They do it mainly in order to stop the opposition from having the ball and attacking. It's hugely important for defence. Barcelona also have many sprints. And City too. Modern football is all about moving the ball quickly and pressing the opposition so that they have fewer attacks.
Do they have 59 sprints per player, per game though? That just seems an absurdly high number to me.
I get pressing the opposition so that they have fewer attacks, but surely part of that is done while you still have the ball, because you should have forced your opposition in to positions that are far deeper on the pitch, bringing their lines closer together, thus giving them less space to distribute it to a teammate should they win the ball.
Actually that is a myth. there is no statistical correspondence between 'letting the ball do the work' and distance covered.
I'm not disputing this because I've nothing concrete to counter it with (although I think there is some merit to the ball doing the work
), but where do you actually go about finding stats like this? I've realised that whilst the near 600 sprints per game stat looks insane, I've nothing to compare it to.
Despite this, I'm still not convinced this style of play is sustainable.