SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,394
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
Just seen some stats which suggests, relatively, we are testing more than other countries. It’s such a shame that capability hasn’t been supported by competent strategy and infrastructure.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,036
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I have a question I suspect what the answer will be but it might be worth asking.

Is the order of groups totally strict?

i.e. Say a lady of 82 gets a phone call to get the vaccination and her husband is 78 do they do them in different waves if the set it at 80+ first or would they get the husband done the same time?
My in-laws are like that, the eldest was called first. He’s in his 80s, she’s in her 70s
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,036
Location
Centreback
Also wonder how significant this new strain stuff will be.
I'm not sure it is actually a new strain and not just a variant of which there a few.

Not saying this variant isn't more infectious (but no more dangerous) but the cynic in me does think that it is a convenient narrative for the government to say a new "strain" is responsible for stage 3 lockdown in London.
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
17,007
Location
England:
They need to close the bloody schools. It’s running absolutely rampant through nearly every school.
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,394
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
I'm not sure it is actually a new strain and not just a variant of which there a few.

Not saying this variant isn't more infectious (but no more dangerous) but the cynic in me does think that it is a convenient narrative for the government to say a new "strain" is responsible for stage 3 lockdown in London.
Its also really strange how it seems this is something that’s been known for a few weeks yet is only making its way public now. Which doesn’t make sense.
 

711

Verified Bird Expert
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,257
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
Its also really strange how it seems this is something that’s been known for a few weeks yet is only making its way public now. Which doesn’t make sense.
It's mostly spin to help sell an unpopular decision. If that's what it takes let's go along with it, if it's the correct decision that's what matters.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,036
Location
Centreback
Its also really strange how it seems this is something that’s been known for a few weeks yet is only making its way public now. Which doesn’t make sense.
Boris: I'm not an incompetent buffoon. The virus did it. Honest. You can trust me.
 

OleBoiii

New Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
6,021
Quick question to the doctors/medical scientists in here: can we be absolutely sure that these vaccines are significantly safer than the swine flu vaccines from 2009? I know a guy who took the swine flu vaccine back then who got narcolepsy. Needless to say he's a little shook and considering not taking this vaccine.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,299
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Quick question to the doctors/medical scientists in here: can we be absolutely sure that these vaccines are significantly safer than the swine flu vaccines from 2009? I know a guy who took the swine flu vaccine back then who got narcolepsy. Needless to say he's a little shook and considering not taking this vaccine.
Short answer: no.
That particular manufacturer's vaccine saw a doubling in the narcolepsy rate, amongst those who took it, it went up to 1:50000 as opposed to 1:100000 who would get diagnosed with it in a normal year. In a clinical trial - statistically speaking at that level, you might not see any cases of it at all, and you won't have enough cases to see a pattern.

Longer answer: in countries where swine flu spread rapidly, the rate of narcolepsy cases also went up and at a similar rate.

It's important to note that the reason why that story is discussed is that it is because it's a rarity. There have been hundreds of new vaccine formulations since then, and billions of vaccinations. Serious vaccine side-effects are rare, that's why the same incidents are talked about a lot.

It's like a lot of things in life unfortunately - there's a risk analysis to be done. We know the lack of a vaccine has already killed about 1:1000 of the population in the UK, and that's despite us living with some pretty miserable restrictions. I don't believe any approved vaccine will kill or cause longterm harm to 1:1000 of the people taking it, I don't even believe it will do it to 1:10000.

Beyond that (as we start to talk about 1:100000 or 1 in a million) we won't know for sure until more people take it. We do know what will happen if people keep getting covid though - a lot of deaths, a massive overload on the health service, and a large number of people with long-lasting illness.
 

Ananke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
1,432
Location
Manchester
I doubt he's celebrating the deaths or the rise in case numbers. I think he, and a lot more Mancs, were left wondering just what the criteria was that meant London didn't have a Tier3 worthy problem two weeks ago. Manchester was basically operating under 2/3 rules from late July and got very little financial help - when Andy Burnham etc complained that punishing a region for being poor, having overcrowded housing etc, wouldn't fix anything, and the lack of support was making it poorer.

