How is a drunk man who resists arrest, fires a taser at the police roaming around the streets not a threat?
1. We don't know if he was drunk (maybe we do now) but as far as I know we don't know that.
2. Who are you perceiving him to be a threat to? Himself ok yes, the general public how?
3. From your other posts, I see you have not followed what happened, as he was not pulled over. He was asleep in the passenger seat of a vehicle (that is not a crime)
4. He did not have a gun
But more to the point even if he was drunk, and he did get pulled over, and he did run away. What danger to the general public is he really? There is no imminent threat to life, there is no reason to suspect he is going to harm anyone.
So in that sense, there is no reason to use deadly force and shoot the man in the back whilst running away.
Let's also address something because I think it is very important. Even if someone has committed a crime or is suspected of committing a crime, that still gives no right to take their life.
The only reason for an officer to kill a suspect is if they feel either their own life is in mortal danger or if there is an imminent threat to the lives of the general public.
Committing a crime does not mean you should die at the hands of the police.