Hound Dog
Full Member
Until when?Original plan was yes but they’ve tweaked the wording to give them an option to close. My money’s on a prolonged half term, with a very good chance the schools won’t reopen.
Until when?Original plan was yes but they’ve tweaked the wording to give them an option to close. My money’s on a prolonged half term, with a very good chance the schools won’t reopen.
This was interesting - a story about the Australian firm that is already manufacturing 2 of the main vaccine candidates.Doubt we’ll hear anything useful for another month or two. Although the one and only upside of the current surge is that it should mean we see results sooner. The more virus in the community the quicker they can see results.
Million dollar question. Nothing is confirmed, it’s just his opinionUntil when?
You believe it?Why are the case numbers in China so low? How come they haven't had a second wave?
China Graph
UK Graph
Cant figure out how to embed it, says administrator error
I do believe it because I think we would have got news of a second lockdown in China. But instead I read about how they are opening up and doing fine. It appears to be the same in Taiwan which has a more 'western' govermentYou believe it?
China parties like it's 2019 as country moves on from coronavirus
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
https://www.ft.com/content/548e151d-39ae-4c6d-9241-b36c3de687b0
People in China are shedding their face masks and partying again, with bars, nightclubs and beach venues across the country filling up after months of pandemic controls. Last weekend, hundreds of Beijing residents attended a music festival on the beachfront at Beidaihe — a location that also serves as the annual getaway for the Communist party leadership. To get into the venue, party-goers had to scan their government-designed app that tracks where they have visited, and have their temperatures taken. But once inside the sealed-off resort, they could throw off any thoughts of coronavirus. “Nobody was wearing masks. It was like we’d all entered a parallel universe and forgot the existence of the epidemic,” said Nancy Lee, 33, an art curator who was one of the festival-goers. “After suffocating at home for more than six months, it was time to loosen up.”
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
https://www.ft.com/content/548e151d-39ae-4c6d-9241-b36c3de687b0
In the capital Beijing, bars and restaurants are becoming busy again. Revellers say they feel they have earned the “freedom to party” after months of strict social distancing from late January.
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
https://www.ft.com/content/548e151d-39ae-4c6d-9241-b36c3de687b0
The mood in China is in stark contrast to much of the rest of the world, where partying has been put on hold because of the pandemic. In many European countries, bars and nightclubs have been blamed for spreading the virus and forced to close.
The return to revelry in China was made possible after local governments gradually relaxed their strong epidemic measures. For the past four months, there have been fewer than a hundred daily symptomatic cases in China, apart from a brief outbreak in Xinjiang province.
Cities across China have resumed socialising at different speeds. Beijing, the seat of government, had the most prolonged epidemic controls. But in many other big cities, such as Shanghai and Chengdu, normal life was barely interrupted.
Rest Spoileredhttps://www.ft.com/content/548e151d-39ae-4c6d-9241-b36c3de687b0The reopening of venues will be welcomed by China’s embattled retail sector. Consumption has been slowly recovering from the depths of the lockdown in February. July retail sales in China were 1.1 per cent below the comparable month of 2019, according to the latest official figures, although UBS estimates that in August, sales returned to the previous year’s levels.
“From restrictions [on movement] and shop closures to no restrictions and shops opening, there’s [going] to be a big rebound,” said Tao Wang, chief China economist at UBS in Hong Kong.
But while many middle-class professionals are engaging in “revenge spending” after months of being unable to splash the cash, lower-income workers are still suffering. Economists say China’s economy is stuck in two-track growth, widening the wealth gap. The most conspicuous sign of the return to confidence in China was the giant pool party held last month in Wuhan, the city where the outbreak originated. Recommended ExplainerCoronavirus economic impact Pandemic crisis: Global economic recovery tracker As part of its economic stimulus package, the local government gave discounts for entry to the Maya Beach Water Park, which hosted an electronic music festival for more than 3,000 people. It was by far the biggest event the city had held since lockdown began in January. It was a release for the people of Wuhan, whose 11m residents were not allowed to leave the city and confined to their apartments for two-and-a-half months at the start of the outbreak. Those controls were later relaxed and confidence returned in June after the mass testing of residents turned up only 300 cases, all non-symptomatic. “We were surprised to see such a big, rowdy crowd,” said Luo Ling, 31, who along with his wife attended the pool party. “People around us were . . . having the time of their lives.” Having worn face masks all day, they removed them after arriving at the venue. “I guess there was no point wearing a mask anyway since we got drenched instantly from head to toe,” he said.
