Shamima Begum, IS teen wants to come back to the UK

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,293
That’s the benefit; it’s the law?
I asked earlier what the other EU countries are doing. Britain is not alone in this situation.
Think they’re still trying to work it out - https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.eur...to-repatriating-isis-members-euronews-answers

@PedroMendez previously posted about a German law seemingly designed to prosecute returning fighters and others. It’ll be interesting to see if other European states introduce similar measures.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,640
Location
Sydney
If our law was set appropriately she should have given up all rights to British citizenship when she left to support terrorists who are fighting against our country.

And yes I think she is a danger whose views are so poisonness that her any everyone associated with ISIS should be killed. There should be a no prisoner policy for terrorists.

Much like a virus, the best way to destroy it is to quarantine and kill it off.
How would you set it up then?

We've already been told we can't make them stateless
 

Penna

Kind Moderator (with a bit of a mean streak)
Staff
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
49,688
Location
Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est.
If our law was set appropriately she should have given up all rights to British citizenship when she left to support terrorists who are fighting against our country.

And yes I think she is a danger whose views are so poisonness that her any everyone associated with ISIS should be killed. There should be a no prisoner policy for terrorists.

Much like a virus, the best way to destroy it is to quarantine and kill it off.
Well, we must agree to differ. We don't execute people anymore in the UK, because we're a civilised democracy, unlike ISIS.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,293
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,661
If she’s a UK citizen then she can rightly come back to the this country and face terrorism charges.

Her interview was just bizarre. She comes across a bit thick really. But then if she thought Syria looked attractive when a war was happening she must have something wrong in her head!

My main concern is that this is ISIS’ plan all along and a few years down the line all these fighters who have returned will blow themselves up.
 

RedTillI'mDead

A Key Tool
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
5,475
Location
London
Well, we must agree to differ. We don't execute people anymore in the UK, because we're a civilised democracy, unlike ISIS.
I agree with the principle of civilised democracy in most cases, but when you are dealing with extreme uncivilized and those associating with them you need extreme actions.

Much like cartels in Mexico and Brazil. You can't deal with extremism with a light touch civil approach as it will not solve these problems.
 

RedTillI'mDead

A Key Tool
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
5,475
Location
London
Do you think this is the end of the caliphate?

"Yes I do....I don't have high hopes"

That simple answer shows she still supports the ISIS ideology.

So put simply she is a serious and dangerous risk to our society. She does not deserve to come back under any circumstances and is of such a danger that we should hunt her down the same way Osama Bin Ladden was.
 

utdalltheway

Sexy Beast
Joined
Aug 20, 2001
Messages
20,507
Location
SoCal, USA
Or try her & jail her indefinitely if guilty on her return.
The child could be looked after by her family or social services.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,378
So hypothetically, if a 15 year old girl gets groomed online by some 40 year old sex predator and convinced to leave the country so he can marry and have sex with her, you would shrug your shoulders and say "well she must have known what she was doing, she wasn't dragged to the airport"?
There's not much of an equivalency between being groomed by ISIS and being groomed by a would-be individual sex predator. She left the UK because of her ideology, and wanting to pursue a lifestyle that fits with it. Aside from the bombing and the shit healthcare it sounds like she got exactly what she wanted and expected from going out there.

Also liked the point made on QT about the overlap between people who claim 15 year olds are incapable of individual responsibility and those who are desperate to let 16 year olds swing the fate of our referendums and elections.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
You bring some interesting balance to this thread which is always good.

However. We must also remember the appalling damage, death and injuries carried out by individuals who are either part of or who have been radicalised by these disgusting Daesh/Isis terrorists.
Not just in the UK but worldwide.
They specialise in killing and maming innocent people and it is fitting that they are very close to being defeated by the Military.

This young woman, for whatever reason went to 'gave comfort' to these people, to have children by and marry one of these terrorist.

