hobbers
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2013
- Messages
- 30,082
I'm sure Toto will brief us on the latest when he's had it leaked to him from his lawyer.So how long till the fia kill f1 by officially letting red bull cheat?
I'm sure Toto will brief us on the latest when he's had it leaked to him from his lawyer.So how long till the fia kill f1 by officially letting red bull cheat?
December 2021.So how long till the fia kill f1 by officially letting red bull cheat?
Last year.So how long till the fia kill f1 by officially letting red bull cheat?
If they take max’s 1st world championship, the can of worms is open for Ferrari and Massa to call the 2008 Singapore race null and void as it was effectively a fixed race.It’s not f1 I’m giving up on… it’s some of their fans brought on by the Netflix bullshit.
An entire sport focused on literally cheating and bending rules to gain advantage. Like legit if you could define Motorsport it would be this sentence.
Accept it happens and move on.You’ll live a happier life.
If they take max’s 1st world championship, the can of worms is open for Ferrari and Massa to call the 2008 Singapore race null and void as it was effectively a fixed race.
I only found he got to keep that win on his record despite the blatant cheating.If they take max’s 1st world championship, the can of worms is open for Ferrari and Massa to call the 2008 Singapore race null and void as it was effectively a fixed race.
That's just a really dumb statement to try and convince people makes sense, though. Bending rules to gain advantages yes, cheating? Absolutely not. It's not intended, the fact that it happens is bad and should be eliminated end of story. There's nothing Netflix about that and to suggest it is is just really bizarre. The sport itself and the fans have been in uproar about numerous cheating scandals long before Netflix arrived and for good reason, the entire sport is absolutely not focused on it, quite the opposite. Different interpretations of the rules in clever ways that result in advantages on track and cheating are two very separate things.It’s not f1 I’m giving up on… it’s some of their fans brought on by the Netflix bullshit.
An entire sport focused on literally cheating and bending rules to gain advantage. Like legit if you could define Motorsport it would be this sentence.
Accept it happens and move on.You’ll live a happier life.
Just take away all his, perez and red bulls points this season as well and ferrari will be cool with it ... problem solvedIf they take max’s 1st world championship, the can of worms is open for Ferrari and Massa to call the 2008 Singapore race null and void as it was effectively a fixed race.
I don’t remember the British media being in uproar over that as the only plausible out come would be to void the race such was the actions and impact it had on the championshipI only found he got to keep that win on his record despite the blatant cheating.
There was plenty of uproar - an example https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-worst-act-of-cheating-in-the-history-of-sport-nhf92sqnkqrI don’t remember the British media being in uproar over that as the only plausible out come would be to void the race such was the actions and impact it had on the championship
The FIA "making an offer" ffs. Let me guess its a fine which Red Bull can obviously well afford.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The terminology makes it sounds worse than it is, but this is normal as per the process. it's always been in the regulations that anything constituted as a minor breach the FIA would propose the penalty which would either be sporting or financial, or both. I guess at this stage then they've decided based on the amount what punishment they are getting. The ball is in Red Bull's court now to decide whether to accept this penalty, and then formally acknowledged that they breached the cost cap and the details become public, or to take it to an adjudication panel and risk the chance of a bigger penalty.The FIA "making an offer" ffs. Let me guess its a fine which Red Bull can obviously well afford.
No way will it actually be the punishment they deserve and no way will Red Bull accept any wrong doing anyway.
Absolute joke.
He's back in the land of Oz on the Supercars Commission now.Let me guess... the appeal panel is massi
This will almost certainly be the case.I suspect they'll accept it but go hard in a press conference to show where the FIA are wrongly claiming they've overspent.
The ABA cant even reduce their cost cap, the only penalties would be fines and wind tunnel reduction.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I don't think Red Bull press conference is going ahead as apparently the meeting between Horner and Sulayem which was scheduled for last night, didn't happen.The overall figure involved is believed to be around $1.8m, which puts the offence well within the “minor breach” limit of 5% over the cap, or just over $7m.
The team appears to have fallen foul of several areas of the FIA's financial regulations, which have regularly been updated by amendments that have not been published on its website or made public.
One is the allocation of the cost of catering at the factory and at the track. In addition, there are believed to be redundancy and sick pay issues related to key employees.
A subject more directly involved to the cost of running the cars is the allocation of the value of unused spare parts.
They were passed to the heritage department at the end of the season for use on show cars and any testing of the 2021 model in 2022, which falls outside the cap restrictions.
It’s understood that the FIA issued a clarification in June this year, three months after teams submitted their documents, about how such parts were to be considered by teams.
There is also a UK-specific tax issue which is believed to be similar to a procedural breach involving Aston Martin.
Either way the whole saga has just been a vehicle for Toto and bitter Mercedes fans in the media to distract from the fact they've been seriously outraced on the track and outdeveloped off it for 2 years on the trot.If these rumours are true then it's an absolute storm in a tea cup that's been blown out of proportion, it feels like people are imagining 7million was pumped directly into development of the car.