From a Manc perspective nothing changed until London got caught up in the restrictions and suddenly Burnham's unreasonable demands were easily met for London and the south, but were not backdated to deal with the same problems in areas who'd been coping for longer.

The question of criteria made it worse - when Manchester went into local measures it had less cases/100k than most Tier1 areas do now. When the post-national lockdown tiers were announced Manchester's rates were falling fast and London's were rising and they weren't that far apart even in raw numbers.

On an emotional level there's a big slice of schadenfreude underway. On a practical level though - there's a real sense that actually the government does bugger all to help people or businesses until it effects the capital, at which point they notice that there might be a need to do something. In other words, there is something in it for other areas in trouble. London going into Tier 3 will do a lot more for the other local support packages than Newcastle did.
It's typical that you'd defend Boris and your Tory mates.

Back in October, Manchester asked for 80% of funding towards furlough in our local lockdown. We got offered 60% because the government apparently couldn't afford it:


Then a few days later, it was announced there'd be a national lockdown which included London. All of a sudden, 80% funding was available again:


Boris tried to prioritise London over the north and he got exposed over it.

And when it came to deciding on the covid tiers, we were used a political football once again as a way to get back at Mayor Burnham for causing a fuss in the national papers, despite having better figures than much of the south:


The Tory plan was to protect the London economy over its busy Christmas period, and to teach those uppity northerners a lesson. Well, feck them for trying to play those games.

There's no joy in seeing Londoners enter tier 3. But there is schadenfreude for the PM treating us like a national afterthought and seeing his masterplan fail.
Well said.
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
Government obsession with keeping schools open is pathetic. Killing people every day by doing it.
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
Apparently its not the schools!!!!! Its people popping round to their families homes for a brew :confused::confused::confused:
Delusion of the highest order. They wheel out the data that says infection is low in schools but isn’t actually impossible to know that if kids are not showing symptoms? Teachers test rates are low but that’s probably because they’re able to keep their distance with all the mask wearing etc. Kids are giving it to each other without even knowing it then going home and spreading it there. At that point it won’t be known exactly where it’s came from.
 

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,498
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
The Christmas relaxations were always stupid. But in the light of the US Thanksgiving outcome and the increased cases here, it will be negligence of the government for not revising their arrangements.
Why five days?
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,299
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Be staying in 3 I think
That's my guess as well. Having places open up just before Christmas through into the New Year, and then families meeting up over Christmas just sounds like a recipe for a truly grim January. If things go well over Christmas then opening up in January and staying open sounds like a much nicer option. Though even that might be wishful thinking, but it would be preferable, if we can achieve it.

Fingers crossed for all those vaccines that are in the pipeline and the ones that are already scheduled for rollout - at least they give me hope.
 
Last edited:

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,942
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Delusion of the highest order. They wheel out the data that says infection is low in schools but isn’t actually impossible to know that if kids are not showing symptoms? Teachers test rates are low but that’s probably because they’re able to keep their distance with all the mask wearing etc. Kids are giving it to each other without even knowing it then going home and spreading it there. At that point it won’t be known exactly where it’s came from.
Dunno if they share the same data in the UK but one of the pieces of information they’re using in Ireland is the positivity rate. Symptoms or not (and teens will get symptoms almost as often as adults) kids are still going to get tested, even if it’s only as close contacts with confirmed cases (e.g. if one of their family gets covid) and the % positive tests with school-kids was lower than it was for adults.

That was a while ago, though. I don’t know if its changed. And I don’t know what the UK data looks like.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,465
Location
Manchester
That's my guess as well. Having places open up just before Christmas through into the New Year, and then families meeting up over Christmas just sounds like a recipe for a truly grim January. If things go well over Christmas then opening up in January and staying open sounds like a much nicer option. Though even that might be wishful thinking, if we can achieve it.