It is no wonder therefore that some of us have little or no sympathy for her. I certainly do not.
Nevertheless, as a civilized country it is important that, should she attempt to return, we allow the authorities to use the full force of the law to decide the outcome.
I despise ISIS as much as any common person and when I turn on the tv and see the results of a terrorist attack or all the cruelty ISIS has imposed on the syrian people, my gut reaction is the same as some people on this thread: to answer cruelty and death in the same coin.

But when I cool down, I don't want us (the west) to deviate from what has made us the success we are today, in comparison to other more violent cultures. We have laws, and when our citizens break those laws they should have the chance to defend themselves in trial and afterwards be released or suffer the consequences.

And I don't think we should take into the account the crime, justice is blind and I want a burglar, a child molester and a terrorist to be treated in the same way. We apprehend them, we take them to court and we imprison them. Then if they remain a danger, we keep them in jail. If we consider them to be rehabilitated, we release them.

As for the sympathy, and please take into account I don't know all the details of her life, I do have a tiny bit of sympathy. This was basically a young teenage girl who was brainwashed and used a sex slave for years, or at least that seems to be the fate of western girls who joined ISIS. She has been in a war, she has lost children, she is living in miserable conditions. This wasn't a grown woman when it all kicked off, she was a kid.

Also, she has a baby, a citizen. I can't ignore that. Her other two babies died, I would hate for the same to happen to this one because politicians are afraid to go against public opinion who wouldn't bat an eye if she dropped dead today.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
So what would you do, bring her back...whether that be in prison or not, pay a load of tax money making this happen...money hard working decent people have paid for. And then when she spreads her terrorist virus to others and more innocent people die what will you think then?

What do you think of the terrorists she has befriended/ married who have cut the heads off soldiers or charity workers or journalists?

How would you feel if it happened to be your wife who was kidnapped and had her head cut off? How would you feel if she comes back and it was more of your friends or family killed by these mindless terrorist acts?

I certainly do not have the mentality of going out killing innocent people, or supporting a cause against my own countrymen.

You need to take a reality check. She isn't some fluffy misguided bunny with a movie ending reflecting on her mistakes. She is potentially highly dangerous whether directly or indirectly.

ISIS are not freedom fighters, they are terrorists. Anyone involved with ISIS should be tortured for all the information we can get and then killed to ensure that virus cannot escape to kill more innocent people or encourage others to do as such.

So read what you want and dislike what I'm saying, but if it's that or a call about friends of families being blown up, heads cut off, stabbed, run over then frankly you have issues if you cannot see that there is only one way to deal with terrorists.
I've already said multiple times what I would do.

I would bring her and the baby back and put her on trial. Then send her to jail. It's what we do with criminals and I don't think we should treat this differently.

Of course ISIS's more heinous crimes have a different impact and obviously if something had happened to family or loved ones I would be screaming for their death, but I recognize that's not justice and it's the reason people with an emotional investment in an incident can't be part of the justice process.

As for her being a danger, she's more dangerous to others in freedom than in a jail, no?
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
For anyone trying to defend her...please consider this scenario.

Your wife invites a person in need to stay at your house. You don't feel like you have any choice in the matter but go along with it.

Your wife lays down some ground rules and that person tries to change the rules entirely and attempts to take over.

Not happy with the rules, that person makes some other friends whose rules they like the sound of more. That friend says actually that your wife's rules are all wrong, you have been treated badly..

The new friend cuts off your wife's head, shoots a few of your friends.

You find out this is all because of this person who was a guest and you hear she is unphased by seeing your wife's head in a bin.

You move away for security. You find out the person who was living with you has had a tough time and the person she was with has been killed.

She finds you and pleads for help and if you can give her a bed.....

Are you actually fcuking serious that you would invite her back in your home?
I would assume that person would be in jail, not knocking on my door for a bed. Which is what's going to happen to this girl.
 

Red Defence

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
12,940
Location
“United stands for attacking, attractive football
I've already said multiple times what I would do.

I would bring her and the baby back and put her on trial. Then send her to jail. It's what we do with criminals and I don't think we should treat this differently.

Of course ISIS's more heinous crimes have a different impact and obviously if something had happened to family or loved ones I would be screaming for their death, but I recognize that's not justice and it's the reason people with an emotional investment in an incident can't be part of the justice process.

