Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
But it's a nonsense argument. You don't know what Sir Jim has bought Nice for.

City's owner has bought 7 other clubs in the world. They don't get the investment that Man City get. So he must be a bad owner then too?

Utd and Nice are a different animal all together. It's just irrelevant.
It's not. As Radcliffe promised that Nice would challenge PSG and not only that didn't happened but they actually became worse than with the previous owner. Thats a good indication of what we can expect.
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,896
Qataris will buy Liverpool and then we will have a chance to see, directly and head to head, which owner is the better.
Yet another post that totally disregards the main reasons that many are against the qatar bid. Nice one.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,756
Location
France
Alright, I'll bite: this really isn't the smoking gun you think it is.

Do you think the supporters' group would've bothered making that statement if their sole concern was "Will the Qataris continue to allow LGBT supporters into the stadium and the players to wear rainbow armbands"? People aren't daft; they know that Sheikh Jassim isn't going to fecking start implementing any anti-LGBT policies at Manchester United because of the hoo-hah it would cause.

This argument is about more than that. It's about whether LGBT players, staff, and supporters feel comfortable supporting and representing a club owned by people who don't believe in their right to exist. So, my response would be that we have indeed come full circle, because my response to YOU would once again be that, by limiting yourself to just whether or not the LGBT community will be allowed to continue supporting or representing the club, you are completely missing the bigger picture.
Okay, I guess their statement isn't about what they stated.
 

JagUTD

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Messages
3,245
Not successful clubs though.
Plucking a random example out of thin air... What about... PSG?

How do their fans currently feel about their owners and club on general. Let's head live to the ongoing protests outside the ground to get a sense of the feeling from the PSG fans...
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,253
Location
Not Moskva
What makes you think that ? I'm thinking SJR leads us down this path if he brings his mate Brailsford with him.
As in “marginal gains” Sir Dave? While we might lose the odd laptop on the way and have an outbreak of asthma, with some new mattresses and pillows, Sancho and Martial will be running around like Park Ji Sung.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,514
Plucking a random example out of thin air... What about... PSG?

How do their fans currently feel about their owners and club on general. Let's head live to the ongoing protests outside the ground to get a sense of the feeling from the PSG fans...
I've said it a few times but they really are perpetually miserable. Your club spending never before seen amounts so that you can watch the world's most talented forwards feck it up constantly is seemingly not the path to joy.
 

Ted Lasso

Full Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Messages
1,940
It's not. As Radcliffe promised that Nice would challenge PSG and not only that didn't happened but they actually became worse than with the previous owner. Thats a good indication of what we can expect.
Yup. Radcliffe will be worse as owner than Moyes was manager for United.
 

AndySmith1990

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
6,507
Things can't really get any worse can they ? SJR isn't my prefered choice as he's just another business man who's in it for his cut but we are going to have to give him a chance.

I can't see his ownership lasting as long as the Glazer's though, I think we will take a few steps forward with him and he will call it a day in a few years.

We are behind the likes of City and Madrid at the moment and I can't see us getting anywhere near them without some major investment, I'm talking billions here and the only people who can do that are either countries or the likes of Bezos as they're in a different league of wealth when you compare them to SJR.
Ineos aren't exactly poor though are they? City haven't spent much more than us and we've been saddled with debt. The difference comes down to ambition, competence, and how well that money has been spent. We don't need a bottomless pit of money to compete with them
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Plucking a random example out of thin air... What about... PSG?

How do their fans currently feel about their owners and club on general. Let's head live to the ongoing protests outside the ground to get a sense of the feeling from the PSG fans...
PSG fans are like Chelsea and City fans. They don't remember what it was used to be before their current ownership. They feel entitled to winning things, PSG fans protest because they fail in the UCL while disregarding their local success as if it's a given. They think of themselves as a huge club and they punish the owners. Maybe they should be a little more grateful to them considering they only have 10 league titles, 8 from the current ownership in the last 10 years.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
It's not. As Radcliffe promised that Nice would challenge PSG and not only that didn't happened but they actually became worse than with the previous owner. Thats a good indication of what we can expect.
Maybe that was his initial plan and then he heard whispers of the Glazers getting itchy feet?

You just don't know. Nobody does.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
35,667
When it's official I will grit my teeth and begrudgingly back Ratcliffe,however the lack of clarification on dealing with debt and stadium/training facilities is greatly concerning
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,756
Location
France
Plucking a random example out of thin air... What about... PSG?

How do their fans currently feel about their owners and club on general. Let's head live to the ongoing protests outside the ground to get a sense of the feeling from the PSG fans...
It's mixed. Ultras don't really like QSI because at the very beginning they tried to "clean" the stadium by getting rid of them which led to a terrible atmosphere, they eventually allowed them back but some of them didn't comeback and won't comeback until QSI leaves. After that it's a mixed bag some are happy because PSG has a won a lot and others wants/expect more.

