SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,448
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
I've an anxious friend about to go for a jab today, they're planning on taking a low dose of Valium before turning up. Any medical reason not to do this? Cheers.
From a newbie.

@Droid_Repairs I can't reply in the main covid thread so hopefully you read this here, but when I went for my vaccine I took a diazepam because I have a severe phobia of needles, and I told them in the queue when they came to get my details and was told that's it's absolutely fine, and that I wasn't the first to have said they'd done that

So hopefully that means valium would be ok too, but as others have said I'd find out from the staff there first to make sure.
 

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,389
Location
Tameside
Am I right in assuming there is unequivocal evidence that being vaccinated means you're less likely to spread the virus?

Because otherwise why would we be restricting unvaccinated people from going certain places.

I have no agenda here, its just a really basic and fundamental question that I've realised I haven't observed the answer to yet.
Vaccination has been shown to neutralise the virus in a significant number of vaccinated people, but not all. So if those people have avoided infection completely, it stands to reason that they can't spread it. So the vaccines are providing a reduction in transmission via that effect in some recipients.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,914
Location
Somewhere out there
it's more like 0.8%

500k without strong measures doesn't seem that ridiculous considering we're at 150k now, with all the lockdowns, a much earlier vaccine roll-out than expected, and still not over the virus
Sorry, meant to post 0.8%, obviously not 8%.

And 510,000 was not even for the almost 2 years to date, it was by Spring 2020 ffs. And with a “Swedish style response”, the model predicted 250,000 deaths by Spring.

So yes it was pretty ridiculous and grossly overestimated.

 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,426
Location
South Carolina
Sorry, meant to post 0.8%, obviously not 8%.

And 510,000 was not even for the almost 2 years to date, it was by Spring 2020 ffs.

So yes it was pretty ridiculous and grossly overestimated.

And yet even if you stretch the date out to December 2021 on those possible death tolls, the numbers are still in favor of taking mitigation measures.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,914
Location
Somewhere out there
And yet even if you stretch the date out to December 2021 on those possible death tolls, the numbers are still in favor of taking mitigation measures.
Well of course you take mitigation measures.

The biggest problem with the model was the gross overestimation of mitigation vs lockdown. Plenty of States have shown that to be a vast exaggeration, and ignoring the seasonal aspects that we see with all upper respiratory viruses.
 
Last edited:

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,973
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
a) fair enough, I was under the impression you had the hospitality sector and other areas of society closed for a large part of last year, and a good bit into the Summer.
So many countries, easy to lose track.
b) you arguing out of both sides of your mouth here Pogue :confused:
Nope. Just pointing out the ridiculousness of you implying it’s ok to take your eye of the ball re covid in summer when South Africa is going through an explosion of cases. Right now. In summer.

All the experts agree this will end up as a seasonal virus. Most of them predicted it would when the pandemic started. But it can take years for a novel virus like this to settle into seasonal endemicity. We’re still a long way short of that now. Summer surges are still very much a thing.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,637
Location
Sydney
Sorry, meant to post 0.8%, obviously not 8%.

And 510,000 was not even for the almost 2 years to date, it was by Spring 2020 ffs. And with a “Swedish style response”, the model predicted 250,000 deaths by Spring.

So yes it was pretty ridiculous and grossly overestimated.

are you sure this chart is directly from source?

I don't think a data analyst would present data like this, it makes no sense to put a death toll at the peak of the bell curve

you'd present your numbers for the entire pandemic surely?
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,973
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I’m not claiming they did :confused:

The March 2020 model did claim the UK could see 500,000 deaths without strong measures, which is almost 8% of the population and quite clearly massively over exaggerated; it also claimed that a “Swedish style model” would see 250,000 deaths. I mean, he said himself in an interview that..



Which is what I remember Tegnell also claiming back in March 2020 when asked about the report.
You’re getting hung up on worst case scenarios. All these models have “optimistic” and “pessimistic” ranges of outcomes. It’s the pessimistic numbers that make headlines when the experts are asked “how bad could this get”?
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,848
Well of course you take mitigation measures.

The biggest problem with the model was the gross overestimation of mitigation vs lockdown. Plenty of States have shown that to be a vast exaggeration, and ignoring the seasonal aspects that we see with all upper respiratory viruses.
The chart you've shown indicates the modelled outcomes with no mitigation measures. It's in the title. If you're criticising it for not accurately taking into account the mitigation measures, then you're not really understanding what the model was designed to do.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,628
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
I've just been looking to attain a Thor style body naturally through my much reduced physical activity this last two years. I'm almost up to his level now and I reckon I can give it a good push to match his physique over Christmas.
:lol:
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,914
Location
Somewhere out there
You’re getting hung up on worst case scenarios. All these models have “optimistic” and “pessimistic” ranges of outcomes. It’s the pessimistic numbers that make headlines when the experts are asked “how bad could this get”?
@jojojo just made a much better post than yours and stated exactly that, to which I replied that it was a great post.
It was in fact the majority on here and policy makers that got too hung up on the quite frankly absurd worst case scenario.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,914
Location
Somewhere out there
The chart you've shown indicates the modelled outcomes with no mitigation measures. It's in the title. If you're criticising it for not accurately taking into account the mitigation measures, then you're not really understanding what the model was designed to do.
You haven’t followed the conversation, I’d said multiple times that Imperial predicted 250,000 deaths by Summer 2020 with a Swedish style mitigation strategy. 500,000 was the “let it rip” prediction.

Let’s remember Ferguson also said the following:


I have the greatest respect for scientists there [in Sweden]. They came to a different policy conclusion but based really on quite similar science.

