You have to wonder why he was moved to right back in the first place. Lets face it, he wasn't good enough as a winger anymore and got places at right back. You can't judge him by winger standards after he changed position because he wasn't good enough on the wing.
He's a perfectly good right back.
What?
So youre saying if David Beckham moved back to RB, I shouldnt expect him to continue to cross at the same ability he was because hes moved position? That makes no sense at all.
Tony V is not somebody thats always been a RB, he was always a RW. The reason its relevant is because his crossing when he was a RW wasnt the best either. Why should it change when he gets into the same positions when down the byline? If hes not getting into the positions, fair enough, but thats clearly not the case.
Theres absolutely nothing wrong with that criticism, even though imo hes been our most consistent solid player this season.
Your post sounds very stupid here.
David Beckham was a world class right winger, why do we need to move him to a right back? So stupid if you even try to imagine of that from the first place.
Did you even read my previous two posts?? I have also mentioned you before that not many full back nowdays can cross like Baines in his best that doesn't mean I don't want my full back can cross like Baines at his best. But the thing is the quality and consistency of Valencia's crossings aren't any different with most right back nowdays. It's not hard to understand mate.
I can ask back your statement here. Do you expect David Beckham or Ronaldo defend like full back? Like Gary Neville? No!! You are hardly see a winger defending like a full back and right back crossing like winger.
go back to the first statement you made and look at what I replied. Your insistence is that his crossing ability right now should be forgiven because hes playing at RB and other full backs around the world cant cross. What does that have to do with Tonys ability? This isnt a comparison thread, this a tony V performance thread.
My whole point is he started as a RW and as a RW you expect his crossing to be better, but its not which is pretty much the first or second point I made.
Its not more complex than that, regardless of where hes playing, and he should not be compared to other RBs cos hes only really been a RB for a few years now (but a RW the majority of his career in club football).
Its a very simple statement which youre not understanding for some reason or choosing to ignore.
That's because he doesn't - every time the defender ends up in a position to block the cross, hence he didn't actually beat himAlso, how often does he take on his man and fail to beat him? It really doesn't happen often, its quite unbelievable how despite being incredibly predictable he almost always manages it.
I see that you are making an excuse of the thread's name now. If you are complaining and making a false statement about me not talking about his 2016/2017 performance then you need to look at your post first mate. You are mentioning him being a right winger which was couple seasons ago.
I'm talking about Valencia's crossing this season means it's considerd to be talking about his performance in 2016/2017 which is related to the thread's name!!
He's a right back now, Valencia's crossings as a right back aren't worse than most right back but you are keep mentioning him need to do better because he used to be a right winger. It doesn't matter where he used to play, we are talking about 2016/2017 season and he's playing right back right now and his crossings are right back quality. It's not complex mate. Valencia is doing absolutely fantastic job and his crossing aren't any different with most of right back you can find.
Hes a right back now. He started as a right winger didnt he? Or at least an attacking right sided player? I would say he needs to be less predicable with his crossing, but that wont change at this stage of his career.
So youre basically saying his crossing is fine because other full backs for other teams are not great at crossing? Good stuff.
And what was my first statement?
Read that again esp the bolded parts. Might help you out.
And what is one of the attributes of being a successful RW? Yep, ill let you figure that out
The fact is, hes either never been good enough or hes regressed on that ability. You can decide on that, and then hopefully you will understand why I used DB being converted to a Rb as my "example" with regards to crossing.
I dont think it can be simpler than that.
Either you don't read my post or you are just being a ******
What more you can ask for a right back to cross? They are right back, their main duty is to defend not make a quality crossing like Beckham or any other winger. You need to understand the difference of being winger and full back!! Even if we buy a new right back we won't find a right back with a better crossing than Valencia because majority right back crosses are like that. I won't say a traditional right back like Neville to have such a consistent crossings and I don't remember Rafael had better crossings than Valencia either.
