Mo Salah

kaiser1

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
2,103
Supports
Bayern Munich
If you're coaching a team with Xavi and you have them reject possession and depend on counter attacks you should be sacked and then banned from coming within 100 yards of a football pitch ever again
Coaches stick to their tactics no matter what, Mourinho will rarely be a possession dominating side while Pep will rarely be a counter attacking side. Pep for example prefers smaller, technical players while Mourinho prefers bigger stronger players which is why most of his complaints start from "lazy"

Rijkaard had Xavi and didn't know how to use him, he actually wanted him sold. If Pep didn't use Xavi in a possession heavy team we wont be here today mentioning him as one of the best midfielders of all time
 

kaiser1

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
2,103
Supports
Bayern Munich
That's a very simplistic way of looking at football. The same logic should would lead you to the conclusion that KDB would struggle under Guardiola (a midfielder who hovers under an 80% pass completion). But great managers aren't so rigid and oblivious to the talent of the players they've got.

IIRC Aragones' Spain wasn't a heavy possession team, and Xavi was fantastic in that team. They ended up with less possession than Germany in that final and Xavi made the assist in that final
KdB is a passing genius, the type of players that work with Pep
KdB struggled under Mourinho for example and was dropped for players like Willian who are obviously weaker technically but probably worked harder in defense. Pep couldnt work with Zlatan and Yaya while I believe they will be perfect for Mourinho, Pep probably will struggle with a talent like Lukaku while Conte would love him
 
Last edited:

1905

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
379
Supports
Chelsea
There’s a strange inverse logic that somehow uses his incredible stats against him.
Because these days a lot of people like to use statistics as the be all end all to judge a player. When comparing him to players of the highest level, why would you only use statistics? Its not about using it against him, its just trying to evaluate players fairly based on all aspects. Statistics/Individual & team honours/Ability/Longevity and what have you.

As if his proficient output is hiding a secret set of flaws only seen by those with a real understanding of the game.
I've stated many times that everything I've said is just my opinion from watching him play a lot. At no point was I trying to present anything as fact or pass it off as some sort of ancient philosophical wisdom like you're suggesting. Pointing out flaws in his technical fundamentals and why that might make him less adaptable than others, what's wrong with that?

This while some less impactful footballers receive more praise for winning the ‘eye test’
See this is where it all just comes down to opinions. I've already said how I like to rank players, you might also have your own way. You might weigh stats more than natural ability, or longevity over a higher short peak (maybe Ronaldinho for example). There's no right or wrong way (unless you're only using stats!).

which is unencumbered by the inconvenience of empirical evidence.
If we're going to need evidence for every world class player that didn't play for a lesser side then we might be here all day. Perhaps these players were so talented that there isn't any plausible reason they'd not be at a top club for the majority of their career?
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,823
Location
india
I think Xavi will struggle in a Mourinho team and any team that reject possession and depend on counter attacks. Since you mentioned Stoke, Xavi will struggle in any team that plays like Stoke
Right one of the greatest ever midfielders would struggle next to Essien and Makelele/Lampard or Cambiasso. In fact he's so unable to adapt he'd somehow manage to struggle playing the role fabregas did so well in 2015-16. Most of those teams did not reject possession in regular games btw. And besides if you have Xavi you use his qualities to increase your chances of winning.
 

TenonTen

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 16, 2022
Messages
893
Supports
Neutral
Prime Robben was so frightening. Remember watching the 2014 World Cup and Robben was an absolute force of nature. Great player to watch. The best "one trick pony" you'll see.
One of the best divers around too.

KdB is a passing genius, the type of players that work with Pep
KdB struggled under Mourinho for example and was dropped for players like Willian who are obviously weaker technically but probably worked harder in defense. Pep couldnt work with Zlatan and Yaya while I believe they will be perfect for Mourinho, Pep probably will struggle with a talent like Lukaku while Conte would love him
That wasn't Prime KDB.

Prime KDB would wreck Havoc in a Mourinho team.

KDB picking killer passes on counter attacks for attackers to run onto would be wonderful. Remember how brilliant Ozil was for Mourinho. Plus KDB is a good ball carrier and has great defensive work rate too. Mourinho would love him. He just didn't want to develop players and stuck with the team he already had.

