Ander Herrera image 21

Ander Herrera Spain flag

2014-15 Performances


View full 2014-15 profile

6.4 Season Average Rating
Appearances
31
Goals
8
Assists
5
Yellow cards
6
Status
Not open for further replies.

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
I thought he was better than Mata and Fellaini but that's not saying much, disappointing from him tonight.
 

DFreshKing

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
3,366
Location
Greater Manchester
I like him, particularly his energy, and I wish he'd get more pitch time, but today's performance will hopefully remind people that he's not the sole solution to all our problems. He can misplace passes and lose possession sometimes just like everyone else.
No - only Fellaini does these things did you not get the memo?
 

fallengt

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
5,622
A bit harsh. He had an ok-ish performance and didn't do anything particularly bad like Fellaini.
I like his attitude, always work his arse off. It could've been worse if someone else had played in his position.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
58,219
Location
Krakow
I thought he wasn't that bad. Not brilliant or even good by any means but it wasn't a shocking performance. When the while XI barely functions as a team I can make it a forgettable performance from him.
 

Feed Me

I'm hungry
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
29,319
Location
Midlands, UK
Herrera seems to be judged more harshly by LvG than, say, Fellaini.

Fellaini was absolutely abject yesterday - if LvG is to apply his much-vaunted philosophy at the weekend, he should drop the Bogbrush.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,722
Location
Manc
I can see why Herrera isn't an automatic starter.

I just hope other posters don't overreact the next time he is on the bench.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
102,078
Location
Barrow In Furness
And Fellaini is?
Fellaini is supposedly in there for his physicality, but got bullied by Wanyama and was getting beaten in the air, supposedly another strength of his. Ander dares to give the ball away and he is rubbish. Fellaini last night was the cause of us conceding one. LvG has to get that defence sorted or we will be seeing more of this type of football. It is no good if Blind/Carrick are forever being drafted into the backline. The midfield needs them.
 

Fahad Jawaid

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
1,196
I don't understand why LVG keeps playing him as an AM, Mata most of the time was almost playing as a CM alongside Fellani yesterday while Herrera was in the AM role. If we had played Herrera in the middle, i felt he would have been more involved in the play, even against Hull and Stoke i felt he was being played in an AM role, when we signed him i was delighted by the fact that we have signed a CM, he has all the attributes to play that position, and he has played for Bilbao in that CM role, yesterday we were crying for someone who can collect the ball from the CB's and play forward, Fellani was awful yesterday in that aspect and we just couldn't keep the ball.
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,112
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
He was poor but the whole team was sh!te apart for RVP, Young and De Gea.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,401
Location
La-La-Land
Fellaini is supposedly in there for his physicality, but got bullied by Wanyama and was getting beaten in the air, supposedly another strength of his. Ander dares to give the ball away and he is rubbish. Fellaini last night was the cause of us conceding one. LvG has to get that defence sorted or we will be seeing more of this type of football. It is no good if Blind/Carrick are forever being drafted into the backline. The midfield needs them.
That's what disappointed me most yesterday about Fellaini (well, next to his piss poor passing). Herrera was ok and did better than any of our other midfielders
 

Oggmonster

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
4,932
Location
Manchester
He was shit last night I thought, though in fairness the whole team was really. Reading through bits of this thread is odd though, it's similar to the Kagawa one I find. One of them players who's stock has risen by not playing, probably due to the rest of squad being pretty poor mainly.
 

charleysurf

Obnoxious, abusive bellend who is best ignored
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
16,298
He was shit last night I thought, though in fairness the whole team was really. Reading through bits of this thread is odd though, it's similar to the Kagawa one I find. One of them players who's stock has risen by not playing, probably due to the rest of squad being pretty poor mainly.
yeah, it's very similar to the Kagawa situation. Becomes world class when he does not play. When he does play, a poor performance by him is put down to the the rest of the team not playing well, or an injury he had months ago. And much distress and confusion is expressed when the manager chooses not to pick this world class player.

Hopefully Herrera will ultimately prove to be a much better player for United than Kagawa though. He's still early in his time in England, and I think he more about him than Kagawa.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
102,078
Location
Barrow In Furness
yeah, it's very similar to the Kagawa situation. Becomes world class when he does not play. When he does play, a poor performance by him is put down to the the rest of the team not playing well, or an injury he had months ago. And much distress and confusion is expressed when the manager chooses not to pick this world class player.

Hopefully Herrera will ultimately prove to be a much better player for United than Kagawa though. He's still early in his time in England, and I think he more about him than Kagawa.
We were terrible before Herrera came on, so the problems were there already. He did help improve things, but I think last night was more down to that damn formation and yet another injury. All these constant changes. We were playing reasonably well in the 4 previous games, so why change it. I think LvG tries to prove he is some tactical genius sometimes when it isn't necessary.
 

