Angel Gomes image 28

Angel Gomes England flag

2019-20 Performances


View full 2019-20 profile

5.3 Season Average Rating
Appearances
6
Goals
0
Assists
0
Yellow cards
0
Status
Not open for further replies.

Chaky_Best

Supports 'a joke of a club'.
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
3,021
Location
Vegeta's Planet
Same hype as Rashford and Mc Tominay.

Just because he's from the club he should be better than the rest ?

If he was that special Ole would have played him more than 1 game in pre season.

Only hype
 

LVGSdive

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 20, 2019
Messages
534
He’s actually 18. Turns 19 at the end of the month.
Yes you are correct. His 19th birthday is this Saturday.

Ole give him the birthday present he really wants with a place in the starting line up :drool:
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,557
Same hype as Rashford and Mc Tominay.

Just because he's from the club he should be better than the rest ?

If he was that special Ole would have played him more than 1 game in pre season.

Only hype
Have you watched him before you make such comments. Or is Ole the second coming now and everything he does is now right?
 

Bestietom

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
8,021
Location
Ireland
How were we wrong? The notion that a youngster is inherently inferior player to an experienced one is incorrect. There's no guarantee that Lingard will out perform Gomes and hence we have bring the latter on , only when there's nothing to lose. It's all very subjective and depends on the two alternatives. The way our attack has performed over the years, I have little qualms about throwing in big talents into home games. That's how they'll improve and you never know, they may just show up some seniors. Surely, they're knocking on the door of the 1st team becuase they have lots of ability?
As I stated we have some quality young players, and we would all like to see them get their chance, but bring them in slowly from the bench until they prove that the are ready. Ole and his coaches know that these young men are good enough, but if they were to have a bad start it could ruin their whole career. Slowly is the best way.
 

Bestietom

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
8,021
Location
Ireland
CM is where our weaknesses have been. We needed to buy a CM in this summer window. It is inexplicable why we didn’t, other than the Glazers are tightfisted. Since we didn’t, we only have the likes of Mata, Fred, Pereira and Lingard as CM and none of them are good enough.

Angel is the only player with potential to fill some of the gap. The only reason I can imagine he is not playing is because he hasn’t signed his contract or because Ole doesn’t actually trust youth. Either way he is our only hope so they need to sort themselves out or Man Utd will become even less worth following than it has already sadly become. The Glazers will see a further contraction of its valuation.
I agree, We need a couple of midfielders in January. We are a couple of injuries away from disaster, say if Pogba and Mctominay got injured.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,557
As I stated we have some quality young players, and we would all like to see them get their chance, but bring them in slowly from the bench until they prove that the are ready. Ole and his coaches know that these young men are good enough, but if they were to have a bad start it could ruin their whole career. Slowly is the best way.
You can bring them in slowly from the bench if they don’t even make the bench in the case of Gomes

It was always my opinion that renewing Mata was a mistake and I have seen nothing yet to go against that
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
This notion that you lose nothing from experimenting with youngsters is utterly wrong. Imagine that you play them and the results aren't good. What happens then? Persist with them and languish in mid-table? Or drop them and appologise to the experienced players and beg them to save your ass? How much time will you give the youngsters to prove themselves whithout writing the season off? Ole would be a laughing stock if he plays the youngsters and makes United a midtable team. There is a hierarchy in the team. To drop an experienced player and replace him with a kid is very risky. If you do it and the kid is poor, you are finished as a manager.
 
Last edited:

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,966
Location
Wales
Same hype as Rashford and Mc Tominay.

Just because he's from the club he should be better than the rest ?

If he was that special Ole would have played him more than 1 game in pre season.

