The latest Ben Jacobs tweet has been resoundingly dismissed as absolute nonsense by someone who works in M&APleased to say it looks like you were right.
The latest Ben Jacobs tweet seems to clarify!
There’s a light at the end of the tunnel!!!
The latest Ben Jacobs tweet has been resoundingly dismissed as absolute nonsense by someone who works in M&APleased to say it looks like you were right.
The latest Ben Jacobs tweet seems to clarify!
There’s a light at the end of the tunnel!!!
He'd be 4th richest owner in the PL behind 2 states and the Chelsea guy, above him if you count INEOS.
He could easily afford either, the Chelsea thing was strange and I don't think he ever wanted to buy.
As for "Rat" what are you, six?
Isn’t he a lot richer than Boehly? First hit on Google say so.
I wasn't sure so went cautious, I know INEOS most certainly are.
A lot of people here acting as though he hasn't got 10p to scratch his arse with.
He's a financially successful bloke, simple as that.
The fact people keep bringing up Brexit as a stick to beat Jim with shows just how out of their depth they are with this debate.
Qatari policy in their own country makes Brexit seem like Disneyland. You'd know this if you actually bothered to read about it.
I can understand wanting the debt gone and the Glazers totally gone. That's all perfectly sensible. However these BS arguement about Brexit and other such things are such a front and BS excuses. You just want that Qatari oil / gas money. That's all it's about so don't pretend it's anything else.
I have more respect for the pro Qatar lot on here who are just honest about their intentions and don't hide behind this nonsense.
I keep seeing this being bandied around in this thread. Who exactly is pretending that they don't want Qatar money? Of course we want the money. We want lots of it!
I’d pick Qatar since I want the Glazers gone.I keep seeing this being bandied around in this thread. Who exactly is pretending that they don't want Qatar money? Of course we want the money. We want lots of it! Because guess what, you need a shit tonne of money to run a successful football club especially in these recent era. We can't afford to keep our debt snowball, the club's maintenance bill is growing, footballers wages are increasing, and the club needs to invest heavily in transfers every season.
Did anyone actually say they prefer Jassim for his personality?
Has there been a annoucement ive missed? Or is this social media speculation that Qatar have won.
Thanks, was wondering as NYSE would need to be informed first.Nothing official yet ^^ .
Thanks, was wondering as NYSE would need to be informed first.
Has Jassim got a burner account?Good Morning to everyone,
Аnd especially to the new owners of Manchester United, Qatar !
We are officially back
Loads on twitter seemingly confident that Qatar have won but I can’t find what’s made everyone think that way
Loads on twitter seemingly confident that Qatar have won but I can’t find what’s made everyone think that way
A mixture of desperation and wishful thinking.
What reports? I see all the "confident" BS just like these previous months. No concrete news yet.Sad day if all reports that Qatar have won are true.I'll just have to accept it I suppose.
Likely made up, apparently there were meetings between Qatar, Glazers and Raine in New York last nightLoads on twitter seemingly confident that Qatar have won but I can’t find what’s made everyone think that way
Jassim is the burner accountHas Jassim got a burner account?
Sad day if all reports that Qatar have won are true.I'll just have to accept it I suppose.
Great day if all reports that Qatar have won are true. I'll have to celebrate it.
Then why is he dithering about by paying 51% and keeping the leeches onboard and not buy all their shares? As you say in the last paragraph, if true, then he could afford this without Ineos backing out of his own wealth and still be a multi billionaire. Instead if he does eventually get iy on current terms, we will still be in as big a mess as we are now.Agree with this.
If he had to up his offer, I'm pretty confident he would. The Times article from a few weeks ago also states that he hasn't been required to bid for all the Glazer shares.
At this point in his life, considering his wealth and age, and the money his company makes, I don't see him not committing a bit more money towards what I suppose is a big dream of his: to own his boyhood club and create a long-lasting legacy by taking us back to the top.
Good Morning to everyone,
Аnd especially to the new owners of Manchester United, Qatar !
We are officially back
No one really knows anything as there has been no news. I'm surprised they think Qatar is more likely given what what little information is known though.Loads on twitter seemingly confident that Qatar have won but I can’t find what’s made everyone think that way
Only the qatar bid has promised to wipe out Utd'd current debt. Ratcliffe has made no such commitment.Then why is he dithering about by paying 51% and keeping the leeches onboard and not buy all their shares? As you say in the last paragraph, if true, then he could afford this without Ineos backing out of his own wealth and still be a multi billionaire. Instead if he does eventually get iy on current terms, we will still be in as big a mess as we are now.
...But one key advantage that Al Thani holds over English billionaire Ratcliffe is that he is promising to make his takeover debt-free.
Include them in what ? They are one of multiple parties bidding for United. The "do they actually have the funds" bit would seem to be a part of the process in selecting a preferred bidder, which hasn't happened yet.
MMMM! cheese rooms"Key advantage" in what sense, though? The Glazers don't give a feck about having the debt cleared, why should they?
Certain journos keep repeating points like this, and it makes no sense whatsoever: "Sheikh promises to clone Pelé and build ten new cheese rooms at OT!". As if the Glazers care what happens to the club after they've pissed off.
Yeah from the glazer point of view it makes no sense simplistically thinking. Unless there's some other things that we don't know of? Is the transaction faster or are there any tax benefits if they debt gets paid off with the glazer exit?"Key advantage" in what sense, though? The Glazers don't give a feck about having the debt cleared, why should they?
Big day today.