'They make the argument that countries will find it very hard to really stop second waves... I don't agree with it but scientifically they are not that far from scientists in any country in the world.'
I mean, what the funk was Neil smoking when he thought lockdown countries wouldn’t find it hard to stop second waves??
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,637
Location
Sydney
I know it states that, but what I'm suggesting is this has been edited because it looks wonky
@Regulus Arcturus Black

I dug out the report

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2020-03-16-COVID19-Report-9.pdf

as you can see the chart is different, it's predicting 510,000 (worst case scenario) for entire pandemic (not for spring 2020)

edit: the modelling for all scenarios actually looks pretty good in retrospect, when you consider how difficult it is to predict how things play out
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
17,007
Location
England:
Some rumours on Twitter that a UK national lockdown could be announced today? Surely bullshit, right?
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,973
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
You haven’t followed the conversation, I’d said multiple times that Imperial predicted 250,000 deaths by Summer 2020 with a Swedish style mitigation strategy. 500,000 was the “let it rip” prediction.
The only one getting “hung up” on these models seems to be you. Everyone else seems to understand they are, at best, crude predictions of a range of outcomes.

Big decisions are constantly being made based on imperfect data. The only people I’ve heard make any predictions with absolute certainty are frauds, grifters or back seat scientists who don’t understand the nuance and uncertainties involved.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,848
You haven’t followed the conversation, I’d said multiple times that Imperial predicted 250,000 deaths by Summer 2020 with a Swedish style mitigation strategy. 500,000 was the “let it rip” prediction.

Let’s remember Ferguson also said the following:




I mean, what the funk was Neil smoking when he thought lockdown countries wouldn’t find it hard to stop second waves??
Yes I'm aware you've repeatedly mischaracterised the information to suit your agenda. I'm just pointing out in this specific instance how obvious your misrepresentation of the data is. It's in the title.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,973
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
You haven’t followed the conversation, I’d said multiple times that Imperial predicted 250,000 deaths by Summer 2020 with a Swedish style mitigation strategy. 500,000 was the “let it rip” prediction.

Let’s remember Ferguson also said the following:




I mean, what the funk was Neil smoking when he thought lockdown countries wouldn’t find it hard to stop second waves??
The same stuff the Swedish experts were smoking who predicted herd immunity would end the pandemic long before now? Meanwhile, in Sweden

Or perhaps making those sort of long term predictions is incredibly difficult and even scientists who understand this stuff way better than any of us have always found it hard to accurately predict the future of the pandemic?
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,088
Location
Dublin, Ireland
It will be bullshit but we absolutely need a lock down. There’s almost certainly one coming after Xmas though.
After Christmas I can see the logic, deal with the after effects of meet-ups, parties etc
Lockdown for Christmas won’t happen because the people are so fcuked off now they won’t listen. January is a crappy month, people have no money and more likely to stay in.
my only fear is something that I read, January is statistically the worst for suicide
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,914
Location
Somewhere out there
@Regulus Arcturus Black

I dug out the report

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2020-03-16-COVID19-Report-9.pdf

as you can see the chart is different, it's predicting 510,000 (worst case scenario) for entire pandemic (not for spring 2020)

edit: the modelling for all scenarios actually looks pretty good in retrospect, when you consider how difficult it is to predict how things play out
“we assume that 50% of those in critical care will die”… kin ell.

It’s worse than I thought.

The chart actually suggests that the epidemic would be over after those 500,000 deaths so yes it is saying by spring 2020, and that somehow magically that’d be the end of it. I guess they’re making the same stupid mistake that Pogue just touched upon as the Swedish experts and thinking herd immunity would kick in and rid us of it.
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
I still feel like after all this time the majority of the population refuse to accept reality that this virus will overwhelm the health system if it goes unchecked. All people care about is their own little worlds and still refuse to see the bigger picture. The game has changed and right now even with vaccination if it’s allowed to run riot as they seem so keen to have happen it’ll cripple the health system in no time at all.

People need to start accepting that this is our reality now.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,914
Location
Somewhere out there
The same stuff the Swedish experts were smoking who predicted herd immunity would end the pandemic long before now? Meanwhile, in Sweden
Absolutely, they were ridiculously way off, also laughable.

You are barking up the wrong tree again if you think that my position is that the Swedish experts are infallible, they clearly aren’t they’ve got, like many countries some stuff right some stuff laughably wrong.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,973
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Absolutely, they were ridiculously way off, also laughable.
So why not ease off on our criticism of people who are trying to predict the unpredictable?

I do agree that governments and their expert advisers (almost) everywhere have erred on the side of caution. And that’s been a pain to live through. I can understand why though. Everyone is shitting themselves over what happened in Italy and India and doesn’t want the same to happen in their country, on their watch.
 

hp88

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
17,414
Location
W3103
Some rumours on Twitter that a UK national lockdown could be announced today? Surely bullshit, right?
Wouldn't be surprised if he rocks up on TV tonight, it will be a trailer for what's to come post Christmas.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,637
Location
Sydney
“we assume that 50% of those in critical care will die”… kin ell.

It’s worse than I thought.

The chart actually suggests that the epidemic would be over after those 500,000 deaths so yes it is saying by spring 2020, and that somehow magically that’d be the end of it. I guess they’re making the same stupid mistake that Pogue just touched upon as the Swedish experts and thinking herd immunity would kick in and rid us of it.
just saw your edit sorry

it's not saying that man come on now, this is ridiculous

in the let it rip scenario it would be over a lot sooner

but yes people make mistakes in complex models
 

MiceOnMeth

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
1,787
Pubs, cinemas and restaurants are closed at 8pm now in Ireland. Feels like we've been in constant restrictions for 2 years now and everybody is fed up. One of the most vaccinated countries in the world yet we're also one of the most restricted with our government making absolutely shambolic decisions that make very little sense.