Westminster Politics

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
13,020
Liz Truss and Nadine Dorries now pretty much Boris' 2 most important ministers :lol:
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,428
Location
bin
On another note there's absolutely no fecking way they can reasonably excuse that photo, even though they will do it anyway (and get away with it because nobody will have a follow up question such as "are you taking the piss?"). But the fact that this photo was taken at the same time that people were being harassed by police for walking their dog in a park, and three days before Boris told people that they needed to be patient and wait for lockdown to ease...and they're all drinking wine in what is apparently a business meeting including the PMs wife who isn't an employee, with fecking WINE...and.

.....right. Here it is. My dad, who lives in Australia, has had Parkinson's for three years now and he's at the point where it can't get worse. He's also had to deal with cancer and liver failure as well, because apparently Parkinson's wasn't fecking enough. But if we weren't at a point where life was still being fecked by this Covid thing he wouldn't still be waiting to meet his grandchild for the first time. He would've been over in May 2020, that got cancelled. Then this year was cancelled twice. Unless by some miracle things get better and he can come over next year, that's probably that.

Anti vaxxers, post truthers, Boris fecking Johnson and his band of "don't give a feck about anyone but me" Tory scumbags. I'm not saying that without them Covid wouldn't be around, but they're not exactly helping are they? feck them, and feck anyone like them.

But back on topic; feck City.
 

Sparky_Hughes

I am Shitbeard.
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
17,539
On another note there's absolutely no fecking way they can reasonably excuse that photo, even though they will do it anyway (and get away with it because nobody will have a follow up question such as "are you taking the piss?"). But the fact that this photo was taken at the same time that people were being harassed by police for walking their dog in a park, and three days before Boris told people that they needed to be patient and wait for lockdown to ease...and they're all drinking wine in what is apparently a business meeting including the PMs wife who isn't an employee, with fecking WINE...and.

.....right. Here it is. My dad, who lives in Australia, has had Parkinson's for three years now and he's at the point where it can't get worse. He's also had to deal with cancer and liver failure as well, because apparently Parkinson's wasn't fecking enough. But if we weren't at a point where life was still being fecked by this Covid thing he wouldn't still be waiting to meet his grandchild for the first time. He would've been over in May 2020, that got cancelled. Then this year was cancelled twice. Unless by some miracle things get better and he can come over next year, that's probably that.

Anti vaxxers, post truthers, Boris fecking Johnson and his band of "don't give a feck about anyone but me" Tory scumbags. I'm not saying that without them Covid wouldn't be around, but they're not exactly helping are they? feck them, and feck anyone like them.

But back on topic; feck City.
Sorry man, that is rough. Made even worse by the constant piss taking by these lying, immoral self-serving elitist cnuts. feck them all and everyone who enables their vile behaviour
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,409
On another note there's absolutely no fecking way they can reasonably excuse that photo, even though they will do it anyway (and get away with it because nobody will have a follow up question such as "are you taking the piss?"). But the fact that this photo was taken at the same time that people were being harassed by police for walking their dog in a park, and three days before Boris told people that they needed to be patient and wait for lockdown to ease...and they're all drinking wine in what is apparently a business meeting including the PMs wife who isn't an employee, with fecking WINE...and.

.....right. Here it is. My dad, who lives in Australia, has had Parkinson's for three years now and he's at the point where it can't get worse. He's also had to deal with cancer and liver failure as well, because apparently Parkinson's wasn't fecking enough. But if we weren't at a point where life was still being fecked by this Covid thing he wouldn't still be waiting to meet his grandchild for the first time. He would've been over in May 2020, that got cancelled. Then this year was cancelled twice. Unless by some miracle things get better and he can come over next year, that's probably that.

Anti vaxxers, post truthers, Boris fecking Johnson and his band of "don't give a feck about anyone but me" Tory scumbags. I'm not saying that without them Covid wouldn't be around, but they're not exactly helping are they? feck them, and feck anyone like them.