I think they have contained it well and continue far more restrictions than they are admitting.You believe it?
I read today that the worst hit cities like New York, Stockholm and places in the UK may have reached 15-20% and with the HIT likely to be 70-85% getting there without a vaccine would be very painful indeed.Does anyone have any idea about the overall % of people that had it any country? I know some studies have been done on Stockholm, New York, certain regions of Italy, but nothing nation-wide.
The reason why I am asking is that, with this number of recorded cases again, surely the herd immunity has at least a chance of being accomplished before the vaccine arrives?
Or if not, what is the way out? It has been seven fecking months and I feel no closer to a resolution than in March - this is still something that no one is talking about.
the 1st one is damningTwo interesting article on Sweden's approach
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...-s-lax-pandemic-policies-face-fierce-backlash
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...trategy-a-cautionary-tale-or-a-success-story/
That first article is damning. Talk about hard headed and stubbornTwo interesting article on Sweden's approach
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...-s-lax-pandemic-policies-face-fierce-backlash
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...trategy-a-cautionary-tale-or-a-success-story/
Gets me every time.
Yet in places like AU and NZ where there are very few infections, and therefore tracing tends to be much better, there is very frequent infection between known contacts and family.Big study in India shows that there’s only a 9% chance of catching it from someone in your household and 78% of people who catch it don’t infect anyone else. I’ve seen similar numbers from studies in other countries. However it gets passed on, it seems as though some people are a hell of a lot more infective than others. Either that or susceptibility is extremely variable.
Hard to work out what’s the most important factor but there’s been loads of super spreader events, so former more likely than latter.
I on the other hand don't understand what there is to not understand.I still can't get my head around the 10pm pub closure thing. How did they think this was ever going to work? If you didn't want to close the hospitality sector down, which I can understand, then you had to ban people mixing in households outside of their support bubble for there to be any chance of making an impact. Just seemed like a no brainer to me. Closing a pub an hour earlier...I mean how can you dress that up in any way that explains how it would stop a virus spreading?
I keep trying to convince myself that whoever is making these decisions is informed and going purely off science/data, but then I remember that the likes of Boris, Gove, Mogg and eyetest man are definitely going to be wading their opinions in on any decisions being made, and I actually feel my heart sink. This lot were doing a great job of fecking up millions of people's lives before covid was even a thing.
.
Where does that leave us then? Schools cannot remain closed indefinitely.Original plan was yes but they’ve tweaked the wording to give them an option to close. My money’s on a prolonged half term, with a very good chance the schools won’t reopen.
In a proper cluster feck I think.Where does that leave us then? Schools cannot remain closed indefinitely.
Remote delivery until we have a vaccine?
I was out last night and everyone was sitting at their own tables, etc - no problem.I on the other hand don't understand what there is to not understand.
I would go further and suggest that pubs and bars should now stop serving alcohol after 8:30pm, although can stay open until 10pm. That does open up a lot of potential rule breaking (buying 10 points for the table at 8:30 for example, or just ignoring the rule altogether) but it should help more than it hurts.
People keep asking the question, where is the evidence that this helps? What data was this idea based off of.
But the truth is, we're all working a bit blind here. If the government are ignore advice from SAGE or not using data from track and trace, then that's deplorable. But we have to use common sense.
Alcohol reduces social inhibitions. We're trying to encourage social distancing.
What is not to understand.
It’s almost certainly the most frequent. Stands to reason that you won’t have a better chance of catching covid than living with someone that’s infected. Doesn’t make the attack rate any higher though.Yet in places like AU and NZ where there are very few infections, and therefore tracing tends to be much better, there is very frequent infection between known contacts and family.
I missed this.The “success” has been managing the virus in a calm manner whilst not having to resort to methods you’d associate with an authoritarian regime. I thought that much was obvious by now.
No-one anywhere is claiming they are a “success” across the board.