Bojan11

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
33,116
We were terrible before Herrera came on, so the problems were there already. He did help improve things, but I think last night was more down to that damn formation and yet another injury. All these constant changes. We were playing reasonably well in the 4 previous games, so why change it. I think LvG tries to prove he is some tactical genius sometimes when it isn't necessary.
We were just as bad against Arsenal. And I don't think we were great against Palace or Stoke.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
58,219
Location
Krakow
We were just as bad against Arsenal. And I don't think we were great against Palace or Stoke.
Score was misleading against Palace, we could have won that game 2-0 or 3-0 which would have made it look more convincing but still the performance was good. Against Stoke we went missing for about 2 minutes of the game at the end of each half, other than that we were comfortable.
 

Anduin

Full Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
5,580
Location
Magical Manchester United.
We were just as bad against Arsenal. And I don't think we were great against Palace or Stoke.
We weren't great against Palace and Stoke, but TBH they are extremely well organised and tough to beat. Stoke have won 1-0 at the Etihad, beat Arsenal 3-2 (should've been 4-0 up before Arsenal got two goals back), only marginally lost at Anfield and just about lost to us. They are hugely improved this season IMO, not an easy three points. Besides that we made enough chances to put 4 or 5 past them, just one of those days where we couldn't put the ball into the net.

Crystal Palace on the other hand are quite similar, beating Liverpool 3-1, only lost 1-2 against Chelsea and held us until the 75th minute mark to a nil nil draw. Again we played OK, but I really think it's getting harder beating those so-called small teams these days. There is so much money involved in British football now that even teams like Stoke, Hull, Palace can stockpile decent to good players.

Furthermore, we're building from ground zero and it takes time. Our players are still getting their confidence back from last season's disaster. 3-5-2 needs to stop though, we keep shooting ourselves in the foot by using it.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
102,078
Location
Barrow In Furness
We weren't great against Palace and Stoke, but TBH they are extremely well organised and tough to beat. Stoke have won 1-0 at the Etihad, beat Arsenal 3-2 (should've been 4-0 up before Arsenal got two goals back), only marginally lost at Anfield and just about lost to us. They are hugely improved this season IMO, not an easy three points. Besides that we made enough chances to put 4 or 5 past them, just one of those days where we couldn't put the ball into the net.

Crystal Palace on the other hand are quite similar, beating Liverpool 3-1, only lost 1-2 against Chelsea and held us until the 75th minute mark to a nil nil draw. Again we played OK, but I really think it's getting harder beating those so-called small teams these days. There is so much money involved in British football now that even teams like Stoke, Hull, Palace can stockpill decent to good players.

Furthermore, we're building from ground zero and it takes time. Our players are still getting their confidence back from last season's disaster. 3-5-2 needs to stop though, we keep shooting ourselves in the foot by using it.
Exactly, we have some of the pieces needed but not all. People are saying about players going, but we need more players not getting rid of some and then replacing them and the extra ones. Unfortunately having to reduce the squad size due to lack of games might not have helped, but tbh the players who have gone out on loan are not in the defence where we have been found short. I can see him having to get defenders in January. Don't think he has a choice.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,683
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
We weren't great against Palace and Stoke, but TBH they are extremely well organised and tough to beat. Stoke have won 1-0 at the Etihad, beat Arsenal 3-2 (should've been 4-0 up before Arsenal got two goals back), only marginally lost at Anfield and just about lost to us. They are hugely improved this season IMO, not an easy three points. Besides that we made enough chances to put 4 or 5 past them, just one of those days where we couldn't put the ball into the net.

Crystal Palace on the other hand are quite similar, beating Liverpool 3-1, only lost 1-2 against Chelsea and held us until the 75th minute mark to a nil nil draw. Again we played OK, but I really think it's getting harder beating those so-called small teams these days. There is so much money involved in British football now that even teams like Stoke, Hull, Palace can stockpile decent to good players.

Furthermore, we're building from ground zero and it takes time. Our players are still getting their confidence back from last season's disaster. 3-5-2 needs to stop though, we keep shooting ourselves in the foot by using it.
Good post.

Our result against West Ham is looking better and better with each passing week too.

