fishfingers15
Contributes to username and tagline changes
You have to trust the manager to put the team out. If he feels Valencia gives him balance, then so be it.
Or the other reason being Valencia has been excellent and Rafael will need to wait and fight for his chance to get back in the team. Great news for all united fans as performance levels will only go up with competition for places.If Rafael had his right leg amputated below the knee, I'd pick Valencia. Otherwise, no.
I had great hopes for him and his twin when they came first. If LVG prefers Valencia, he may eventually follow his bro out the door. Pity.
What 18?I have no issue with the form argument but I don't understand not even having him in the 18, if Valencia got hurt we have no RB cover and out only RWB is Januzaj, and Rafael is certainly better than him in that role.
LvG said he was left out on merit, we'll see if he's in the 18 tomorrow but it didn't sound like he would be.What 18?
Only game he wasn't in the 18 for was Liverpool. And that may have been a match too soon for him.
OK. Well in that case, I don't agree with LvG. Just like I don't agree with the back 5 etc. I am miffed :-(I think it's as simple as LvG just prefers Valencia to Rafael.
Agree with this. Rafael is one of my favourite players and Valenica has done my nut in for a while now, but while Valencia is playing well and doing as the manager asks, he should play.Valencia has been excellent at right back recently. Van Gaal is absolutely right and it sends a great message to the squad.
Spot on. Doing a good job as cover isn't the same as being capable of fulfilling that role full time. Maybe Rafael is playing badly in training or something.As good as Valencia and Young have been for us while Rafa and Shaw have been out injured, they've still made mistakes. We've just been lucky the teams haven't taken them and De Gea has been in super human mode.
Sooner or later it will bite us in the ass, so I wouldn't persist with keeping Rafa out.
Even Rojo or Blind would work.Shaw is still not fit so we cant go back to the back 4 unless he is fit too.
Valencia having played in a back four when Rafael was injured does not necessarily mean that he can be trusted.He's played just slightly less games in a flat four than he has as a RWB. There's no basis for you saying 'he can't be trusted' in a back four.
Ultimately it's the same thing, merit. LvG's own words. BS double standards.Different situations, it doesn't even make sense to compare them.
Valencia has been excellent the last few games and he is rarely injured. A good combination for a right back. Love Rafael but he has to fight for his place, same as any player here.Ultimately it's the same thing, merit. LvG's own words. BS double standards.
The worst bit is that Rafael's performances at RB have clearly been superior to Valencia's.
The games he did play in a back four were at home against very weak opponents, and even then he was basically a wing back and we just used 2 defenders. Same with young. They never played as proper fullbacks.He's played just slightly less games in a flat four than he has as a RWB. There's no basis for you saying 'he can't be trusted' in a back four.
You're not saying anything. Why can't he be trusted? He's done nothing wrong on the pitch to warrant that. My only criticism is that he hasn't been as good going forward. Defensively he's been very, very sound.Valencia having played in a back four when Rafael was injured does not necessarily mean that he can be trusted.
If the rumours are correct, it could be Clyne and maybe in january.Prediction.
He wont be starter RB next seasons. I dearly hope it isn't Alvez.
Hope so. Clyne looked great against Everton. Big fan of his.If the rumours are correct, it could be Clyne and maybe in january.
I was just thinking that today. I see he is going to Spurs. Probably didn't cost that much either.We should have bought that Yedlin fella...
Still don't see why he continues to get labelled with these big mistakes at key moments. I know he was rash and immature in his early days but it's something that he has improved greatly on. Every player is vulnerable to rash challenges and lapses in concentration but they don't get the same treatment as Rafael. He just seems to get labelled with it because of his past and not for what he actually produces now.In fairness Young and Valencia have been excellent. Hard to say they have been at fault as can't say Rafa hasn't had his own defensive lapses. To me it's down to LVG defensive set-up preference, and if it's 3 at the back, that changes everything in the future around personal. I suspect Rafa may go in the summer anyway.....to many mistakes in key moments in games.
completely agree, I think people calling Rafael immature, making a lot of rash unwise challenges are really sick tbh. He is actually very consistent in his defending even he's got very aggressive style and commits himself a lot but unlike when he first arrived he very often wins those challenges and sets the counter attack which is in contrast to fullbacks who sits back deep and waiting the player to take them on, not only they risk the player will go past them, players like Hazard are very difficult to defend this way.. but they also have really poor starting position to start or support the attack something in which Rafael is brilliant. As for the Vardy challenge, it was nonsense from Clattenburg and every mature player can commit this kind of foul or get sent off but just because it is Rafael people are all crazy about him. Referees didn't like him either for the same reason - just because he is from south america, if he was english he would already be the best RB in the world and treated fairly.. The biggest problem is his injury record thoStill don't see why he continues to get labelled with these big mistakes at key moments. I know he was rash and immature in his early days but it's something that he has improved greatly on. Every player is vulnerable to rash challenges and lapses in concentration but they don't get the same treatment as Rafael. He just seems to get labelled with it because of his past and not for what he actually produces now.