Television The Last of Us - TV Series HBO | NO GAME REFERENCES OR SPOILERS | Receives 24 Emmy nominations

Simbo

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
5,228
It was a decent finale, only a couple gripes with the season as a whole. One being Joel taking on an army by himself, that was the first time it was obvious I was watching a computer game remake. I know he's supposed to be some sort of badass, but there's been too many instances of him being pretty incompetent for that to be believable.

Another, like others have said, is the importance put on finding a cure, when the infected don't appear to be much of a threat anymore. I'll make the assumption however that they are still a massive threat to the world, just not in the areas they visited this season...
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,462
It was a decent finale, only a couple gripes with the season as a whole. One being Joel taking on an army by himself, that was the first time it was obvious I was watching a computer game remake. I know he's supposed to be some sort of badass, but there's been too many instances of him being pretty incompetent for that to be believable.

Another, like others have said, is the importance put on finding a cure, when the infected don't appear to be much of a threat anymore. I'll make the assumption however that they are still a massive threat to the world, just not in the areas they visited this season...
TBF, it was all in one on one combat rather than him gunning down five or six people at the same time.

I also think ep3 was good in terms of giving Joel more of a direction and increasing his purpose (especially with no more Tess). I would have enjoyed one or two more scene of them together bonding but also the threat of the infected (even if its having to avoid them due to their threat).I could see the infected use ramp up in s2 and 3 though.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,683
The end bothered my inner medic…

…specifically the idea that crudely stitching shut a probably already infected penetrating wound with an unsterilised needle and thread would do anything other than make a bad situation worse.
My Missus was pissed off as well. The joys of watching TV serieses with a doc around.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,927
Location
W.Yorks
Thought it was a strong finale - great performance from Pedro, thought he sold everything really well.

It's interesting watching this show with the missus though... her takes are a lot different to mine as she has no idea about the game and can't draw anything from it. She didn't like the episode at all.
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
20,007
Location
England
They need a cure for the 3 infected they’ve encountered so far.
 

BD

technologically challenged barbie doll
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
23,194
Surely it's obvious that a cure would be revolutionary? That doesn't fully excuse the fireflies of being so callous, but the quality of life improvements would be massive.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,905
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Surely it's obvious that a cure would be revolutionary? That doesn't fully excuse the fireflies of being so callous, but the quality of life improvements would be massive.
I presume it’s from game players who assume that not needing to waste hordes of infected every single time a character travels from A to B implies infected not a problem.
 

padr81

Full Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
11,939
Supports
Man City
Who cares? One life for potentially saving humanity's future is really not a moral dilemma like some pretend. Joel literally killed dozens just to save one human life he holds dear. People in hundreds die in war etc. Just look at the actual real world scenario of Covid vaccines being fast tracked. Even the safest ones did result in 1-2 perfectly healthy person(s) dying in a million or so. But that cost was accepted due to the larger benefit derived out of vaccinating a critical mass of people.
Of course it matters, people who spout stuff like this and the nonsense that comes with it are only fine when its not one of their own thats the acceptable casualty. This is where their hypocrisy lies.

I like the way the tv series has brought this whole debate back, its like 2013 again, but usually the people who say the utilitarian solution is the correct one don't actually have the stones to follow through with it when its them or someone belong to them who has to pay the price. The many above few mentality is not a healthy one because it de-humanizes a problem, its a choice for robots to make not people.

https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/calculating-consequences-the-utilitarian-approach/#:~:text=The principle of utilitarianism invites,persons affected by our actions. The section in here on the problems of Utilitarianism is everything wrong with the many over the few approach.
 
Last edited:

Buchan

has whacked the hammer to Roswell
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
17,650
Location
The Republik of Mancunia | W3102
Late to the party on this one but just finished E03 last night. What an amazing hour-and-a-quarter of television that was. Among the best I’ve ever seen in any series.

I haven’t played the game so unsure how faithful the show is to the original material but I’m completely baffled by the ratings this particular episode received on IMDb, for example. Can only imagine it’s either (a) butthurt gamers annoyed at the deviation off the ‘script’, (b) butthurt Neanderthals annoyed at the sexual orientation of the characters’ love story portrayed so beautifully, or (c) both of the above.
 

WI_Red

Redcafes Most Rested
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
12,135
Location
No longer in WI
Supports
Atlanta United
Late to the party on this one but just finished E03 last night. What an amazing hour-and-a-quarter of television that was. Among the best I’ve ever seen in any series.

