Erik ten Hag - Manchester United manager

Would you allow ETH to manage the cup final before parting ways?

  • Yes

    Votes: 391 45.9%
  • No, get an interim now

    Votes: 461 54.1%

  • Total voters
    852
  • This poll will close: .

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,173
No - I would want the board to consult him, of course. And if he absolutely does not fancy said player, the board should listen very carefully to what he has to say about it.

The point is that United - as a club - should target players according to a transfer/recruitment policy that transcends the current "manager" (or head coach). We shouldn't go for players ETH (or his successor) fancies - we should go for players that fit a certain profile.
I agree with all that but for the bit where the board retains the right to sign a player a manager does not want. The club's job is to find players who fit the managers profile and way of playing. If a player is proposed who the manager believes does not match that, his view should prevail. Ultimately the manager is accountable for the performance of his players, not the board or anyone else.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,534
If a player is proposed who the manager believes does not match that, his view should prevail.
I would say that this depends on the overall scenario.

If we're talking about a player who does fit the overall profile, and who the DOF likes, but the manager (head coach, whatever) is reluctant about (for specific reasons) - then yes, absolutely, it makes sense to give the last word to the manager/ head coach (who actually has to fit that player into his team).

The structure should be clear, though (and that is the key point): the manager/head coach should not be the one identifying targets. He should be consulted on them and no target should be forced on him, but the overall transfer policy should be carried out by someone beyond (above, if you will) the manager/ head coach.

Why? Because the manager/head coach is most likely a figure who will be much more temporary than the transfer policy itself.
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,800
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
No - I would want the board to consult him, of course. And if he absolutely does not fancy said player, the board should listen very carefully to what he has to say about it.

The point is that United - as a club - should target players according to a transfer/recruitment policy that transcends the current "manager" (or head coach). We shouldn't go for players ETH (or his successor) fancies - we should go for players that fit a certain profile.
I think we agree, I guess my opinion is that ETH is the first manager we've had that actually has the proper profile of player in mind (that the board should always have had yes). We should always be targeting players that thrive in the modern game, but it's also understandable for our first window to go after specific ETH targets seeing as he's the one that has to bed in a new system.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,534
I think we agree, I guess my opinion is that ETH is the first manager we've had that actually has the proper profile of player in mind (that the board should always have had yes). We should always be targeting players that thrive in the modern game, but it's also understandable for our first window to go after specific ETH targets seeing as he's the one that has to bed in a new system.
Yes - and I've said before that we (as fans) should probably give 'em all a pass for this window: it's not unreasonable (at least not very unreasonable) if Murtough decided to primarily focus on ETH targets in this window.

Going forward, though...Murtough needs to do much more than just rely on ETH. He needs to establish an actual transfer/recruitment strategy that does not depend on recommendations from the current manager/head coach.

In other words - it's really not about doubting ETH's preferred targets this window, but rather about the big picture, the long-term approach, how we should do things as a club.
 

bosskeano

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Messages
5,131
Winning games (every game we play) should always be our priority, take each game as it comes, move on from there, that's what builds success. Making excuses for fielding a moderate (squad team) is a 'get out' clause, either for manager who doesn't know his players or his lack of strategy for each game. I've been pleased with ETH's approach so far, and will count last night's (6 as far as we know un-forced) team changes as an aberration.
getting back into the CL is the priority simple as that....the europa league is not a priority
 

kaku06

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
2,398
He's not. Hes a possession based manager in a sense that his Ajax dominated the league as always so it didn't matter what he did.
In UCL, i rarely saw his team had more possession against teams with same or higher caliber. Go check the stat, Ajax had less ball possession than Dortmund & Spurs.
So he’s not a possession based manager who wants to dominate the teams with more of the ball ? Well, that’s a bummer. I was hoping to go in that direction under him.
 

kaku06

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
2,398
Don't think you need the people here to tell you anything. You can watch any Ajax game from last season and realize how they play is very different to how we're playing now.
Give the man a moment before jumping to conclusions about his style of play.
I didn’t jump to any conclusions mate. You did that for me. I specifically mentioned that I’m genuinely asking about his style of play that he is a possession based manager or not. Would have been better if you had read it properly rather than jumping on me.
 

kaku06

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
2,398
Whilst being an Ajax Cruijff-ian possession nerd, ten Hag is supposedly a bit more lenient and will amend his teams as necessary. I think he's doing this with us, as he lacks the personnel to actually control a midfield.