But back on topic; feck City.
I’m really sorry to hear that mate, hope somehow he can come and meet baby pigeon next year.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,839
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Liz Truss getting the Brexit job is a tactical move by Boris just when she started positioning herself for a leadership challenge right?

What better way to ruin an MP’s (already risible) public image than to give them an impossible job?
 

GuybrushThreepwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
1,167
Supports
Blackburn Rovers
I did wonder whether the size of the Tory rebellion last week will scare Johnson off from sanctioning tighter COVID restrictions over the winter. I didn't think that there would tighter restrictions before Christmas (he'd have a riot on his hands if that happened), but I thought that his government would consider implementing straight after Boxing Day from next Monday.

But even if they come in post-Christmas, I do think that any move towards tighter restrictions could still lead to full-scale warfare within his own party. Many of the Tory rebels staunchly opposed COVID restrictions last winter during the second wave, and well before any of us had been vaccinated. The irony of many of the same MPs saying that we should ignore the advice of financial experts during the EU referendum, demanding financial impact assessments ahead of implementing tighter COVID restrictions last year let alone this year, hasn't been lost on me. Neither has the irony of those MPs defending the public's 'civil liberties' in the face of such restrictions, while also supporting measures to remove their rights to freedom of movement within the EU, to peacefully protest etc.

I have to admit that part of me is enjoying the fact that many of the same people who enthusiastically supported Johnson in 2019 to 'get brexit done', have become his biggest critics.
 
Last edited:

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,606
I still don’t get the logic in this train of thought, as much as I detest Boris & Co, why would they deliberately shut down parts of their economy, pay millions more in welfare unless they absolutely had too?
Your mistake is classifying it as logic, it's backwards rationalisation to justify their baseless opinion. Same as Brexit and every other debate these tools are involved in.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
Find it amusing that Tories are using the “oh, we were already there and after we had a hard days work, we got the cheese and wine out to unwind”.

You didn’t see nurses, doctors and other frontline staff whom had unbelievably gruelling jobs, having a sit down and glass of wine after they finish their shifts.

Lousy excuse, but it’s the best one they got which tells you they don’t have a leg to stand on.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,764
Ok but the electorate is an average of the collective "switched on"-ness of everybody in the country and the average really doesn't change much through the generations. Trying to blame people for being the product of their genetics and environment is pointless. What you can blame is the system that's supposed to educate them as opposed to trick them i.e. the media, and the system that's supposed to teach them critical thinking i.e. the education system, presided over by successive poor governments.

And as for who you'd elect instead, I tend to think the Lib Dem and Labour leaders are both pretty awful but you'd have to hope there's some decent people in their parties somewhere. The right answer to your question is pretty much "someone else". And then if they are shit the answer again becomes "someone else", ad infinitum.

Whenever you're afraid to change the people who are failing in case the next lot are worse, you're removing the incentive to not be cnuts from the incumbent as they will believe they can act with impunity. In that way you're pretty much guaranteeing poor performance and corruption. You see it with councils all over the country, whenever the councillors don't believe there's any threat to their seats they start supplementing their salaries in all sorts of creative ways (usually property development).
Yes indeed, there isn't much in what you have said that I would disagree with, except perhaps waiting for the 'collective' electorate to see things your way via education etc. The two most important pieces of legislation in my lifetime (well almost) have been the Education Act 1944 and the National Health Service Act 1946. These two pieces of legislation acted as the catalyst to change the old way of life for millions, we need something 'ground-breaking' or 'breathtakingly' similar now, otherwise we are 'not learning from our mistakes in history'.

Our whole way of life is built on precedent, our law making, our way of looking at things, going forward, etc. but with world wide issues like Climate Change, Mass Migration, Pandemics, now facing us, looking back has to take on a new dimension, the sort that the post War Labour Government saw when it brought in the above Acts following the end of WW2. They were determined to make a difference, no matter how long it took.