I'm getting crazy here. You clearly don't read my post at all. I have already mentioned that he's playing a right back and this thread is about 2016/2017. What matters is what position he's playing right now!! Who cares about him "used to be or started" as a right winger. He's a right back right now!! Don't you understand???
Just go make your own thread mate if you still want to mention him started as a right winger.
I dont think I can make it any simpler than this example:
It would be the equivalent of Carrick moving into CB for the rest of the season, his passing not being good, and then me saying his passing should be better as hes been a CM all the time, and you saying who cares if his passing is bad, because traditional CBs for other teams passing is not any better)
And not to be a dick, but the first bolded part isnt even a sentence. Youre either anger typing as seen by your second bolded statement or youre clearly not understanding my point and the relevance of it, which if its the latter, thats fine.
However your statement comes down to:
"its ok if his crossing isnt good because other RBs around the world cant cross." That is the basis of your argument. Good stuff if you believe that.
Funny thing is, im not even saying its bad, im saying (and said) t could be better and less predictable. If you dont agree, fine
Do people expect Valencia crosses like Beckham or what? He's a right back and a lot of right back crosses nowdays are worse than his.
I said the quality and inconsistent of Valencia's crosses are common in any right back
He's a right back that what counts!! Who cares about him being a right winger in the past!!
Gonna assume English isnt your first language or you dont know what paraphrasing means.I never said right back around the world can't cross.
What is the reason? Im genuinely askingThere is a reason why he is converted to right back
Do you still not see why him being a RW for the majority of his career is relevant in this?
Which comes back to it, youre basically saying its ok if his crossing isnt better because other RBs arent better.
Gonna assume English isnt your first language or you dont know what paraphrasing means.
What is the reason? Im genuinely asking
No!! How many times do I need to say this he's a right back right now not a right winger. You were complaining about my posts have zero connection with the thread but what I have been talking about is clearly related with Antonio Valencia 2016/2017 performance. You are the one who keep talking about him being a right winger in the past which has nothing to do with Valencia's 2016/2017. Don't you understand the difference between present and past??
For someone who doesn't read people post has no right to said that.
There is a reason why he is converted to right back
Im not saying your posts have zero connection to the thread. I said his ability should have no connection to how other full backs perform.
Which goes back to why him being previously a RW is relevant. If you cant see or understand the relevance, thats something different and I cant say anything more on that.
Given this quoted sentence, im going to say my assumption is correct, which make sense why youre taking some things literally.
You didnt answer this.
Who cares about him being a right winger in the past!! There is a reason why he is converted to right back, he would have still be a right winger if he has better crosses.
He asked about crossing, I merely gave the crossing stats. 1 of 11 completed, @those others - no I am not wrong. FFTsz categorizes the assist for the goal as "a pass". (So ner, it suits my argument... )Who the feck judges anyone on cross completion? Not a stat I've often heard bandied about. Maybe name a bunch of other fullbacks who got more crosses into the box over the weekend, and completed more of them?
Sorry to ask, but when has Valencia been able to get 20 crosses into the box in the league? (I know the answer, it is not this season.) A rather weird remark to just throw out there? A fantasy version of events in which Valencia just happens to possibly put 20 crosses in?If Valencia is able to get 20 or so crosses into the box, it really speaks volumes that so few of our players get on the end of them.
What agenda would that be Pogue? You've just replied and constructed an argumentative retort about a fictitious number of attempted crosses that has been pulled out of somebodies arse? What point does that even highlight? I merely dumped the crossing stats above, I have the rest of them here.I also suspect getting 20 crosses in the box is a remarkable stat for a fullback. Yet it's used as a means to slag him off. Textbook agenda posting.
You are so weird. Everyone in this forum are talking about Pogba's ability to pass and dribble in his performance thread, Valencia's crossing and run in his performance thread, Carrick's passing and calmness in performance thread, Zlatan ability to score goals in his performance thread.
If you still want to complain about me talking about his ability to cross then tell everyone in here not me!! because they are the ones who mentioned Valencia's ability to cross the ball in his performance's thread. I was just responding their posts by saying "Do people expect Valencia crosses like Beckham or what? He's a right back and a lot of right back crosses nowdays are worse than his."