Agree about 3-5-2 too. We're making tough fixtures even tougher.
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,176
@Amar__
I am really not sure why you think I hate Herrera, but if you care to actually read my posts in this thread you will likely see that that is not the case at all.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,313
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
@Amar__
I am really not sure why you think I hate Herrera, but if you care to actually read my posts in this thread you will likely see that that is not the case at all.
I don't think you hate Herrera, I am just teasing you, don't worry mate. But you are big fan of Fellaini, that's for sure.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
37,535
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Once Herrera came on, we got more control of the game and matched Southampton towards the end of the first half. Without him, we were always hoofing the ball forward and relying on Rojo or Smalling/Evans to play our players into the game. Carrick was easily closed down, and Fellaini was frequently going long, looking for a long ball, whilst Mata would drop deep at times but play too safely with the ball. When Herrera came on, he joined up the defence and attack and made us more assured in possession against Southampton.

In the second half, Herrera was very important in us keeping control of the match. He was getting Mata into the game, and Fellaini always had an option when playing the deeper role. I was disappointed that we didn't do more with this possession, control, and fluidity that Herrera provided us. Once we scored the second goal, we became very negative in our approach, preferring to play the ball back at every opportunity then hoof it away, which made everyone including Herrera ineffective.

Every time I see Herrera on the pitch, we become much better on the attack and gain much more control of the game. We also start creating gaps in the middle, and attacking players like Mata and Rooney get more involved in the game.
 

Shamwow

listens to shit music & watches Mrs Brown's Boys
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
13,969
Location
Spiderpig
Once Herrera came on, we got more control of the game and matched Southampton towards the end of the first half. Without him, we were always hoofing the ball forward and relying on Rojo or Smalling/Evans to play our players into the game. Carrick was easily closed down, and Fellaini was frequently going long, looking for a long ball, whilst Mata would drop deep at times but play too safely with the ball. When Herrera came on, he joined up the defence and attack and made us more assured in possession against Southampton.

In the second half, Herrera was very important in us keeping control of the match. He was getting Mata into the game, and Fellaini always had an option when playing the deeper role. I was disappointed that we didn't do more with this possession, control, and fluidity that Herrera provided us. Once we scored the second goal, we became very negative in our approach, preferring to play the ball back at every opportunity then hoof it away, which made everyone including Herrera ineffective.

Every time I see Herrera on the pitch, we become much better on the attack and gain much more control of the game. We also start creating gaps in the middle, and attacking players like Mata and Rooney get more involved in the game.
He only made 19 passes with an accuracy of 75%. Impressive he could do all that while hardly getting involved at all.
 

Speak

Step up to my misogyny soapbox
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
6,347
If he was a bit more polished he'd make a great 'number 10'. He has the eye for the pass, the ability to link up, but his technique can be sloppy and he sometimes shows a lack of urgency.

He's been good so far. Nothing more or less. I think people see the positive impact that they want to see a lot of the time. He tends to have a few nice moments each game, but I don't think he's been as great as other people seem to think.

It's possible that van Gaal isn't as keen on him as many people on here. And no, that doesn't mean van Gaal hates him, doesn't rate him at all, or wont ever play him.
 

Shamwow

listens to shit music & watches Mrs Brown's Boys
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
13,969
Location
Spiderpig
If he was a bit more polished he'd make a great 'number 10'. he has the eye for the pass, the ability to link up, but his technique can be sloppy and he sometimes shows a lack of urgency.

He's been good so far. Nothing more or less. I think people see the positive impact that they want to see a lot of the time. He tends to have a few nice moments each game, but I don't think he's been as great as other people seem to think.

It's possible that van Gaal isn't as keen on him as many people on here. And no, that doesn't mean van Gaal hates him, doesn't rate him at all, or wont ever play him.
Agreed. I like him because of his style of play and creativity but his passing can be atrocious at times recently. Not sure if it's related to his injury? Is he fully fit yet? Saw him holding his chest at the end of the Stoke (I think, might have been arsenal actually) game.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
37,535
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
He only made 19 passes with an accuracy of 75%. Impressive he could do all that while hardly getting involved at all.
His involvement was only possible during the period before we scored the 2nd goal, as I mentioned. Otherwise, we were very negative and static in our game. As I also said in my last post, once we scored the second goal, the team decided to not keep possession to see the game off and, instead, drop deep and clear the ball away at almost every opportunity. It was only during the brief period after he came on and during the second half before van Persie scored that we were in control of the match, with Herrera being very involved in our build up.

The one thing that was clear from this match is that, whilst Herrera may make us better, he's not someone who will singlehandedly make us better. The same goes for everyone else in the team. Everyone has to perform well if the team is to perform well.
 

Speak

Step up to my misogyny soapbox
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
6,347
Agreed. I like him because of his style of play and creativity but his passing can be atrocious at times recently. Not sure if it's related to his injury? Is he fully fit yet? Saw him holding his chest at the end of the Stoke (I think, might have been arsenal actually) game.
Na, from what I saw of him before, while obviously he's capable of great passes and dribbling (he showed that against us at Old Trafford obviously) his technique can seem a bit rushed and scrappy at times. A bit like Aaron Ramsey's.