Right one of the greatest ever midfielders would struggle next to Essien and Makelele/Lampard or Cambiasso. In fact he's so unable to adapt he'd somehow manage to struggle playing the role fabregas did so well in 2015-16. Most of those teams did not reject possession in regular games btw. And besides if you have Xavi you use his qualities to increase your chances of winning.
The thing is, to utilize Xavi's qualities to great use you have to gear the entire team towards that possession approach which wouldn't be possible with just Xavi. You would need a suitable team around him for that particular style of play. That philosophy only works with a very specific profile of players like Guardiola would tell you.

Mourinho teams(or even Fergie teams) even in possession were very different to the teams Xavi played for.

If you're coaching a team with Xavi and you have them reject possession and depend on counter attacks you should be sacked and then banned from coming within 100 yards of a football pitch ever again
Only having Xavi wouldn't make you a possession side though. You need to build the entire team geared around that to apply that philosophy. Otherwise, it'll just be a half baked possession system which will be "neither-here-nor-there".

What an incoherent rancid logic is that ? Yikes. Thought you were a Stoke fan for a second after seeing that. Expected better from a fan of a cultured team like Bayern on football. Out of curiosity what team of past or present you think Xavi would struggle in ?
"Cultured Football" thing is a load of utter BS. There's no one correct or cultured way to play Football.

In modern Football, most teams tend to play in phases anyways. Sometimes the teams get into a low block just to recharge their batteries for an upcoming 10 minute spell of high pressing.

Not every team has City's stacked billion dollar squad.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,823
Location
india
Prime Robben was so frightening. Remember watching the 2014 World Cup and Robben was an absolute force of nature. Great player to watch. The best "one trick pony" you'll see.
One of the best divers around too.



That wasn't Prime KDB.

Prime KDB would wreck Havoc in a Mourinho team.

KDB picking killer passes on counter attacks for attackers to run onto would be wonderful. Remember how brilliant Ozil was for Mourinho. Plus KDB is a good ball carrier and has great defensive work rate too. Mourinho would love him. He just didn't want to develop players and stuck with the team he already had.



The thing is, to utilize Xavi's qualities to great use you have to gear the entire team towards that possession approach which wouldn't be possible with just Xavi. You would need a suitable team around him for that particular style of play. That philosophy only works with a very specific profile of players like Guardiola would tell you.

Mourinho teams(or even Fergie teams) even in possession were very different to the teams Xavi played for.
Why? Fabregas starred for Chelsea's title win and Scholes dominated English football. What do you see do lacking in Xavi's qualities that makes him such a one note footballer?
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,616
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
The whole Rijkaard argument is a weird one. The Xavi Rijkaard inherited was a player no longer a youngster who had failed to develop on his obvious potential in a dysfunctional team.

It was under Rijkaard he became world class. So of course he was a great fit for what Rijkaard was doing, once he grew into the player we are actually talking about. A young undeveloped xavi would probably not fit into every side. Jeez.
 
Last edited:

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,823
Location
india
The whole Rijkaard argument is a weird one. The Xavi Rijkaard inherited was a player no longer a youngster who had failed to develop on his obvious potential in a dysfunctional team.

It was under Rijkaard he became world class. So of course he was a great fit for what Rijkaard was doing, once he grew into the player we are actually talking about. A young undeveloped xavi would probably not fit into every side. Jeez.
Scholes didn't shine for England so apparently only a SAF player.
 

Lord SInister

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2015
Messages
2,967
Location
where grasses are green and girls are pretty
The whole Rijkaard argument is a weird one. The Xavi Rijkaard inherited was a player no longer a youngster who had failed to develop on his obvious potential in a dysfunctional team.