However looking around I don't see any current politicians (any party) who could even think that way, let alone act in such ways, it is all short- term thinking. The Chinese think in terms of 30, 50, even 100 year plans, the nearest we have is the HS2 plan (and that is going to pot already!) to be fair to Boris his 'levelling up' agenda is on the right track, but he is the wrong leader to see it through, the Tories will now be searching for someone to take over from Boris, what is Labour and/or the Lib Dems doing... the truth is the Conservatives now hold the ball, and they will move heaven and earth to stop Boris dropping it?
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
13,020
Yes indeed, there isn't much in what you have said that I would disagree with, except perhaps waiting for the 'collective' electorate to see things your way via education etc. The two most important pieces of legislation in my lifetime (well almost) have been the Education Act 1944 and the National Health Service Act 1946. These two pieces of legislation acted as the catalyst to change the old way of life for millions, we need something 'ground-breaking' or 'breathtakingly' similar now, otherwise we are 'not learning from our mistakes in history'.

Our whole way of life is built on precedent, our law making, our way of looking at things, going forward, etc. but with world wide issues like Climate Change, Mass Migration, Pandemics, now facing us, looking back has to take on a new dimension, the sort that the post War Labour Government saw when it brought in the above Acts following the end of WW2. They were determined to make a difference, no matter how long it took.

However looking around I don't see any current politicians (any party) who could even think that way, let alone act in such ways, it is all short- term thinking. The Chinese think in terms of 30, 50, even 100 year plans, the nearest we have is the HS2 plan (and that is going to pot already!) to be fair to Boris his 'levelling up' agenda is on the right track, but he is the wrong leader to see it through, the Tories will now be searching for someone to take over from Boris, what is Labour and/or the Lib Dems doing... the truth is the Conservatives now hold the ball, and they will move heaven and earth to stop Boris dropping it?
Interesting point about being too backwards looking and needing something a bit revolutionary to change the way we live, work and think. I would absolutely love that and tbh that's why I usually vote Green even though I don't like the "hippyish" aspects of what they're often talking about. And I do think Corbyn would have shaken things up if he'd got in but he was too old fashioned in the way he spoke about it all and conveyed his message I think (as well as being continually character assassinated by the folk with vested interests).

None of the Tories are actually interested in levelling up though. They are the party of austerity, increasing inequality and repressing the poor. And they always have been. New Labour weren't much better but they at least occasionally threw someone a bone. All you can do is vote for change and keep voting for change until someone finally delivers it.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
Yes indeed, there isn't much in what you have said that I would disagree with, except perhaps waiting for the 'collective' electorate to see things your way via education etc. The two most important pieces of legislation in my lifetime (well almost) have been the Education Act 1944 and the National Health Service Act 1946. These two pieces of legislation acted as the catalyst to change the old way of life for millions, we need something 'ground-breaking' or 'breathtakingly' similar now, otherwise we are 'not learning from our mistakes in history'.

Our whole way of life is built on precedent, our law making, our way of looking at things, going forward, etc. but with world wide issues like Climate Change, Mass Migration, Pandemics, now facing us, looking back has to take on a new dimension, the sort that the post War Labour Government saw when it brought in the above Acts following the end of WW2. They were determined to make a difference, no matter how long it took.

However looking around I don't see any current politicians (any party) who could even think that way, let alone act in such ways, it is all short- term thinking. The Chinese think in terms of 30, 50, even 100 year plans, the nearest we have is the HS2 plan (and that is going to pot already!) to be fair to Boris his 'levelling up' agenda is on the right track, but he is the wrong leader to see it through, the Tories will now be searching for someone to take over from Boris, what is Labour and/or the Lib Dems doing... the truth is the Conservatives now hold the ball, and they will move heaven and earth to stop Boris dropping it?
The only purpose of HS2 and Leveling Up were to convince the electorate in the North and Midlands to vote Tory. As soon as it required them to actually put in the money required those 'plans' were revealed a the vapour they always were.

If you genuinely want to know what Tories think, listen to what they say to each other, to the speeches they give to Tory groups and thinktanks and the books they write. What they say on TV and during elections is nothing but puff intended to swing the electorate around to handing them power.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,764
The only purpose of HS2 and Leveling Up were to convince the electorate in the North and Midlands to vote Tory. As soon as it required them to actually put in the money required those 'plans' were revealed a the vapour they always were.