Still... I'm in agreement with you, I'm surprised he didn't make a proper no.8 our main target. I mean, he did with de Jong, but once it became clear he wasn't available, there was no alternative with a similar skill-set targeted...

Eriksen, Fernandes, + one of Casemiro/McTominay is a decent midfield 3, but they have the glaring flaw of none of them being expert short to medium pass players who control the middle third of a football field. They all suit a counter attack game. Case/McT are ball winners who aren't expressive on the ball; Eriksen and Fernandes are fantastic insightful long passers, but don't run the tempo of a game and instead play very instinctively.

I'd imagine (and very much hope) that a de Jong/Verratti/Kovacic/Thiago style of central midfielder is our next main priority in there.
Thanks. Much appreciated.
 

Shai-Hulud

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 22, 2022
Messages
561
We still have massive issues. If we had a competent striker , we would have won it. Ronaldo is done. Criminal that we didn't even try for a striker. I mean, any one who could control a ball would have been enough.
Yep. Very frustrating. It's going to hold us back all season long. Might cost us a trophy or top 4.

Could have brought in someone as a stopgap... Memphis for instance. Not great, but better than geriatric Ronaldo.
 

RedOrange

Full Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Messages
1,124
No - I would want the board to consult him, of course. And if he absolutely does not fancy said player, the board should listen very carefully to what he has to say about it.

The point is that United - as a club - should target players according to a transfer/recruitment policy that transcends the current "manager" (or head coach). We shouldn't go for players ETH (or his successor) fancies - we should go for players that fit a certain profile.
What you're describing isn't so much a player recruitment problem as it is a manager recruitment problem. The board has flip flopped between managers with different tactical philosophies, which has resulted in a half constructed squad that's not good at anything. This is how every manager has simultaneously spent a ton of money and still not felt that they were backed by the board because half the players weren't fit for purpose.

I'm not sure what buying players that transcend the current manager is supposed to look like. Buying "good" players that the current manager doesn't want is a waste of money. If we build a good squad for Ten Hag and then hire Nagelsmann after he leaves, that likely wouldn't require a £400 million squad overhaul. If we hire Mourinho after, then we're going to have to replace most of the players.
 

Abhinav

Full Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2017
Messages
874
I think yesterday showed our lack of depth in terms of quality. All the changes he made were logical and necessary.
1) Maguire instead of Varane to give respite to our best centre half with previous injury issues
2) Lindelof instead of Martinez - same as above plus need to give Lindelof game time
3) Dalot being replaced in 2nd half to manage his game time
4) Eriksen /Bruno 45 minutes each as our midfield needs atleast one of them to have a cutting edge and both have been our most hardworking players
5) Fred as a forward 8 to press from the front and accommodate Cristiano
6) Casamerio & Cristiano needed game time
It is hard to argue with any of the changes and if it were not for a horrendous ref call, we might have won the game.

The issue is that a lot of our 2nd string are just not good enough. Maguire & Lindelof slow us down and are not proactive in defending. Fred is an enigma and can’t be relied upon on the ball. Cristiano seems to have declined further and everything he does seems to be in a slow motion.

Ten hag has a big problem at hand with fixtures coming fast. He should maintain a consistent PL XI (give or take 1/2 players) and heavily rotate in cups. We will likely see bad results and shock cup exits but I rather we make Top 4 our priority.

Next season, get rid of Maguire and bring a replacement CB, bring a ball playing midfielder, a starting striker and a GK and we are almost there if Dalot can continue to develop.
 

Red Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
55,373
Location
Across the Universe....from Old Trafford.
I think yesterday showed our lack of depth in terms of quality. All the changes he made were logical and necessary.
1) Maguire instead of Varane to give respite to our best centre half with previous injury issues
2) Lindelof instead of Martinez - same as above plus need to give Lindelof game time
3) Dalot being replaced in 2nd half to manage his game time
4) Eriksen /Bruno 45 minutes each as our midfield needs atleast one of them to have a cutting edge and both have been our most hardworking players
5) Fred as a forward 8 to press from the front and accommodate Cristiano
6) Casamerio & Cristiano needed game time
It is hard to argue with any of the changes and if it were not for a horrendous ref call, we might have won the game.

The issue is that a lot of our 2nd string are just not good enough. Maguire & Lindelof slow us down and are not proactive in defending. Fred is an enigma and can’t be relied upon on the ball. Cristiano seems to have declined further and everything he does seems to be in a slow motion.