It was under Rijkaard he became world class. So of course he was a great fit for what Rijkaard was doing, once he grew into the player we are actually talking about. A young undeveloped xavi would probably not fit into every side. Jeez.
Hilarious to hear when Xavi was one of the best Barcelona players under Rijkaard until his injury :lol: :annoyed:
 

kaiser1

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
2,103
Supports
Bayern Munich
Barcelona midfielder Xavi launched a stinging attack on former-manager Frank Rijkaard on Friday, stating that he felt like a "cancer" for the club during the Dutch manager's five-year reign.
Xavi, 32, is widely regarded as one of the world's best midfield operators, but felt as though Rijkaard did not value his talents due to his diminutive stature.
"Rijkaard did not believe in me. He wanted our game to be based on a superior physical level. He believed that it was the only way to be at the same level as the top clubs in Europe," Xavi told French newspaper L'Equipe.
"Four or five years ago, I was [deemed] terrible and useless. I was Barca's cancer! A player 1,70m tall was simply impossible."

https://www.espn.com/soccer/news/story/_/id/1051576/xavi:-frank-rijkaard-made-me-barca's-
 

kaiser1

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
2,103
Supports
Bayern Munich
The whole Rijkaard argument is a weird one. The Xavi Rijkaard inherited was a player no longer a youngster who had failed to develop on his obvious potential in a dysfunctional team.

It was under Rijkaard he became world class. So of course he was a great fit for what Rijkaard was doing, once he grew into the player we are actually talking about. A young undeveloped xavi would probably not fit into every side. Jeez.
Did you intend to write Guardiola instead of Rijkaard
 

LJP

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
193
Didn’t look too happy to be taken off by Klopp there. 79th Minute.
 

LJP

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
193
Deserved to be taken off. He was trying to do it all himself in the second half.
Jota wasn’t a bad replacement to bring on.
All in all, lucky enough to get the 3 points today.
 

Ahmer Baig

Full Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
3,241
Mohamed Salah’s agent appeared to be mocking Jurgen Klopp’s claims that Liverpool are doing everything they can to retain control of the Egyptian player.

 

USREDEVIL

Full Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Messages
4,932
Location
California U.S.A.
Mohamed Salah’s agent appeared to be mocking Jurgen Klopp’s claims that Liverpool are doing everything they can to retain control of the Egyptian player.

Jeez is he fecking 12? FFS dealing with multi million dollar deals and the man sends numerous laughing emoji's.
 

Vidyoyo

The bad "V"
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
21,436
Location
Not into locations = will not dwell
Sadly I think they're doing the right thing. He's in his prime but there's every reason to think he'll drop off a bit over the next few years, as many strikers on the wrong side of 30 do.

At that point a megabucks contract won't be great value from the club's financial perspective.

He's there until 2023 so at the very worst they'll get another year out of him.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,194
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
We should offer him 300-400k a week for fun, so Liverpool need to match it.
 

Fridge chutney

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
8,969
We should buy Salah for £100M, see his form immediately drop off a cliff, which then funds Liverpool's purchase of 5 players for £20M each, who then become world class their respective positions.

This sets Liverpool up for a decade of dominance, including 3 consecutive trebles (a treble of trebles).
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Game of Chicken, he’ll agree an extra 50k a week and everyone will smile for the photo..
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,867
Supports
Real Madrid
Would he go to PSG, or will he choose Barcelona? Because honestly those are the only two options I can see in Europe

Hopefully Liverpool manage to keep him
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,535
We should buy Salah for £100M, see his form immediately drop off a cliff, which then funds Liverpool's purchase of 5 players for £20M each, who then become world class their respective positions.

This sets Liverpool up for a decade of dominance, including 3 consecutive trebles (a treble of trebles).
That would be so us.
Not suspicious that a rival would suddenly sell one of their top players, and we'd bundle in with a 6 year deal on 500k a week.

If we were in their position we'd have already given him such a contract without a thought.
 

Klopper76

"Did you see Fabinho against Red Star & Cardiff?"
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
19,932
Location
Victoria, BC
Supports
Liverpool
I think we might let him go in the summer. If he's not going to sign a contract we can't let him go for free in 2023.
 

dcrompton

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Messages
1,254
Location
The Cock of the North
Liverpool are better at replacing their star than us. Torres replaced by Suarez replaced by Salah. We replaced Ronaldo with Michael Owen, Alexis Sanchez and eventually a 37 year old Ronaldo