An odd hill to die on where the issue is more how the news came (conspiracy theories around a former lawyer of Mercedes now at the FIA being a source) out rather than the breach of the cap itself.And whatever happens with RB and their penalty, there still needs to be a serious public discussion on how Toto knew about 2 teams confidential budget cap breaches 2 weeks before the teams themselves were informed.
Binotto answering generic cost cap questions in May isn’t relevant. He didn’t allude to knowing a team had definitely broken the cap like Toto did in Singapore.An odd hill to die on where the issue is more how the news came (conspiracy theories around a former lawyer of Mercedes now at the FIA being a source) out rather than the breach of the cap itself.
Binotto has been banging the breaching of the cap drum since Miami, long before Wolff mentioned anything. This isn't new news by the way, but Toto is a board member at Aston Martin so he would have heard this news anyway. With only 4 areas to look at, Binotto knew that no Ferrari powered team had an issue, Wolff knew that no Mercedes powered team had an issue, and a simple question to Alpine would have highlighted who the other team where. The teams all have a relatively good idea of how much each team is spending based on what they see on the car, plus the paddock is a very, very small place.
That can't be true can it? Changing the rules after the money's been spent and the accounts have already been submittedParts designed for the 2021-spec of cars that could not be carried over to the new breed were previously exempt, but in June of this year, the rule was changed so these parts were included in the budget total.
If that’s true then the majority of their alleged overspend can be wiped out. Craig Slater was saying 7 figures worth of old parts that shouldn’t have counted were counted after that rule was changed.This article is filled with new information and some very interesting bits.
https://racingnews365.com/red-bulls-f1-cost-cap-breach-was-in-four-main-areas
This bit is is especially interesting:
That can't be true can it? Changing the rules after the money's been spent and the accounts have already been submitted
Yeah. Honestly, if that article is accurate I can imagine Red Bull will not accept any punishment that will hurt them in the coming seasons like a lower budget cap or less wind tunnel time. I'd imagine they'd rather hire an army of lawyers and stick it to the FIA in court. But we'll probably hear more over the weekend. Some of the information in the article could be wrong, could be fed by Red Bull as well so truth could be somewhere in the middle. We'll see.If that’s true then the majority of their alleged overspend can be wiped out. Craig Slater was saying 7 figures worth of old parts that shouldn’t have counted were counted after that rule was changed.
It's OK though, as it was spent on catering, and none of the other teams had to factor that into their budget either...People seriously trying to downplay 2m investment. Ridiculous.
Who's the source? Could be a leak straight from the FIA and RB.Rumours of the overspend from motorsport.com:
I don't think Red Bull press conference is going ahead as apparently the meeting between Horner and Sulayem which was scheduled for last night, didn't happen.
If these rumours are true then it's an absolute storm in a tea cup that's been blown out of proportion, it feels like people are imagining 7million was pumped directly into development of the car.
Someone in RB is leaking info?Binotto answering generic cost cap questions in May isn’t relevant. He didn’t allude to knowing a team had definitely broken the cap like Toto did in Singapore.
AM didn’t know about their procedural breach before Suzuka, same as Red Bull.
Rao was heavily involved with the TD, low and behold Mercedes get a drop on the details of the TD long before anyone else raising eyebrows all across the paddock in Canada. Same situation again with the cost cap. It’s insultingly obvious what’s going on.
Only three teams could even breach it to begin with .. The rest are trying to find money to spend not the other way aroundWho's the source? Could be a leak straight from the FIA and RB.
If it's true, they only need to prove it by sharing the accounts publicly/ through a neutral audit team and that should generally get them off any serious punishment, as long as they didn't also spend more money on car development than competing teams.
I still don't really understand why RB were the only team to breach the cap, if the rules were confusing/ changed at the last minute. And why were things like catering apparently so much more expensive for them than other teams?
If only one team breaks the rules, especially one as good at pushing boundaries as much as RB, it hints at wrongdoing. The current excuse of the overspend only being on redundancies and catering, when other teams will have had similar challenges, also doesn't seem to make a lot of logical sense. But I'll be pleasantly surprised if the process transparently reveals this is not the case.
RB didnt hear from the FIA about breaching the cap until Suzuka. This line that the teams were going back and forth with the FIA for months debating their submissions is just a Mercedes fan fiction. AM and RB were genuinely caught by surprise with the news in Singapore that they'd committed breaches.Someone in RB is leaking info?
Binnotto?RB didnt hear from the FIA about breaching the cap until Suzuka. This line that the teams were going back and forth with the FIA for months debating their submissions is just a Mercedes fan fiction. AM and RB were genuinely caught by surprise with the news in Singapore that they'd committed breaches.
Someone in the FIA either leaked vague details of submissions and breaches straight to AMuS or it went via Mercedes.
Joke of a "sport".Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date