Fluctuation0161
Full Member
I wonder if Alex Albon is in the simulator today going through the different lines of turn 1 at Monza.

I wonder if Alex Albon is in the simulator today going through the different lines of turn 1 at Monza.
Based on other drivers taking that corner in the same race. Based on Max knowing a Monza is a Mercedes track and just having had an 11 second pit stop.Based on what exactly? Honestly I can't believe so many here seem to believe Max would intentionally crash into Hamilton when it was still all to play for. Ridiculous really. This battle between Max and Hamilton, Wolff and Horner, is really getting out of hand. I had hoped Mercedes would have been more classy in their response to this incident than Red Bull were at Silverstone but they've responded the exact same way and poured more oil on the fire.
Do you even watch F1? Here is a little clip showing just a little of Max's previous "form".Or that Max has all these crashes all the time. I feel like people are mixing him up with his dad. Max doesn't have a lot of collisions at all (until his current thing with Hamilton, anyway) and has been very level-headed about his racing more generally.
So, some people say Lewis has decided to be too aggressive with Max, to match Maxs style, and is causing incidents. Now you are saying he is not aggressive enough...Watch youtube channel driver61 breakdown on it, describes it really well. Because Lewis hit the apex on T1 there was enough room for Max to believe he had space and attempt to hang on around the outside. If Lewis was more aggressive and missed the apex Max would have had no doubt in having to cut the chicane.
I don't know how many times it needs to be explained that the first lap and start of a race is always treated differently to the rest of the race.The stewards decision is what it is but the punishment is laughable. Not when you compare with Lewis at Silverstone, but when you compare with Bottas at Hungary. If what Max did yesterday is worth a 3 place grid penalty, what Bottas did is easily worth 20, served in consecutive races if need be. His balls up was orders of magnitude worse and hit several teams in the points and in their budgets.
Well I'll admit that when he first joined F1 he was young and a bit reckless but he's definitely matured since then. I think it's more his personality that people on here don't like. He wears his heart on his sleeve and always says what he thinks, the polar opposite of Hamilton who seems to have had extensive media training. That's fine, each to their own, but it doesn't mean that one is a saint and the other is the devil
At what point does he pass the "he still young" mark. He is 23. Russel and Leclerc are 23, Norris is 21. I actually believe (probably unpopular opinion) Verstappen was done a disservice by putting him into the F1 seat at such a young age. Fast enough yes very much so, mature enough? Depends on the team I guess who would mentor rather than pander. I guess though Schumacher and Senna were older when they won their first WDC, Hamilton was about same age, Vettel was about same age. Maybe in terms of experience, and not time in F1, he is approaching the point were he should be expected to start to win now?
Your last statement I agree, he will realize what it takes to win a WDC, but after 130+ races though he needs to sort his head out quick or he might be a 1 or 2 time winner rather than 5 or 6.
I don’t see you call out the blatant bullshit by a handful of Max fans or Hamilton haters, though. Perhaps you should just do what all of us try to which is ignore the wildly blinkered posts and focus on discussing with the majority of people in here who can form balanced opinions, even if you disagree.Honestly it's posts like this without any nuance or common sense to them that make it pointless to discuss anything. I get that there's mainly English people on here so Hamilton will get a lot of support and that's fine but some of these posts are so extreme it looks more like blind hatred
Only reason he hasn't had more collisions is because everyone usually always bailed and let Max get his way rather than getting hit and ruin their race.Or that Max has all these crashes all the time. I feel like people are mixing him up with his dad. Max doesn't have a lot of collisions at all (until his current thing with Hamilton, anyway) and has been very level-headed about his racing more generally.
Honestly Wolff and Hamilton are just as bad as Horner and Max. Wolff saying the crash was a "tactical foul" thus deliberate is ridiculous. Disgusting from Mercedes.
Do you even watch F1? Here is a little clip showing just a little of Max's previous "form".
