To be fair the statement does say 100 percent of the club, not just the Glazers share. That’s what you’re saying.
Go Pigeon! Fly my pretty!!
Again, I wouldn’t get too wrapped up in percentages or offer sizes at this stage. The rounds of formal bidding are yet to begin - everything thus far is subject to change.
Yeah but it seems people are getting off on being argumentative.
I know which was strange because not only this isn't a round for actual bids but Raine isn't taking care of the shares not owned by the Glazer family. That's why I was confused by both statements.
Was talking about by the media and by those on here who are pro Ratcliffe.Jim is being questioned and ripped to pieces on every single page man
Him previously owning exec facilities at Chelsea is mentioned on every page, his Chelsea bid mentioned often multiple times per page. Every single thing you’re claiming to be “ignored” is the exact opposite.
In most online polls he’s losing by between 70-80%. What World are you living in?
Would you be happy with an owner who could do that?
Anyone calling a billionaire on a football forum by their first name should look in the mirror. You're obsessed.Jim is being questioned and ripped to pieces on every single page man
Him previously owning exec facilities at Chelsea is mentioned on every page, his Chelsea bid mentioned often multiple times per page. Every single thing you’re claiming to be “ignored” is the exact opposite.
In most online polls he’s losing by between 70-80%. What World are you living in?
Yep. Its called irony, based on how much its been used. I aint even going to pretend you deserve any points.
But that long ago people were chanting homophobic stuff at Greame LeSaux, including United fans
3 letters vs. 9 letters innit.
it’s just business. i’d feed my wife into an industrial mincer if it meant i could go into a phone box moments after tulisa from n-dubz had guffed in it.
Qatar will surely look to take the club private if they have the winning bid. Ineos might, too. Nothing that has been said so far is particularly indicative one way or the other and everything is liable to change, anyway. Basically, we don't know enough at this stage and all options are on the table for all prospective buyers, so there's really nothing for us to be arguing about!
I could send you a tonne of media articles, every single one mentioning the Chelsea bid and season tickets man.
And it's seems that I'm in good company.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
There are points now? What's this forum coming to?!
I reckon you deserve at least a few points for this comment. At least, at least 3 points.
True, don’t even have to go that far back
Probably just meant full control as opposed to financing the Glazers with a minority share. It’s not that deep.
Surely… we have cleaned ourselves up?
Points for shit is your department dude. Can’t help, sorry!
I give you zero points Mr OriginalPoints for shit is your department dude. Can’t help, sorry!
More sad times.
It doesn't matter at all because he's obviously just a front man for a state purchase.
That's what I assume but initially I didn't think about that, likely due to a lack of pedantry.
Yeah must be ironyErm, I mean it was irony based on how many times the joke has been used. Isn’t it @FujiVice
Surely part of cleaning ourselves up means "not being a whole lot worse with owners who persecute gay people in their country."
As long as you weren’t one of the clowns wetting your pants about JR propping up the Glazers because he said majority and not 100% it’s all good friend!
Do you guys keep repeating this because you think it will somehow affect who ends up buying United?United's debt was major concern for all fans for years.
"We want club without debt!!"
Then comes a news where a guy will buy a club with another debt without clearing current debt.
Same fans; "Not every debt is bad". Ffs
It’d be a slightly strange way to “clean up” mind.
Ah the inevitable sportswashing from some United fans begins.
