Anthony Martial image 9

Anthony Martial France flag

2019-20 Performances


View full 2019-20 profile

6.2 Season Average Rating
Appearances
48
Goals
23
Assists
8
Yellow cards
1
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pablo76

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2006
Messages
3,744
You're judging him and calling him awful after he played 6 minutes today and at a time where Liverpool were completely on top and it was practically impossible for him to make an impact on the game? Strange that.
No, I’m judging him on his performances and general attitude in games for more or less the last 2 seasons.

Today was just another glimpse of his obviously already forgotten poor application.
 

Posh Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
3,468
Location
Peterborough, England
Baffling some of the comments here. He came on as lone striker and was absolutely miles away from the closest teammate to him from midfield. Really wasn't much he could do off the ball as he was having to solo press a back 4. All he could do was wait for the ball to come to him. Not sure what people were expecting.
Some fans place more importance on body language and facial expressions than on actual football.
 

IRELANDUNITED

Full Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
2,316
No, I’m judging him on his performances and general attitude in games for more or less the last 2 seasons.

Today was just another glimpse of his obviously already forgotten poor application.

I'm confident that if he stays injury free he can be a decent player for us. He's certainly not awful anyway
 

Raven

Full Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
6,714
Location
Ireland
If you say so.

Looks and acts disinterested mostly, refuses to get involved in play unless forced to with a pass, obviously doesn’t want the ball, hangs out on the touch line trying to be invisible, poor decision making, rarely dribbles or tries to take on a player anymore, woeful shooting and hangs his head and walks around whenever he loses the ball.

Awful player.
Awful poster.
 

Canagel

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
13,888
His effort was an absolute disgrace
If you say so.

Looks and acts disinterested mostly, refuses to get involved in play unless forced to with a pass, obviously doesn’t want the ball, hangs out on the touch line trying to be invisible, poor decision making, rarely dribbles or tries to take on a player anymore, woeful shooting and hangs his head and walks around whenever he loses the ball.

Awful player.
State of these posters :lol:
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,873
Location
New York City
Baffling some of the comments here. He came on as lone striker and was absolutely miles away from the closest teammate to him from midfield. Really wasn't much he could do off the ball as he was having to solo press a back 4. All he could do was wait for the ball to come to him. Not sure what people were expecting.
Unreal criticism
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,926
Location
W.Yorks
Jesus Christ, the flow of the game saw no change with or without Martial or Rashford. Martial came in when we were already being pinned back and no getting any sniff of the ball and it carried on with him on the pitch.

The pressure argument some of you are trying to dig is utter nonsense because at no point in the second half were Liverpool put under any pressure by us. Rashford puffed and huffed which is admirable but unfortunately that didn't affect Liverpool rythm nor the pressure they were putting us through.

I'll repeat again for those trying to lie to themselves. Martial came in a game that was a 1 way traffic and it continued so. Liverpool were threatening far before Rashford was subbed and they continued so far after he was subbed.
Yeah that's just not true really.

Rashford was constantly running and pressing and challenging in the air.

You honestly think Martial came on and had the same effect on the game that Rashford was having?
 

Santoryo

ripping the reward
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
6,302
Yeah that's just not true really.

Rashford was constantly running and pressing and challenging in the air.

You honestly think Martial came on and had the same effect on the game that Rashford was having?
Again nothing changed with or without Rashford.

We were under the cosh with Rashford on the field and it remained so after he got subbed. People reaching in order to bash players with these sort of ridiculous argument is downright petty.
 

LoneStar

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2017
Messages
3,558
This is the sort of nonsense that were being spouted in the matchday thread. The level of absurdity in this post is ridiculous.

At no point did Liverpool struggle in the second half. The had completely pined us back and trying to blame Martial for anything let alone our tempo or Liverpool is crazy.


Let me guess, you're also blaming him for the goal.
Martial FC are so far up his ass they can't see daylight, or the match unbiased.

He did feck all in the game, keeping Rashford on would have been a better choice. The reason he was brought on was that he could provide some energy and goal threat, which a normal player would do in a football match.