And you are talking about him being a right winger which has nothing to do with his 2016/2017 performance at all. Unbelievable!
Sorry mate, I can't see it. He's a right back not a right winger anymore. I was talking about his 2016/2017 performance not 2009-2014 performance. I have already told you before if you still want to talk about his right winger performance then you have joined the wrong conversation.
Its relevant to why youre having an inability to understand the basic concept and relevance, which you dont agree with. Maybe you can use a few more exclamations and question marks to make your pointExcuse me?? For someone who can't even write properly has no right to say that. I find it amusing that I tried to ignore it by focusing more to our original conversation but you are keep making a new argument.
You have clearly never read my post at all. What a waste of time.
Check this one out then:
I am not talking about how he stacks up against other players, I don't really care all that much about that as he's our player and I want him to use the ball better is the end goal. I like him in general, I am not a fan of yelling a random players name and then telling people he would be a better player. I rate Valencia as a solid fullback and I think he's a handy player on the defensive end and at the end of the day all I am merely doing is sharing my opinion on how I think he utilizes the ball poorly in the final third in general, while wanting him to improve.
I know that doesn't tell the whole story and we all watch and have different viewpoints and perspectives but all I am arguing is that I'd love for him to have a bit more of a think about it when he has time on the ball and space look around and survey his options. That is all I am saying.
He asked about crossing, I merely gave the crossing stats. 1 of 11 completed, @those others - no I am not wrong. FFTsz categorizes the assist for the goal as "a pass". (So ner, it suits my argument... )
Brunt has the highest completion for what it's worth, but I doubt he plays at fullback all that often. Soares is tied with him. (See below for my explanation.)
Sorry to ask, but when has Valencia been able to get 20 crosses into the box in the league? (I know the answer, it is not this season.) A rather weird remark to just throw out there? A fantasy version of events in which Valencia just happens to possibly put 20 crosses in?
Hull City - 3/14 completed.
Boro - 5/12 completed.
Liverpool 1/11 completed.
Chelsea - 5/10 completed.
To go with 5 lots of 1/2 for the season and a couple of 1/5, 0/5, 0/3.
What agenda would that be Pogue? You've just replied and constructed an argumentative retort about a fictitious number of attempted crosses that has been pulled out of somebodies arse? What point does that even highlight? I merely dumped the crossing stats above, I have the rest of them here.
I am not talking about how he stacks up against other players, I don't really care all that much about that as he's our player and I want him to use the ball better is the end goal. I like him in general, I am not a fan of yelling a random players name and then telling people he would be a better player. I rate Valencia as a solid fullback and I think he's a handy player on the defensive end and at the end of the day all I am merely doing is sharing my opinion on how I think he utilizes the ball poorly in the final third in general, while wanting him to improve.
He has a lot of time and space and averages a lot of touches in the final third (around 20) if you watch him in a game he rarely has the timing to be released in behind, he rarely has the ability to approach his marker face up and make a dynamic decision to either round him or play a dangerous ball in (it is not always on so that is fine to turn back and recycle possession) and those stats give a minor indication that quite often he will just bazook a cross into the box when it is a low percentage option. It actually happened a couple of times against Liverpool, but has also created a few goals for us this season.
I know that doesn't tell the whole story and we all watch and have different viewpoints and perspectives but all I am arguing is that I'd love for him to have a bit more of a think about it when he has time on the ball and space look around and survey his options. That is all I am saying.
I am the same on this. It feels like im bashing him, but im not. Hes been one of my fav players this season, but theres nothing wrong in saying he could be doing some things better especially the final ball part. In fact one of the main criticisms have been the ankle smashing or lack of using the left foot. (which is funny, cos hes put in some good left footed crosses).
Tony V has been a revelation. He actually plays right-back, and wingers role all on his own.
He's also completely stopped the ankle bashing.