Something Guillem thinks on the regular.
- Status
Something Guillem thinks on the regular.
Arsenal won't let Sanchez go until they get a replacement in. The potential replacements are Mkhi, Malcom or Aubameyang. If Mkhi agrees to go, this deal can be wrapped up pretty fast or else we'll have to wait till Arsenal sign someone. This seems to be the situation now. Only Mkhi is holding up the deal for obvious reasons - 1.Wage cut 2.Arsenal are not in great shape 3.He will end up being called a failure if he leaves now. He might want to stay and prove himself.
I want Sanchez as much as the next man and I’ll be absolutely gutted if we don’t end up with him but the abuse Mkhitaryan is getting in here is fcuking disgusting. Shame on you lot.
Could this idiot be any more pathetic and bitter?
who even said that by the way?
Where the feck is Malcom?
I don't know why footballers should be criticised for taking the job that offers more money, when it's how 95% of the normal working world operates.
Just Imagine a Sanchez winning goal in the CL final.....I'll have to join tweeter just to respond...
TBH I couldnt be arsed about this anymore for a couple of reasons. The ABU media have taken the joy out of it and I really wanted Mkhi to work out. If Alexis goes to Chelsea so be it and if he comes to us then great too.
I would not blame him to be honest, If Mhki thinks going to Arsenal is a step backwards who can blame him. I want Sanchez as much as anyone but Mhki don't deserve this hate over a transfer.
Someone might have brought this up but would a loan deal not work. I mean we subbed Nani wages for ages.
If Mikhi digs his heels in and doesn't want to move permanently, given he has two and a half years left on his contract, would United have right to ship him off to Arsenal on loan....indefinitely?
Weird that Mkhi is key, given they look to be on to Auba and Malcom, both who directly replace him with depth on top. Mkhi doesn't play ahead of Ozil, and probably not even Wilshere on current form if he was to be tried deeper.
Why would they be so desperate to obtain a player who hasn't been good for quite some time. Arsenal aren't really in a position to bring in a player who is out of form and persevere with him until he reaches form, which he may not.
Who are Chelsea giving them in return which supposedly puts them in pole position?
Why would they be so desperate to obtain a player who hasn't been good for quite some time. Arsenal aren't really in a position to bring in a player who is out of form and persevere with him until he reaches form, which he may not.
Who are Chelsea giving them in return which supposedly puts them in pole position?
Talksport know absolutely nothing 10% chance, Chelsea in driving seat, don't trust jim white a twat with crap tie.
Because its to get Sanchez. Overall it weakens Arsenal and strengthens us by swapping a useless player (in a United shirt) for a PL proven top class player.
If Miki performs at Arsenal I would be surprised but frankly not care. They are on the slide and probably losing their other best player in the Summer.
Maybe he will enjoy sitting on the bench.
Ornstein:
I'm really struggling to understand why BVB are relevant in any part of this
Pretty pointless camping in this thread today.
Because of course he's obligated to do as he's told. Seriously mate get a grip.
It was a quick transfer to be honest. I was quite confident after Di Marzio posted the breaking news
If Mhki pulls out of the deal and doesn’t want to go, what makes people think that will mean Arsenal sell to Chelsea instead of us? They would still not have a replacement in.
The media’s obvious bs is so transaparent, it makes me sick. They want drama. Us being the only choice is not drama, they had City and now they have Chelsea to spice things up.
All Mhki saying no to Arse does is delay things slightly.
The media’s obvious bs is so transaparent, it makes me sick. They want drama. Us being the only choice is not drama, they had City and now they have Chelsea to spice things up.
All Mhki saying no to Arse does is delay things slightly.
You'd think before we started to negotiate and then make an offer, the club must have sounded Miki out. I mean surely before we would say right we are offering 10m plus miki. Seems like we are still at the negotiating stage which means this wont be sorted out for a couple of days at least
I just wonder if he is not generally happy in the UK. Not that I know much about him but some people dont settle.
Ps, I thought the Sanches issue would be sorted by now, will check-in in another couple of hours.
What do you mean by "right to", Mkhi is free to accept or refuse a transfer or a loan.
Doubt he will, regardless of his form, he kept getting chances and minutes.
There is more posts claiming that Mkhi is getting horrible abuse than there is ''abuse'' posts. No one is giving him disguising abuse, re-read the comments you drama lama.
Ornstein:
I'm really struggling to understand why BVB are relevant in any part of this
Because it gives Micky one less possible exit. He might have no other choices left.
Don't you all know that Mkhi is obliged to sign for Arsenal, just because Wenger needs him and United need Sanchez? How dare he, a player who was transferred by United and is on a long-term contract, think about his own interests instead of submitting to Wenger's will?
Why are most of your posts so negative? Chelsea can pay his wages, he wants to stay in London, Chelsea can easily pay his agent and he is not worth 400k?
The figure quoted is anyway 350k something which we gave Zlatan last season and almost the same we dished out on Rooney. Don't fall for media propaganda.
The figure quoted is anyway 350k something which we gave Zlatan last season and almost the same we dished out on Rooney. Don't fall for media propaganda.
What does he mean here about the twist being obvious? Is he talking about Mkhi being a perfect Wenger player? i.e. his 'soft on the tackle' attitude?
Nope. We cannot force him. There would be two options left, and both are not good
1.) We pay up his contract to get him off our books
2. ) Dont play him, but then it is the Bogarde situation all over again.
I'm looking for a 95th minute Sanchez goal in the final league game which sees us somehow take the title off City on goal difference; on the final day of the season.
Martin Tyler's last ever commentary act is him screaming Saaaaaancheeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!! and then goes into a 2 year long catatonic trance state; seemingly unable to mentally process, nor accept, what he's just witnessed.
Jose runs down the touchline pretending to poke everyone he meets in the eye and puts on the shit-coat someone chucks him from within the crowd. (The coat would have the words "Yes RAWK this really is a shit coat" on the back)
And then I wake up to see City winning the league by 10 points - Sigh
Martin Tyler's last ever commentary act is him screaming Saaaaaancheeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!! and then goes into a 2 year long catatonic trance state; seemingly unable to mentally process, nor accept, what he's just witnessed.
Jose runs down the touchline pretending to poke everyone he meets in the eye and puts on the shit-coat someone chucks him from within the crowd. (The coat would have the words "Yes RAWK this really is a shit coat" on the back)
And then I wake up to see City winning the league by 10 points - Sigh
Mourinho must freeze out Mkhitaryan and take his locker away from him. Make him train with the reserves. Give him the Schweinsteiger treatment. Force him out at any and all costs to push this deal through.
No he doesn't, why should he go somewhere he doesn't want to just to satisfy United fans.
I do agree that Miki should not get any abuse.
Yes, he's been terrible for us (I certainly called him out on this), but I won't say anything negative, if he fails to agree terms with AFC.
Doens't want to live in London? At the rate he is going he will be choosing between Middlesbrough and Dundee in the Summer. If Arsenal want him and want to play him he should go. I think his career in a United shirt is effectively over anyway and if Sanchez comes in without a Mikhi deal then he won't even be making the subs bench.
Sorry, you are right, i've just seen numerous posts saying we can do the deal without mkhi when Ornstein says thats 100% not true.
- Status