It's just how he is really. I don't think it's got much to do with any injuries.
 

Bob Loblaw

New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
8,979
Supports
Liverpool
Na, from what I saw of him before, while obviously he's capable of great passes and dribbling (he showed that against us at Old Trafford obviously) his technique can seem a bit rushed and scrappy at times. A bit like Aaron Ramsey's.

It's just how he is really. I don't think it's got much to do with any injuries.
I'd agree. He was the same at Athletic Club so the injury isn't an excuse. I think he needs to learn that sometimes it's better to play...slower. He seems to want to play at 100mph every game, probably a result of playing for Athletic for so long.
 

Speak

Step up to my misogyny soapbox
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
6,347
I'd agree. He was the same at Athletic Club so the injury isn't an excuse. I think he needs to learn that sometimes it's better to play...slower. He seems to want to play at 100mph every game, probably a result of playing for Athletic for so long.
Yeah, definitely.

I think it's too late for that to be taken out of his game. But if somehow it was, I think he'd make a great number 10 option. His vision and intelligence is still so typically Spanish. I don't think his ability to see a pass is far (if at all) off Thiago's, but their composure, technique and execution is quite far apart.

I haven't watched much of Athletic Club for a good while now, but they seemed to have a few players like that. Definitely Muniain has that same untidiness too.
 

dirkey

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Messages
1,976
Once Herrera came on, we got more control of the game and matched Southampton towards the end of the first half. Without him, we were always hoofing the ball forward and relying on Rojo or Smalling/Evans to play our players into the game. Carrick was easily closed down, and Fellaini was frequently going long, looking for a long ball, whilst Mata would drop deep at times but play too safely with the ball. When Herrera came on, he joined up the defence and attack and made us more assured in possession against Southampton.

In the second half, Herrera was very important in us keeping control of the match. He was getting Mata into the game, and Fellaini always had an option when playing the deeper role. I was disappointed that we didn't do more with this possession, control, and fluidity that Herrera provided us. Once we scored the second goal, we became very negative in our approach, preferring to play the ball back at every opportunity then hoof it away, which made everyone including Herrera ineffective.

Every time I see Herrera on the pitch, we become much better on the attack and gain much more control of the game. We also start creating gaps in the middle, and attacking players like Mata and Rooney get more involved in the game.
Oh God. Herrera is becoming the new Kagawa. Don't get me wrong, I like the guy, and think he's a good player, but he did not play well the other night.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
37,535
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Oh God. Herrera is becoming the new Kagawa. Don't get me wrong, I like the guy, and think he's a good player, but he did not play well the other night.
Of course. He was rarely involved and almost invisible. I'm not talking about him playing well or poorly. All I'm saying is that he brought us more control into our game, allowing Mata to get into his game whilst also playing Rooney and Mata through into dangerous areas. By his standards, I wouldn't say he was that good. He was average, a 6/10. He was rarely involved on the ball due to seemingly playing a higher role (#10 by the looks of it) with Mata dropping deeper more frequently. To be honest, I'd wish it was the other way as Herrera is less of a #10 than Mata is and more of a #8 than Mata is.

Herrera took several good positions on the pitch, but we played so slowly and safely against Southampton that he was never getting involved. I think @Speak and @Bob Loblaw both mentioned it well when they said that Herrera seems rushed in his game. Of course, this style of play is very fun to watch, but in a match like against Southampton, when the whole team was playing slowly and safely, he would have been more involved if he played more safely and slowly. However, I doubt him playing like everyone else was would have led us to our second goal. He was good at attracting Wanyama and giving Mata the space to become more influential, whilst when Mata attracted Wanyama, Herrera would drop deep and either carry the ball forward, causing havoc, or play the ball to Mata/Rooney in dangerous spaces. If he were to play more safely and slowly, we might have struggled to build up our attacks during our good period.
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,462
Location
Lucilinburhuc
i am pretty sure van Gaal went to every player and shook their hands, i dont know what you want to express with the picture. As soon as Strootman arrives, his place will be the bench for most of the time. Just isnt good enough as an 8 or 10 or to be more exact, not what van Gaal wants.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
Oh God. Herrera is becoming the new Kagawa. Don't get me wrong, I like the guy, and think he's a good player, but he did not play well the other night.
Not yet. We'd need a Mad Winger equivalent to obsess over him, and know his exact average short passes per minute ratio or something insane like that. But I think it's more that people just have a lot of hope for him, and he has impressive technical ability.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.