- Joined
- Dec 31, 2020
- Messages
- 822
He's not a top player, simple as
Varane Martinez Shaw Eriksen Antony and Rashford has been our talisman. Those who are not of course McT, AWB…maybe more. I’m not sure about Weghorst but he isn’t a great player and merely a stop gap.If you want a possession game, then you'll need players for it. Bruno Fernandes certainly won't start doing it alone, so he has to adapt to the team mates he has. Look at the first eleven of todays match and tell me who's comfortable playing a possession game. You'll need more than 2-3 players for that.
If you want to compare him with Odegaard, compare the team mates that sorround them too.
Defenders that know how to play with the ball on their feet are important for a possession game, but that's far from enough. Rashford is great, but he mainly likes to run and dribble, get to the goal ASAP instead of a more patient passing game, link up plays, etc. Weghorst I don't know well enough, but he doesn't look like the the best player for it too. AWB is horrible, McT not great, Fred not ideal.Varane Martinez Shaw Eriksen Antony and Rashford has been our talisman. Those who are not of course McT, AWB…maybe more. I’m not sure about Weghorst but he isn’t a great player and merely a stop gap.
Yes.If we swapped Odegaard/Bruno, do you think Arsenal would lose their ball control, creativity and pace?
We'd transform almost as much as the Casemiro transfer. Arsenal would be weaker in the middle of the park.Defenders that know how to play with the ball on their feet are important for a possession game, but that's far from enough. Rashford is great, but he mainly likes to run and dribble, get to the goal ASAP instead of a more patient passing game, link up plays, etc. Weghorst I don't know well enough, but he doesn't look like the the best player for it too. AWB is horrible, McT not great, Fred not ideal.
What I see is that Bruno can't rely on only making the ball roll and help things happen. If Bruno started playing a little more in the back, started doing more short and safe passes and reduced his risky passes... That would kill almost all creativity of the team.
You may hate what looks like wasted passes and loss of possession, but that's the price of actually trying to make things happen (sometimes, forcing too much to make up for lack of solutions).
What combination of players look more creative, skilled with the ball and faster thinkers/executives?
Xhaka, Odegaard, Saka, Martinelli, Nketiah vs McTominay, Eriksen, Bruno; Antony, Weghorst, Rashford?
If we swapped Odegaard/Bruno, do you think Arsenal would lose their ball control, creativity and pace? Would Manchester United finally be able to play a possession football? I don't know, I have my doubts.
This will be proved to be utterly wrong in the next two seasons. Bruno, in fact will raise the cup as he's our captain.He's just never going to be part of a premier league winning team
Sure hope so but I just don’t see itThis will be proved to be utterly wrong in the next two seasons. Bruno, in fact will raise the cup as he's our captain.
I also think it's just incredibly difficult to be successful with an attacking midfielder that's so poor in dribbling/carrying the ball. He basically has to be a sniper with his end product/chance creation to make up for it because he can't play in any sort of tight space or receive the ball on the turn. His erratic passing wouldn't be nearly as much of an issue if he could dribble. Quite frankly we don't have a single decent carrier/dribbler in our entire midfield which I think is a huge issue in these bigger games and something we need to target this summer.I honestly think we'll look to phase him out over the next season or two. I just think he's too erratic to survive in a ten Hag team.
I 100% agree with this assessment. People are just looking to scapegoat Bruno. Won us the game against city, liverpool, arsenal first game… he was poor yes and all of a sudden the knives are out for himDefenders that know how to play with the ball on their feet are important for a possession game, but that's far from enough. Rashford is great, but he mainly likes to run and dribble, get to the goal ASAP instead of a more patient passing game, link up plays, etc. Weghorst I don't know well enough, but he doesn't look like the the best player for it too. AWB is horrible, McT not great, Fred not ideal.
What I see is that Bruno can't rely on only making the ball roll and help things happen. If Bruno started playing a little more in the back, started doing more short and safe passes and reduced his risky passes... That would kill almost all creativity of the team.
You may hate what looks like wasted passes and loss of possession, but that's the price of actually trying to make things happen (sometimes, forcing too much to make up for lack of solutions).
What combination of players look more creative, skilled with the ball and faster thinkers/executives?
Xhaka, Odegaard, Saka, Martinelli, Nketiah vs McTominay, Eriksen, Bruno; Antony, Weghorst, Rashford?
If we swapped Odegaard/Bruno, do you think Arsenal would lose their ball control, creativity and pace? Would Manchester United finally be able to play a possession football? I don't know, I have my doubts.
It's a pity that stats/facts show that's not the case. No player in his position has an accuracy of 90% and above. Most, even world class players, will be happy with mid 70 to 80%. I don't know if there's a stat about completed passes, but that are less than ideal for the receiver, but it's also a competence to position yourself to be able to receive the best pass. Read the game to know where to be, where to appear, so the team mate can make the best pass for you.Bruno 's competitive core is his pass, both range and vision. Problem is his passes are missing the key 3rd dimension: accuracy. You may argue all those nice passes he delivered were quite accurate , but the norm in his pass accuracy are far worse compared with those masters on this technique such as Ozil / Zidane / Fabregas , whose passes could pinpoint to your preferred foot, time with your moving speed & trail, and in consistent spin.
Those masters could deliver such passes with 95% confidence level. As the runners, you can trust their skills and run at full speed and accelerate the games. Bruno's accurate delivery is let say 20% confidence level , so 1/5 chance you could receive a perfect ball from him, but in other times you could get the ball at weaker foot; ball too slow and you have to slow down to receive ; misplaced and could not catch it, etc. So basically you would waste lots of energy adjusting yourself to receive the balls, or simply prepare to track back if the balls misplaced.