They are essentially no different other big clubs supporters.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,514
So you're saying we're getting to the Champions League semi finals?

The good times are back guys!
Your memory is rosier than the reality here, I think.
 

Mmm-Qatarian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
1,484
Okay, I guess their statement isn't about what they stated.
Their statement was about ensuring that "Any owner of Manchester United must commit to making football a sport for everyone". That's pretty nebulous and certainly does not conclusively end at members of the LGBT community simply being allowed to exist within football, as you suggest it does.

I'm extending Rainbow Devils the courtesy of assuming they aren't thick enough to believe that Sheikh Jassim was going to ban LGBT people from the stadium, or otherwise explicitly discriminate against them, upon taking over at United. Therefore, I'm assuming there are other factors driving their decision to issue such a statement, such as the conflict that any LGBT players, staff or supporters might have in representing a club owned by representative's of the Qatari state, or the fact that Qatari state ownership of Manchester United might well legitimise their position on homosexuality in the minds of some Manchester United fans (i.e. sportswashing). Evidently, you don't wish to extend them this same courtesy, and would rather assume that they were genuinely naive enough to fear they might be banished from the stadium upon Sheikh Jassim's prospective take over of the club.
 

jm99

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
4,667
So you're saying we're getting to the Champions League semi finals?

The good times are back guys!
Did moyes reach the semi finals? I remember bayern knocking us out in the quarter finals. Wasn't moyes sacked before the semi finals were done :lol:
 

Von Mistelroum

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2015
Messages
4,223
In Tory Britain, one can remove the government via referendum. In Qatar, you will be prosecuted for attempting to remove the government. Peacefully, too.

Stop playing innocent and stop with the false equivalences.

If you support Qatar, you are wholly complicit in their style of politic. Manchester (compli)city style.
In Tory Britain people are very much discouraged from removing them via their media friends, but that's beside the point. We cannot control what happens in Quatar, just like we can't control what the Tories get up to. Similarly, we don't know what Jim's personal opinions are and can't really judge. We also don't know what Jassim's opinions are, and he can't really be judged by the country he's from as a whole. It's racist to just assume that because he's from Qatar, he represents every value the country as a whole does.

Also, wanting something that's best for the club doesn't make anyone complicit in something that they have absolutely no control over. I fully expect that you'll be gone from the forum and no longer supporting United if they take over though, if that's what you believe.
 

Murder on Zidanes Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
29,395
Well I'd probably that 60 years ago, homosexuality was illegal in the UK, we've made a lot of progress in 60 years. Closer cultural ties to the west are likely to gradually improve things in Qatar, Saudi Arabia certainly isn't a bastion of women's rights but since they've started seeking closer ties to the west things have improved for women. It's easy to look at these countries and think its totally barbaric but they're really only about 60-70 years behind us, I'm not saying Qatar buying man united is going to immediately make it a great place for lgbt people, but closer cultural ties with more tolerant countries, will gradually improve things, telling them to feck off until they share our values is far less likely to improve things
We didn't execute homosexuals or journalists sixty years ago.

Try 600 years behind us
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
You're stretching it quite a bit don't you think?
Why aren't Girona top of La Liga? Maybe the City football group are ruining them then?

Him buying Nice has no bearing on United. What experience does this Sheikh Jassim have in football? None as far as I can tell.
 

I’m loving my life

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 22, 2022
Messages
1,350
The Glazers should be harangued for their conduct towards the club more than ever. Jim too for keeping them here. The whole thing is a joke.

Yup. Radcliffe will be worse as owner than Moyes was manager for United.
Get ready for the normalisation of 6th/7th place as a good season. He’s that good.
 

JagUTD

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Messages
3,245
Maybe that was his initial plan and then he heard whispers of the Glazers getting itchy feet?

You just don't know. Nobody does.
It's more likely he looked at the reckless spending of PSG and thought it was pointless to even try. If Ligue 1 has shown us anything, it's that every so often PSG will implode and if you happen to be the one side in France that gets everything right on that season, you can win the league. Money for the other clubs plays very little part.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
You have to admire the likes of @JagUTD @Nou_Camp99 & @Plant0x84 who genuinely believe Ratcliffe will be good owner
You believe Qatar will be despite the fact we all have a pretty good inkling that their bid isn't a transparent one and this Sheikh Jassim fellow has absolutely no experience whatsoever in football and sport.

Two can play that game.
 

McGrathsipan

Dawn’s less famous husband
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
24,844
Location
Dublin
I havent followed the details of the bids at all as the world of billionaires doesnt interest me in the slightest

Is the summary this....