Only hype
I hope he's as promising as those 2 mentioned.
 

nyanza

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
468
Location
Bulgaria
This notion that you lose nothing from experimenting with youngsters is utterly wrong. Imagine that you play them and the results aren't good. What happens then? Persist with them and languish in mid-table? Or drop them and appologise to the experienced players and beg them to save your ass? How much time will you give the youngsters to prove themselves whithout writing the season off? Ole would be a laughing stock if he plays the youngsters and makes United a midtable team. There is a hierarchy in the team. You can't just take an experienced player off and replace him with a kid. If you do it and the kid is poor, you are finished as a manager.
Ole has it pretty tough, doesn't he? Other than actual football and results he seems to be judged pretty harshly based on giving playing time to like 5 players with virtually no PL experience (and most of them any at all at men level) - Gomes, Greenwood, Garner, Tuanzebe and now I'm reading in the Brandom Williams thread about how he should leave if he doesn't play him over Young. :D :D It's actually ridiculous, that amount of youngsters from one group rarely develops to top team level, let alone delivering with their first involvements. This is just bound to end in Mcnair/Blackett/Borthwick-Jackson way looking at some people's expectations towards the boys. Pereira looked outstanding at youth level, even did very well with Valencia as well. Now everyone's calling him useless. Same with Mctominay. Showed a lot of improvement, fought his way into the first eleven and after 2 questionable appearances the tone quickly changed.

Was he supposed to say this is not his team and he will never play young players so he doesn't get shit about this?
 

SteveW

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
7,194
Same hype as Rashford and Mc Tominay.

Just because he's from the club he should be better than the rest ?

If he was that special Ole would have played him more than 1 game in pre season.

Only hype
If he's at their level he should be playing.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
This notion that you lose nothing from experimenting with youngsters is utterly wrong. Imagine that you play them and the results aren't good. What happens then? Persist with them and languish in mid-table? Or drop them and appologise to the experienced players and beg them to save your ass? How much time will you give the youngsters to prove themselves whithout writing the season off? Ole would be a laughing stock if he plays the youngsters and makes United a midtable team. There is a hierarchy in the team. To drop an experienced player and replace him with a kid is very risky. If you do it and the kid is poor, you are finished as a manager.
Is there anything worse than playing a youngster over a player like Lingard (4 league goals 2 assists) & Mata (3 league goals 2 assists)?
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Is there anything worse than playing a youngster over a player like Lingard (4 league goals 2 assists) & Mata (3 league goals 2 assists)?
How long would you persist with playing youngsters over experienced players if the results aren't good and United are 8th-12th in the table? Is the purpose of United's existence to develop players rather than compete for trophies?

Lingard is one of the hardest working players in this team and suits the high-pressing and fast counter-attacking tactics. He was a regular starter for England in Russia and didn't look worse than Sterling there. If you play Lingard in the U-23 competition, he would look like Maradona there, the gap in quality between youth level and the PL is that big.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,598
This notion that you lose nothing from experimenting with youngsters is utterly wrong. Imagine that you play them and the results aren't good. What happens then? Persist with them and languish in mid-table? Or drop them and appologise to the experienced players and beg them to save your ass? How much time will you give the youngsters to prove themselves whithout writing the season off? Ole would be a laughing stock if he plays the youngsters and makes United a midtable team. There is a hierarchy in the team. To drop an experienced player and replace him with a kid is very risky. If you do it and the kid is poor, you are finished as a manager.
Let's not be overly dramatic. No one's talking about replacing all seniors with youth at once we're talking about giving an 18 year old some minutes over a senior player who is a proven failure. You rotate them and let them compete.

You'd think we'd never integrated youth into the team before.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
How long would you persist with playing youngsters over experienced players if the results aren't good and United are 8th-12th in the table? Is the purpose of United's existence to develop players rather than compete for trophies?

Lingard is one of the hardest working players in this team and suits the high-pressing and fast counter-attacking tactics. He was a regular starter for England in Russia and didn't look worse than Sterling there. If you play Lingard in the U-23 competition, he would look like Maradona there, the gap in quality between youth level and the PL is that big.
The same question that I would like to ask how long would you persist with playing Lingard / Mata over more talented & hungry players if the results aren't good and United finish outside top 4 again like last season?

