If you read the rest of the post you might understand the context and wouldn't need to ask that question. Just a thought.I thought that was the voters choice in 2016?
Groundhog day... again?
I actually think it's more complicated than that and doesn't just rely on the result of a second referendum. It also relies on the result of the next GE.To be fair I think the only way a 2nd ref can actually settle things is if the leave vote goes down (say 15m) and the remain vote goes up (to 20m)
More people overall Vote
The leave vote goes down
And remain gets higher total vote and higher % than leave did before
57% to 43%
I don't think that's likley though (unless they drop age to 18 and allow EU nationals resident in UK to vote... Though that in its self would be seen as a stitch up
So yeah I think remain starts slight favourite but to settle things they would need a resounding win
Regardless of what the margin of victory is for "Remain" vs "No Deal", the Tory government will be hell bent on framing the result of the referendum as a loss for that particular Brexit rather than a sign that the public now wants to Remain full stop.
So rather than looking to revoke Article 50 in line with the result of the second referendum (There would definitely be no "Remain means remain" campaign), they will seek an extension and look to enter into negotiations with the EU for a different type of deal in the hope that a longer spell of propaganda in favour of whatever new deal they get will be enough to convince the public in yet another referendum further down the line. All the while maintaining that the default position is "No Deal", this is what the people really want and are blocked by parliament on voting for and using every loophole and mechanism they can find to force it to happen.