Ratcliffe is going to be the new majority owner and his model keeps the glazers in some way and doesnt really change the way we are run financially.

And lots of people are pissed off as the oil money was tantalisingly close but now is gone.

And the club is doomed?

Is that the general gist?
 

MarkoDolohov

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 17, 2023
Messages
150
Location
Greater Manchester
Writing has been on the wall for the past two weeks. Gutted with the outcome, yes its not confirmed yet but
in the initial Times article it mentions the Raine group and the Qataris have had limited contact since the third bid was lodged, coupled with the posts about INEOS taking a lead strongly indicates this is the eventual outcome.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,756
Location
France
Their statement was about ensuring that "Any owner of Manchester United must commit to making football a sport for everyone". That's pretty nebulous and certainly does not conclusively end at members of the LGBT community simply being allowed to exist within football, as you suggest it does.

I'm extending Rainbow Devils the courtesy of assuming they aren't thick enough to believe that Sheikh Jassim was going to ban LGBT people from the stadium, or otherwise explicitly discriminate against them, upon taking over at United. Therefore, I'm assuming there are other factors driving their decision to issue such a statement, such as the conflict that any LGBT players, staff or supporters might have in representing a club owned by representative's of the Qatari state, or the fact that Qatari state ownership of Manchester United might well legitimise their position on homosexuality in the minds of some Manchester United fans (i.e. sportswashing). Evidently, you don't wish to extend them this same courtesy, and would rather assume that they were genuinely naive enough to fear they might be banished from the stadium upon Sheikh Jassim's prospective take over of the club.
It's not what I suggested. You are essentially making up their statement and mine, QSI literally celebrate pride day, this sin't just allowing them to exist, it's not even passively accepting it, it's participating to a political and media campaign in favor of the LGBT community. Which is why I asked you why they would feel excluded if a qatari purchased the club.
 

JagUTD

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Messages
3,245
Your memory is rosier than the reality here, I think.
It is. Moyes lied to me. He said yesterday that he reached the semi finals of the Champions League.

I'll never believe a gollum lookalike again.
 

AndySmith1990

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
6,507
You have to admire the likes of @JagUTD @Nou_Camp99 & @Plant0x84 who genuinely believe Ratcliffe will be good owner
There's nothing to back up claims he won't be a good owner. We're heading into unknown territory. What it all comes down to really is those who want to be owned by a state, therefore presumably having unlimited wealth, and those who aren't arsed. Those who want unlimited wealth are annoyed at the prospect of Ratcliffe owning United and throwing their toys out the pram and claiming he'll be useless, without anything to back it up. Other than the occasional nonsense link to Nice, as if that has any bearing on owning a club valued at £5bn
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
I havent followed the details of the bids at all as the world of billionaires doesnt interest me in the slightest

Is the summary this....

Ratcliffe is going to be the new majority owner and his model keeps the glazers in some way and doesnt really change the way we are run financially.

And lots of people are pissed off as the oil money was tantalisingly close but now is gone.

And the club is doomed?

Is that the general gist?
Basically yeah.

Hissy fit brigade aren't happy they aren't getting their oil money it would seem as things stand. That's all this is.

A year ago if Sir Jim had stepped forward with this bid and there was no sign of Qatar the opinions on this thread would be much different which says it all.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Why aren't Girona top of La Liga? Maybe the City football group are ruining them then?

Him buying Nice has no bearing on United. What experience does this Sheikh Jassim have in football? None as far as I can tell.
City group didn't promise Girona to be top of the league. Radcliffe did promise that to Nice, he has failed there's no two ways about it.

You're right Jassim doesn't have experience in football but I guess that's better than Radcliffe who has experience failing.
 

Andy_Cole

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
8,082
Location
Manchester
I havent followed the details of the bids at all as the world of billionaires doesnt interest me in the slightest

Is the summary this....

Ratcliffe is going to be the new majority owner and his model keeps the glazers in some way and doesnt really change the way we are run financially.

And lots of people are pissed off as the oil money was tantalisingly close but now is gone.

And the club is doomed?

Is that the general gist?
There is a huge concern that instead of a €1bn debt we’d have a $5bn debt but yeh choose to ignore that.
 

AndySmith1990

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
6,507
City group didn't promise Girona to be top of the league. Radcliffe did promise that to Nice, he has failed there's no two ways about it.

You're right Jassim doesn't have experience in football but I guess that's better than Radcliffe who has experience failing.
Whats he failed at? Not spending billions competing with PSG for the signings of Mbappe and Neymar?
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
40,292
Location
Cooper Station
It doesn't make sense that Qatar lose this deal over ~500m

They are proposing billions in infrastructural investment and clearing the debt. If they want it they will get it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.