Just a team of 11 strangers.
Was listening to TalkShite at lunch time and they was interviewing Marcel VanDer Kranne (sp?) They has asked his opinion on Arne Slot vs ETH. HIs considered opinion was Slot in most cases would stick to his principals and let the opposition worry about his tacticts. Eth on the other hand would react to the opposition which often lead to various tactics, formations, chaos week in week out.
Im not sure on the former but on the latter, it really is just chaos. Slow in transition, no link between midfield and Hojlund. Garnacho in most cases is relied on for moments of individual brilliance rather than part a contributor to the bigger team. Hojlund, I feel for the lad, feeding off utter half scraps, what does he offer the team ? Nobody knows, he very rarely gets the ball.