Ten hag has a big problem at hand with fixtures coming fast. He should maintain a consistent PL XI (give or take 1/2 players) and heavily rotate in cups. We will likely see bad results and shock cup exits but I rather we make Top 4 our priority.

Next season, get rid of Maguire and bring a replacement CB, bring a ball playing midfielder, a starting striker and a GK and we are almost there if Dalot can continue to develop.
Pretty much.

Think/hope we will concentrate on the League.
The Cups a distant second.
We simply do not have the squad strength.
 

NK86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
10,399
I didn’t jump to any conclusions mate. You did that for me. I specifically mentioned that I’m genuinely asking about his style of play that he is a possession based manager or not. Would have been better if you had read it properly rather than jumping on me.
Mate you were asking for evidence for him being a manager who wants his team to be more possession oriented. Seemed like you were not sure of that since you perceived him to be a counter attacking style manager based on what you've seen so far.
Hence why I said you should just watch Ajax of last season to get the answer.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,217
Location
La-La-Land
We still have massive issues. If we had a competent striker , we would have won it. Ronaldo is done. Criminal that we didn't even try for a striker. I mean, any one who could control a ball would have been enough.
We did but he rejected us
 

giggs-beckham

Clueless
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
6,966
Well, excluding Arnautovic.

Anyway - point is: we shouldn't depend on him picking targets (based on personal experience). That isn't sustainable in the long term.
On talkshit White asked the cnut 'Ten Hag has been given the signings he's asked for, what does that tell us?' I said under my breath, we haven't got a dof
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,781
Location
US
So he’s not a possession based manager who wants to dominate the teams with more of the ball ? Well, that’s a bummer. I was hoping to go in that direction under him.
Ajax completely dominated Dortmund in both games. That can‘t be right.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,781
Location
US
He's not. Hes a possession based manager in a sense that his Ajax dominated the league as always so it didn't matter what he did.
In UCL, i rarely saw his team had more possession against teams with same or higher caliber. Go check the stat, Ajax had less ball possession than Dortmund & Spurs.

mic drop
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
12,203
Location
Manchester
Would ten Hag of played the first 11 against sociedad if he knew games was postponed this weekend? I think he would of. The only reason he played that team was so we had a fully fit team on Sunday.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,213
Location
Voted the best city in the world
Would ten Hag of played the first 11 against sociedad if he knew games was postponed this weekend? I think he would of. The only reason he played that team was so we had a fully fit team on Sunday.
Yeah rotation seemed to focus heavily on his mind (giving players a rest and giving others who haven’t featured much some minutes). Including Antony because he needs fitness and to be integrated into the team. I’m just not sure why AWB still didn’t get a chance :lol: (unless he’s injured?).
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,973
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Would ten Hag of played the first 11 against sociedad if he knew games was postponed this weekend? I think he would of. The only reason he played that team was so we had a fully fit team on Sunday.
I think he would have swapped up regardless. It’s important to give fringe players match time when you can. Especially for a new manager still getting to know his squad. If anything, he should have maybe rotated more than he did.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,709
getting back into the CL is the priority simple as that....the europa league is not a priority
So, what's happened to the 'in it to win it' mentality? I'm sure fans who bought tickets for the Europa games would like to know. Success breeds success, once you start saying one competition is the priority, it's the slippery slope and provides ready-made excuses for failure. This club is bigger than that and I hope ETH is too!
 

AmanNits04

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 27, 2014
Messages
489
Location
India
This season is going to this way. We will lose some and win some. The main thing now should be building a stable team where players can perform their best by trusting each other. The small patterns of play are already visible albeit on a few occasions. But we finally have a tactical manager after I don't know how long, so it's going to take a bit of time. We just have to trust the manager and players for now. Patience is the name of the game now. We will work hard and keep on getting better.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
Hopefully he stops making weird decisions like playing Fred at CAM and Lindelof as fullback.

I guess he feels like he needs to know his players but I feel like he doesn’t need to be so stupid intentionally.

What I love the most out of him though is his in game changes to help win a match.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,781
Location
US
We went into this game to win it with a strong line up, but our performance wasn‘t good enough. We need to improve more, as the manager is reminding you after every press conference.

We did not deserve to lose, but we were poor, with a lot of turnover. Antony looks not fit yet and needs time to adapt.

Fred was poor and Casemiro needs time to adapt as well. Ronaldo needs to show more if he wants to start.

