Almost. It also included the clause that it was a result of the lockdown, not the pandemic. That isn't what the report states.
Specfically what they say about Category D impacts - including mental health and economic impacts - is...
https://assets.publishing.service.g...aths-morbidity-sage-december-update-final.pdf
Because actual experts on complicated subjects don't just make big claims and wave their hands. They don't just see social isolation = depression = suicides go up, without considering effects going the other way. Pogue has already given one example, that report provides others. And as you've now noted, perhaps the environment people are in - however glibly you want to describe it - doesn't exacerbate suicidal tendencies, because it depends a lot on the social context. And the social cues that contribute to suicide aren't quite that simple. For example, that simple link between economic harm and self-harm...they don't think it's simple.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839093/
That general principle applies to all these things you happily list, with no examination, no expertise, and no sense of responsibility for their veracity. They just enable you to feel the way you want to feel, to fit into the ideology you couldn't possibly second-guess