- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 62,851
Like many authoritarian types, Trump instills a culture of sycophancy and then despises those who become sycophants; recently, he's complained about people 'only telling him what he wants to hear'.
But he’s said publicly now that getting up to speed is just a lawyer trick for rinsing him for money, so why wouldn’t a respectable lawyer want to take that on?Even the most brilliant lawyers in the world - how do you come late into an investigation this complex and in-depth and get up to speed? It's absolute madness, as expected.
A bullshitter, to use the legal term.Yeah. His whole shtick is projecting an image of extreme self-confidence with absolutely no intention of following through on things he says.
Nice one DonaldTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Nothing to do with him. It was sneaked in to the Omnibus Bill he signed and didn't read. Apparently he's furious about this.Nice one Donald
Is that a rumour/urban myth or there is some clause we can see in the Omnibus?Nothing to do with him. It was sneaked in to the Omnibus Bill he signed and didn't read. Apparently he's furious about this.
Myth it seemsIs that a rumour/urban myth or there is some clause we can see in the Omnibus?
Well it's been widely reported around the net but it is no myth that he didn't read the bill as he admitted it himself. It's also telling that he has not mentioned the expelling of the Russians yet and it is also telling that he has not publically condemned Russia or Putin for the attack nor has he sent any message of support to Theresa May or the UK. But he did Tweet about phoning Putin to congratulate him on his election win. So although unconfirmed, I think It's a fair bet to be true.Is that a rumour/urban myth or there is some clause we can see in the Omnibus?
The litmus test is whether he tweets this out n takes credit for it.Well it's been widely reported around the net but it is no myth that he didn't read the bill as he admitted it himself. It's also telling that he has not mentioned the expelling of the Russians yet and it is also telling that he has not publically condemned Russia or Putin for the attack nor has he sent any message of support to Theresa May or the UK. But he did Tweet about phoning Putin to congratulate him on his election win. So although unconfirmed, I think It's a fair bet to be true.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
@TheReligion somehow got confused between the Russia threads so Raoul edited this one and got Trump's name wrong.Is it ok that I'm just leaving work now and don't get tgebtitle change?
I think the name changes have been good.@TheReligion somehow got confused between the Russia threads so Raoul edited this one and got Trump's name wrong.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Only Trump's legal team of 1.5 folks are worried.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I'm surprised he hasn't been offered an important position by Trump. Considering he is already hiring all the FOX "News" staff I wouldn't even be surprised if he did. Too bad he can't fire Mike Pence, vice president is surely something Hannity would be interested in.
He's already in an important position as Propadandist in Chief of State TelevisionI'm surprised he hasn't been offered an important position by Trump. Considering he is already hiring all the FOX "News" staff I wouldn't even be surprised if he did. Too bad he can't fire Mike Pence, vice president is surely something Hannity would be interested in.
I wonder how much of this is significant and not just six degrees of separation stuff in the eyes of a legal system. Manafort has for ages worked in Ukraine so the likelihood that one of his associates would have Russian background is not the least bit surprising. Once again its hard to pin malicious intent here unless they have more suggesting that.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Nice one, @Raoul at this stage the Caf is my best news source on Russia/Trump. Feck Reddit.Some cyber security guy who was RTd by a mainstream journo on my feed.
Mueller already has all that information.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Wow that's amazing. I don't know which hammer will fall first for Trump. Stormy Daniels or Russia-gate
And yet it still sounds fairly plausible.Wow it really is looking bad for Trump now. If he really is ignorant he was getting played by everyone around him and was completely ignorant to all of it. I can't see that being a plausible defence.
And yet it still sounds fairly plausible.
I'm more astonished that 3 people that are close to this discussion with Trump can leak and still be un named sources.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date