I haven’t played the game so unsure how faithful the show is to the original material but I’m completely baffled by the ratings this particular episode received on IMDb, for example. Can only imagine it’s either (a) butthurt gamers annoyed at the deviation off the ‘script’, (b) butthurt Neanderthals annoyed at the sexual orientation of the characters’ love story portrayed so beautifully, or (c) both of the above.
C, definitely C
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,206
Location
La-La-Land
Did not really like it as much as I thought. Maybe my expectations where too high playing the game but just too many things overall that irked me
 

Bole Top

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
3,533
for an action/adventure show, at least labeled as such, there's barely any action and adventure in it. I liked it though, I simply misjudged it + I never played the game. I was expecting it to be more similar to The Walking Dead, which I loved during the first 2 or 3 seasons, but there are actually very few characters here and very few action and horror scenes. it felt a bit empty at times and I also think that the first season peaked too early. other than that, I have no complaints. I can accept it for what it is and I'd give it a 7 if I had to rate it.
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,605
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
Really good season overall. I enjoyed it although I did not care for the hospital run in the last episode. I didn't even know this is based on a game, but that scene immediately gave me 1st person shooter vibes.
 

Drawfull

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
4,887
Location
Just close your eyes, forget your name
I just got a mate to start watching; he hasn't played the game.

One of my bugbears with streaming shows (and blu ray discs with chapters) is that the thumbnails for each episode/chapter can tip what's coming and so I looked, in case I had to warn him to not pay too much attention to them.
Here, I thought that episode 7 being called 'Left Behind' was a clever call by the producers after the events of 6, for those that won't clock the DLC reference. And there's no Joel in the thumbnails after episode 6 either
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,006
Location
Centreback
Of course it matters, people who spout stuff like this and the nonsense that comes with it are only fine when its not one of their own thats the acceptable casualty. This is where their hypocrisy lies.

I like the way the tv series has brought this whole debate back, its like 2013 again, but usually the people who say the utilitarian solution is the correct one don't actually have the stones to follow through with it when its them or someone belong to them who has to pay the price. The many above few mentality is not a healthy one because it de-humanizes a problem, its a choice for robots to make not people.

https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/calculating-consequences-the-utilitarian-approach/#:~:text=The principle of utilitarianism invites,persons affected by our actions. The section in here on the problems of Utilitarianism is everything wrong with the many over the few approach.
A utilitarian argument works fine when we are talking about things like vaccines where the potentail harm is so low and we have no idea who will be affected. When you are talking about the certain death of your child (which we are really here) then I'd go full postal as did Joel. No question.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,462
A utilitarian argument works fine when we are talking about things like vaccines where the potentail harm is so low and we have no idea who will be affected. When you are talking about the certain death of your child (which we are really here) then I'd go full postal as did Joel. No question.
Kill one person to save a majority is a great dilemma when youre not directly involved with the one person.
once you are, then it becomes even tougher and you are obviously not gonna want to sacrifice the one person that is left that matters to you. Especially when the choice is taken from you.

I kinda agree with you, in that. But its a great dilemma to think of (like the whole, train is on track, which splits, if you let is continue, you and one other person die, if you change course, you survive but it crashes into a town or something)
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,587
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
Surely it's obvious that a cure would be revolutionary? That doesn't fully excuse the fireflies of being so callous, but the quality of life improvements would be massive.
Given the level of incompetence routinely displayed by the Fireflies, surely it's no definitive thing that it'd work?

Why the feck are they chucking concussion grenades at potentially the most important people in the world? Have they been deceived regularly by pairs of middle-aged men and teenage girls where this approach is warranted?

Also, why the feck are they going immediately to "nonconsensual lethal brain surgery" with the most valuable person? Surely you could run some blood tests, potential exposure testing - especially given that Marlene knows some of the circumstances surrounding Ellie's birth in the show.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,314
Location
bin
Why the feck are they chucking concussion grenades at potentially the most important people in the world? Have they been deceived regularly by pairs of middle-aged men and teenage girls where this approach is warranted?
:lol: that's the bit that got me.

"Don't forget; we're waiting for a young girl, an adult male AND an adult female. Do you see the adult female? Exactly. These two must be wrong uns. For all we know, that man has stuffed the girl with explosives."

If we're honest though it's clear that the Fireflies are just a bit shit in general.
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,587
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
:lol: that's the bit that got me.

"Don't forget; we're waiting for a young girl, an adult male AND an adult female. Do you see the adult female? Exactly. These two must be wrong uns. For all we know, that man has stuffed the girl with explosives."

If we're honest though it's clear that the Fireflies are just a bit shit in general.
Especially because they know this fungus is in the brain! So the person notwithstanding, perhaps let's refrain from damaging the most important brain in existence?

Though I suppose this is in keeping with their approach to just slice into said brain immediately, because going in blindly in order to save a few weeks makes sense 20+ years after the fact.