If you genuinely want to know what Tories think, listen to what they say to each other, to the speeches they give to Tory groups and thinktanks and the books they write. What they say on TV and during elections is nothing but puff intended to swing the electorate around to handing them power.
But isn't this the problem, the Tories know what to say, the idea of 'levelling up', was never broached by Labour. I live in a rock solid Labour area, (still is). When there is a Labour Government we are always at the back of the queue for any government help, why? Because you could put up a dog with a Labour sign on it and it would get voted in, so the Labour hierarchy bye-pass our needs. Conversely the Tories have given up on ever taking this seat/area so they also put us at the back of the queue for anything worthwhile, in fact they couldn't care less.
Maybe the 'red wall' changes might just shake things up, for areas like ours anything is better than what we have now... please don't even mention the Lib dems!!!
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
When there is a Labour Government we are always at the back of the queue for any government help, why?
I don't think that's true in the slightest. I come from Bassetlaw, and that place definitely improved markedly under Blair.

Maybe the 'red wall' changes might just shake things up, for areas like ours anything is better than what we have now... please don't even mention the Lib dems!!!
I get so angry hearing this all the time from people in Labour heartlands. You've just lived through a decade of Tory misrule, funding cuts and mismanagement, and yet people think the answer to that is to vote in more Tories. It beggars belief, it really does. How much power do you actually think a local MP has for feck sake?
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,449
Location
left wing
Liz Truss and Nadine Dorries now pretty much Boris' 2 most important ministers :lol:
It is remarkable. You might have thought that Boris would be self-aware enough to want to compensate for his own rather obvious shortcomings by appointing a team of highly competent people to do the work for him. Instead, he as accumulated arguably the least talented front bench in living memory.

Priti Patel is of course well known for being monumentally stupid, but Liz Truss is on another level. In the past few years I have been independently told by three separate people who have had the misfortune to deal with Truss in a professional capacity, that she is without doubt the thickest minister they have ever come across, completely unable to get her head around even the simplest of briefings, with civil servants forced into explaining topics as one might if dealing with a child or a labrador.
 

esmufc07

Brad
Scout
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
49,914
Location
Lake Jonathan Creek
Priti Patel is of course well known for being monumentally stupid, but Liz Truss is on another level. In the past few years I have been independently told by three separate people who have had the misfortune to deal with Truss in a professional capacity, that she is without doubt the thickest minister they have ever come across, completely unable to get her head around even the simplest of briefings, with civil servants forced into explaining topics as one might if dealing with a child or a labrador.
I have sometimes wondered whether it is a bit of an act with Truss, much like Johnson, but it seems she really is just thick. Amazes me someone like her can get to such high positions in government, and is seemingly in with a chance of becoming the next leader of the Conservative Party and potentially a PM!
 

CassiusClaymore

Is it Gaizka Mendieta?
Scout
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
35,957
Location
None of your business mate
Supports
The greatest team in history
I have sometimes wondered whether it is a bit of an act with Truss, much like Johnson, but it seems she really is just thick. Amazes me someone like her can get to such high positions in government, and is seemingly in with a chance of becoming the next leader of the Conservative Party and potentially a PM!
If you think about in terms of who might be pulling her strings then she's the perfect candidate for next PM.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,449
Location
left wing
I have sometimes wondered whether it is a bit of an act with Truss, much like Johnson, but it seems she really is just thick. Amazes me someone like her can get to such high positions in government, and is seemingly in with a chance of becoming the next leader of the Conservative Party and potentially a PM!
Johnson's reputation is of someone intelligent but unbelievably work-shy - in his case, the bumbling buffoon act is definitely just that, an act.

Truss is allegedly just thick.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
13,020
It is remarkable. You might have thought that Boris would be self-aware enough to want to compensate for his own rather obvious shortcomings by appointing a team of highly competent people to do the work for him. Instead, he as accumulated arguably the least talented front bench in living memory.