Gomes already look like Maradona playing in U-23 comp. He rarely even feature in U23's team anymore.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Let's not be overly dramatic. No one's talking about replacing all seniors with youth at once we're talking about giving an 18 year old some minutes over a senior player who is a proven failure. You rotate them and let them compete.

You'd think we'd never integrated youth into the team before.
He introduced a 17 y.o. to change the game. How many youngsters should he play to please people?

Bad results lead to depseration and desperation to seriously inflated expectations about youngish saviours.
 

foolsgold

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2008
Messages
1,702
Location
Aotearoa
It's worth remembering our U23s play in the second division after being relegated two years ago.

It's a massive jump from 2nd tier age football to the premier league, let's give them a run in the league cup and sprinkle one or two in the uefa cup and see how they go
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
The same question that I would like to ask how long would you persist with playing Lingard / Mata over more talented & hungry players if the results aren't good and United finish outside top 4 again like last season?

Gomes already look like Maradona playing in U-23 comp. He rarely even feature in U23's team anymore.
Except he doesn't. Daft exaggerations would take you nowhere.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
It's worth remembering our U23s play in the second division after being relegated two years ago.

It's a massive jump from 2nd tier age football to the premier league, let's give them a run in the league cup and sprinkle one or two in the uefa cup and see how they go
Basically, they play against shit young teams and are asked to perform at a completelt different level better than English internationals. It's like going from the 150th best league in the world to the very best league and make a difference there. Ole's job is not to experiment and find a jem but to win a CL spot and get us back to the top.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Sorry correction, he played like Messi against grown men Rotherham and that's why he rarely features with U23 team anymore.
Ok, hope you are right and Ole will play him soon. Think he'll get a chance in EL and other cup games anyway.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Ok, hope you are right and Ole will play him soon. Think he'll get a chance in EL and other cup games anyway.
Right for what? Our discussion was started by my question:

Is there anything worse than playing a youngster over a player like Lingard (4 league goals 2 assists) & Mata (3 league goals 2 assists)?

I haven't receive any direct answer regarding this one.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,773
It’s gas the way people can make themselves believe in whatever completely hypothetical scenario, no matter how unlikely, best fits their agenda in threads like this.
Where is the gas exactly? All that says is that nobody knows what's going on in training and that people shouldn't assume it's a player's doing.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Right for what? Our discussion was started by my question:

Is there anything worse than playing a youngster over a player like Lingard (4 league goals 2 assists) & Mata (3 league goals 2 assists)?

I haven't receive any direct answer regarding this one.
Depends on how good the youngster actually is. Who is best placed to estimate the quality of youngsters? Muppets on a football forum or the manager and the coaches who train them every day? This idea that Lingard and Mata contribute almost nothing and if you replace them with anybody nothing would change betrays a poor understanding of the game. There is much more to football than the goals/assist numbers.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
13,010
Depends on how good the youngster actually is. Who is best placed to estimate the quality of youngsters? Muppets on a football forum or the manager and the coaches who train them every day? This idea that Lingard and Mata contribute almost nothing and if you replace them with anybody nothing would change betrays a poor understanding of the game. There is much more to football than the goals/assist numbers.
Whilst I see what Lingard offers against the big teams, ultimately against a parked bus what counts is goals and assists. Both our seemingly first choice no.10s are next to useless on those occasions.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Whilst I see what Lingard offers against the big teams, ultimately against a parked bus what counts is goals and assists. Both our seemingly first choice no.10s are next to useless on those occasions.
Let's hope Ole is smart enough to notice it and play Gomes against the next parked bus.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
23,021
Location
Somewhere out there
Whilst I see what Lingard offers against the big teams, ultimately against a parked bus what counts is goals and assists. Both our seemingly first choice no.10s are next to useless on those occasions.
Mata's an infinitely better choice against a parked bus, as is Fred next to McTom and Pogba at 10. Andreas is also much more likely to pick a pass or score a goal.