I agree with those who say Ellie's life isn't worth a cure - but I feel like people are assuming the cure would actually work when the Fireflies are pretty consistently idiots. In addition to the previous examples, they also:

- Somehow feck up the rendezvous with a pregnant woman so badly that she gets killed by a single low-level infected
- Have most of their squad killed in Boston whilst vastly outnumbering a group of low-level smugglers over a dead car battery
- Despite moving with a well-equipped team and having strength in numbers, they manage to get half their group killed moving cross-country
- Don't kill Joel for some reason and instead decide to escort him out with a grand total of two dudes, despite having 5 minutes prior acknowledged how much more competent he is than anyone in their organization given the above bullet point

I appreciate that Joel's position isn't exactly rational, but I just think it's disingenuous to say he picked Ellie over a cure given that he's privy to a very large percentage of the Fireflies' idiocy.
 

Slevs

likes to play with penises
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
28,423
Location
Boyo
Loved it. Was like playing part 1 again all those years ago.

Can't wait for season 2, I've not played part 2 so going in blind.
 

owlo

Full Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
3,252
I liked how some of the episodes felt like individual stories, almost as if Joel and Ellie were some of the least developed characters until later, with each story feeding a little into them rather than the other way around.

Episode 3 and 8 were by far my favourites. Masterful television.

9 was the worst for me. Didn't fit in.
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
19,231
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
Just caught up with this, it’s excellent. Hope the lie at the end doesn’t come back to bite Joel and affect his and Ellie’s relationship as that is one of the best things about the show.
 

stepic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
8,672
Location
London
The silly thing in the finale for me was the fact Marlene had an unconscious Joel there, not chained up or in a cell or anything, someone who she now knows is very capable and potentially dangerous given he just made it across the country, and waits for him to wake up, then tells him basically the truth about what’s going to happen to Ellie. I mean christ you don’t think maybe they’d have developed some kind of relationship by now? And then you think 2 measly armed guards is going to be enough to take him away out to some random place?

they should have had him locked up if they were gonna tell him the truth, or I dunno, maybe not go all cliche villian and tell him all their plans for Ellie until it had actually taken place. That was the annoying part for me in terms of writing. I guess maybe that was in the game too

On the whole though I really loved the season, and I’ve not played the game.
 

stepic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
8,672
Location
London
I’ve not played the game but it’s pretty obvious the lie will have some repercussions
 

hasanejaz88

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
5,922
Location
Munich
Supports
Germany
Good finish.
Was Joel right or wrong ?
i think he was right given the situation , but wrong to lie.
100% wrong. Potentially saving the world over one life, I'd be willing to if the other person was as well. I suppose that is where the fireflies were wrong as well, they should have told this to Ellie, who most likely would've gone with it. Both wrong but Joel much more wrong.

Also it was annoying how 1) they didn't just lock Joel in one of the rooms till the surgery was over because they know how dangerous he is but rather 2) sent him away with only two guards and 3) Joel single handedly took down a whole group typical cliched hero style.

Overall a decent 7/10 series. Not worth the hype is garnering but certainly not bad as well.
 
Last edited:

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,927
Location
W.Yorks
100% wrong. Potentially saving the world over one life, I'd be willing to if the other person was as well. I suppose that is where the fireflies were wrong as well, they should have told this to Ellie, who most likely would've gone with it. Both wrong but Joel much more wrong.
Nah, if the Fireflies hadn't shown themselves to just be incompetent morons so far, then maybe... But leaving it in their hands, plus the fact that they didn't give Ellie a choice makes it far more 50/50 (and probably more in Joel's favour) for me.
 

buchansleftleg

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
3,720
Location
Dublin, formerly Manchester
The silly thing in the finale for me was the fact Marlene had an unconscious Joel there, not chained up or in a cell or anything, someone who she now knows is very capable and potentially dangerous given he just made it across the country, and waits for him to wake up, then tells him basically the truth about what’s going to happen to Ellie. I mean christ you don’t think maybe they’d have developed some kind of relationship by now? And then you think 2 measly armed guards is going to be enough to take him away out to some random place?

they should have had him locked up if they were gonna tell him the truth, or I dunno, maybe not go all cliche villian and tell him all their plans for Ellie until it had actually taken place. That was the annoying part for me in terms of writing. I guess maybe that was in the game too

On the whole though I really loved the season, and I’ve not played the game.
I get what you are saying...she knows Joel is ruthless and dangerous, but she also thinks he is just motivated by money and self interest (as he was before he grew attached to Ellie). Marlene saw her relationship with Joel as merely transactional. He wasn't a committed Firefly, he was a loner and a ruthless killer, maybe he was made more approachable by his contact with Tess but still motivated only by self interest. So she probably is thinking that if he gets his money and a free ride out of town he will declare "no foul" and just walk away, rather than risk his own life to save a kid.