I don't know what match you saw, but we were comfortable handling them pretty much the whole of the second half. Keeping the ball does not equate to dominating. They created feck all till the 80th minute. Guess you were busy seeing martial on the bench and not the game.
 

LoneStar

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2017
Messages
3,558
It's an attitude problem. He struts around when he's fully fit.

We can't be having passengers in this team and his work rate has been questionable for years.
Yeah the worst part is he has a cult following and anything you say against him is just blasphemy.

He's our best finished right now, but this game was a bad time to bring him on in the dying minutes.
 

Ace of Spades

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
5,217
He can appear lazy at times, and he is not the type to close people down relentlessly, but he was pressing more before his injury. The fact that he is coming back from a lay off, I won't be too harsh on him.

Hopefully, he will get back to sharpness soon, as we need him.
 

WR10

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
5,644
Location
Dream
Very glad he didn't come on and headlessly run after everything like Rashford. As a physio, I was cringing at the thought of him being brought on with 7 minutes to go and re-injuring himself.
 

Handré1990

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
4,819
Location
In hibernation
Wow. I should know how this place is by now, but I keep getting impressed by the low standard of posts on the football forum. The only thing to take away from his 7(?) minutes today is that he’s back from injury.
 

Acecross1

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
9
Location
London,UK
Baffling some of the comments here. He came on as lone striker and was absolutely miles away from the closest teammate to him from midfield. Really wasn't much he could do off the ball as he was having to solo press a back 4. All he could do was wait for the ball to come to him. Not sure what people were expecting.
He could have made an effort to pressure the opposition when not in possession. He was on for a few minutes and I’d expect 100% for those few minutes, instead he jogged around. Waiting for the ball to come to you is absolutely not what you do.
 

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
4,101
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
So I guess Martial FC is off, and Brexit FC is on by the reaction from some of the posters here. I look forward to revisiting this thread when we have played against a team sitting low.
 

Irwin99

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
9,348
Wonder if he'll start on Thursday if he was only deemed fit enough for 10 minutes today. Might be more sensible to save him for next Sunday. After what happened with Pogba I think it might pay to be cautious on this one.
 

Sayros

Full Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
6,006
Supports
Paris Saint-Germain
Wonder if he'll start on Thursday if he was only deemed fit enough for 10 minutes today. Might be more sensible to save him for next Sunday. After what happened with Pogba I think it might pay to be cautious on this one.
What did he get today? Around 10 minutes? He'll probably get 25-30 minutes. Hoping Ole eases him back into match fitness.
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,839
Very glad he didn't come on and headlessly run after everything like Rashford. As a physio, I was cringing at the thought of him being brought on with 7 minutes to go and re-injuring himself.
He was being brought on with all hands on deck. Given this, why then, would a manager bring on a player who can't run around like a headless chicken?
The idea should be to send on a player full of energy, who can run with more energy than anybody else, for 10 minutes.
Whatever the case, the Martial sub happened at the wrong time. Ole should've brought on someone who could actually do hard running and not a player returning from injury.
 

girish

I too love women...for their shoes.
Joined
Jul 23, 2004
Messages
14,491
Location
Kerala,India
And also, running around a lot. A lot in here bring it up all the time as if it is some sort of measure of 'how much you care'. I remember people laying into Berbatov because he didn't run much. Same goes for Martial too. Just because you didn't chase a lost cause ball to the opponent gk or a throw in doesn't make you a bad player.
 

Andersons Dietician

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
13,235
Martial FC are so far up his ass they can't see daylight, or the match unbiased.

He did feck all in the game, keeping Rashford on would have been a better choice. The reason he was brought on was that he could provide some energy and goal threat, which a normal player would do in a football match.

I don't know what match you saw, but we were comfortable handling them pretty much the whole of the second half. Keeping the ball does not equate to dominating. They created feck all till the 80th minute. Guess you were busy seeing martial on the bench and not the game.
The problem was that Ole shifted tactics and put 4 across the middle which stopped Young and Bissaka stepping in and picking off passes and not pressing. We retreated as a team inviting them on to us.

personally bringing on Greenwood might have been the better option or Martial and Greenwood and leave it as 2 up top but one Martial was only cleared yesterday so probably not fully fit so obvioulsy he is not going to sprint around like Rashford and James were but what he did do which was better was one moment where he took the ball down gave us a break and played a ball through to James.