Bruno's dribbling / ball control / strength are all mediocre . So if you want to fully utilize Bruno , then you have to give him the balls, let him place them, and hope for the best. At the end of the day, we either looks like an one-man team with performance all depended on Bruno , or we carry a mediocre liability player on field. Either case, it won't be an title winning team.
And yet, Ten Hag squeezes out of him every minute he can. He even prefers to make him play on the right when he wants to refresh the midfield, instead of simply subbing him.I honestly think we'll look to phase him out over the next season or two. I just think he's too erratic to survive in a ten Hag team.
He's definitely an enigma as what you're saying is probably right, but on the other hand we might become a better team with somebody in his position that excels at what he struggles with. He's made a name for himself by being a consistent risk taker with his passes and, when it comes off, it is great. But when he is erratic and sloppy, which is becoming more the norm, then he's a liability to our all around play.Bruno's one of the few players in our squad that could make a transfer to absolutely any top team in the world and you wouldn't be shocked.
Liverpool, City, PSG, Madrid... he'd be an absolute monster at any one of those teams with his work rate and productivity.
Fans are fickle
He would have no place in any of those teams at their best and it wouldn't take long for Madrid fans to start booing him.Bruno's one of the few players in our squad that could make a transfer to absolutely any top team in the world and you wouldn't be shocked.
Liverpool, City, PSG, Madrid... he'd be an absolute monster at any one of those teams with his work rate and productivity.
Fans are fickle
I'm sure you were saying that when he got 28 goals and 17 assists the season before last.He's not a top player, simple as
Lets be honest, there are alot on here who have a Bruno agenda. Any small sign to post negative they will.Just checked Fbref and Dusan Tadic’s pass completion over the last 365 days is 69%. With passing like that he wouldn’t ever get picked by a “possession based manager”, would he?
Tadic’s dribbles completed is almost identical to Bruno’s. Tadic has more assists and touches (playing in a stronger team) but otherwise Bruno is offensively very similar and defensively absolutely miles better. You can see why Ten Haag has him as the first name on the team sheet. Weird that so many fans can’t see why but meh, fans often get stuff wrong.Lets be honest, there are alot on here who have a Bruno agenda. Any small sign to post negative they will.
They clearly know more than Ten Hag, who every game, compliments Bruno, keeps him on, gave him captaincy.
Now, I am reading he isn't a good enough dribbler to play in the 10 because we want players to dribble in the middle of the park. They want a player to be good with passing, good with shooting, good at dribbling and dont try Hollywood passes.
They probably prefer Mount because he can dribble 10 yards and passes it backwards.
How many times did Tadic play in midfield under Ten Hag?Just checked Fbref and Dusan Tadic’s pass completion over the last 365 days is 69%. With passing like that he wouldn’t ever get picked by a “possession based manager”, would he?
Firstly, can you explain what you mean by a possession based team? keeping the ball around the back?How many times did Tadic play in midfield under Ten Hag?
Anyway, Ten Hag so far hasn't really played a possession-based system and it remains to be seen if he ever does with the type of players he has.
You don't really need to be a manager to know how he plays. It is quite clear and he also talks about it himself.I love how fans who watch him play on a Saturday know so much more about his playstyle than the manager.
The same people who have now changed the narrative to "he cant play with our wingers" are the same ones that said, when Ten Hag comes, he will replace Bruno with Donny because he won't fit his system.
Fast forward 6 months into Ten Hag's reign and Bruno is probably the 1st name on the team sheet and is captain. Its interesting to see a player who cannot keep possession, is erratic, cant work with Antony is the one the manager keeps on and takes Antony off when we lose control of games.
Fans clearly have not been watching our football, just because we have a possession based manager means we will keep the ball and build from the back is a myth. Possession based managers keep the ball but also have massive emphasis on counter press.
Guess who is the best when we are in transition and a ball needs to be found? Bruno.
Im sure we all know he likes to create chances. So saying Bruno wont play under Ten Hag, he will be replaced by Donny ? Saying we wont win a trophy with Bruno in the team.You don't really need to be a manager to know how he plays. It is quite clear and he also talks about it himself.
And who exactly do we substitute Bruno for? McTominay? Fred? Mainoo? We don't have another player in the team in his position that can create chances. Eriksen can, but he usually plays next to Casemiro. Do you really believe Ten Hag would run him into the ground game after game if he didn't have to?
He is stylistically similar and about as productive as KDB, who plays for the best football team in the world. Why would they boo him? You think he wouldn't be productive there too?He would have no place in any of those teams at their best and it wouldn't take long for Madrid fans to start booing him.
Im sure we all know he likes to create chances. So saying Bruno wont play under Ten Hag, he will be replaced by Donny ? Saying we wont win a trophy with Bruno in the team.
So are you saying Ten Hag shouldn't be manager? Because Ten Hag to me wants to win trophies but he plays Bruno, surely that cant work?
Im sorry but he keeps Maguire on the bench even with Injuries and plays a LB at CB, so yes, I do believe if Ten Hag did not rate him, he wouldn't play.
Also, Bruno started big games V City on RW over Antony who is his type of player apparently, also in games Bruno plays 90 minutes. PLayers dont play 90 mins every game if the manager does not rate him. I am sure you are aware of that?