ok, re thinking about this, we don't yet know when United made the first offer and when it was signed and when United then lowballed.
Probably might tie up with the contract being signed in Feb before or after we won the cup. The idea might have been to get a decent understudy if De Gea stays on.
Post that United have been dog shite and De Gea has played a prime role in United losing big games, letting Liverpool close. Losing to Sevilla due to De Gea's brilliant goal keeping him screwing United in the FA cup final.
So there would have been backroom discussions to move away from him right away.
The offer would have been rescinded and a lower new one would have been given as a "Feck you" to either push away from United or stay on as a 2nd choice.
Not a classy move De Gea deserved better and better is someone telling to his face that we appreciate his services but he is no longer needed or if you stay you will be a second choice.
The decision is correct but not done the right way.