Wouldnt put it beyond Telles to scupper the entire sale.
I think you're giving them too much credit mate, Joel Glazer has no idea who Telles is.
It's complicated
Raine too? Assuming they won't get a cut of the sale if it's direct buyer to seller?
Win-win then?
They’d sue the Glazers into next century
I got it.
They put a bid in the following morning so my gut tells me they do think the Glazers want to sell.
If Muppetiers want to escalate and need to raise money for weapons I will contribute.Goldbridge and Mupperiers going to war now
Mupperiers are arguably worse in terms of general toxicity to be honest.
Sod it I’m willing to fund both sides of this war.
It seemed pretty clear they were doing a poor job running the club even looking from the outside despite some posters' attempts to claim Nice were somehow doing well, but seeing comments like that from someone internal is extremely worrying. I have no interest in a Boehly-like figure trying to force their football ideas over respected professionals who have shown they know what they're doing.
Not a bad idea. Just stand back and watch the mutual destruction
I do wonder if the Raine Group were more inclined towards SJR bid as it may have brought them more commission. I know the Sheikhs bid is for more money up front but I wonder if Raine groups commission was based on the value of the sale as opposed to up front amount. Who knows.
Didn’t Jim feck about raine last time with late bids etc for Chelsea, if your going down that route I believe it would be a lot more likely he would be used as a pawn to extract maximum cash from the Qatar state.
Yes he did, and he failed miserably.
It would be extremely unprofessional for either side if that were the case. The Qataris for trying to save a few quid, and Raine for letting the commission influence their decision. It is more likely that Qatar tried to rush things, or wanted more feedback about the bids that Raine weren't willing to give. Maybe they have their way of doing business, and they found out money doesn't always talk.
More likely is that they knew one of the parties were a giant and it would be completely one sided and wouldn’t encourage much of a bidding war if it was a level playing field.
From what I read INEOS have no idea on how to run a football club. Players were brought in behind the manager back to the point that Favre didn't knew how old Barkley is and which position he plays in. Some cyclist guy was tasked to make an audit about the club and Bob Ratcliffe keep getting kicked upstairs (president of Lausanne, Nice CEO and then head of football) despite having no experience in football and that he keeps tanking at every club. On a players perspective they have Ramsay on over 104k a week which around to what Osimhen is paid. Barkley at 30k is paid more then Kvaratskhelia
??Goldbridge and Mupperiers going to war now
Muppetiers are accusing Mark of being paid by Qatar.
both should be ignored to be honestGoldbridge and Mupperiers going to war now
Probably doesn’t help that he’s gone in with a last ditch offer of £10 and a snickers bar
Mark is many things but I very much doubt that he's been paid by anyone TBH. Muppetiers should be careful what he says. After all he's the one who keep mentioning that he's got very close links to INEOS
god reading that gives me nightmares. Imagine a shit run organization and still have debt and still have glazers around.
Absolutely. He's very biased in favor of Ratcliffe
Just found a twitter post from Feb, I can't post media though.
Right okay, that means there's no presence at all for the guy who the media are talking about, which is very odd as the rest of the family have articles and wiki pages.
And nor should he be.
