Bastian Schweinsteiger | Signed for MUFC - confirmed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

LitterBug

No-one likes (a) litterbug
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
4,605
they say the World Cup's 64th match against Argentina
Was that some sort of moral victory somwhere because Gotze had the official vote while Boateng had the unofficial? First I hear of this so naturally baffled.
 

itso 7

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,840
Location
harare,zimbabwe
Yes, because he's best his behind him. How can we call ourselves a top club when we only rely on leftovers from other top clubs?
Look at this way, your soulmate could be someone else's leftover so could be the job you get after your predecessor has moved on. How things come you should have no bearing on how you get satisfaction off them.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,428
Location
Flagg
Hope this actuallly happens. Don't think it's guaranteed he'll be a hit with his age and fact he has nothing left to achieve that he hasn't already, but if we can get him in and for a reasonable fee it's still a no brainer. He's exactly the type of player we're missing.
 

LilRicky

New Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
1,448
We are signing a player who is something like a national treasure, do you expect us to pay him "Carrick money"?

What's that? :lol:

Falcao was a national treasure also and still is.

Just wait an see what happens with him in the season ahead, he could be a revelation and command the midfield like Keane did back in the day or we could be looking at another Hargreaves. Only time will tell.
 

LitterBug

No-one likes (a) litterbug
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
4,605
It was at least between him and Boateng for best player in the World Cup final itself. Don´t worry he´ll be fit. Ana Ivanovic willl chase him around with a frying pan for the next four weeks yelling Manchester, I liked Munich. Best shape of his life.
Munich is fecking amazing. No offense to Mancs but Manchester is worse than a shithole for comparison!
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,168
@Pogue Mahone gets it.

My main concern is that at best Schweinsteiger is a short term solution - he is 31 in August. Lets assume he gives us two or three fantastic years, then what? We are in the market again.
At worst we have another Falcao sitaution, and as a club we look rather silly to boot. The blind optimism in this thread just goes to show that some folk clearly didnt learn anything from last season, that signing big name galacticos is not a guarantee of success.

I would rather we go after a younger player who can compete with Carrick, and take over from him in a couple of years time. It is part of a bigger trend we are seeing in the post-Fergie Era and I dont like the short term attitude to transfers that LVG and Woody appear to be taking. In some instances, it reminds me of Mourinho at his previous clubs, buying up all the top talent, neglecting youth, winning some trophies but then leaving the team a bit fecked when he buggers off after a few yeras. I hope LVG isnt prioritising his short term success for the sake of his ego, rather than trying to build a team which will be able to compete for years to come.
 

Cnaiür urs Skiötha

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
2,994
As I am from Austria I am able to watch Bundesliga games for free. Beside United Bayern is certainly the Team I have watched the most the last few years.

That being said different to the sale of Kroos Guardiola is right to let Schweinsteiger go. In a System based on quick short passing and permanent movement by the whole Team I often had the Impression that Schweinsteiger has been slowing down the game. You could argue that he calms down the game which might be positive in certain situations.
Guardiola seems to be sure that Alonso is the better Option. Both together did not really work.
He is a big fighter but due to his Age and growing injury Problems his game had to become less physical. He still has a good passing range but not as great as Scholes or Pirlo. He reads the game very well but Carrick might be better at this.
Some here might think that he is the Kind of Player where Age is not such an important factor but I am afraid they are wrong. The great Thing about him has been the combination of his physical attributes and technical abilities. There have always been Players being better in single Areas but only a few being as near to being a "complete" midfielder. I always thought of him as a good hybrid between a 6 and an 8.

Most of the Bayern supporters moaning about his departure are more referring to his Status as leader and being one of the last "real" Bayer in the Team.

Based on his interviews he also seems to be one of the most intelligent Footballers. I have never heard him talking rubbish or making dirty laundry public.
He seems to be a very correct Person and you can clearly see why he is called a leader.

So the question is where to fit him into our Team? Some might think he will follow in the footsteps of Carrick but those 2 have quite a different playing style. However, I think that we should Play either him or Carrick on the 6. If Schweinsteiger can stay fit it might be an Option to Play him in front of Carrick behind Herrera in some games.

Overall I am not too hyped about this Transfer but Bastian deserves our full respect and Support. Let`s hope he stays fit and can Show what he is worth.
 

LitterBug

No-one likes (a) litterbug
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
4,605
)

He came from a two week lasting flu... Took him a while to shake that off...