I guess he’ll probably get 30-45 minutes next game as he continues his comeback.
 

Stadjer

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
7,536
Location
The Netherlands
And also, running around a lot. A lot in here bring it up all the time as if it is some sort of measure of 'how much you care'. I remember people laying into Berbatov because he didn't run much. Same goes for Martial too. Just because you didn't chase a lost cause ball to the opponent gk or a throw in doesn't make you a bad player.
English mentality i guess... huff and puff, play for the badge, earn the shirt.. that kind of stuff.

Running a lot and looking like you care is the most important thing. Someone who keeps playing when he is bleeding is the ideal player for some posters here. They dont care about the technical abilities of someone like Pogba or Martial. They love a technical very limited player like McT because he runs and works hard yet they hate Pogba even if Pogba creates more chances in one game than someone like McT does in 10 matches.

Same with Martial.. technical, his ball control and dribbeling is a level above Rashford his ability but Rashford keeps running.... so they love him and call Martial awfull.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,003
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
And also, running around a lot. A lot in here bring it up all the time as if it is some sort of measure of 'how much you care'. I remember people laying into Berbatov because he didn't run much. Same goes for Martial too. Just because you didn't chase a lost cause ball to the opponent gk or a throw in doesn't make you a bad player.
Some absolute weirdos in this thread I swear.
 

Based Adnan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
4,109
He could have made an effort to pressure the opposition when not in possession. He was on for a few minutes and I’d expect 100% for those few minutes, instead he jogged around. Waiting for the ball to come to you is absolutely not what you do.
Solo pressing a back 4 is a complete waste of time.
 

dogwithabone

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
2,260
I thought it was a really poor substitution. He took Rashford off just so he could get a round of applause, that’s madness with the game balanced on a knife edge. It looked a heartfelt decision rather than one made with his head.

Rashford didn’t look knackered, he was still full of running. Martial, understandably after such an absence, looked a bit lost and we had no outlet. He looked like a player just coasting through and one who didn’t want to make an unnecessary stretch or lunge in case he aggravated his injury.

I’m not saying the outcome would have been different with Rashford on the pitch but we lost ten minutes of impetus once he went off.
 

WR10

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
5,644
Location
Dream
He was being brought on with all hands on deck. Given this, why then, would a manager bring on a player who can't run around like a headless chicken?
The idea should be to send on a player full of energy, who can run with more energy than anybody else, for 10 minutes.
Whatever the case, the Martial sub happened at the wrong time. Ole should've brought on someone who could actually do hard running and not a player returning from injury.
Bang on. Which is why there is no criticism towards Martial at all. It was a bizarre substitution. Greenwood was best fitted for that role late on. He will run aimlessly and still provide sharpness if we got one lucky chance. Martial was not poised to provide either running or sharpness.
 

Moiraine

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2016
Messages
2,981
Location
Oslo
So much has been said about his effort at the closing stages. Has anyone got a gif or a video of that ?
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,616
Location
DownUnder
I thought it was a really poor substitution. He took Rashford off just so he could get a round of applause, that’s madness with the game balanced on a knife edge. It looked a heartfelt decision rather than one made with his head.

Rashford didn’t look knackered, he was still full of running. Martial, understandably after such an absence, looked a bit lost and we had no outlet. He looked like a player just coasting through and one who didn’t want to make an unnecessary stretch or lunge in case he aggravated his injury.

I’m not saying the outcome would have been different with Rashford on the pitch but we lost ten minutes of impetus once he went off.
How do you know? Did you ask him?

He’s been staying that he needed to manage Rashford better and rest him, was that all a cover story for letting him get a round of applause? Feckin ell some posters...
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,394
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
English mentality i guess... huff and puff, play for the badge, earn the shirt.. that kind of stuff.

