FlawlessThaw
most 'know it all' poster
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2005
- Messages
- 29,602
I know, but it implied Matic was old and over the hill when one of his replacements isn't that much younger.Yes, I didn't actually think Matic was 37.
I know, but it implied Matic was old and over the hill when one of his replacements isn't that much younger.Yes, I didn't actually think Matic was 37.
Well bit of a silly way to justify drinkewater then? Your ‘37’ jibe clearly implying matic is old and drinkewater was vastly younger. Yet you then admit you know he’s only 18 months younger thanYes, I didn't actually think Matic was 37.
"Silly" was what I was going for.Well bit of a silly way to justify drinkewater then? Your ‘37’ jibe clearly implying matic is old and drinkewater was vastly younger. Yet you then admit you know he’s only 18 months younger than
Matic.
So- why did you get rid of Matic for drinkewater? Perhaps it’s because Matic was desperate to join the biggest club in England and Jose and Danny was best replacement you could get?
Fair enoughMatic wanted to go, is about 37 and was on much higher wages.
Funny. But they don't have games at that time on saturday's. I wondered if it's something they plan on doing.Because you're in Norway. It's 19:45 in UK.
3000.How many bookings does Kante get away with per year?
Nah its feckin shite13 mins since the game has started and mostly just discussion in the thread. Take it nothing has been happening in the game?
Not sure about that, plus no one is likely to pay Drinkwater what he is on currently at Chelsea and he still has 4 years left."Silly" was what I was going for.
I agree with your assessment, Matic wanted to go to United for a few (understandable) reasons, Chelsea saw a change to get decent money, get a high earner off the wage bill and bring in a younger, "homegrown" player on lesser wages with a decent re-sale value. It looks like it won't work for Drinkwater at Chelsea but I bet we don't lose much (if any) money on him.
As expected then.Nah its feckin shite
I guess it's because from next season there are 10 'prime time' Saturday evening games, so maybe they're trialling it?Funny. But they don't have games at that time on saturday's. I wondered if it's something they plan on doing.
Southampton showing why they are in trouble in the league and Chelsea haven't much to play for. The important game for them is against the same team in the F.A. Cup semi next Sunday.As expected then.
Seems an Everton signing... and they're currently paying Schneiderlin £120k/week so are used to overpaying.Not sure about that, plus no one is likely to pay Drinkwater what he is on currently at Chelsea and he still has 4 years left.
They could at least pretend to try and catch Liverpool/Spurs. Lazy cnuts!Southampton showing why they are in trouble in the league and Chelsea haven't much to play for. The important game for them is against the same team in the F.A. Cup semi next Sunday.
"Silly" was what I was going for.
I agree with your assessment, Matic wanted to go to United for a few (understandable) reasons, Chelsea saw a change to get decent money, get a high earner off the wage bill and bring in a younger, "homegrown" player on lesser wages with a decent re-sale value. It looks like it won't work for Drinkwater at Chelsea but I bet we don't lose much (if any) money on him.
Maybe they would do a swap.Seems an Everton signing... and they're currently paying Schneiderlin £120k/week so are used to overpaying.
Makes sense then.I guess it's because from next season there are 10 'prime time' Saturday evening games, so maybe they're trialling it?
He definitely likes falling over.I fecking hate Morata's attitude.
And shouting at the ref to give yellow cards. I thought that was a yellow card offense in itself?He definitely likes falling over.
Højbjerg, too.Wouldn't mind Bertrand at a cut rate price if Southampton goes down.
Him and Romeu will be snapped up quickly.