A democracy like Australia acting like a communist state yet having a death toll 34 times higher than their neighbour NZ certainly aint a success, so what really constitutes “success“ in a pandemic?
I'm ignoring it in the same way that I'm ignoring everything in the world I didn't mentionI was out last night and everyone was sitting at their own tables, etc - no problem.
Also, you're ignoring all the people employed in the pubs industry - with your proposals, that industry would collapse
Which is fine if the country had only one issue to consider (Covid) but sadly the world is more complicated than that.I'm ignoring it in the same way that I'm ignoring everything in the world I didn't mention
It's a problem.
If the pandemic is going to last years (or somehow get worst and last years) then they need to shut these industries down and these people need to find new jobs.
If the pandemic is going to last months, then they should be supported
But thats not a unique problem for the entertainment industry
The GF has been posted up in Tianjin for a couple of years for a project. Folks there are pretty conscientious and not partying like its 1999. Masks everywhere including the inside her office.You believe it?
But my redcafe.net post isn't.Which is fine if the country had only one issue to consider (Covid) but sadly the world is more complicated than that.
Then why are other countries not copying their behaviours? With flatlines like thatThe GF has been posted up in Tianjin for a couple of years for a project. Folks there are pretty conscientious and not partying like its 1999. Masks everywhere including the inside her office.
She was stuck in a hotel for two weeks upon arrival. And that's with a certified document from her company's doctor prior to leaving to China stating that she is clean.
Tested upon arrival and again prior to release from the hotel. NO contact with anyone including any cleaning staff within the hotel. (Ordered her meal and misc stuff online and delivered to her door.)
They seem to be quite serious with the whole thing considering that there have been little spikes since June.
Totally with youOr let me put it another way;
I can't take my kids to see their grandparents because people are going out partying during a pandemic.
I don't have much sympathy.
In some countries, they may not take it as seriously?Then why are other countries not copying their behaviours? With flatlines like that
https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/1011/1170773-coronavirus-ireland/
Irish government poo-poo the idea of a longer Halloween break as a natural ‘circuit-breaker’
@Pogue Mahone
I think they’re missing a trick here, could have had a break/remote learning and been back in schools again for another 6 weeks before Christmas break where they could again have a longer break
this government seem to be pushing for schools to remain open no matter what
We have to remember that there’s tonnes of data that NPHET see which we don’t. I’m not a fan of jumping to conclusions without data, so if they’ve analysed all the available data and are comfortable with keeping schools open then that’s good enough for me.Mr Collins said that "all the public health advice which is available shows quite clearly that schools are not an issue in terms of the transmission of Covid".
I wonder if they’re being honest. I don’t understand how schools - especially secondary schools - could not be massive transmission zones, given what we all think we know about the virus.We have to remember that there’s tonnes of data that NPHET see which we don’t. I’m not a fan of jumping to conclusions without data, so if they’ve analysed all the available data and are comfortable with keeping schools open then that’s good enough for me.
Why lie though? If schools are a problem, come out and say it. There’s no upside for anyone to tell lies about the science here. It’s only going to bite them on the arse eventually. All these data will be in the public domain soon enough.I wonder if they’re being honest. I don’t understand how schools - especially secondary schools - could not be massive transmission zones, given what we all think we know about the virus.
I don’t like the manner he delivered the news, it irritated me. Why not say “at the moment there is no plans to close the schools as things stand, off course we continue to review the situation”.We have to remember that there’s tonnes of data that NPHET see which we don’t. I’m not a fan of jumping to conclusions without data, so if they’ve analysed all the available data and are comfortable with keeping schools open then that’s good enough for me.
You only have to look at what’s happening in universities in the U.K. I think from teenager up, it’s impossible for them not to spread itI wonder if they’re being honest. I don’t understand how schools - especially secondary schools - could not be massive transmission zones, given what we all think we know about the virus.
Economy.Why lie though? If schools are a problem, come out and say it. There’s no upside for anyone to tell lies about the science here. It’s only going to bite them on the arse eventually. All these data will be in the public domain soon enough.
Well we all benefit if the economy stays afloat. And if the virus gets completely out of hand then the economy gets fecked. There’s no upside to the government to let the virus run amok, while they tell lies about its spread.Economy.