Running a lot and looking like you care is the most important thing. Someone who keeps playing when he is bleeding is the ideal player for some posters here. They dont care about the technical abilities of someone like Pogba or Martial. They love a technical very limited player like McT because he runs and works hard yet they hate Pogba even if Pogba creates more chances in one game than someone like McT does in 10 matches.

Same with Martial.. technical, his ball control and dribbeling is a level above Rashford his ability but Rashford keeps running.... so they love him and call Martial awfull.
fecking stupid post.

It's the Pogba/Marital defenders that are blind to the realities of the game, not the other way around.

Let's look at some of the best managers in the game to see what they value/valued.

Fergie - Ji Sung Park, Fletcher, Butt, P. Neville, O'Shea etc. None the most technically gifted but all played hundreds of games for United. Fergie knew how important it was to have workers in the team and actually saw the back of talented players without the work rate ie Veron.

Klopp - Has a team built with quality and hard work, but doesn't carry a single player on his team that isn't willing to work hard and press the opposition. His midfield is literally made up of work horses like Henderson, Milner, Fabinho, Wijnaldum. His full backs bomb up and down the pitch for 90 minutes. Firmino fights for eveything, as do Salah and Mane. Very hard working team, not one comparable to Pogba or Martial when it comes to work rate. Got rid of lazy players like Sturridge previously.

Guardiola - Inherits supremely gifted players and turns them into hard working versions of themselves. He did it at Barca with Xavi, Iniesta, Busquets etc. Try to win the ball back within 5 seconds of losing it. He had a Pogba type player in Yaya Toure, who he had issues with at Barca as he didn't fit his style. Same with Zlatan. No matter how technically gifted they were, if they couldn't fit his high energy style then they didn't survive.

Mourinho - Goes without saying. Had big issues with Pogba, Martial and others.

So basically, you're very wrong in thinking you can get away without working hard on the pitch. Technical ability often means nothing unless you can back it up with effort, especially in the PL and modern day football in general.
 
Last edited:

Santoryo

ripping the reward
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
6,302
Wonder if he'll start on Thursday if he was only deemed fit enough for 10 minutes today. Might be more sensible to save him for next Sunday. After what happened with Pogba I think it might pay to be cautious on this one.
He'll need to get more minutes under his belt to build up his sharpness. I'm sure he'll be involved Thursday.
 

Stadjer

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
7,536
Location
The Netherlands
fecking stupid post.

It's the Pogba/Marital defenders that are blind to the realities of the game, not the other way around.

Let's look at some of the best managers in the game to see what they value/valued.

Fergie - Ji Sung Park, Fletcher, Butt, P. Neville, O'Shea etc. None the most technically gifted but all played hundreds of games for United. Fergie knew how important it was to have workers in the team and actually saw the back of talented players without the work rate ie Veron.

Klopp - Has a team built with quality and hard work, but doesn't carry a single player on his team that isn't willing to work hard and press the opposition. His midfield is literally made up of work horses like Henderson, Milner, Fabinho, Wijnaldum. His full backs bomb up and down the pitch for 90 minutes. Firmino fights for eveything, as do Salah and Mane. Very hard working team, not one comparable to Pogba or Martial when it comes to work rate. Got rid of lazy players like Sturridge previously.

Guardiola - Inherits supremely gifted players and turns them into hard working versions of themselves. He did it at Barca with Xavi, Iniesta, Busquets etc. Try to win the ball back within 5 seconds of losing it. He had a Pogba type player in Yaya Toure, who he had issues with at Barca as he didn't fit his style. Same with Zlatan. No matter how technically gifted they were, if they couldn't fit his high energy style then they didn't survive.

Mourinho - Goes without saying. Had big issues with Pogba, Martial and others.

So basically, you're very wrong in thinking you can get away without working hard on the pitch. Technical ability often means nothing unless you can back it up with effort, especially in the PL and modern day football in general.
If you are going to mention Fergie you should know that his teams were also build around very talented but less hard working players. Cantona and Ronaldo (yes he doesnt work/chase defend much during a game but will wait for the ball in the front) as prime examples. Fergie did see the need to add special quality to his teams instead of just playing the hard workers. Those players you mentioned were to support the hard working players, to make up numbers in training, play the "easy" games or fulfill a special role during a special game. Like Park shadowing Pirlo for a match.