He will be the first to wear gloves when it gets cold.

He had the 5th penalty... and was not needed anymore. But give the pens to others...

He had the most heroic performance in the WC final and the highest distance covered. A very good match against the US and Brazil. Until the France match it was timesharing between him and Khedira.
Shall we buy George Boyd as well? He covers shitloads of distance. The rest of the world disagrees with you, the most heroic performance was that of Boateng.
 

Roman Bellic

Prick
Joined
Jul 21, 2014
Messages
7,145
What's that? :lol:

Falcao was a national treasure also and still is.

Just wait an see what happens with him in the season ahead, he could be a revelation and command the midfield like Keane did back in the day or we could be looking at another Hargreaves. Only time will tell.
Yes, he might end up winning the treble with us or he might just be another sick note, but my point is - he is Bastian Schweinsteiger,he is going to earn a lot of money regardless, people shouldn't expect us to pay him like Carrick.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,557
So is Pep now dreaming of a midfieldless team or something? Thiago, Javi, Lahm, Xabi all have concerns bigger than Basty being injuries, age and not actually being a midfield but good anyway.

Big pressure on Holjberg?

A massive u-turn from midfield heaven team at one point at Barca with Busquets-Masch in defence and Cesc false 9 or wining it up while trying to find a place for Thiago
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,140
@Pogue Mahone gets it.

My main concern is that at best Schweinsteiger is a short term solution - he is 31 in August. Lets assume he gives us two or three fantastic years, then what? We are in the market again.
We signed a 20 year old goalkeeper and will have got at most 4 great seasons from him and that's if he leaves on a free next year. We got 6 years out of a 35 year old Edwin Van Der Sar.

This obsession having the same 11 for 10 years is a bit stupid IMO. Nobody ever has that, change is good - your team needs to evolve every 3-4 years with a regular turnover of players. Getting 3 years of excellent service is perfect.
 

Danny Boi

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
1,183
I don't see why some people always want to look on the negative side.Talking about his age,fitness concerns etc.Not that they arn't valid concerns but it's Bastian Schweinsteiger ffs.The risk is the well worth the reward.

It's the same case with Falcao really.We took a risk on a formerly great player and unfortunately it didn't work out.As a club we are big enough to absorb these losses, so there is no reason to moan and worry about it.
 

Mali_Zeus

New Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2012
Messages
16,987
Location
Zagreb, Hrvatska
@Pogue Mahone gets it.

My main concern is that at best Schweinsteiger is a short term solution - he is 31 in August. Lets assume he gives us two or three fantastic years, then what? We are in the market again.
At worst we have another Falcao sitaution, and as a club we look rather silly to boot. The blind optimism in this thread just goes to show that some folk clearly didnt learn anything from last season, that signing big name galacticos is not a guarantee of success.

I would rather we go after a younger player who can compete with Carrick, and take over from him in a couple of years time. It is part of a bigger trend we are seeing in the post-Fergie Era and I dont like the short term attitude to transfers that LVG and Woody appear to be taking. In some instances, it reminds me of Mourinho at his previous clubs, buying up all the top talent, neglecting youth, winning some trophies but then leaving the team a bit fecked when he buggers off after a few yeras. I hope LVG isnt prioritising his short term success for the sake of his ego, rather than trying to build a team which will be able to compete for years to come.
What short term attitude?
Only Falcao was a bit older and that was a loan. All the other players bought are young or in their prime.
Neglecting youth?
We have a young squad all in all and LVG has given youth a chance last year and I'm sure he'll give it in this season too.
He can give us 2 or 3 years but if all goes well he could be with us 5 more who knows.
Its not that we're Milan and buying just old players.
Herrera, Blind, Rojo, Darmian - all young players .
ADM is not old too.
Plus if we buy Otamendi and Morgan that wont be some short time solutions..

There's no blind optimism here, people are just glad we bought a player of that calibre. Sure its a risk but a risk worth taking.
 

itso 7

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,840
Location
harare,zimbabwe
Im so excited and optimistic at the moment. Schweinsteiger is class, he adds that extra balance witj his work rate, tactical nouse but also he creates chances in a different way in long balls, something we lacked last season. And ofcourse he has tons of experience. Im not on the Mata brigade, a midfield of Carrick, Herrera, Schweini could dominate every team in the PL.
Won't we run into the same problem that Pep had pairing him with Alonso? I think it should be an 'either or' between the two, and if we bring Schneidi in then he partners one if them.
 