As for her being a danger, she's more dangerous to others in freedom than in a jail, no?
She wouldn’t be in jail for long and when she came out there’s a likelihood of her jihadi husband joining her. It he doesn’t make it for some reason then there’s a reasonable chance that she will remarry and her new husband will more than likely have the same views on religion and terrorism as she does. Couple of jihadis living here (in their enemies territory) free to plot and plan with other freed jihadi terrorists doesn’t give me a good feeling if I’m honest.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
Why do you think she was brainwashed?
I don't know for sure, but I know how easy it is to brainwash 15 year-olds, so it wouldn't surprise me at all.

But I would be defending bringing her back for trial either way.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
She wouldn’t be in jail for long and when she came out there’s a likelihood of her jihadi husband joining her. It he doesn’t make it for some reason then there’s a reasonable chance that she will remarry and her new husband will more than likely have the same views on religion and terrorism as she does. Couple of jihadis living here (in their enemies territory) free to plot and plan with other freed jihadi terrorists doesn’t give me a good feeling if I’m honest.
I don't know how laws work in the UK, but for certain crimes here in Portugal, if the person shows no sign of repent or rehabilitation the judge can decide a person is still a danger to society and keep the person in jail. It would surprise me she would be in jail promoting jihadism and terror attacks and praising ISIS and shw would still be released.

But either way, she's free right now, what is stopping her from joining other lunatics and carry out a terror attack? Wouldn't you rather having her in jail and if released monitored by intelligence services?

And another question, do you think a person like her is 100% beyond rehabilitation?
 

Red Defence

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
12,940
Location
“United stands for attacking, attractive football
I don't know how laws work in the UK, but for certain crimes here in Portugal, if the person shows no sign of repent or rehabilitation the judge can decide a person is still a danger to society and keep the person in jail. It would surprise me she would be in jail promoting jihadism and terror attacks and praising ISIS and shw would still be released.

But either way, she's free right now, what is stopping her from joining other lunatics and carry out a terror attack? Wouldn't you rather having her in jail and if released monitored by intelligence services?

And another question, do you think a person like her is 100% beyond rehabilitation?
The only crime the authorities would have evidence of is her being a member of a terrorist organisation. She won’t get much time for that. Say she got 6 years (which she is unlikely to get) then she’d be out in two years with “ good behaviour”. As for rehabilitation....I don’t know. From listening to that interview I would venture that she sees no reason to change her views. Those are her beliefs, she is entitled to them so why should she need to change them.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
The only crime the authorities would have evidence of is her being a member of a terrorist organisation. She won’t get much time for that. Say she got 6 years (which she is unlikely to get) then she’d be out in two years with “ good behaviour”. As for rehabilitation....I don’t know. From listening to that interview I would venture that she sees no reason to change her views. Those are her beliefs, she is entitled to them so why should she need to change them.
I don't know either but I wouldn't form an opinion based on what she is saying now. She's in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by ISIS sympathizers in that camp, so I wouldn't expect her to badmouth them. But even is she truly believes what she's saying, for me it's not a good reason to leave her to die when there's a chance (even if very tiny) to rehabilitate her and, more importantly, save a baby who will most likely die if nothing is done.
 

Red Defence

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
12,940
Location
“United stands for attacking, attractive football
I don't know either but I wouldn't form an opinion based on what she is saying now. She's in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by ISIS sympathizers in that camp, so I wouldn't expect her to badmouth them. But even is she truly believes what she's saying, for me it's not a good reason to leave her to die when there's a chance (even if very tiny) to rehabilitate her and, more importantly, save a baby who will most likely die if nothing is done.
She hasn’t been left to die, she’s in a refugee camp. With Times journalists wandering around interviewing them.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
She hasn’t been left to die, she’s in a refugee camp. With Times journalists wandering around interviewing them.
Figure of speech. Although from some reports of how life is in those camps, maybe not that different.
 