We've options in midfield and in pre-season several players hugely outperformed Jesse, including Gomes, but despite that, the season has begun and Lingard is firmly first choice in that position, no matter the opposition.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Depends on how good the youngster actually is. Who is best placed to estimate the quality of youngsters? Muppets on a football forum or the manager and the coaches who train them every day? This idea that Lingard and Mata contribute almost nothing and if you replace them with anybody nothing would change betrays a poor understanding of the game. There is much more to football than the goals/assist numbers.
We are in Gomes's thread. I think we are all know which youngster you are referring to otherwise you won't be on this thread. Well, it seems the coaches who train Sancho every day at City couldn't see what he can become when the players is given the opportunity & time for experiences & improvement. But the one you called muppets could see.

What a no 10 & attacking midfielder should offer if it's not goals & assists?

What betrays? We should be ruthless to someone who contribute nothing & get paid lots.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
We are in Gomes's thread. I think we are all know which youngster you are referring to otherwise you won't be on this thread. Well, it seems the coaches who train Sancho every day at City couldn't see what he can become when the players is given the opportunity & time for experiences & improvement. But the one you called muppets could see.

What a no 10 & attacking midfielder should offer if it's not goals & assists?

What betrays? We should be ruthless to someone who contribute nothing & get paid lots.
If things don't go well, Ole will play Gomes. We beat Chelsea and drew with Wolves away, it was only natural to continue with the same team. If we lose from Soton, new things will be tried and eventually Gomes will get his chance.

Regarding Sancho, City knew how talented he is, just weren't ready to drop Sterling/Sane and play him. Which is natural too. It's not clear that Sancho at his best would bench Sane if the latter is in form. Sancho was 17 y.o. then and wasn't ready. He needed another year at Dormund before starting to shine properly. It's not like City decided to play a Lingard or a Mata over him.

I'll admit that I like Mata and find his treatment from some fans on here unfair. I'm no Lingard fan nor I blindly believe in Ole. I think some fans are too harsh on Lingard though. He isn't that bad.
 

Inigo Montoya

Leave Wayne Rooney alone!!
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
38,543
If things don't go well, Ole will play Gomes. We beat Chelsea and drew with Wolves away, it was only natural to continue with the same team. If we lose from Soton, new things will be tried and eventually Gomes will get his chance.

Regarding Sancho, City knew how talented he is, just weren't ready to drop Sterling/Sane and play him. Which is natural too. It's not clear that Sancho at his best would bench Sane if the latter is in form. Sancho was 17 y.o. then and wasn't ready. He needed another year at Dormund before starting to shine properly. It's not like City decided to play a Lingard or a Mata over him.

I'll admit that I like Mata and find his treatment from some fans on here unfair. I'm no Lingard fan nor I blindly believe in Ole. I think some fans are too harsh on Lingard though. He isn't that bad.
He's a decent squad player and an ok option to come off the bench to chase and close down. Beyond that...I'm unconvinced.

He had a good season in goal scoring a couple of years back but since?
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
He's a decent squad player and an ok option to come off the bench to chase and close down. Beyond that...I'm unconvinced.

He had a good season in goal scoring a couple of years back but since?
I'm sure we'll look for new players in his position in the next transfer windows if some of the younger players do not step up in the meantime. Arguably, Lingard contributes more to our high-pressing game than any other player and this is an important reason why he plays together with his acelleration which is really good.
 

Hughes35

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
2,623
I really like the look of Gomes but Ole does seem to trust the youngsters when he thinks they are ready so I trust his judgment on this.

Gomes should 100% be starting the next cup game though and if he doesn't then I will start to have some doubts.