Red Hand Devil

Plan M ish
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
19,511
Location
"I said a hip hop, hippie to the hippie..."
Ho Lee Fuk :eek:

Just seen the reports that he's close to signing. Never thought this would happen, but it looks like it actually will.

Brilliant player & an excellent addition - just hope we get Schneiderlin too & that's us set in CM for years to come. Feckin delighted :D
 

RedStarUnited

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
8,157
@Pogue Mahone gets it.

My main concern is that at best Schweinsteiger is a short term solution - he is 31 in August. Lets assume he gives us two or three fantastic years, then what? We are in the market again.
At worst we have another Falcao sitaution, and as a club we look rather silly to boot. The blind optimism in this thread just goes to show that some folk clearly didnt learn anything from last season, that signing big name galacticos is not a guarantee of success.

I would rather we go after a younger player who can compete with Carrick, and take over from him in a couple of years time. It is part of a bigger trend we are seeing in the post-Fergie Era and I dont like the short term attitude to transfers that LVG and Woody appear to be taking. In some instances, it reminds me of Mourinho at his previous clubs, buying up all the top talent, neglecting youth, winning some trophies but then leaving the team a bit fecked when he buggers off after a few yeras. I hope LVG isnt prioritising his short term success for the sake of his ego, rather than trying to build a team which will be able to compete for years to come.
We are signing both Bastian and Morgan according to reports. Would getting both of them not appease your worries?
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,227
Location
France
Won't we run into the same problem that Pep had pairing him with Alonso? I think it should be an 'either or' between the two, and if we bring Schneidi in then he partners one if them.
Carrick is more flexible and adaptable than Alonso, but yeah it's a risk.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,478
@Pogue Mahone gets it.

My main concern is that at best Schweinsteiger is a short term solution - he is 31 in August. Lets assume he gives us two or three fantastic years, then what? We are in the market again.
At worst we have another Falcao sitaution, and as a club we look rather silly to boot. The blind optimism in this thread just goes to show that some folk clearly didnt learn anything from last season, that signing big name galacticos is not a guarantee of success.

I would rather we go after a younger player who can compete with Carrick, and take over from him in a couple of years time. It is part of a bigger trend we are seeing in the post-Fergie Era and I dont like the short term attitude to transfers that LVG and Woody appear to be taking. In some instances, it reminds me of Mourinho at his previous clubs, buying up all the top talent, neglecting youth, winning some trophies but then leaving the team a bit fecked when he buggers off after a few yeras. I hope LVG isnt prioritising his short term success for the sake of his ego, rather than trying to build a team which will be able to compete for years to come.

For me 3 years in football is a lifetime, for £13m if we get 3 decent years from Bastian its money well spent. His experience and leadership will also be vital I feel our squad lack balls to be honest since losing Vidic and Evra.
 

darioterios

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2014
Messages
2,746
Compared to Schweinsteiger, yes... Now this has absolutely nothing to do with his footballing abilities, just his brand as a whole.
now understand that, but I still feel it quite disrespectful

Oh, and do you know how much Carrick is paid by the way?
 
Last edited:

POF

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
3,798
Very surprised by the negativity around this signing. Carrick missed a lot of games last season and when he was out there was nobody who could control the midfield. When United lost control of games and were hanging on against West Ham and Everton at home, they were crying out for someone like Schweinsteiger to manage the game.

Maybe he's not as good as he was but he can add a lot to that midfield and should have no issues adapting to the philosophy.
 

JB08

Searches for nude pics of Marcos Rojo
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
8,458
Again, this signing shows the advantage of having a big name manager. Would Moyes have a chance of signing Schweinsteiger? I don't think so.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,784
People complain about signing a 30 year old for 14 mil. But id bet they would be over the moon if we bought a 30 year old Ronaldo fir 100 mil
Ronaldo is fit as a bird and knows the EPL inside out. Some of the finest EPL defenders are still in his pockets till this very day
 

Kakeru

New Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2013
Messages
5,229
Location
In the Box
Slower of foot perhaps, but so much quicker of mind. I'd be shocked if he fell on his arse to hand away the title or got sent off 27 seconds into a crucial derby either.
This.

Scholes didn't have to be the quickest of all in his thirties, but, man, he was always anticipating the play ahead. It's almost an insult to put Gerrard's name in the sentence; he never had the kind of sharpness of mind Schweinsteiger, Scholes or even Carrick have.
 

