Nobby style
Full Member
Correct me if I´m wrong, but didn´t he have just three crosses today - one poor, one very good, and one that looked like another handball from the defender?His crossing is just so bad though, it's really frustrating.
Correct me if I´m wrong, but didn´t he have just three crosses today - one poor, one very good, and one that looked like another handball from the defender?His crossing is just so bad though, it's really frustrating.
Within 5 minutes that cardboard box would be torn apart.Put a fecking cardboard box on his right foot and make him hit crosses with his left in training. Every day. Even if it's only one moment a game that goes wanting, it's unbelievable he's got so little ability in his left foot as a professional football player.
Bailly is the shiny new toy. it is understandable (although Valencia was much better today).The fact that he only has a 6,1 rating on today's match is so weird - lower than Bailly, which is just baffling.
Still doesn't explain why Valencia has a 6,1 average rating, which is just laughable.Bailly is the shiny new toy. it is understandable (although Valencia was much better today).
I feel sick with this forum now.Still doesn't explain why Valencia has a 6,1 average rating, which is just laughable.
Because Mkhitaryan and Bailly were ball watching that's why the attacks came from right side and De Bruyne was enjoying toying with Bailly our right centre back. Nothing much from Nolito today.Valencia was poor today. Poor positioning, poor use of the ball in final third, he's just too one dimensional. There was a reason City kept attacking down our right. He just isn't required quality for me.
Funny, I remember City´s actual goals coming down the middle and from the Shaw´s side, as well as Shaw´s side when Prince Harry hit the post again. And if you´re going to complain about his positioning, blame Mourinho. He is the one positioning him more centrally, giving the wings more outside space. And watch the second goal, Valencia perfectly plays him offside while ball watching Blind gifted them the onsides goal.Valencia was poor today. Poor positioning, poor use of the ball in final third, he's just too one dimensional. There was a reason City kept attacking down our right. He just isn't required quality for me.
You and me must have watched different a different game todayValencia was poor today. Poor positioning, poor use of the ball in final third, he's just too one dimensional. There was a reason City kept attacking down our right. He just isn't required quality for me.
ExactlyFunny, I remember City´s actual goals coming down the middle and from the Shaw´s side, as well as Shaw´s side when Prince Harry hit the post again. And if you´re going to complain about his positioning, blame Mourinho. He is the one positioning him more centrally, giving the wings more outside space. And watch the second goal, Valencia perfectly plays him offside while ball watching Blind gifted them the onsides goal.
Because Mkhitaryan and Bailly were ball watching that's why the attacks came from right side and De Bruyne was enjoying toying with Bailly our right centre back. Nothing much from Nolito today.[/QUOT
Bailly wasn't ball watching at all. He was all over the place. Players kept ghosting in behind Felliani, who was his usual self. Nolito was
He kept showing Nolito inside rather than on his left and he kept feeding the central players, his inability to handle things on his side (along with Felliani) meant Bailly had to vacate his space to engage higher up.You and me must have watched different a different game today
Think you're deluded! Judge our players by their own performances. Valencia and Fellaini were two who got pass marks yesterday. Bailly was poor and Blind was at fault for both City goals. Bailly or Blind should have followed their striker as he came short into midfield but they didn't first half and that contributed to the reason we got battered. Second half the did it better. Blaming Valencia the way you are makes no sense.He kept showing Nolito inside rather than on his left and he kept feeding the central players, his inability to handle things on his side (along with Felliani) meant Bailly had to vacate his space to engage higher up.
Compare that to an actual good performance which was Shaw completely shutting Sterling down dealing with those passes wingers latch onto inside the fb. Valencia was then horrendous with his delivery he doesn't aim his crosses he either just lofts it or hammers it. I judge players relative to the best about so when people say Valencia has been playing well I look at Lahm, Alaba, Felipe Luiz, Azpilicueta, Marcelo, Carvajal and have to disagree. He'll never be good enough for this club.
You judge quality relatively and holistically. What is good for Valencia would be average for a top full back so to say he is playing well for a team who aspires to win this league baffles me. He would be good for a Soton or Everton. Fellaini was poor and we won't prosper as long as he starts for the team, he can't mark space, below average on the ball, too slow, clumsy. Silva, Fernandino and KDB had a field day so I'm actually baffled as to why Felliani is getting high marks. Nolito was constantly on the ball providing service to those in the middle. Like I say as long as they both start we are not going to reach our full potential.Think you're deluded! Judge our players by their own performances. Valencia and Fellaini were two who got pass marks yesterday. Bailly was poor and Blind was at fault for both City goals. Bailly or Blind should have followed their striker as he came short into midfield but they didn't first half and that contributed to the reason we got battered. Second half the did it better. Blaming Valencia the way you are makes no sense.
What are you on even on about? For the love of God I judge our players on how they play for us not in comparison to other teams players.You judge quality relatively and holistically. What is good for Valencia would be average for a top full back so to say he is playing well for a team who aspires to win this league baffles me. He would be good for a Soton or Everton. Fellaini was poor and we won't prosper as long as he starts for the team, he can't mark space, below average on the ball, too slow, clumsy. Silva, Fernandino and KDB had a field day so I'm actually baffled as to why Felliani is getting high marks. Nolito was constantly on the ball providing service to those in the middle. Like I say as long as they both start we are not going to reach our full potential.
I would agree with that if you swapped the names Valencia and Shaw.He was good. The only defender that actually looked like defending. Nolito is annoying to play against. He did well to shut him out though some passes were still played down that side. Compare that with Shaw who was pretty poor and was getting pulled all over by Sterling and later Sane