Fingers crossed for all those vaccines that are in the pipeline and the ones that are already scheduled for rollout - at least they give me hope.
Yeah it seems totally logical especially with the moving of London and the South into 3.

Can't the see value in making such changes now to be honest. Christmas and New Year are just around the corner and the furlough scheme is still in place. It makes sense to tighten things up or at least maintain what we have and get through the holiday season and then see where we are at.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,848
Dunno if they share the same data in the UK but one of the pieces of information they’re using in Ireland is the positivity rate. Symptoms or not (and teens will get symptoms almost as often as adults) kids are still going to get tested, even if it’s only as close contacts with confirmed cases (e.g. if one of their family gets covid) and the % positive tests with school-kids was lower than it was for adults.

That was a while ago, though. I don’t know if its changed. And I don’t know what the UK data looks like.
The ONS collect data from a large random sample of the population every week, irrespective of symptoms reported or positive tests of. Available here. Imperial do another one.

Primary school kids have a positivity rate of around 1%, in line with 25-34 and 35-44 year olds and below uni age kids, but it has been rising in December.

Secondary school kids now have the highest positivity rate of 2%, while college / uni age fell down from 2.3% in mid-November to 1.3% in December. Uni folks are still infected more often than all older age groups but its coming back in line, while secondary school kids are essentially infected 2x as often as their parents, and 3-5x as often as their grandparents.

None of that suggests that schools are a disproportionately likely place for super-spreader events, you would still expect more super spreader events to have happened given the amount of time they spend in there and the limited precautions available. But they are an opportunity for transmission that isn't available to other age groups, and it's quite likely that poorly ventilated schools have went to unventilated schools as the cold started to bite. And then hanging out afterwards somewhere indoors.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,997
Government obsession with keeping schools open is pathetic. Killing people every day by doing it.
If the kids aren't in school then the parents have to look after them and not work, killing the economy which is what its all about really for them.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,942
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
The ONS collect data from a large random sample of the population every week, irrespective of symptoms reported or positive tests of. Available here. Imperial do another one.

Primary school kids have a positivity rate of around 1%, in line with 25-34 and 35-44 year olds and below uni age kids, but it has been rising in December.

Secondary school kids now have the highest positivity rate of 2%, while college / uni age fell down from 2.3% in mid-November to 1.3% in December. Uni folks are still infected more often than all older age groups but its coming back in line, while secondary school kids are essentially infected 2x as often as their parents, and 3-5x as often as their grandparents.

None of that suggests that schools are a disproportionately likely place for super-spreader events, you would still expect more super spreader events to have happened given the amount of time they spend in there and the limited precautions available. But they are an opportunity for transmission that isn't available to other age groups, and it's quite likely that poorly ventilated schools have went to unventilated schools as the cold started to bite. And then hanging out afterwards somewhere indoors.
Ok, interesting. It does seem a bit nuts that we aren’t at least extending school xmas holidays. In Ireland they’ve done the opposite. Our kids (primary school) would usually finish up this week but they’re going back in next week until Wednesday (which I think is helping catch up on days missed during first lockdown?) Thus giving them a grand total of 48 hours between a day in the classroom and a day with their granny and grandad!
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London

British Government minister says ‘"We've got to trust the British people to act responsibly and do the minimum that is possible for them in their family situation”.

This is the same British public whose behaviours have engineered amongst the very highest density of deaths per population on the planet. :wenger:
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,311
Location
Salford
British Government minister says ‘"We've got to trust the British people to act responsibly and do the minimum that is possible for them in their family situation”.

This is the same British public whose behaviours have engineered amongst the very highest density of deaths per population on the planet. :wenger:
I've spoken to a few people who live abroad about their situation.

They'll say restaurants and clubs and cinemas remain open, but nobody goes and most people choose to stay away from places by choice.

It is curious how we seem to have the attitude to flock places as soon as they open. But then, i can't say i'm guilt-free. I can't wait to do things again.