Rooney in Paris

Gerrard shirt..Anfield? You'll Never Live it Down
Scout
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
36,022
Location
In an elephant sanctuary
We signed a 20 year old goalkeeper and will have got at most 4 great seasons from him and that's if he leaves on a free next year. We got 6 years out of a 35 year old Edwin Van Der Sar.

This obsession having the same 11 for 10 years is a bit stupid IMO. Nobody ever has that, change is good - your team needs to evolve every 3-4 years with a regular turnover of players. Getting 3 years of excellent service is perfect.
It's Fergie's legacy I think, for better or for worse. There's a tradition at this club that we get players young, can develop them and keep them for ages. It's great, but it's less and less the reality of modern football and in a sense we were isolated from this evolution for a while. But the truth is that 3-4 years of service from a player, if he's successful, is great and we should embrace it.

I'd also like Schneiderlin to sign, of course, but I think people are being way too negative about the Schweiny signing, mainly for the wrong reasons.
 

Leg-End

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,577
@Pogue Mahone gets it.

My main concern is that at best Schweinsteiger is a short term solution - he is 31 in August. Lets assume he gives us two or three fantastic years, then what? We are in the market again.
At worst we have another Falcao sitaution, and as a club we look rather silly to boot. The blind optimism in this thread just goes to show that some folk clearly didnt learn anything from last season, that signing big name galacticos is not a guarantee of success.

I would rather we go after a younger player who can compete with Carrick, and take over from him in a couple of years time. It is part of a bigger trend we are seeing in the post-Fergie Era and I dont like the short term attitude to transfers that LVG and Woody appear to be taking. In some instances, it reminds me of Mourinho at his previous clubs, buying up all the top talent, neglecting youth, winning some trophies but then leaving the team a bit fecked when he buggers off after a few yeras. I hope LVG isnt prioritising his short term success for the sake of his ego, rather than trying to build a team which will be able to compete for years to come.
I don't get this notion that you have to get 5-6 years out of a player for it to be considered a success, if we get 2-3 "fantastic" years out of him then how exactly is it a bad thing? So we have to buy another midfielder 3 years from now........I just don't see that as a problem for Man Utd and football changes a lot in that timespan. Success breeds success, Schweinsteiger adds a huge leader and an excellent footballer to what is a relatively young squad (we have a ton of talents around the breakout ages of 25-26).

And we might still be in for Schneiderlin anyway.
 

BennyBlanco

fixated with Shaw's bum
Joined
Jul 21, 2011
Messages
5,803
As a few others have pointed out, not overly enthused by this, 31 by the time the season starts and attracted through mega-wages, I don't think this is a signing we'd of made under Sir Alex, but got to roll with the times I suppose.
 

LilRicky

New Member
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
1,448
Slower of foot perhaps, but so much quicker of mind. I'd be shocked if he fell on his arse to hand away the title or got sent off 27 seconds into a crucial derby either.
Very true, Scholes and Sheringham come to mind.
 

Blackwidow

Full Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
7,764
Sky tells that Rummenigge will join the press conference at 1 pm that was prior announced to be only with Sammer to introduce Kimmich and Douglas Costa.

The team presentation is shown on youtube with English comment... if you want to see fan reactions...
 

Hernandez - BFA

The Way to Fly
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Messages
17,334
People actually moaning about signing Schweinsteiger :lol: Proven-winner, experience, leadership and can offer so much more when it comes to the football too.

There is no downside to this. I'm close to actually getting angry/annoyed at those who are putting this one down. Sure I understand why some might be annoyed if we don't sign Schneiderlin, but that may not be the case. It's 11th of July for feck sake.

Experienced heads is what we need after losing such a plethora of it over the last couple of seasons in Giggs, Scholes, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra etc.
We're signing Schweinsteiger for goodness sake.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,829
Location
india
@Pogue Mahone gets it.

My main concern is that at best Schweinsteiger is a short term solution - he is 31 in August. Lets assume he gives us two or three fantastic years, then what? We are in the market again..
So what? If we felt there was a younger player who was available and could be as good as Schweinsteiger and understood the system, we'd sign him up and pay 50 million for him. There isn't so we're signing this guy for a small fee and we'll do the former when the opportunity arises.

2 or 3 fantastic years would be great. For 10 million? feck yeah I'd take that. Heck id take a couple of good years let alone 3 fantastic ones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.