Canagel
Full Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2016
- Messages
- 13,888
City don't have players that get me off the edge of my seat but they are well drilled and functional and for that you have to give credit.
Do they really have that many better players than ourselves? If you do think that way, out of interest which ones are you thinking of?I think the main difference is they have better players than us mate.
Schmeichel is having an absolute mare here.
Yep. I'd take a 28 year old Aguero over a currently 24 y/o Harry Kane.As sickening as it is...Aguero is still a phenomenal player.
He has a decent season overall, not great but decent. Still disappointing to see him that far away in goal scoring record.Think he will get us plenty of goals, but he is not mobile enough to get into the positions they get.
all those players are of a much higher qualityHas to say I feel disappointed not seeing Lukaku competing with Salah, Kane and Aguero for the top goal scorers. Didn't expect that at all after seeing him hitting 7 goals in the first 7 matches in the league. He looks far away now.
Really? I'd take Kane over Aguero tbh.Yep. I'd take a 28 year old Aguero over a currently 24 y/o Harry Kane.
Not sure all their players are better than ours, think they as someone said well drilled and know exactly how to play to their system.Do they really have that many better players than ourselves? If you do think that way, out of interest which ones are you thinking of?
Why? Kane is younger, already better and suits us down to a T.Yep. I'd take a 28 year old Aguero over a currently 24 y/o Harry Kane.
Yeah, I think he's been outstanding through-out his career. Only downside is the annual injury time.Really? I'd take Kane over Aguero tbh.
Troopz is on?Gonna be such a wankfest on MOTD.
feck blood money fc
Almost.City will win this 6-1 now
I just worked out that Lukaku has got 5 league goals since the end of September. Including February, that's a goal a month since then. He got 7 in his first month and a half hereAguero will retire a City legend and something about that is kinda sad to me, a player of that quality should have had bigger clubs in his resume, though i'm sure he's happy with the titles he's won
all those players are of a much higher quality
Well that's just silly.Yep. I'd take a 28 year old Aguero over a currently 24 y/o Harry Kane.
There's not much in it IMV, just think he's been the best striker in the league since he joined City.Why? Kane is younger, already better and suits us down to a T.
Maybe I’m talking shite, but I was just reflecting on what I saw on the pitch. The difference in intensity really was striking, couldn’t believe my eyes. Thought maybe it was fatigue, after the United/Pool matches. But that obviously wasn’t the case seeying their second half performance after a hairdryer from Pochettino.What? This is hilarious.
Same,Really? I'd take Kane over Aguero tbh.
The league's top talent usually is.I thought Salah was going to be the league’s top scorer earlier in the season, but Kane and Aguero have been relentless.
So you were perfectly fine when we sold Di Maria.?Yep. I'd take a 28 year old Aguero over a currently 24 y/o Harry Kane.
De Bruyne is good no doubt, but better than de Gea, no not for me.de Bruyne is illegal, just illegal. Single-handed the win to City in 5 minutes.
Regarding the other games, Swansea have completely changed the tune after appointing Carvajal. Would have never thought of this.
feck off .De Bruyne is good no doubt, but better than de Gea, no not for me.
Completely agree with this. No idea why he hasn’t sought a move to a bigger stage but I suppose he’s happy with the money.Aguero will retire a City legend and something about that is kinda sad to me, a player of that quality should have had bigger clubs in his resume, though i'm sure he's happy with the titles he's won
Of all the opinions you have this isn't the most ludicrous one.De Bruyne is good no doubt, but better than de Gea, no not for me.
Because attacking players tend to have more impact.Of all the opinions you have this isn't the most ludicrous one.
DDG is rightly highly rated but perhaps a tad underrated when it comes to receiving major awards for the sheer impact he has. Although it's the nature of the beast with these things, they're geared towards attacking players.
Sure, but there's a way to go about praising a rival player I don't think we're doing it the right way.I agree it is annoying, but wouldn't you just love a KDB for us. Be honest. He is the only one I would want mind.
Why is saying that the best keeper in the world is the best player in the league worthy of a laugh emoticon?feck off .
You have to be Lingard.
Well, there's the proof that commentators know nothing.
You can see the way his body is after the header he was aiming the other way and the hall hit the side of his head.
Do they?Because attacking players tend to have more impact.
Goals win you games, a goalkeeper might stop you losing. It is about winning.Do they?
I guess it depends on how you are quantifying "impact".
Not sure how seriously I take RedRom but is it seriously that laughable that DDG might be better than KDB relative to positions? I'm not saying who's better but it's not that outlandish to suggest it either way.feck off .
You have to be Lingard.
And you tend to win more games the more clean sheets you have.Goals win you games, a goalkeeper might stop you losing. It is about winning.
Both are WC in their respective positions. But KDB has a bigger impact for his team and is enjoying a more successfull campaign.Not sure how seriously I take RedRom but is it seriously that laughable that DDG might be better than KDB relative to positions? I'm not saying who's better but it's not that outlandish to suggest it either way.
If KdB doesn’t do that for you, I guess you need some Specsavers as you Brita say. They don’t have a Hazard or Messi, but few teams do.City don't have players that get me off the edge of my seat but they are well drilled and functional and for that you have to give credit.
One is the best in the world in his position, whilst one is only up there with the very best, a big difference there, hence why it surely is fine to suggest the best player in ones position in the world, should be up for such an award?Not sure how seriously I take RedRom but is it seriously that laughable that DDG might be better than KDB relative to positions? I'm not saying who's better but it's not that outlandish to suggest it either way.
They could, but why has Buffon never won the top awards? Goalkeeping just isn't a very sexy position.And you tend to win more games the more clean sheets you have.
Unless what you are saying is that a goalkeeper could never win an award?
They rarely deserve the award.And you tend to win more games the more clean sheets you have.
Unless what you are saying is that a goalkeeper could never win an award?