiming to know what actually happened in Portugal but feel free, as is your wont, to throw in alien abductions, JFK etc etc.
The ridiculous is what ridicule was invented for.For goodness sake, stop ridiculing opinions which don't tally with your own. This happens all over the Caf these days, on a number of subjects. On this particular subject, I'm not claiming to know what actually happened in Portugal but feel free, as is your wont, to throw in alien abductions, JFK etc etc.
Jaysus, Steve, don't apologise!Fair points, Pogue.
Sorry.
It's because they didn't cry enough on television.It's odd that this couple can provoke such dislike compared for example to the parents of those lovely girls who were murdered in Soham
You're up there with the best of 'em, just not in this particular case.It's because they didn't cry enough on television.
That and the great British public being such judgemental arseholes.
Well, exactly. Some people are just better at hiding their emotions than others. They had two other kids to worry about and must have been desperate not to reveal the extent of their anguish to them, either in public or private.I'm not sure about the crying part. Just because someone isn't in constant tears doesn't mean you're not dying inside
I feel like I kicked a puppy, dude, can you just give me a little space?
Wonder how many people could handle so much press attention without putting their feet in the mouth a few times? I woud probably be a train wreck in terms of how I handled the press.They have said some unfortunate things I think. I'm not sure they've got the greatest knack for knowing what to say, I'm sure that's turned a few people off them. I'm sure one of them complained about having to hire babysitters or something recently, which isn't what you'd say if you were one of them. Nothing particularly shady or guilt laden about them at all but they could maybe have done with a more attentive PR editor.
Probably not many people at all really, especially knowing there's an undercurrent of suspicion toward you. Like I said, could have done with some "coaching" or something really.Wonder how many people could handle so much press attention without putting their feet in the mouth a few times? I woud probably be a train wreck in terms of how I handled the press.
The thing is taking the aformentioned Ramsey case, the parents there came under a lot of criticism for hiring a PR firm to help them with handling the press.Probably not many people at all really, especially knowing there's an undercurrent of suspicion toward you. Like I said, could have done with some "coaching" or something really.
Funnily enough my mums a criminal phycologist and has a minor in forensics. So I've got a little bit of an idea what to look for. Not saying they are, I just have a gut feeling there is foul play involved.How exactly do they look guilty? What are you basing that judgement on? What experience do you have judging peoples guilt or innocence bask on how they look when they are on TV?
Maybe it's the natural guilt that any parents will feel when something bad happens to their child that could have been prevented (in hindsight at the very least) which you are seeing.Funnily enough my mums a criminal phycologist and has a minor in forensics. So I've got a little bit of an idea what to look for. Not saying they are, I just have a gut feeling there is foul play involved.
Probably. Im not a parent so I suppose I can't relate to it. I wasn't trying to make a fleeting comment and piss people off, just what my gut told me.Maybe it's the natural guilt that any parents will feel when something bad happens to their child that could have been prevented (in hindsight at the very least) which you are seeing.
Well obvious foul play in involved, she's gone right. Considering the amount of schooling/training one has to go through to be a criminal psychologist, including licensing and certification (at least in the US) best to just leave it be.Funnily enough my mums a criminal phycologist and has a minor in forensics. So I've got a little bit of an idea what to look for. Not saying they are, I just have a gut feeling there is foul play involved.
Have to ask, how do they look guilty?So who else thinks that they were reckless and accident happened and they tried to cover it up. They look really guilty everytime I see them on tv.
A) It wasn't Sky who brought her to the attention of the police, was it? Genuine question, I don't know who did.Sky News was a disgrace for the way they put Brenda Leyland on the spot - it was irresponsible reporting that verged on vigilantism. As others have said, she was a poor target because her Twitter comments sat on the lame end of the spectrum, by many accounts.
What's worse is that in the aftermath of her apparent suicide, Sky have chosen to push the story right to the periphery of their news agenda, focusing on the "no foul play" angle when they do cover it so as to absolve themselves of any blame. What a shitty, self serving way to run a news channel.
If she did have mental issues, is it any wonder she topped herself in the face of mainstream humiliation and the threat of police action? A new low for the media.