Tbf a lot of PC ports are absolutely fecked.
Gaming Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
- Thread starter BristolRuss
- Start date
Apparently it's like 150GB! The feck!?
Is this on GP?
The first took a long time to get going but by the time you get the key skills and lightsaber upgrades it was a better game. So based on the reviews I bought it this morning. Let’s see!
Does it still cost power to twirl your lightsaber around?
Of all the issues the first one had, that was my biggest problem
Of all the issues the first one had, that was my biggest problem
Getting great reviews. Hopefully not the usual Stars Wars overhyping going on.
Agreed.
Though as usual it's beginning to work on me. If there wasn't the usual performance issues on launch I would have definitely been suckered again
No.
Insisting games are unplayable in 30 fps is my favourite. Who gives a feck.
I still want to get this one day, but there's no way I'm avoiding any spoilers until that day. It's already plastered all over my homepage whenever I go on YouTube. I keep clicking the three dots to stop recommending me them but more just pop up like whac-a-mole
Well thankfully the world doesn’t have that attitude so we can move away from the horror that is a 30fps game in 2023.
I thought it was a cinema trailer
I do, they look shit.
I really did not like the first game - found it very repetitive and boring and basically a tomb raider clone but with a star wars skin. This looks like more of the same so I'll give it a miss.
I quite enjoyed the first one, even though I felt the story to be quite formulaic and the choppy framerate became a major bugbear whenever certain periods of the game got busy ( The AT-AT sequence was conceptionally brilliantly but the choppy framerate made me loath that scene when re-playing it).
I'm not sure If I'll go near this anytime soon. One, its pricey and two, I dont really have the time (so, I'll probably just binge a walkthrough on YT).
I'm not sure If I'll go near this anytime soon. One, its pricey and two, I dont really have the time (so, I'll probably just binge a walkthrough on YT).
It shares some elements with the modern Tomb Raider games (as do so many other games), but to call it basically a clone is absurd. It's nothing of the sort.
Yes we are now blessed with super smooth 800 fps interactive movies with gameplay so easy my 6 month old baby can beat them
I heard that's not actually the installed size, but the needed space during installation.
Good gameplay and reasonable fps aren't mutually exclusive. A challenge does not require a slideshow.Yes we are now blessed with super smooth 800 fps interactive movies with gameplay so easy my 6 month old baby can beat them
30fps is hardly a slide show though. Of course more fps is better, but no one can overreact quite like gamers.
Did you visit the united forum recently?
Lots of running about, climbing about mixed with kinda rubbish combat and some puzzles. Sounds like a tomb raider clone to me.
Do you also describe every 2D metroidvania ever as a Super Metroid or SOTN clone?
Soulsraidervania.
Close enough.
Never played any of those so couldn't say
Really because I reckon you guys are in the minority. You're loud though I'll give you that. Like the gammons.
Ah so the developers have started going to 60fps on chance, got it nothing to do with it makes the whole game a better experience.
Thanks for clearing that up for me.
60fps is better than 30fps, it's not even a discussion. Imagine only having 30 beers every night and thinking that it's just as fun as having 60 beers. It's just plain not. 60 is better.
Are you honestly trying to argue that 30 fps doesn't matter and that saying 60 fps should be standard is somehow ridiculous? Are we in 2004?
Given it a while but seeing as I'm away next week and have company for the weekend, I'm just going wait for a patch or 2.
It's pretty bad technically. It's not even the frame rate but you can't move the camera without screen tearing. I don't remember a game this bad for it - people moaned about Cyberpunk but I think this is comfortably worse.
It's pretty bad technically. It's not even the frame rate but you can't move the camera without screen tearing. I don't remember a game this bad for it - people moaned about Cyberpunk but I think this is comfortably worse.
Once you get used to 60, 30 feels archaic.
I was fine with 30 till I had a PS4. Now I’m above that shit.
So is it good?
You mean PS5, surely?
Pressure from marketing no doubt. I'm sure real developers know what's most important about a game is how enjoyable and fun it is regardless of any technical limitations. Like Nintendo do.
Last edited:
Do you think when you were born that your parents already knew they wanted to throw you away but couldn't because of the rules of modern society?
I believe the rules worked in my favour, yes.
Why are you guys arguing about 30fps, especially with a low-level troll like Vid? He's like the 30fps version of Elvis.
It's 2023, we should have been done with this 15 years ago
It's 2023, we should have been done with this 15 years ago
I have all the playstations and a rather high end PC (it was high end 2 years ago, so it's probably an old timer now actually). I recently replayed Elden Ring on PS5 after playing it extensively on PS4 and I obviously notice the difference, but I just really realllllly don't care.