royboy16
Full Member
Where the hell did this Monaco team arise from? They've actually got some tidy players.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
They've been around for a few seasons now, they knocked out Arsenal in 2015.Where the hell did this Monaco team arise from? They've actually got some tidy players.
Remember when the Champions league was full of quality teams that would lock horns and shut each other out over two legs?29 goals in 6 CL matches of this round...
It does matter that he is behind Aguero, you can only be offside if you're ahead of the player making the pass.Im pretty sure that should still be offside.
Mane is technically in an offside position because there's only the keeper between him and the goal. It doesn't matter if he's behind Aguero, because Aguero plays the ball forward, not backwards.
Have you only just started watching football?Im pretty sure that should still be offside.
Mane is technically in an offside position because there's only the keeper between him and the goal. It doesn't matter if he's behind Aguero, because Aguero plays the ball forward, not backwards.
I knew they were building over the years but I guess they were always in PSG's shadow and a bit away from making a mark in Europe again.They've been around for a few seasons now, they knocked out Arsenal in 2015.
It was irony, I just badmouthed him on here a few minutes ago because I do believe that he is really, really bad.
Embarrassing !Im pretty sure that should still be offside.
Mane is technically in an offside position because there's only the keeper between him and the goal. It doesn't matter if he's behind Aguero, because Aguero plays the ball forward, not backwards.
Re read the rulesIm pretty sure that should still be offside.
Mane is technically in an offside position because there's only the keeper between him and the goal. It doesn't matter if he's behind Aguero, because Aguero plays the ball forward, not backwards.
That was my mistake, obviously needed to brush up on my readingIt does matter that he is behind Aguero, you can only be offside if you're ahead of the player making the pass.
Have you only just started watching football?
Then there's these twoEmbarrassing !
Yeah that's my goofRe read the rules
Defo. City are a level below Juventus, Bayern, Madrid. PSG i dont think will win it either. Bayern v Real or Juve for me in finalI think Monaco have blown it. I can't see them winning by two clear goals. City on that showing, will be out in the next round.
Agreed. At 2-3 they had a chance, but they just imploded.I think Monaco have blown it. I can't see them winning by two clear goals. City on that showing, will be out in the next round.
Sorry but it is basics.That was my mistake, obviously needed to brush up on my reading
Then there's these two
At 4-3 you would fancy them but the balance of power is with City now.I think Monaco have blown it. I can't see them winning by two clear goals. City on that showing, will be out in the next round.
Like I said, it was completely my mistake for forgetting one of the nuances of the rule, I wasn't taking issue with that. It's unnecessarily cnuty responses that made me laughSorry but it is basics.
It's like asking why a boxer doesn't just knee him in the balls.
Well Stones certainly is...Manchester City. Entertaining Europe.
Tbf someone did bite an ear.Sorry but it is basics.
It's like asking why a boxer doesn't just knee him in the balls.
About time, tbf. You lot were stinking up the joint pre-Pep, especially last season's dull run to the semis.Manchester City. Entertaining Europe.
Entertaining all right. But maybe not in the sense you mean it.Manchester City. Entertaining Europe.
Last thing I'd do as Pep is sell Sterling. Sane and Sterling have both been excellent, and at 21 and 22, will likely stay on the flanks during Peps entire tenure.I have tried, but i just do not rate Sterling either, said it before. I just think hes meh. If i was Pep id be replacing him in the summer, if i could get a world class winger, in a heartbeat
That ref was a total tit. He loved getting in the playersLet's do away with defenders, make football 7-a-side and just have games like that all the time.
Ridiculous from both sides and the referee. I need a lie down.
Pretty much this. I hope we don't see too many games like that even though it is entertaining if it happens from time to time. I do like to see goals but if I watch CL knockout games I'd like to see more quality than this. It's a bit embarassing to watch.City were lucky that they came up agaisnt a team even shittier at defending than them, it was a very entertaining game but laughable at times.
Monaco fitness levels are really good for Frances's league but not against a PL top team, they collapsed at the endAs an Italian I am pretty a limited football brain and only can see 0-0 1-0 1-1 ... what happened?
Yeah, I was saying to my Dad that a lot of them are under 25 in that side and haven't got much CL experience, their heads went after City's 4th. Sidibie was fine in attack but was playing like he was on ice defensively at times.Easy to forget how young and inexperienced this Monaco team is. Most of them should learn from this. However I was really disappointed by Sidibe, thought he'd do a bit better than that.
As an Italian I am pretty a limited football brain and only can see 0-0 1-0 1-1 ... what happened?
Just saw the second half unfortunately and it looked like one of his worst games I've seen.Yeah, I was saying to my Dad that a lot of them are under 25 in that side and haven't got much CL experience, their heads went after City's 4th. Sidibie was fine in attack but was playing like he was on ice defensively at times.
Raheem's a funny sort of player. He's not as bad as some would have you believe and he's having a great season but he's far from being the finished article.I have tried, but i just do not rate Sterling either, said it before. I just think hes meh. If i was Pep id be replacing him in the summer, if i could get a world class winger, in a heartbeat
Yeah, of the two fullback's on show Mendy outshone him considerably.Just saw the second half unfortunately and it looked like one of his worst games I've seen.
Stones is one you should replace though. I think, albeit the player rejected it, you would have been more solid with Laporte. Tonight was another in a long line of your fans not happy with Stones, and the money paid. I think if hed cost say 10-15m, it wouldn't appear so bad.Raheem's a funny sort of player. He's not as bad as some would have you believe and he's having a great season but he's far from being the finished article.
Take tonight: he gets in the right position for his goal and stays onside when it was very hard to do so, fantastic; plays that great ball through to Aguero for the second, a constant threat when he has the ball. His stats speak for themselves as well - that's 9 goals and 14 assists in 33 appearances.
But in little moments you still see the work he has to do to truly reach his potential. He can't strike it that well yet and probably never will, he can't trap a ball if it's coming at him in the air or at any sort of speed, and every once in a while when he needs to flick it on or just keep it tight it'll bobble away from him and he'll lose it.
But the fact is he's 22 and has more than enough time to correct these sorts of mistakes. The same goes for Stones who looked a little lost tonight at times, but he's also a young lad playing in the biggest game of his life (his first CL knockout tie remember). Only time will tell with either of them but Sterling's certainly showing promise right now.