Abizzz

Full Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
7,642
She hasn’t been left to die, she’s in a refugee camp. With Times journalists wandering around interviewing them.
You say that as if there weren't scores of journalists killed in regions like this every year.
 

Bola

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
1,205
Some people in this thread have the exact same mentality extremists have in other countries, they were just lucky to have been born in a civilized democracy. Let her rot, just kill her, let her die in a ditch, go shot her... jesus, it's hard to read.
Some of the comments in here are a little strong perhaps, but I'd be careful about defining the status 'civilised' as having to adopt a form of pacifism

Killing (in various forms) for security is one of the basic functions of a state and is a prerequisite for maintaining civilisation. It's a crude but relevant analogy, but I look at the desecration of Palmyra as a consequence of ISIS' savagery and the inability of the Syrian state (Assad's or 'Free Syria) to protect it from these armed savages
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
Some of the comments in here are a little strong perhaps, but I'd be careful about defining the status 'civilised' as having to adopt a form of pacifism

Killing (in various forms) for security is one of the basic functions of a state and is a prerequisite for maintaining civilisation. It's a crude but relevant analogy, but I look at the desecration of Palmyra as a consequence of ISIS' savagery and the inability of the Syrian state (Assad's or 'Free Syria) to protect it from these armed savages
That's a fair point, I was focusing more on the people, not the state. I understand sometimes the state might have to do it (although I'm not completely convinced regarding extra-judicial killings), but having individual citizens wishing for someone to be killed or left to die... well, I wouldn't use the adjective civilized for that.
 

Bola

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
1,205
That's a fair point, I was focusing more on the people, not the state. I understand sometimes the state might have to do it (although I'm not completely convinced regarding extra-judicial killings), but having individual citizens wishing for someone to be killed or left to die... well, I wouldn't use the adjective civilized for that.
I'm speaking more generally now than this case, but if an individual is playing a significant enough role in a regime like ISIS or is directly supporting their military campaigns, then there could be justification for direct kinetic action (e.g. airstrikes) depending on the circumstances

In this case, I understand this women is now in a refugee camp, so talk of military action by some posters is probably redundant
 

dannyrhinos89

OMG socks and sandals lol!
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
14,450
The minute she left British soil for the reasons she did she should’ve had her citizenship revoked. It’s treason pure and simple and she should’ve been left to rot in the hell hole she got herself into.

The fact she still openly admits she’s a supporter of Isis she doesn’t care about the atrocities they commit and she clearly shows no regret or remorse. She’s scum and always will be I don’t want an open terrorist living freely among the general public. Put A bullet in her head and be done with it.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
I'm speaking more generally now than this case, but if an individual is playing a significant enough role in a regime like ISIS or is directly supporting their military campaigns, then there could be justification for direct kinetic action (e.g. airstrikes) depending on the circumstances

In this case, I understand this women is now in a refugee camp, so talk of military action by some posters is probably redundant
I get your point and I agree, if a government has the chance to take out an important enemy, then that's understandable.
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Make your own way back and face the necessary charges.
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,532
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
Her interviews worry me and they should worry the authorities. When she makes a case for her innocence she says "i didn't spread propaganda or encourage others to join ISIS". She has basically directly quoted two of the charges that were likely to be put towards her. This just tells me that she's been trained what to say and it's a charade.

You can't trust this person at all. People talking about her facing justice maybe don't realise howhard that will be in this case, and for what she will be charged with, she'll be out in her early 20s most likely. The government might be happy to go through this pointless exercise, but that doesn't mean we should just accept it.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,293
This was basically a young teenage girl who was brainwashed and used a sex slave for years, or at least that seems to be the fate of western girls who joined ISIS.
Sorry I have to go back to this since I overlooked the “sex slave” comment before. You realize that ISIS fighters had literal sex slaves right? Non-Muslim girls they captured and traded, who often subsequently ended up sharing a home with wives who had travelled over and married their owner out of their own free will. Do you think any of these actual sex slaves would speak of their owners with the affection that Shamima continues to show for her husband? If not it seems bizarre to draw an equivalence between them, intentionally or otherwise.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
Sorry I have to go back to this since I overlooked the “sex slave” comment before. You realize that ISIS fighters had literal sex slaves right? Non-Muslim girls they captured and traded, who often subsequently ended up sharing a home with wives who had travelled over and married their owner out of their own free will. Do you think any of these actual sex slaves would speak of their owners with the affection that Shamima continues to show for her husband? If not it seems bizarre to draw an equivalence between them, intentionally or otherwise.
Yes, I do realize it, I said as much in the sentence you quoted.

