hobbers
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2013
- Messages
- 28,885
Isak going to make a firm case for being the leagues second best striker now Toney and Kane are out of the picture.
What a signing
What a signing
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
What's not the rule?Again, that's not a rule. Of course it can be an obvious goalscoring opportunity without it being the last man.
Castore have major issues with any of their stuff. Loads of people who bought kits or any products from them say the quality is awful.Is Newcastle shirt made out of paper? A little pulp and it ripped
What???Isak would have been a United player if we needed a striker last year or if he was still at Sociedad this summer. Shame.
What? I think we would have signed him if he wasn't signed by Newcastle last year.What???
But we did need a striker last yearIsak would have been a United player if we needed a striker last year or if he was still at Sociedad this summer. Shame.
He should have cashed in on that chanceShould have buried that. Wasted chance with the goal wide open,
Not enough. You deserve a good beating. Request the closest person to slap the shit out of you.Kicking myself for having Watkins over Isak in my fantasy team now.
Pretty cringe as humor attempts goHe should have cashed in on that chance
Based on nothing at all?What? I think we would have signed him if he wasn't signed by Newcastle last year.
Nothing less than I deserve.Not enough. You deserve a good beating. Request the closest person to slap the shit out of you.
Yeah I can agree on him being out wide. But the covering defender shouldn’t count when it’s the keeper out of position. Same as offside. If the keeper is up high, one defender counts as a ”keeper”What's not the rule?
It wasn't a denial of a clear goal scoring opportunity because of his position, he was out on the wing, and because there was a covering defender.
I've never seen them give DOGSO when there was a covering player and the attacker was so far from goal.
It was a bit of a surprise transfer wasnt it otherwise everyone should have been after him. Quality player. Newcastle look strong this season.Tonali is tenacious. A proper CM. Arsenal should have spent the havertz money on him.
And people would've said "Why the feck are we paying £75m for a striker who scored ten goals for Sociedad last season?", like people are saying about Højlund nowWhat? I think we would have signed him if he wasn't signed by Newcastle last year.
Arguably so should we, instead of Mount. Still too early though. Let's see how it goesTonali is tenacious. A proper CM. Arsenal should have spent the havertz money on him.
Spot onAnd people would've said "Why the feck are we paying £75m for a striker who scored ten goals for Sociedad last season?", like people are saying about Højlund now