That'd never work, I'm atheistUnless he’s Shapiro?
They aren't debating him though, but sure let's not call the racist guy names.Still, I think if you want to debate with someone you need to not resort to name calling.
If someone is a flat earther, and you laugh at them instead of explaining why the world isn't flat, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
I think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
If a famous person's views are beyond moronic and said person never can respond to your posts anyways, I see no reason to write long paragraphs on why he is wrong.Still, I think if you want to debate with someone you need to not resort to name calling.
If someone is still a flat earther in this day and age, yes, they should be laughed at rather than try and explain to them why the world isnt flat.Still, I think if you want to debate with someone you need to not resort to name calling.
If someone is a flat earther, and you laugh at them instead of explaining why the world isn't flat, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
I think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
It seems to me that someone called a racist racist, and that made you fantasize about the left calling everyone a fascist nazi.I think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
I'm not sure if you're aware but the bolded part does not work.Still, I think if you want to debate with someone you need to not resort to name calling.
If someone is a flat earther, and you laugh at them instead of explaining why the world isn't flat, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
I think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
If someone says racist things they deserve to be called a racist, simple as that.Still, I think if you want to debate with someone you need to not resort to name calling.
If someone is a flat earther, and you laugh at them instead of explaining why the world isn't flat, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
I think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
Who the hell wants to debate with Ben Shap?Still, I think if you want to debate with someone you need to not resort to name calling.
If someone is a flat earther, and you laugh at them instead of explaining why the world isn't flat, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
I think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
I spent far too many hours of my life listening to "debates" with flat earthers last year. Whilst I don't think laughing is the correct way to interact with them, there really is only so far a conversation with them can go.I'm not sure if you're aware but the bolded part does not work.
A wet vagina seemingly a foreign concept in the Shapiro household
https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1292927011724304384?s=19
To be fair, I think explaining stuff to a flat earther gets you about as far as laughing at him.Still, I think if you want to debate with someone you need to not resort to name calling.
If someone is a flat earther, and you laugh at them instead of explaining why the world isn't flat, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
I think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
I think the bigger issue is someone like shapiro is not ready for debate at all. Hes spewing nonesneTo be fair, I think explaining stuff to a flat earther gets you about as far as laughing at him.
With your last paragraph you generalize the entire left as a single entity that calls every conservative a fascist nazi. I'd say both sides are guilty of generalizing the other side.
That being said, Ben Shapiro is an evil cnut and should be called out as such relentlessly. Not every opinion is worthy of debate and further exploration. If I release a paper tomorrow claiming 2+2 now equals 5 and get angry that mainstream mathematicians are censoring me, by not exploring my theory further I would be called a moron. So should these alternative fact eejits like Ben fecking Shapiro.
I’m just claiming that he’s a fecking cnut! And yeah, someone like that deserves a good old bullying.Wait... You guys claim Ben Shapiro is a racist/transphobic/homophobic person because he was bullied... while bullying him online?
You are an idiot.Still, I think if you want to debate with someone you need to not resort to name calling.
If someone is a flat earther, and you laugh at them instead of explaining why the world isn't flat, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
I think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
Wait... You claim United58 is an idiot... while bullying him online?You are an idiot.
This.If someone says racist things they deserve to be called a racist, simple as that.
Facts don't care about his feelings.Wait... You claim United58 is an idiot... while bullying him online?
Is your wife a doctor?Facts don't care about his feelings.
Incredible, this is the thread you chose to bring this up inI think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
Take this bitStill, I think if you want to debate with someone you need to not resort to name calling.
If someone is a flat earther, and you laugh at them instead of explaining why the world isn't flat, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
I think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
plus this bitIf someone is a flat earther
And you get:, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
The answer surely can't be to mass-shame them into staying quiet publicly while they organise en masse online, galvanise each other with evidence of censorship and gather increasingly more people into their groups with that narrativeTake this bit
plus this bit
And you get:
If someone is a flat earther, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
The answer is no, you won't get anywhere. The conspiracy nutters are like addicts. You can't force them to get clean.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/general-ce-chat.417014/page-36#post-25845101If someone is a flat earther, and you laugh at them instead of explaining why the world isn't flat, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
Didn't say that either. You ignore them and live a better life for it.The answer surely can't be to mass-shame them into staying quiet publicly while they organise en masse online, galvanise each other with evidence of censorship and gather increasingly more people into their groups with that narrative
Is it increasing? I wouldn't know from first hand experience as I'm not yet 30, but have things not always been this divided, for decades and even centuriy? Increased exposure to news coverage (24/7 now with phones and internet) and forums can cause the illusion of more polarization - do you think it's still increasing?not saying you were, that sentiment has already been posted on this page forgot to quote the right one. I don't see how its a useful tactic but then I don't see any way out of the increasing polarisation
could be illusory effect of me being online more than the average person for sure. middle seems to be hollowing outIs it increasing? I wouldn't know from first hand experience as I'm not yet 30, but have things not always been this divided, for decades and even centuriy? Increased exposure to news coverage (24/7 now with phones and internet) and forums can cause the illusion of more polarization - do you think it's still increasing?
I think most people (myself included) spend far too much time onlinecould be illusory effect of me being online more than the average person for sure. middle seems to be hollowing out
Wait, are you telling me that debating in the marketplace of ideas won't work against racists? Oh no!I'll never understand why some people get so concerned about the hurt feeling of racists.
Go to a racist rally, try to engage with them as you advocate and see what happens.
Not just that, I'm telling you there are people out there who will blame you for the growing racism of racists if you don't debate said racists.Wait, are you telling me that debating in the marketplace of ideas won't work against racists? Oh no!
Diversity scares Ben Shapiro almost as much as transgender people do.
Still, I think if you want to debate with someone you need to not resort to name calling.
If someone is a flat earther, and you laugh at them instead of explaining why the world isn't flat, do you really think you'll get anywhere?
I think this is a big problem with the left - every conservative is a fascist Nazi; by perpetuating this, they're essentially ending any rational discourse between the sides and furthering the divide between people.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Like I said, dweeb. Ben Shapiro is the quintessential dweeb, and he should be wedgied, metaphorically and literally, until he stops being one.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date