I am not sure she is free to say what she wants right now or if she feels safe enough to do so. I know that if I was in a refugee camp filled with ISIS members, I wouldn't talk shit about them to a foreign paper. But I've also said that regardless, I don't think any of it should disqualify her from getting assistance from her government.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
Her interviews worry me and they should worry the authorities. When she makes a case for her innocence she says "i didn't spread propaganda or encourage others to join ISIS". She has basically directly quoted two of the charges that were likely to be put towards her. This just tells me that she's been trained what to say and it's a charade.

You can't trust this person at all. People talking about her facing justice maybe don't realise howhard that will be in this case, and for what she will be charged with, she'll be out in her early 20s most likely. The government might be happy to go through this pointless exercise, but that doesn't mean we should just accept it.
So if someone is actually regretful and wanted to come back and redeem himself/herself, we should ignore it because that person might be lying?
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,293
Yes, I do realize it, I said as much in the sentence you quoted.
You referred to Shamima as a sex slave. I don’t see any acknowledgement of the existence of the actual sex slaves used and abused by ISIS fighters. Your use of the term in reference to Shamima suggests both are equally victims.
 

dbs235

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
1,871
I don't know how laws work in the UK, but for certain crimes here in Portugal, if the person shows no sign of repent or rehabilitation the judge can decide a person is still a danger to society and keep the person in jail. It would surprise me she would be in jail promoting jihadism and terror attacks and praising ISIS and shw would still be released.

But either way, she's free right now, what is stopping her from joining other lunatics and carry out a terror attack? Wouldn't you rather having her in jail and if released monitored by intelligence services?

And another question, do you think a person like her is 100% beyond rehabilitation?
Even if she can be deradicalised etc, its not just about that, its about deterring others from similar actions in the future.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
You referred to Shamima as a sex slave. I don’t see any acknowledgement of the existence of the actual sex slaves used and abused by ISIS fighters. Your use of the term in reference to Shamima suggests both are equally victims.
I said "used a sex slave for years, or at least that seems to be the fate of western girls who joined ISIS.".

In that sentence I am saying that western girls' fate is to be sex slaves.

If that's not what it's understandable from the sentence, that's what I wanted to say. And of course being a willing wife to a terrorist is not comparable to being forced to be with one, if it seemed I was implying it, then it wasn't my intention.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
The minute she left British soil for the reasons she did she should’ve had her citizenship revoked. It’s treason pure and simple and she should’ve been left to rot in the hell hole she got herself into.

The fact she still openly admits she’s a supporter of Isis she doesn’t care about the atrocities they commit and she clearly shows no regret or remorse. She’s scum and always will be I don’t want an open terrorist living freely among the general public. Put A bullet in her head and be done with it.
This has come up a few times, legally this can't happen.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,036
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
Even if she can be deradicalised etc, its not just about that, its about deterring others from similar actions in the future.
If you are a radical I don't think you care about deterrent. A bit like the death penalty.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,293
I said "used a sex slave for years, or at least that seems to be the fate of western girls who joined ISIS.".

In that sentence I am saying that western girls' fate is to be sex slaves.

If that's not what it's understandable from the sentence, that's what I wanted to say. And of course being a willing wife to a terrorist is not comparable to being forced to be with one, if it seemed I was implying it, then it wasn't my intention.
I’m not talking about Western girls who willingly travelled to Syria to marry ISIS fighters. I’ve no idea why you’re describing them as sex slaves to be honest. I’m talking about Yazidi girls captured and taken from their homes and families and sold in slave markets before being used as actual sex slaves/concubines.