Priti Patel is of course well known for being monumentally stupid, but Liz Truss is on another level. In the past few years I have been independently told by three separate people who have had the misfortune to deal with Truss in a professional capacity, that she is without doubt the thickest minister they have ever come across, completely unable to get her head around even the simplest of briefings, with civil servants forced into explaining topics as one might if dealing with a child or a labrador.
It's not really remarkable though. If you're a power hungry but incompetent leader, in order to maintain power you either need to surround yourself with people who have good reason to go along with you and stay loyal (e.g. family, people you can blackmail), or you need to surround yourself with people too dim and uninspiring to be able to challenge you.

If you think about it Boris tried the first tactic with his brother who couldn't face being tarred with the Brexit brush, and Cummings whose power hungry nature meant he was very keen to stay as the PM's adviser but eventually even he grew to be fed up. He then has gradually moved more and more down the 2nd route by appointing the likes of Truss, Raab, Patel, Williamson, Shapps, Dorries etc to high office. And in fact the whole Tory party is something of a reflection of this strategy as he booted out anyone who wouldn't vote for his shit Brexit deal, thereby removing most of the backbone and remaining competence from the parliamentary party at a stroke.
 

GuybrushThreepwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
1,167
Supports
Blackburn Rovers
I don't think that's true in the slightest. I come from Bassetlaw, and that place definitely improved markedly under Blair.
On a side note and in relation to this, I think that one of Labour’s biggest and most fatal mistakes, was going to such extreme lengths to distance themselves from their record in government after Ed Miliband became leader in 2010. I liked Ed Miliband, thought he was treated shabbily by the media, and wish that the 2015 election ended with him as PM instead of Cameron. But he deserves a lot of criticism for that. The Tories would never distance themselves from positive achievements (or what they themselves considered to be positive achievements) from previous administrations, they would lap them up.

Yes that meant distancing themselves from the bad decisions, notably re Iraq. But it also meant distancing themselves from their numerous positive achievements, such as reducing hospital waiting times, reducing school class sizes, what was in my opinion their best achievement of all significantly reducing child poverty (it’s no surprise that this increased noticeably under the Tories from 1979-1997, decreased noticeably under Labour from 1997-2010 and has sky rocked under the Tories since 2010) etc. Plus they also allowed the Tories to bang the ‘mess we inherited’ drum, and blame them for causing a global financial crash, without defending themselves properly.

Given that Labour had majorities of 160-180 between 1997-2005, at least or more than double what Johnson currently has, I think that they certainly could have achieved more in government. But what they did achieve was still significantly better than what the Tories did either before or afterwards.
 

owlo

Full Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
3,252
On a side note and in relation to this, I think that one of Labour’s biggest and most fatal mistakes, was going to such extreme lengths to distance themselves from their record in government after Ed Miliband became leader in 2010. I liked Ed Miliband, thought he was treated shabbily by the media, and wish that the 2015 election ended with him as PM instead of Cameron. But he deserves a lot of criticism for that. The Tories would never distance themselves from positive achievements (or what they themselves considered to be positive achievements) from previous administrations, they would lap them up.

Yes that meant distancing themselves from the bad decisions, notably re Iraq. But it also meant distancing themselves from their numerous positive achievements, such as reducing hospital waiting times, reducing school class sizes, what was in my opinion their best achievement of all significantly reducing child poverty (it’s no surprise that this increased noticeably under the Tories from 1979-1997, decreased noticeably under Labour from 1997-2010 and has sky rocked under the Tories since 2010) etc. Plus they also allowed the Tories to bang the ‘mess we inherited’ drum, and blame them from causing a global financial crash, without defending themselves properly.

Given that Labour had majorities of 160-180 between 1997-2005, at least or more than double what Johnson currently has, I think that they certainly could have achieved more in government. But what they did achieve was still significantly better than what the Tories did either before or afterwards.
Honestly, I wish they'd have just owned the bad too. They didn't have a choice over the Iraq war. No British government, conservative or British would have done. Own up to the mistake, blame the Americans and move on.