Kieran McKenna isn't anywhere near best in class, so that appointment wouldn't fit the previous ones in my opinion.
Would just show they want just a coach and basically a yes man under the CEO, and Directors.
Poch isn't best in class, I think you could argue a case for Tuchel but it's not clear either.
So I don't think any of the candidates are worth changing Ten Hag for. He has brought more discipline to the squad and if more players need to go then so be it.
If the new structure are buying the players then I'd like Ten Hag be given one more season of his contract to coach the players.
A yes man?
Hello Goldbridge.
We aren't being run by the Glazers anymore why would they want a yes man?
United much like Chelsea Arsenal etc are far too large to be run by any one "manager" that style of football club is on the way out for sporting academy style set ups with a head coach and team around him to make signings and run aspects of the team he shouldn't be involved with. His specialty should be boots on te grass football not boardroom or financial decisions.
He will have a say in the players he needs but the overall club will have a playing style and be aligned on a philosophy it won't come from one singular massiaha this ain't the fergie or wenger days.
Pep and Klopp have been proponents of that structure in their clubs they don't run the place they are coaches in a wider set up but have a heavy influence due to their proven track record and it just so happens their philosophy and coaching style match that of the club's visions.
We've only just got people in that realise that and in time we will likely have multiple coaches and we won't be shy in replacing the ones that aren't able to mat h the club vision.
I welcome it and the old school manager style and manager driving the structure of a club is long long long gone.
We are a sporting institute we're not a vehicle to massage managers philosophies and ideas.
Long may we evolve into the modern decade.