Di Maria's angel
Captain of Moanchester United
You must be anti-New Zealand.I can't argue that at all, because according to the rules, New Zealand lost.
It's done.
And based on the rules, they actually won by 1 run.
You must be anti-New Zealand.I can't argue that at all, because according to the rules, New Zealand lost.
It's done.
There is no one specific answer to that. It can be many thing like arrogance (one which I pointed out) or trusting wrong individuals for the job (Shastri and selectors) and too much power given to certian individuals (Kohli) all are some of the reasons.I get that, but why poor planning? Cricket India has the depth of talent, $ resources and infrastructure to plan better than anyone else. So why did they plan so poorly?
Rahane is pretty crap in ODIs so that's why he wasn't considered.I can't even understand why Rahane wasn't even considered. A very reliable option for number 4. We looked so fragile after having lost two wickets. Bizarre management and, in truth, we deserved to go out to teach those feckers a lesson.
Isn't Rahane an ODI opener?I can't even understand why Rahane wasn't even considered. A very reliable option for number 4. We looked so fragile after having lost two wickets. Bizarre management and, in truth, we deserved to go out to teach those feckers a lesson.
I'm not anti NZ at all. I just accept this result and outcome.You must be anti-New Zealand.
And based on the rules, they actually won by 1 run.
The last thing we need is Rahane back in ODIs. He should just stick playing Tests.Rahane is pretty crap in ODIs so that's why he wasn't considered.
Hasn't been good in tests for a while too.Rahane is pretty crap in ODIs so that's why he wasn't considered.
Goes way beyond 'supporting an underdog' though doesn't it?Yes. Supporting an underdog in a sport is a very rare event. Great question.
He's not half bad. Still averages 35 and had proven himself very useful in the middle order.Rahane is pretty crap in ODIs so that's why he wasn't considered.
A bloke I used to work with has now retired from full time work but does a lot of stewarding at Derbyshire CCC and Derby County. He says Bairstow got out once playing for Yorkshire at Derby and threw a right hissy fit, throwing his bat and gloves around like a child. He got warned by the ground staff.Understandable.
He’s one of those players that looks like he could be a massive twat with his attitude when he plays but in interviews actually seems like hes probably an alright guy.
He's rubbish. Lucky to be in Test team. Has been garbage for English county this season too.He's not half bad. Still averages 35 and had proven himself very useful in the middle order.
@Skills hes played quite a few games as a number 4.
Yeah, of course, no need to have him in now.The last thing we need is Rahane back in ODIs. He should just stick playing Tests.
Just to clarify, I only mean we should have picked him for the WC. I wouldn't consider him now.He's rubbish. Lucky to be in Test team. Has been garbage for English county this season too.
That doesn’t surprise me at all, some people turn into monsters once they’re in the competitive zone. I’m one of them, I’m vile when I play sportA bloke I used to work with has now retired from full time work but does a lot of stewarding at Derbyshire CCC and Derby County. He says Bairstow got out once playing for Yorkshire at Derby and threw a right hissy fit, throwing his bat and gloves around like a child. He got warned by the ground staff.
That's probably going back 5 years maybe slightly more and I agree he comes across much better these days. There's nothing wrong with a bit of passion anyway. I still totally disagree with his comments in the group stage about the media ganging up and wanting England to fail - that was absolute drivel but to be fair to him he has become some cricketer over the last 18-24 months.
Isn't Gill another top order batsman? I thini it's time for India to start phasing Dhawan out & also carefully evaluate Rohit too over the next few years (to see if he'll really be the best available option for 2023).Dhawan
Rohit
Kohli
Gill
Iyer
Pant
Pandya
Jadeja
Kuldeep
Bumrah
Shami
Ideally I'd like us too see this team start from now on in ODIs.
Add Aggarwal/Shaw for openers.
Yeah but I'd like to get him eased in the team and then make him an opener. He's a ridiculous player.Isn't Gill another top order batsman? I thini it's time for India to start phasing Dhawan out & also carefully evaluate Rohit too over the next few years (to see if he'll really be the best available option for 2023).
Shame it all goes behind a paywall again.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Good for cricket.
I'm sure the rules say that the team that pick up the trophy win the world cup. End of.You must be anti-New Zealand.
And based on the rules, they actually won by 1 run.
Shame it's crap cricket!Well the hundred will be on BBC ...
I am not too sure if the hundred will be a good thing for the game. We already have three formats, why introduce a 4th one to further complicate the game. Maybe I will love it once it his here but so far I feel they should have stuck with T20.Well the hundred will be on BBC ...
Nah it's to make it shorter.Let's see . England started T20 as well and people didn't like it at the start . The idea of the hundred is to make it less complicated to watch the game so let's see how it goes
100-ball matches. Last over will be 10 deliveries.WTF is the hundred?
A new format of cricket. It shortens the game even more than 20/20.WTF is the hundred?
All overs will be 10 deliveries100-ball matches. Last over will be 10 deliveries.
So 5 10-ball overs per innings?All overs will be 10 deliveries
Yeah change of ends every 10 balls (though a single bowler can bowl either 5 bowls or 10 balls in that over). 25 balls max per innings for a bowler.So 5 10-ball overs per innings?
100 deliveries per innings. 10 “overs” each.So 5 10-ball overs per innings?
So 5 10-ball overs per innings?
On 19 April 2018, the ECB announced the creation of 100-ball cricket, in which there would be 15 traditional six-ball overs and a final ten-ball over.[3] Other mooted changes include removing the LBW law.[4] The plan drew significant opposition but was supported by England captain Joe Root.[5] On 21 February 2019, the ECB confirmed revised playing conditions in which there would be 10 ten-ball overs with bowlers delivering 5 or 10 consecutive balls.[6]
Would you still have thought it was a farce if NZ had only scored say 5 in their Super Over?Another thing that's interesting is that this is the first time a team got all out and still won .
Just goes to show what a farce this is.