Alexis Sanchez | Done deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

Canagel

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
13,888
Tomorrow has to be the day surely. I expect the deal to be wrapped up by the end of the weekend.
 

Crackers

greasy ginfers
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
29,321
Location
Glazers Out
Once you sign this guy and he gets his first pay packet, I'm worried that there'll be no money left in the world.
Money? We're gonna drive inflation through the roof so much that the 1920's depression will look like a blip. Total financial meltdown leading to a world akin to mad max.
 

Oscie

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
3,680
We're getting one of the best players in the league and the star of a direct rival for a player we don't want nor use plus agent fees. It shows how absolutely fecking crackers it is and how hurt the feelings of the pro-Pep paper pricks are that this is somehow being seen as a terrible, waste-of-money deal.
 

Summit

"do the dead, spread your seed and get out"
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
51,054
Once you sign this guy and he gets his first pay packet, I'm worried that there'll be no money left in the world.
I know it is a joke, but it will never be a better joke than....Crouch :lol:
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,645
Location
Manc
Lazy question...

Can he play in the CL or has Arsenal’s Europa campaign tied him up until next season?
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
Even Liverpool fans have begun to text me and say the finance guys at United should get the sack.

He’s saying our clubs balance sheet is a mess. He’s an accountant. He’s reading and believing the £180m package for Sanchez and saying we’re ruining football. Can any of the finance boys on here help me out with some counter arguments?! :confused:
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
Even Liverpool fans have begun to text me and say the finance guys at United should get the sack.

He’s saying our clubs balance sheet is a mess. He’s an accountant. He’s reading and believing the £180m package for Sanchez and saying we’re ruining football. Can any of the finance boys on here help me out with some counter arguments?! :confused:
It really does amaze me fans, regardless of profession, think they’ll have a superior insight to the people running the club. Honestly stuns me. Call him an idiot and move on. Our money, we can spend it how we want.
 

Schmiznurf

Caf Representative in Mafia Championship
Joined
Sep 18, 2016
Messages
12,997
Location
The Lazy Craig Show
Even Liverpool fans have begun to text me and say the finance guys at United should get the sack.

He’s saying our clubs balance sheet is a mess. He’s an accountant. He’s reading and believing the £180m package for Sanchez and saying we’re ruining football. Can any of the finance boys on here help me out with some counter arguments?! :confused:
It's 180 million over 4 and a half years, so roughly 40 million per year. Manchester United have the lowest salary to earnings percentage in the league.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Even Liverpool fans have begun to text me and say the finance guys at United should get the sack.

He’s saying our clubs balance sheet is a mess. He’s an accountant. He’s reading and believing the £180m package for Sanchez and saying we’re ruining football. Can any of the finance boys on here help me out with some counter arguments?! :confused:
Just tell him it like it is, that he’s a monumental bellend that doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
 

ZAGREB RED

Guest
Even Liverpool fans have begun to text me and say the finance guys at United should get the sack.

He’s saying our clubs balance sheet is a mess. He’s an accountant. He’s reading and believing the £180m package for Sanchez and saying we’re ruining football. Can any of the finance boys on here help me out with some counter arguments?! :confused:
I think your mate is just jealous.
 

Earthquake

Pokemon expert
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
35,456
Location
Lemmy has forsaken us....
Even Liverpool fans have begun to text me and say the finance guys at United should get the sack.

He’s saying our clubs balance sheet is a mess. He’s an accountant. He’s reading and believing the £180m package for Sanchez and saying we’re ruining football. Can any of the finance boys on here help me out with some counter arguments?! :confused:
Not a very good one if he believes the bollockology the media are reporting.
 

lakim

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
8
Its an asset exchange. There is no fee. You can talk about value if you like, but there's no fee. I can't be arsed arguing about this any more.
Correct. There is no market value in this for either player. Since suddenly everyone needs to discuss "book value" (e.g. total cost of ownership), all numbers needs to reflect this. You can't pick and choose the numbers that fits your agenda.

If Mkhitaryan cost us £27m in 2016 on a 4-year contract, this will mean he is valued to approx £17m in our books today. That is what Sanchez will cost us in "transfer fee" given straight swap.

Then we must consider saved wages on HM, compared to wages for AS. Then we will have the total deal cost.

However, not sure where agent fees fit in. Everyone pays them of course, but it is not a player wage. So it will not go against the FFP either.

Anyway, don't care, get him in :)
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
Hahhaha, thanks guys. Even though he’s a scouser & jealous, I unfortunately can’t call him a bellend...though I would really like to! Lol
 

Danillaco

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Messages
4,131
Location
Rio
Maybe it's the Jose United combo. Jose complained about Chelsea not getting any plaudits and he was correct. Combine those two things with Saint Pep and the points they've amassed in 20 odd games

Can you imagine if we'd signed a Southampton defender for £75 million, we'd be called crackers, and be guilty of putting the game into disrepute but with Liverpool it's crickets.

United had something similar to Sanchez for Martial (who many want now apparently). United were out of the minds and the fee kept rising. Journos were walking the streets of France asking people can you adam and eve it.
Imagine if our defense was made from a 75mi CB, and two fullbacks that amount 80mi and a 40mi goalkeeper.
 

Fully Fledged

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2013
Messages
16,272
Location
Midlands UK
Even Liverpool fans have begun to text me and say the finance guys at United should get the sack.

He’s saying our clubs balance sheet is a mess. He’s an accountant. He’s reading and believing the £180m package for Sanchez and saying we’re ruining football. Can any of the finance boys on here help me out with some counter arguments?! :confused:
Say someone who is intelligent enough to be an accountant should not be naive enough to believe the ramblings of the gutter press. We are not going to pay him £500k a week.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
Not a very good one if he believes the bollockology the media are reporting.
It was an article that Matt Law had written. I did try and explain to him that he wouldn’t have a clue about our signings and finances...but in true scouse style, said I’m delusional because I don’t believe the paper...especially that ML! :houllier:
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,866
No you are not. Companies try to get fixed costs off their books all the time. We could quite easily equate removing his wage off the books as more important than gaining a fee from him.
Ok, so say we sold him elsewhere now for £20 m (which we surely could), then used that money to pay for part of Sanchez, then they'd still be no fee?
 

fergies coat

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
2,807
Location
Wythenshawe, Manchester
Why didn’t they factor in the wages and agent fees when city bought a full back for 50 million, or when Liverpool bought a defender for 75 million. Is this a new thing? It’s starting to really irritate me now. We’re not paying a transfer fee so where’s the 35m coming from? We’re getting rid of a player we don’t want and also taking his wages of our books. There was none of this uproar when the media thought he was gonna go to city.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.