No way Lingard should still be starting though. Either Fred, Andreas, Mata, Gomes or Greenwood should start the next game ahead of him.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,301
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Where is the gas exactly? All that says is that nobody knows what's going on in training and that people shouldn't assume it's a player's doing.
What’s gas is that nobody knows what is going on in training but you’re assuming that something unlikely is happening (Gomes dominating but not being picked) because that’s the version of reality that best suits your agenda here.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,773
What’s gas is that nobody knows what is going on in training but you’re assuming that something unlikely is happening (Gomes dominating but not being picked) because that’s the version of reality that best suits your agenda here.
That's actually not what I said at all. It's very clear what I said. I'm saying you don't know what's going on in training and him dominating was a hypothetical, not one that I believe in btw, but the other end of "he sucks in training." All I did was give parameters of what could be going on in training. I didn't offer my opinion on how he's doing in training.

And what agenda exactly? I literally said a few pages back that I wasn't fussed about him not playing yet. It's completely understandable that he hasn't played yet even if other posters did make sense in wanting him to be on the bench during a game where the other team sat back.
 

BlackBen

Full Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
725
Location
Ghana
If things don't go well, Ole will play Gomes. We beat Chelsea and drew with Wolves away, it was only natural to continue with the same team. If we lose from Soton, new things will be tried and eventually Gomes will get his chance.

Regarding Sancho, City knew how talented he is, just weren't ready to drop Sterling/Sane and play him. Which is natural too. It's not clear that Sancho at his best would bench Sane if the latter is in form. Sancho was 17 y.o. then and wasn't ready. He needed another year at Dormund before starting to shine properly. It's not like City decided to play a Lingard or a Mata over him.

I'll admit that I like Mata and find his treatment from some fans on here unfair. I'm no Lingard fan nor I blindly believe in Ole. I think some fans are too harsh on Lingard though. He isn't that bad.
For Brighton he isn't but for Manchester United yes he is that bad.

A forward who has zero goals and assists in 2019 for Manchester United and earns £100k a week should be considered a liability. If it were any other occupation, he would have been sacked for no productivity. Come on man, let's have some standards.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,659
It’s interesting there are 45 pages already in Gomes performance thread when he played exactly zero minutes this so far :)

But the thing is he of course needs to play
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,301
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
That's actually not what I said at all. It's very clear what I said. I'm saying you don't know what's going on in training and him dominating was a hypothetical, not one that I believe in btw, but the other end of "he sucks in training." All I did was give parameters of what could be going on in training. I didn't offer my opinion on how he's doing in training.

And what agenda exactly? I literally said a few pages back that I wasn't fussed about him not playing yet. It's completely understandable that he hasn't played yet even if other posters did make sense in wanting him to be on the bench during a game where the other team sat back.
Ok. Well I have no dog in this fight either. I just think there’s so many unknowns here we have to go with the most likely scenario. Based on what he’s been showing in training and all the input from coaches who’ve known him for years Ole has made the correct decision in not playing Gomes yet. Watching pre-season and reserves/underage games doesn’t give us much reliable information about exactly when a player is ready for PL minutes. Hence fans have been getting this wrong many many times over the years.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,417
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Whether it's Greenwood, Gomes or Chong, I think they're not ready yet to step up. Greenwood is the closer to get serious minutes now but it's not easy for a kid to play at this level, specially when we need him immediately to be consistent. Ole can be criticized for many things but I like how he is handling these young players.
Europa League and Cup games are coming up, the Premier League is just too much right now.
 

LVGSdive

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 20, 2019
Messages
534
Right for what? Our discussion was started by my question:

Is there anything worse than playing a youngster over a player like Lingard (4 league goals 2 assists) & Mata (3 league goals 2 assists)?

I haven't receive any direct answer regarding this one.
Gomes was better than both in pre-season when he got on the pitch.

Unfortunately, people just always have an excuse not to play youth players out of the academy. No matter how obvious it is that the youth player is better.

See Hudson-Odoi last season for Chelsea. He was much better than Pedro and Willian in pre-season last season. Then right to the bench/out if the squad no matter how good, bad or indifferent Pedro or William were playing. It took a bid from Bayern for Sarri to finally realise that Hudson-Odoi needs to be playing. Which is why I'm hoping we get a bid or 2 for Angel to force the clubs hand into playing him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.