There were good phases of play and Elanga was a bright spot.

I think we will see another improved performance on the back of this.

We need to find a way to play without Eriksen. I had him in my line up, because there is no one else to do the playmaking.

Watched Ajax vs Rangers: night and day, but that is the goal.
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
12,203
Location
Manchester
I think he would have swapped up regardless. It’s important to give fringe players match time when you can. Especially for a new manager still getting to know his squad. If anything, he should have maybe rotated more than he did.
It’s a tough one because it’s hard to rest both Bruno and eriksen together because without one of them in the team we have 0 creativity. Think the full backs both should of been rested.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,483

I can do that too
He's not. Hes a possession based manager in a sense that his Ajax dominated the league as always so it didn't matter what he did.
In UCL, i rarely saw his team had more possession against teams with same or higher caliber. Go check the stat, Ajax had less ball possession than Dortmund & Spurs.
It's OK to be wrong. Accept it.
 

Cheimoon

Made of cheese
Scout
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
14,339
Location
Canada
Supports
no-one in particular
I think he would have swapped up regardless. It’s important to give fringe players match time when you can. Especially for a new manager still getting to know his squad. If anything, he should have maybe rotated more than he did.
Exactly. Ten Hag has a squad to keep happy, including many very capable players that also will want to show that they can play the game his way. If they don't even get to play the first Europa League game (there are five, losing this one shouldn't be a big deal), when do they? And will that do to their motivation?

Plus, even though a significantly changed team is always a bit disjointed and won't function as efficiently as the regular team, Ten Hag will have learned something about the rotated players' ability to execute his demands under pressure in a real game. That should help him figure out what to focus on in training, at least for them. Again, when else would he get this opportunity if not in this sort of game? (And early-stage cup games, obviously.)
 

MikeKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
5,125
Supports
Bournemouth
The positives is that we play with a lot more width, and we switch play from side to side more often which is something we have been struggling heavily with, so whilst not quick or perfect yet it's an improvement. The negatives is that our squad's depth consists of expensive former failed first team players struggling to adapt. We have to sell these players, as they don't provide any consistency through the team when they play. Effort is still lacking, quality below par. It's so unusual to keep these expensive flops for so long I'm sure it must feel like an impossible job to create the right atmosphere. We should have sympathy for Ten Hag and look to the owners, and men above for not making it easier for our managers to come in and do the right things.
 

bosskeano

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Messages
5,131
So, what's happened to the 'in it to win it' mentality? I'm sure fans who bought tickets for the Europa games would like to know. Success breeds success, once you start saying one competition is the priority, it's the slippery slope and provides ready-made excuses for failure. This club is bigger than that and I hope ETH is too!
i get what you're saying but we don't have enough depth in the squad right now to play our best XI in both the Europa and League matches especially with Martial already injured. that's why i say top 4 is more important than winning the europa league
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,781
Location
US
How did Chelsea, PSG, City and Liverpool do against Real Madrid in the CL last year with all that possession?
The guy was trying to prove that Ajax had less possession against big sides in the CL. Which is not often the case.

The two games above that he cherry picked: if you are up and the other side is is chasing the game, it is normal to have lower numbers, especially against a good side. 2 goals up after 18 minutes against Real Madrid, and he‘s using that game to prove a point about Ajax in big games :lol:
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,279
Location
NYC
It’s a complete misunderstanding that ETH’s philosophy is possession-based football. In contrast, his playing style is “vertical” positional play.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,781
Location
US
It’s a complete misunderstanding that ETH’s philosophy is possession-based football. In contrast, his playing style is “vertical” positional play.
Having the ball, pressing and getting it back quickly is the essence of possession style football. How the ball progresses forward is a different matter. You are right Hag wants it vertical when possible.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,279
Location
NYC
Having the ball, pressing and getting it back quickly is the essence of possession style football. How the ball progresses forward is a different matter. You are right Hag wants it vertical when possible.
It’s about the principles. Positional play doesn’t concentrate on possession at all. When a well drilled positional playing team does well in possession and press to recover the ball out of possession (when it’s possible), the effect is high possession. But again, it’s the effects, not purpose.
 

AdNani

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,674
anyone else excited how we'll look after the break? essentially 2 weeks to drill his style into the team
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,933
Location
France
anyone else excited how we'll look after the break? essentially 2 weeks to drill his style into the team
Not really, if the team looks good I will have nothing to complain about.