Klopp tried bringing in more quality, creativity and less workrate to his midfield with Keita. So far Keita failed but the intention was there. Mane and Salah are the stars of the team and Klopp is lucky to have such talented players who also work hard (does Salah really work that hard though?). They mostly play because of their footballing qualities and not because they earn the shirt and play for the badge with their running.

Guardiola had Messi, everyone in that team had to work for the special class of Messi. That is still how Barcelona plays. Messi is allowed to walk most of the game because of his special qualities. Also before you mention Pogba or Martial and claim i compare them to Messi, im not. Pogba and Martial work way harder than Messi. They have to since Messi has way more talent.

In an ideal world you have hard working, world class ability players but that isnt always the case. Usually the super talented players dont work that hard. The less talented players will have to work harder to support them. How many of the best players in the world are also know to be very hard workers on the pitch? Messi isnt, Ronaldo isnt, Neymar isnt, Hazard isnt. Again the question if Salah even is that much of a hard worker? Kevin de Bruyne might be one of the few but that is very rare.

A team of hard workers and no special quality isnt going to win anything. You will need special quality to win stuff.

Pogba and Martial can offer that special quality but they wont be running up and down the pitch for 90 minutes. If you dont want to see special talent play than you should just watch midtable games because the not so talented but hard workers will usually play for midtable teams. Pogba and Martial have missed quite some matches and look where Manchester United is now... lower part of midtable. That is with a selection of players who do run a lot during matches.

You need special players to do special things to win medals.
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,261
Location
Manchester
If you are going to mention Fergie you should know that his teams were also build around very talented but less hard working players. Cantona and Ronaldo (yes he doesnt work/chase defend much during a game but will wait for the ball in the front) as prime examples. Fergie did see the need to add special quality to his teams instead of just playing the hard workers. Those players you mentioned were to support the hard working players, to make up numbers in training, play the "easy" games or fulfill a special role during a special game. Like Park shadowing Pirlo for a match.

Klopp tried bringing in more quality, creativity and less workrate to his midfield with Keita. So far Keita failed but the intention was there. Mane and Salah are the stars of the team and Klopp is lucky to have such talented players who also work hard (does Salah really work that hard though?). They mostly play because of their footballing qualities and not because they earn the shirt and play for the badge with their running.

Guardiola had Messi, everyone in that team had to work for the special class of Messi. That is still how Barcelona plays. Messi is allowed to walk most of the game because of his special qualities. Also before you mention Pogba or Martial and claim i compare them to Messi, im not. Pogba and Martial work way harder than Messi. They have to since Messi has way more talent.

In an ideal world you have hard working, world class ability players but that isnt always the case. Usually the super talented players dont work that hard. The less talented players will have to work harder to support them. How many of the best players in the world are also know to be very hard workers on the pitch? Messi isnt, Ronaldo isnt, Neymar isnt, Hazard isnt. Again the question if Salah even is that much of a hard worker? Kevin de Bruyne might be one of the few but that is very rare.

A team of hard workers and no special quality isnt going to win anything. You will need special quality to win stuff.

Pogba and Martial can offer that special quality but they wont be running up and down the pitch for 90 minutes. If you dont want to see special talent play than you should just watch midtable games because the not so talented but hard workers will usually play for midtable teams. Pogba and Martial have missed quite some matches and look where Manchester United is now... lower part of midtable. That is with a selection of players who do run a lot during matches.

You need special players to do special things to win medals.
How special are Pogba and Martial?
 

Stadjer

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
7,536
Location
The Netherlands
How special are Pogba and Martial?
In this Manchester United selection of players? Very special. Pogba has some of the best vision and passing ability in the league and Martial has shown at a young age that he has a talent not many players have.

I really dont get why Martial is being called awfull. He started the season well before he got injured. Today the only central forward thing he had to do was control a ball and pass it to the left (which he did just fine) but he didnt chase 1 versus 3 or 4 Liverpool players after the ball like a energetic puppy... because of that he was awfull?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.