I don’t see you call out the blatant bullshit by a handful of Max fans or Hamilton haters, though. Perhaps you should just do what all of us try to which is ignore the wildly blinkered posts and focus on discussing with the majority of people in here who can form balanced opinions, even if you disagree.
Horner and Max has set the standard at Silverstone, Toto and Lewis are just going to shit bag the whole season and give it to Red Bull just how they dished it out.
It's entertaining really.
An interesting video from 2017, I think Max thought he would have the same outcome into turn one yesterday as he got in 2017. However whilst he's aged, I don't see much has changed in his wheel to wheel race craft.
Oh there is alot more. Look into it, that video was just a snippet.That's just over one per year and most are actually from his first two years. Not the strongest evidence that this is a constant and current pattern with him...
An interesting video from 2017, I think Max thought he would have the same outcome into turn one yesterday as he got in 2017. However whilst he's aged, I don't see much has changed in his wheel to wheel race craft.
An interesting video from 2017, I think Max thought he would have the same outcome into turn one yesterday as he got in 2017. However whilst he's aged, I don't see much has changed in his wheel to wheel race craft.
Guess I'm focusing too much on cases where it actually went wrong then. That still means the 'Crashstappen' label is wrong though. (Those nicknames are anyway boringly childish - whoever it was that used it in this case.)Oh there is alot more. Look into it, that video was just a snippet.
This for example from 2019.
https://www.theweek.co.uk/formula-1...o-lewis-hamilton-mexican-grand-prix-reactions
Compare the race craft there to Hamilton vs Alonso this year. There's absolutely no way you could attack Verstappen for multiple laps and corners and stay on the track. There's a huge difference between aggressive driving and forceful but fair driving. Note, the number of times Hamilton backed out when he knew there was no space before forcing a mistake and the number of times Alonso just gives the space.
Spot on.Team Red Bull is a bunch of pricks. It starts with the principal and spreads down the chain. Christian Horner is the antithesis to gentleman of sport. He wants to win at any costs and I question his morality. Horner and Verstappen is to me a bad combination. I can imagine Horner encourage Verstappen to drive like an a…., and his uncritical support of Verstappen is like throwing petrol on flames.
Spot on again. Both are cnuts.Verstappen is a really unlikeable, contemptible character. Good fit with Horner.
which is why he got a 3 place grid penalty from the FIA? Toto called it a tactical foul - that doesn't come across as him agreeing it with the move in any way.Any objective person would look at how his car bounced up off a sausage curb and figure out pretty easily that it obviously wasn't on purpose, and any suggestion it was says a lot more about the person suggesting it frankly. You can argue about risk vs reward and giving space and bailing out, but the move was a perfectly valid thing to try, which was also the universal opinion of the team principles asked about it including Toto.
The point is that the crash would not have felt like it endangered Lewis' life from Max's perspective, regardless of him bouncing up onto another car. He contributed (along with Lewis) to causing an accident much like Lewis contributed to putting Max's life in far more danger at Silverstone. And I'm not sure why the need for histrionics about 'causing accidents that endanger life'? So what? It's F1. Every tiny error and every risky manoeuvre by every driver falls into that bracket.
An interesting video from 2017, I think Max thought he would have the same outcome into turn one yesterday as he got in 2017. However whilst he's aged, I don't see much has changed in his wheel to wheel race craft.
I appreciate the real danger of starting this all again but:
First time I had seen that angle. Based on the talk I assumed Max's tyre was on Lewis's head a lot longer, it more skipped over it/the halo.
I appreciate the real danger of starting this all again but:
First time I had seen that angle. Based on the talk I assumed Max's tyre was on Lewis's head a lot longer, it more skipped over it/the halo.
I appreciate the real danger of starting this all again but:
First time I had seen that angle. Based on the talk I assumed Max's tyre was on Lewis's head a lot longer, it more skipped over it/the halo.
Definitely will have caused a concussion that, Lewis needs to sit out a few races to be safe.
Definitely will have caused a concussion that, Lewis needs to sit out a few races to be safe.
Guy lost his head.