ICC Cricket World Cup 2019

Snowjoe

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,315
Location
Lake Athabasca
Supports
Cheltenham Town
Overall that was a really pleasing performance, not collapsing under the pressure despite losing key wickets which we’ve seen so many times before. Decent bowling and great in the field. Professional turn out.
 

Raees

Pythagoras in Boots
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
29,469
Funnily enough getting a ‘par’ score and winning that with their bowling is probably better for England’s long term psyche this tournament than smashing a 400 score this game.
 

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
Guys like 6"2,/6"3, built like a mini tank, fast as feck, has incredible reactions yet plays cricket. He could probably play a multitude of sports at a professional level.
His Dad played Rugby league for New Zealand I think.
 

zing

Zingle balls
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
13,808
Ben Stokes shouldn't be a cricketer. Earlier, I think they had him down sprinting at 28kmph which, considering was over just 20 yards, is quite quick. I don't think he's particularly great at bowling or batting but his athleticism is incredible. Weird he chose cricket as his sport.
He's a good bowler in test cricket..

Old ball in the sub continent - very good as a 3rd bowler.
 

madRedDevil07

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
615
You should've watched it happen. They looked on their way to 360 but completely lost momentum in their innings.
They were not looking to get anywhere near 360. As per Root's mid innings interview, they were looking for 310-330. It was not an absolute flat wicket to be fair. Slower balls were gripping and the wicket was a bit sticky. England reached 311 due to some smart batting and very poor bowling from SA's 3rd and 5th/6th bowling options.
311 was above par on today's wicket as per many experts and I agree with them.
 

Ayush_reddevil

Éire Abú
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
10,774
You should've watched it happen. They looked on their way to 360 but completely lost momentum in their innings.
That doesn't make it rather average though , it wasn't a flat wicket . They lost an early wicket and then lost wickets every time they tried to accelerate but still were sensible enough to score 311 which was pretty good on that pitch
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
That's harsh. Cant remember the exact numbers but he averages around 50 with a strike of 90. I'd say hes surrounded by a bunch of average players. AB aside, the rest of their team hasnt impressed in ODIs.
It is, but that's kind of the point. We're talking about great players, and I just don't think he has that extra gear to really hurt teams when he gets in. He might get up to a run a ball by the time he reaches a hundred, but that's about it. An exceptionally consistent accumulator, but without that destructive power that separates great batsmen from very good ones despite what his average says.
 

dbs235

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
1,871
Funnily enough getting a ‘par’ score and winning that with their bowling is probably better for England’s long term psyche this tournament than smashing a 400 score this game.
Definitely. The batsmen can't get 400 every game, we're going to have to rely on our bowlers sometimes too.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,697
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Just been given 4 tickets to Australia - Afghanistan on Saturday :D
 

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,792
Location
London
It is, but that's kind of the point. We're talking about great players, and I just don't think he has that extra gear to really hurt teams when he gets in. He might get up to a run a ball by the time he reaches a hundred, but that's about it. An exceptionally consistent accumulator, but without that destructive power that separates great batsmen from very good ones despite what his average says.
Joe Root: 133 125 19 5351 133* 50.48 6140 87.14
Hashim Amla: 175 172 12 7923 159 49.51 8888 89.14

The biggest difference is the team. I mean the guy was the fastest to 7000 ODI runs.
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,015
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
Joe Root: 133 125 19 5351 133* 50.48 6140 87.14
Hashim Amla: 175 172 12 7923 159 49.51 8888 89.14

The biggest difference is the team. I mean the guy was the fastest to 7000 ODI runs.
Yeah he's a top tier batsman, run a ball hundred with other hitters finishing the job you can rack up the scores.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Joe Root: 133 125 19 5351 133* 50.48 6140 87.14
Hashim Amla: 175 172 12 7923 159 49.51 8888 89.14

The biggest difference is the team. I mean the guy was the fastest to 7000 ODI runs.
Would people really have Root amongst their greatest ODI batsmen either?

He's probably currently England's, but I suspect most would have him a level below the greats (or even lower probably), which is exactly where I'm saying Amla is.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,186
Location
Canada
Everyone talks about pitches but one of the main reasons that England have made 300 easy is the batting depth , still not so easy to do if your 8-11 can't bat much
This. Archer came in at number 10, that is some batting strength. I fear India fail miserably in that department. Once we are 6 down , thats it for us. 270-6 , we will be bowled out under 290. England can still go 300 plus after being 6 down.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,507
Location
Oslo, Norway
The greats are winners. The greats are clutch players. Amla is just a stat padder.
 

Traub

Full Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
10,239
The greats are winners. The greats are clutch players. Amla is just a stat padder.
To be fair to Amla, I think he has been clutch plenty of times in tests. He’s definitely well into his decline now, and he was never going to be the one to lead from the front in this World Cup.

I think this World Cup is going to turn very quickly into the big 3 + 1. The winner is definitely going to be one of the big guns. England may be peaking too early though.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,507
Location
Oslo, Norway
To be fair to Amla, I think he has been clutch plenty of times in tests. He’s definitely well into his decline now, and he was never going to be the one to lead from the front in this World Cup.

I think this World Cup is going to turn very quickly into the big 3 + 1. The winner is definitely going to be one of the big guns. England may be peaking too early though.
Yeah in tests he's easily up there with the best players in the last 15 years. In ODIs he'll score well batting first when the pitch is flat but in pressure moments and chases he has always been featherweight.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,833
WI and Pakistan tomorrow. Probably the two most similar teams in world cricket. Both capable of producing a best in the world type performance, or equally so collapsing to an embarrassingly floundering defeat. Impossible to call.

Rally :devil:
 

zing

Zingle balls
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
13,808
WI and Pakistan tomorrow. Probably the two most similar teams in world cricket. Both capable of producing a best in the world type performance, or equally so collapsing to an embarrassingly floundering defeat. Impossible to call.

Rally :devil:
Yup. Could be a good match.
 

RooneyLegend

New Member
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
12,963
That doesn't make it rather average though , it wasn't a flat wicket . They lost an early wicket and then lost wickets every time they tried to accelerate but still were sensible enough to score 311 which was pretty good on that pitch
They had 200 for 3 after 35 overs iirc. They basically collapsed to 311 for 8. Ngidi, Rabada and Tahir pulled it back.
 

Mr.Ridiculous__

The name says it all
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
1,015
WI and Pakistan tomorrow. Probably the two most similar teams in world cricket. Both capable of producing a best in the world type performance, or equally so collapsing to an embarrassingly floundering defeat. Impossible to call.


Rally :devil:
West Indies are far better than Pakistan at the moment.
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,601
They had 200 for 3 after 35 overs iirc. They basically collapsed to 311 for 8. Ngidi, Rabada and Tahir pulled it back.
So they were batting at 5.7 an over up until 35 overs and then for the last 15 overs went at 7.4. Not bad I'd say, no issues losing wickets as the pitch was slow and the batting was deep.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,093
Azam will score 80 and a windies player will go off.
But which windies player though? They're just so unpredictable :lol:

I had difficulty choosing between Finch and Imam. I hope I didn't make the wrong choice :nervous:
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,833
I never fail to get chills when I hear rally round the West Indies play before a match :drool: