Eric Dier | Poch: “He is an important player for us and the idea is not to sell him."

Do you want United to sign Eric Dier?


  • Total voters
    547

Sammyjunn

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
10,299
Location
In Smalling's pocket (as every other person)
Ill give you those, didn't realise all of those came straight from ligue 1 though?

I'll give you those, but thennoll throw out Barthez , Bellion, Cheyrou,


Except he really wasnt, hed performed well in a mid table to 6th placed team, Dier has been a mainstay I now 2 title challenging teams.
He hasnt, he doesnt even play CDM every match. Nor has he been instrumental or anything.
 

United Pro

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2015
Messages
2,702
Location
London
Absolutely right Chief. He hasn't been as good as last year as he has played CB more often but as a holding midfielder in front of the back for I think he has the potential to be excellent.

As Fabinho's name keeps popping up in comparison with Dier, I thought it would be right to put a video of him this season (a month old) tagged with the Dier video so it's easier to compare:
 

Cliche Guevara

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
3,790
Location
Inverness
If signing Fabhino was off the table, would a lot of people's opinion of Dier be higher?

In the event of this happening, I suspect Spurs have already indicated they are prepared to do business at this figure. It seems a good deal for them for a player they might see as replaceable.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,480
Location
...
Posted a few times last summer that Dier would be a dream signing in my opinion. That said, that was really before Fabinho replicated last season's form again. I'd probably prefer Fabinho, but Dier is gold, and if we can get that same defensive midfield protection and go English, then I have no issue with it.

He's far from average though I think. Will get better and better too, future England captain if he came here I think.
 

AdNani

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,746
He hasnt, he doesnt even play CDM every match. Nor has he been instrumental or anything.
Last season he played 37 times in the league, as a CDM, spurs finished 2nd
This season he has played 21 times, as a CB and 9 times as a CDM. There sitting 2nd.

Whether or not you think he is their most important player or not, he's a major part of this very good spurs team, either as a midfielder or a CB, if your bang average,
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,570
Location
Flagg
Slightly confused why there's even a discussion here. He's not even a key part of a Spurs team who are in second and come up short whenever they play anyone good. We want to be competing with and beating the team in first, so how signing a player who's adequate for the team in second helps achieve that is going to be a suspicious argument at best.

We already have midfielders and defenders who aren't good enough...we had so many we had to get rid of some of them. We don't need to start signing more again. Especially not ones who IF we could get them and IF they wanted to sign for us, would involve a massive protacted saga which woould end with us paying about £20m too much.

If he was Spurs best midfielder or defender, maybe, but he isn't (and if he was chances of signing him woould be roughly 0%). He doesn't get in either their first choice midfield or defence. If Spurs were first instead of second he probably wouldn't get in their team at all.
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
Last season he played 37 times in the league, as a CDM, spurs finished 2nd
This season he has played 21 times, as a CB and 9 times as a CDM. There sitting 2nd.

Whether or not you think he is their most important player or not, he's a major part of this very good spurs team, either as a midfielder or a CB, if your bang average,
They finished third actually.

O'Shea was an important part of our team winning trophies, Park was, fecking Anderson was and I honestly couldn't see Arsenals, Citys or Chelseas wanting to buy them.
 

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
They finished third actually.

O'Shea was an important part of our team winning trophies, Park was, fecking Anderson was and I honestly couldn't see Arsenals, Citys or Chelseas wanting to buy them.
Hey you can make your point without slandering O'Shea and Park. They have nothing to do with this.
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
Hey you can make your point without slandering O'Shea and Park. They have nothing to do with this.
I'm not slandering them, quite contrary, I absolutely loved both of them and find them incredibly important for our team but at the same time I do acknowledge that neither of them would be bought by the top sides.

FWIW I was very angry with Frogie when he sold Park.
 

Harry190

Bobby ten Hag
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
7,629
Location
Canada
How is he any different from what we had with Schneiderlin?

They play better as a team, but in terms of individual quality, they don't have much more than we do.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
How is he any different from what we had with Schneiderlin?

They play better as a team, but in terms of individual quality, they don't have much more than we do.
Along with us i would say they have the best starting XI in the league so there is nothing wrong with that comparison.

I think he's bang average but probably because I don't like Spurs and he was yet another player to get the nod over Carrick for England. But if rumours are true I'm happy to be proven wrong, we need a player like him and he plays like a Mourinho player.
 

Giant Midget

Aka - rooney_10119
Joined
Aug 2, 2008
Messages
5,220
Don't know what's wrong with you lot - I'd absolutely love to have this guy at United.

Keeps the game simple, tidies up well, good passing between the lines and can spread play when given space - remind you of any other player we've bought from Spurs?
 

AdNani

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,746
They finished third actually.

O'Shea was an important part of our team winning trophies, Park was, fecking Anderson was and I honestly couldn't see Arsenals, Citys or Chelseas wanting to buy them.
So they did, my mistake.

Difference between them is none of them were starters, they were squad players, very good ones, but not first names on the team sheet really, just filled in for injuries or rotated in.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
Slightly confused why there's even a discussion here. He's not even a key part of a Spurs team who are in second and come up short whenever they play anyone good. We want to be competing with and beating the team in first, so how signing a player who's adequate for the team in second helps achieve that is going to be a suspicious argument at best.

We already have midfielders and defenders who aren't good enough...we had so many we had to get rid of some of them. We don't need to start signing more again. Especially not ones who IF we could get them and IF they wanted to sign for us, would involve a massive protacted saga which woould end with us paying about £20m too much.

If he was Spurs best midfielder or defender, maybe, but he isn't (and if he was chances of signing him woould be roughly 0%). He doesn't get in either their first choice midfield or defence. If Spurs were first instead of second he probably wouldn't get in their team at all.
Sorry, but that isn't true. We usually play 3 at the back these days - and Dier is always part of the starting XI. And if we play with a back 4, then there's no solid evidence that Wanyama would be preferred over him in the DM position.
 

AP88

New Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
978
Location
Manchester
Supports
Man City
Times change, not everything Fergie did is applicable now, and other than a couple of occassions when he did buy British they were actually good enough, these days most of them aren't, including Dier.
Spurs have embraced that pro-British philosophy, and it's taken them to the pinnacle of English football on a relative pauper's budget.

United ignored Dele Alli despite him destroying the midfield; SAF would have taken him home from
Milton Keynes that night.

Leicester won the league with 5 British starters last year; every team that succeeds accommodates a core of domestic players on the pitch.

Identity is the most important element of success.
 

AP88

New Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
978
Location
Manchester
Supports
Man City
Dier is a good player as an anchor man. He's got a good passing range and will be good on the break. If Mourinho does get him, it would be going back to the old Manchester United philosophy to keeping the spine of the team, English. The only problem is Tottenham will hold us ransom to some crazy money which is why I would rather consider other options. Personally, I wouldn't consider buying any of Tottenham's players. It'll be a long drawn out saga till the end of the transfer window which will just disrupt our pre-season preparation.
I think it'll be done early; Dier reminds me of Matic and I think that's why Jose is hard for him.
 

AP88

New Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
978
Location
Manchester
Supports
Man City
He's the type of player who is invaluable if you already have him in your squad - versatile, young and English. But for that price there really is so much better out there.
Who's better? Di Maria and Falcao were 'the best out there' and they fell on their arse. Veron was 'the best out there' too.

We know Dier can be dominant in a Premier League midlfied; Fernando was rated similarly to Fabinho currently is while at Porto, and has been a shambles for City.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,278
Who's better? Di Maria and Falcao were 'the best out there' and they fell on their arse. Veron was 'the best out there' too.

We know Dier can be dominant in a Premier League midlfied; Fernando was rated similarly to Fabinho currently is while at Porto, and has been a shambles for City.
Di Maria was and still is a very good player. The issue was never talent. Falcao was recovering from a serious injury and went to the two wrong teams to try and remedy himself back into form (a side that couldn't score goals/lacked an established settled XI and another who downed tools for their manager.

We knew Morgan Schneiderlin could be dominant in a premier league midfield too.

Fabinho is far better than Fernando, he is proving it at a better league and a higher level - his side currently sits in the semi final of the CL. In any case, there is also more out there in midfield than simply 'destroyers' - many froth for a Carrick replacement, somebody like Jorginho plays the role to a tee. Even then there are other all-round options out there like Saul Niguez, Tolisso, Sanson, Nabi Keita... There are certainly options and I imagine our scouts have names.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
Spurs have embraced that pro-British philosophy, and it's taken them to the pinnacle of English football on a relative pauper's budget.

United ignored Dele Alli despite him destroying the midfield; SAF would have taken him home from
Milton Keynes that night.

Leicester won the league with 5 British starters last year; every team that succeeds accommodates a core of domestic players on the pitch.

Identity is the most important element of success.
I don't think so, Real Madrid are on course for 3 CL wins in 4 years, at most they start with 2 Spanish players, Chelsea are about to win their 2nd PL title in 3 years and field 2 at most English players. Ander Herrera, Mata and Tony Valencia are as dedicated to Manchester United as any player with a British birthplace stamped on their passport.

Spurs have so far done nothing bar choke in the CL, get knocked out 7 semis in a row in the cup and make up the top 3, when they win a PL then they'll be worth mentioning. I have no issue with English or British players if they are actually good enough, most of them aren't.
 

Prodigal7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
2,284
Location
Daenerys' pants
We would be wise not to spend time with Levy and concentrate in getting better specialist players for each postion. Our club were poor in transfers mainly because instead of getting players when they are available we waste time in going for players who are not available.
Buy top players when they are available(ready to move clubs) and good players from second tier selling clubs.
Only last summer we have done really well in going for Zlatan and Mkhi(last year contract).
As the above posts we should go for specialist RB Aurier if he is available. He has also played RCB in 3 man Central Defense for much of his initial development in France.
Aurier is an unmanagable scum bag. You won't see the club go for someone like him given his attitude, let alone Mourinho.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
Wouldnt say no to Dier or Fabinho. Both are very good and can play multiple positions.
 

RedEM10

Sweaty Foot Monster
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
1,655
Genuinely would have on interest in signing him, don't like him at all
 

Peanut Butter

New Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2016
Messages
5,498
Spurs have embraced that pro-British philosophy, and it's taken them to the pinnacle of English football on a relative pauper's budget.

United ignored Dele Alli despite him destroying the midfield; SAF would have taken him home from
Milton Keynes that night.

Leicester won the league with 5 British starters last year; every team that succeeds accommodates a core of domestic players on the pitch.

Identity is the most important element of success.
Taken Spurs to the pinnacle of football?! When? Have they won the league then?
 

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,792
Location
Mumbai
Spurs have embraced that pro-British philosophy, and it's taken them to the pinnacle of English football on a relative pauper's budget.

United ignored Dele Alli despite him destroying the midfield; SAF would have taken him home from
Milton Keynes that night.

Leicester won the league with 5 British starters last year; every team that succeeds accommodates a core of domestic players on the pitch.

Identity is the most important element of success.
It's taken them to the pinnacle of square root of feck all. Which is feck all incase you're confused.
 

dbs235

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
1,871
Don't know what's wrong with you lot - I'd absolutely love to have this guy at United.

Keeps the game simple, tidies up well, good passing between the lines and can spread play when given space - remind you of any other player we've bought from Spurs?
Agree with this, he's a good player and with our injury record for centre-backs he'd be useful as cover there too.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,970
Spurs have embraced that pro-British philosophy, and it's taken them to the pinnacle of English football on a relative pauper's budget.

United ignored Dele Alli despite him destroying the midfield; SAF would have taken him home from
Milton Keynes that night.

Leicester won the league with 5 British starters last year; every team that succeeds accommodates a core of domestic players on the pitch.

Identity is the most important element of success.
It's taken them to the pinnacle of zero of the three trophies available in English football.
 

Rajma

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
8,589
Location
Lithuania
The only thing I can tell after seeing this news is that we would benefit a lot from having DoF.
 

Oldyella

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
5,991
If we cannot get Fabhino would be more than happy with this signing as the DM. Solid player who would free up those further forward, and also provide CB cover for our annual injury crisis there.
 

Nick7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
19,352
Location
Ireland
The only thing I can tell after seeing this news is that we would benefit a lot from having DoF.
What does that have to do with this? How would having a DOF benefit us in the face of us potentially signing Dier?
 

Rajma

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
8,589
Location
Lithuania
What does that have to do with this? How would having a DOF benefit us in the face of us potentially signing Dier?
Benefit in terms of stopping managers from signing average players for inflated fees and having a clear transfer strategy that would be tied to the club's long-term style with players meeting multiple criteria rather than leaving it up to every manager we have (seeing as their styles and preferences vary so greatly)? How many more squad overhauls are we away from coming to particular realization.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Varun

Dong Fangzhuo

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2011
Messages
2,009
This story needs to die a quick, yet painful death. He's so limited, there is just no way we can't pick up a DM of similar ability for much less from any number of leagues. He doesn't even qualify as homegrown. PL proven is basically his one plus and that is such an overrated "quality" anyway.